--- license: apache-2.0 base_model: meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct datasets: - 15juneee/hr-practitioner-adapted-v1 tags: - hr - adaption-autoscientist - lora language: - en --- # HR Practitioner (hr) Fine-tuned for HR and people operations, trained with [Adaption AutoScientist](https://docs.adaptionlabs.ai/guides/autoscientist-api/) for the AutoScientist Challenge (Part 2). - **Base model:** `meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct` - **Training data:** [`15juneee/hr-practitioner-adapted-v1`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/15juneee/hr-practitioner-adapted-v1) (also on [Kaggle](https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/junesdata/hr-practitioner-adapted-v1)) - **Method:** AutoScientist co-optimised data adaptation and training recipe ## Measured improvement AutoScientist reported **best_win_rate = 0.6262** against `meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct` - the fine-tuned model is preferred over its own baseline in 62.6% of comparisons. This model was trained with **DPO on preference pairs** generated by `datasets.run(training_type='preference_pairs')`. That is a substantial gain over the supervised fine-tune of the same data, which scored 0.5492: SFT teaches the style of good answers, whereas DPO optimises the pairwise preference that is actually being measured. Evaluation methodology, including the position-swap and dual-judge controls, is in `EVAL.md` in the project repository. The held-out split used is published alongside the training data so the number can be reproduced. ## Intended use and limitations Intended for HR and people operations assistance. **Output is not legal advice.** Employment law is jurisdiction-specific and the training data is not jurisdiction-tagged, so any compliance-sensitive guidance needs review by a qualified professional in the relevant jurisdiction. Training data is drawn from English-language job adverts and generic HR questions weighted toward salaried office employment. ## Reproducing The dataset build, training pipeline and evaluation harness are all scripted; see the project repository.