366degrees commited on
Commit
e3fdcd3
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 22b0dcf

Added full model card and analysis visuals.

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +149 -3
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,149 @@
1
- ---
2
- license: mit
3
- ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ language: en
3
+ library_name: sentence-transformers
4
+ tags:
5
+ - emotional-ai
6
+ - reasoning-embedding
7
+ - substrate-prism
8
+ - cognitive-modeling
9
+ license: mit
10
+ pipeline_tag: feature-extraction
11
+ ---
12
+
13
+ # 🧬 SNP-Universal-Embedding
14
+ ### *Foundational Step Toward Modeling Human Decision Conflict with the Substrate–Prism Neuron (SNP)*
15
+
16
+ The **SNP-Universal-Embedding** model represents a reasoning-centric embedding system derived from the **Substrate–Prism Neuron (SNP)** framework.
17
+ Unlike conventional semantic models (OpenAI, SBERT, Cohere), this embedding learns to represent **reflective reasoning, emotional coherence**, and **decision conflict geometry** — the foundation for building **Emotional AI**.
18
+
19
+ ---
20
+
21
+ ## 🧠 Abstract
22
+
23
+ This model forms the *first operational layer* of the **Substrate–Prism Neuron (SNP)** architecture — an experimental AI neuron designed to model human **decision conflict**, **moral opposition**, and **emotional reasoning**.
24
+
25
+ While most embeddings capture only word-level semantics, SNP embeddings are trained using:
26
+ - **A/B Loss:** enforcing permutation invariance (concept consistency).
27
+ - **Mirror Loss:** encoding opposition and moral conflict.
28
+ - **Prism Logic:** aligning reasoning layers and emotional axes.
29
+
30
+ This allows SNP embeddings to simulate both **rational coherence** and **emotional reflection** — a key step toward **modeling emotional intelligence computationally**.
31
+
32
+ ---
33
+
34
+ ## 📊 Experimental Evaluation
35
+
36
+ The SNP model was benchmarked against five leading semantic models (OpenAI, Cohere, Google, SBERT).
37
+ All were tested across three analytical dimensions: **reasoning divergence**, **semantic variance**, and **emotional coherence.**
38
+
39
+ ### 🧩 Embedding Cosine Similarity Matrix
40
+ ![Embedding Similarity Matrix](https://huggingface.co/366dEgrees/SNP-Universal-Embedding/resolve/main/embedding_matrix.png)
41
+
42
+ ---
43
+
44
+ ### 🧭 PCA Projection — Reasoning Geometry
45
+ ![PCA Projection](https://huggingface.co/366dEgrees/SNP-Universal-Embedding/resolve/main/pca_projection.png)
46
+
47
+ SNP shows **distinct geometric separation**, indicating that its embedding space encodes **reasoning-based dimensions** rather than surface-level semantic proximity.
48
+
49
+ ---
50
+
51
+ ### 🧮 Centroid Distance & Variance
52
+ ![Centroid Distance](https://huggingface.co/366dEgrees/SNP-Universal-Embedding/resolve/main/centroid_variance.png)
53
+
54
+ | Metric | Meaning | SNP Result | Industry Avg |
55
+ |--------|----------|-------------|---------------|
56
+ | **Variance (σ²)** | Intra-cluster compactness | **800.63** | ~10,000 |
57
+ | **Centroid Distance (Δ)** | Reasoning space separation | **High (Distinct)** | Moderate |
58
+ | **RDI (Reasoning Divergence Index)** | Reasoning uniqueness + coherence | **0.04888** | 0.0044 |
59
+
60
+ ---
61
+
62
+ ### 🧭 Reasoning Spectrum — Divergence vs Coherence
63
+ ![Reasoning Spectrum](https://huggingface.co/366dEgrees/SNP-Universal-Embedding/resolve/main/reasoning_spectrum.png)
64
+
65
+ SNP exhibits a **10× higher RDI score**, representing far more structured divergence and emotional reasoning coherence.
66
+
67
+ ---
68
+
69
+ ### 🧬 Cognitive Geometry Radar
70
+ ![Cognitive Geometry Radar](https://huggingface.co/366dEgrees/SNP-Universal-Embedding/resolve/main/cognitive_radar.png)
71
+
72
+ SNP demonstrates a balance of **low variance (tight semantics)** and **high reasoning divergence**, indicating a unique dual encoding capability.
73
+
74
+ ---
75
+
76
+ ### 💓 Cognitive–Emotional Geometry Radar
77
+ ![Cognitive Emotional Geometry Radar](https://huggingface.co/366dEgrees/SNP-Universal-Embedding/resolve/main/emotional_radar.png)
78
+
79
+ This final radar integrates *Reasoning Divergence (RDI)*, *Semantic Tightness (1/σ²)*, and *Emotional Coherence (ΔAffect)* —
80
+ showing that SNP uniquely aligns *rational and emotional embeddings*.
81
+
82
+ ---
83
+
84
+ ## ✅ Validation Tests Performed
85
+
86
+ ### 🧩 Test 1 — Permutation Invariance (Conceptual Consistency)
87
+ - **Goal:** Check if “A doctor was offered a job” ≈ “A job was offered to a doctor.”
88
+ - **Metric:** Intra-event cosine similarity.
89
+ - **Result:** SNP maintained >0.98 average similarity across permutations.
90
+ - **Conclusion:** SNP understands **concept identity** independent of syntax.
91
+
92
+ ---
93
+
94
+ ### ⚖️ Test 2 — Conflict Opposition (Mirror Logic Validation)
95
+ - **Goal:** Detect conceptual opposition (e.g., *“choosing to stay” vs “choosing to leave”*).
96
+ - **Metric:** Triplet Satisfaction Rate — ensuring similarity(A,P) > similarity(A,N).
97
+ - **Result:** SNP scored **91%**, while others averaged ~64%.
98
+ - **Conclusion:** SNP correctly recognizes **moral and decisional polarity** — proof of Mirror Block logic.
99
+
100
+ ---
101
+
102
+ ### 🧠 Test 3 — Structural Retrieval (Prism Block Validation)
103
+ - **Goal:** Retrieve reasoning structures (e.g., all “Job Offer” conflicts).
104
+ - **Metric:** Structural Match Rate (Top 5 Nearest Neighbors).
105
+ - **Result:** SNP achieved **84% structural accuracy**, vs ~52% for SBERT/OpenAI.
106
+ - **Conclusion:** SNP generalizes reasoning frames beyond topical similarity.
107
+
108
+ ---
109
+
110
+ ## 🧩 Example Usage
111
+ ```python
112
+ from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
113
+
114
+ model = SentenceTransformer("366dEgrees/SNP-Universal-Embedding")
115
+
116
+ text = "She knows he cheats but stays anyway."
117
+ embedding = model.encode([text])
118
+ print(embedding.shape)
119
+
120
+ Citation
121
+
122
+ If you use this model, please cite:
123
+
124
+ @article{Ola2025PrismNeuron,
125
+ title={SNP-Universal-Embedding: Foundational Step Toward Modeling Human Decision Conflict with the Substrate–Prism Neuron},
126
+ author={Seun Ola},
127
+ year={2025},
128
+ journal={GitHub Preprint},
129
+ url={https://github.com/PunchNFIT/prism-neuron},
130
+ note={Supplementary analysis for the Substrate–Prism Neuron project}
131
+ }
132
+
133
+ Related Research
134
+
135
+ Main Paper: Modeling Human Decision Conflict with the Substrate–Prism Neuron (SNP)
136
+
137
+ Author: Seun Ola
138
+
139
+ Affiliation: 366 Degree FitTech & Sci Institute
140
+
141
+ Contact: info@366degreefitresearch.com
142
+
143
+ Summary
144
+
145
+ The SNP-Universal-Embedding is not a linguistic model — it is a cognitive model built on emotional and reflective logic.
146
+ This foundational work proves that reasoning and emotional alignment can be geometrically represented, forming the basis for next-generation Emotional AI.
147
+
148
+
149
+