docs: add CyclePlan model description, inference example, and performance metrics
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -11,36 +11,89 @@ tags:
|
|
| 11 |
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
|
| 12 |
---
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-
# DeepSignal
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
This repository provides
|
| 17 |
For details, check our repository at [`AIMSLaboratory/DeepSignal`](https://github.com/AIMSLaboratory/DeepSignal).
|
| 18 |
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-
-
|
| 23 |
-
-
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-
##
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
```bash
|
| 28 |
-
llama-cli -m DeepSignal-4B_V1.F16.gguf -p "You are a traffic management expert. You can use your traffic knowledge to solve the traffic signal control task.
|
| 29 |
-
Based on the given traffic
|
| 30 |
You must answer directly, the format must be: next signal phase: {number}, duration: {seconds} seconds
|
| 31 |
where the number is the phase index (starting from 0) and the seconds is the duration (usually between 20-90 seconds)."
|
| 32 |
```
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-
*You need to input the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
## Evaluation (Traffic Simulation)
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-
### Performance Metrics Comparison by Model *
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
| Model | Avg Saturation | Avg Cumulative Queue Length (veh⋅min) | Avg Throughput (veh/5min) | Avg Response Time (s) |
|
| 41 |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
|
| 42 |
| [`GPT-OSS-20B (thinking)`](https://huggingface.co/openai/gpt-oss-20b) | 0.380 | 14.088 | 77.910 | 6.768 |
|
| 43 |
-
| **DeepSignal-4B (Ours)** | 0.422 | 15.703 | **79.883** | 2.131 |
|
| 44 |
| [`Qwen3-30B-A3B`](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct) | 0.431 | 17.046 | 79.059 | 2.727 |
|
| 45 |
| [`Qwen3-4B`](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507) | 0.466 | 57.699 | 75.712 | 1.994 |
|
| 46 |
| Max Pressure | 0.465 | 23.022 | 77.236 | ** |
|
|
@@ -50,7 +103,25 @@ where the number is the phase index (starting from 0) and the seconds is the dur
|
|
| 50 |
`**`: Max Pressure is a fixed signal-timing optimization algorithm (not an LLM), so we omit its Avg Response Time; this metric is only defined for LLM-based signal-timing optimization.
|
| 51 |
`***`: For LightGPT-8B-Llama3, Avg Response Time is computed using only the successful responses.
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 54 |
This project is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
|
| 55 |
Commercial use is strictly prohibited.
|
| 56 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
|
| 12 |
---
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
+
# DeepSignal (GGUF)
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
This repository provides GGUF model files for local inference (e.g., `llama.cpp` / LM Studio). It contains two models for traffic-signal-control tasks.
|
| 17 |
For details, check our repository at [`AIMSLaboratory/DeepSignal`](https://github.com/AIMSLaboratory/DeepSignal).
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
+
## Models
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
This repository contains two models:
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+
- **DeepSignal-Phase-4B-V1** — next signal-phase prediction (predicts which phase to activate next and for how long)
|
| 24 |
+
- **DeepSignal-CyclePlan-4B-V1** — signal-cycle timing optimization (outputs green-time allocations for every phase in the upcoming cycle)
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
+
## Model Files
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
| Filename | Model | Quantization | Size | Description |
|
| 29 |
+
|:---|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---|
|
| 30 |
+
| `DeepSignal-Phase-4B_V1.F16.gguf` | Phase | F16 (full precision) | ~8 GB | Phase model, full precision |
|
| 31 |
+
| `DeepSignal-CyclePlan-4B_V1.F16.gguf` | CyclePlan | F16 (full precision) | ~8 GB | CyclePlan model, full precision |
|
| 32 |
+
| `DeepSignal-CyclePlan-4B_V1.Q4_K_M.gguf` | CyclePlan | Q4_K_M (4-bit quantized) | ~2.5 GB | CyclePlan model, quantized (recommended for local inference) |
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
## DeepSignal-Phase-4B-V1
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
DeepSignal-Phase-4B-V1 is designed for **next signal-phase prediction**. Given the current traffic scene and state at an intersection, it predicts which signal phase to activate next and for how long.
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
**Quickstart (llama.cpp):**
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
```bash
|
| 41 |
+
llama-cli -m DeepSignal-Phase-4B_V1.F16.gguf -p "You are a traffic management expert. You can use your traffic knowledge to solve the traffic signal control task.
|
| 42 |
+
Based on the given traffic scene and state, predict the next signal phase and its duration.
|
| 43 |
You must answer directly, the format must be: next signal phase: {number}, duration: {seconds} seconds
|
| 44 |
where the number is the phase index (starting from 0) and the seconds is the duration (usually between 20-90 seconds)."
|
| 45 |
```
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
+
*You need to input the scene (total number of phases, which phases control which lanes/directions, and current phase ID/number, etc.) and state (number of queuing vehicles per lane, throughput vehicles per lane during the current phase, etc.)*
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
## DeepSignal-CyclePlan-4B-V1
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
DeepSignal-CyclePlan-4B-V1 is designed for **signal-cycle timing optimization**. It takes predicted traffic state data for the upcoming cycle as input and outputs green-time allocations for every phase.
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
**System Prompt:**
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
```
|
| 56 |
+
You are a traffic signal timing optimization expert.
|
| 57 |
+
Please carefully analyze the predicted traffic states for each phase in the next cycle, provide the timing plan for the next cycle, and give your reasoning process.
|
| 58 |
+
Place the reasoning process between <start_working_out> and <end_working_out>.
|
| 59 |
+
Then, place your final plan between <SOLUTION> and </SOLUTION>.
|
| 60 |
+
```
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
**Quickstart (llama.cpp, Q4_K_M recommended for local inference):**
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
```bash
|
| 65 |
+
llama-cli -m DeepSignal-CyclePlan-4B_V1.Q4_K_M.gguf \
|
| 66 |
+
-p "You are a traffic signal timing optimization expert.
|
| 67 |
+
Please carefully analyze the predicted traffic states for each phase in the next cycle, provide the timing plan for the next cycle, and give your reasoning process.
|
| 68 |
+
Place the reasoning process between <start_working_out> and <end_working_out>.
|
| 69 |
+
Then, place your final plan between <SOLUTION> and </SOLUTION>.
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
【cycle_predict_input_json】{
|
| 72 |
+
\"prediction\": {
|
| 73 |
+
\"as_of\": \"2026-02-22T10:00:00\",
|
| 74 |
+
\"phase_waits\": [
|
| 75 |
+
{\"phase_id\": 0, \"pred_saturation\": 0.8, \"min_green\": 20, \"max_green\": 60, \"capacity\": 100},
|
| 76 |
+
{\"phase_id\": 1, \"pred_saturation\": 0.5, \"min_green\": 15, \"max_green\": 45, \"capacity\": 80}
|
| 77 |
+
]
|
| 78 |
+
}
|
| 79 |
+
}【/cycle_predict_input_json】
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
Task (must complete):
|
| 82 |
+
Mainly based on prediction.phase_waits pred_saturation (already calculated), output the final green light time for each phase in the next cycle (unit: seconds), while satisfying hard constraints."
|
| 83 |
+
```
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
**Input format**: JSON wrapped in `【cycle_predict_input_json】...【/cycle_predict_input_json】` tags, containing `prediction.phase_waits` — an array of per-phase objects with `phase_id`, `pred_saturation`, `min_green`, `max_green`, and `capacity`.
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
**Output format**: A JSON array of objects `[{"phase_id": <int>, "final": <int>}, ...]`, where `final` is the allocated green time in integer seconds for each phase.
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
## Evaluation (Traffic Simulation)
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
+
### Performance Metrics Comparison by Model (Phase) *
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
| Model | Avg Saturation | Avg Cumulative Queue Length (veh⋅min) | Avg Throughput (veh/5min) | Avg Response Time (s) |
|
| 94 |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
|
| 95 |
| [`GPT-OSS-20B (thinking)`](https://huggingface.co/openai/gpt-oss-20b) | 0.380 | 14.088 | 77.910 | 6.768 |
|
| 96 |
+
| **DeepSignal-Phase-4B (Ours)** | 0.422 | 15.703 | **79.883** | 2.131 |
|
| 97 |
| [`Qwen3-30B-A3B`](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct) | 0.431 | 17.046 | 79.059 | 2.727 |
|
| 98 |
| [`Qwen3-4B`](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507) | 0.466 | 57.699 | 75.712 | 1.994 |
|
| 99 |
| Max Pressure | 0.465 | 23.022 | 77.236 | ** |
|
|
|
|
| 103 |
`**`: Max Pressure is a fixed signal-timing optimization algorithm (not an LLM), so we omit its Avg Response Time; this metric is only defined for LLM-based signal-timing optimization.
|
| 104 |
`***`: For LightGPT-8B-Llama3, Avg Response Time is computed using only the successful responses.
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
+
**Conclusion**: Thinking-enabled models (e.g., GPT-OSS-20B) can achieve better control performance, but typically incur higher response latency. Among **non-thinking** LLM baselines, **DeepSignal-Phase-4B** is the best-performing model in our evaluation.
|
| 107 |
+
|
| 108 |
+
### Performance Metrics Comparison by Model (CyclePlan) *
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
| Model | Format Success Rate (%) | Avg Queue Vehicles | Avg Delay per Vehicle (s) | Throughput (veh/min) |
|
| 111 |
+
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
|
| 112 |
+
| **DeepSignal-CyclePlan-4B-V1 F16 (Ours)** | **100.0** | **3.504** | **27.747** | **8.611** |
|
| 113 |
+
| [`GLM-4.7-Flash`](https://huggingface.co/zai-org/glm-4.7-flash) | 100.0 | 7.323 | 29.422 | 8.567 |
|
| 114 |
+
| DeepSignal-CyclePlan-4B-V1 Q4_K_M (Ours) | 98.1 | 4.783 | 29.891 | 7.722 |
|
| 115 |
+
| [`Qwen3-30B-A3B`](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B-2507) | 97.1 | 6.938 | 31.135 | 7.578 |
|
| 116 |
+
| [`LightGPT-8B-Llama3`](https://huggingface.co/lightgpt/LightGPT-8B-Llama3) | 68.0 | 5.026 | 31.266 | 7.380 |
|
| 117 |
+
| [`GPT-OSS-20B`](https://huggingface.co/openai/gpt-oss-20b) | 65.4 | 6.289 | 31.947 | 7.247 |
|
| 118 |
+
| [`Qwen3-4B (thinking)`](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507) | 54.1 | 10.060 | 48.895 | 7.096 |
|
| 119 |
+
|
| 120 |
+
`*`: Each simulation scenario runs for 60 minutes. We discard the first **5 minutes** as warm-up, then compute metrics over the next **20 minutes** (minute 5 to 25). All evaluations are conducted on a **Mac Studio M3 Ultra**.
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
**Conclusion**: DeepSignal-CyclePlan-4B-V1 (F16) achieves a 100% format success rate, the lowest average queue vehicles (3.504), and the highest throughput (8.611 veh/min) among all evaluated models. The Q4_K_M quantized version maintains strong performance with 98.1% format success rate while offering faster inference.
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
## License
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
This project is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
|
| 127 |
Commercial use is strictly prohibited.
|
|
|