Update README - GeoFractalDavid-Basin-k12 - Run 20251016_020120 - Acc 71.40%
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ model-index:
|
|
| 23 |
type: imagenet-1k
|
| 24 |
metrics:
|
| 25 |
- type: accuracy
|
| 26 |
-
value: 71.
|
| 27 |
name: Validation Accuracy
|
| 28 |
---
|
| 29 |
|
|
@@ -34,16 +34,16 @@ Features must "fit" geometric signatures: k-simplex shapes, Cantor positions, an
|
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
## 🎯 Performance
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-
- **Best Validation Accuracy**: 71.
|
| 38 |
-
- **Epoch**:
|
| 39 |
-
- **Training Time**:
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
### Per-Scale Performance
|
| 42 |
-
- **Scale 384D**: 61.
|
| 43 |
-
- **Scale 512D**:
|
| 44 |
-
- **Scale 768D**: 70.
|
| 45 |
-
- **Scale 1024D**: 51.
|
| 46 |
-
- **Scale 1280D**: 44.
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
## 🏗️ Architecture
|
|
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ Each scale learns to weight these components differently.
|
|
| 71 |
The alpha parameter controls middle-interval weighting in the Cantor staircase.
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
- **Initial**: 0.3290
|
| 74 |
-
- **Final**: -0.
|
| 75 |
-
- **Change**: -0.
|
| 76 |
- **Converged to 0.5**: False
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
The Cantor staircase uses soft triadic decomposition with learnable alpha to map
|
|
@@ -84,29 +84,29 @@ Each class has a learned scalar Cantor prototype. The model pulls features towar
|
|
| 84 |
their class's Cantor position.
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
**Scale 384D**:
|
| 87 |
-
- Mean: 0.
|
| 88 |
-
- Std: 0.
|
| 89 |
-
- Range: [-0.
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
**Scale 512D**:
|
| 92 |
-
- Mean: 0.
|
| 93 |
-
- Std: 0.
|
| 94 |
-
- Range: [-0.
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
**Scale 768D**:
|
| 97 |
-
- Mean: 0.
|
| 98 |
-
- Std: 0.
|
| 99 |
-
- Range: [-0.
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
**Scale 1024D**:
|
| 102 |
-
- Mean: 0.
|
| 103 |
-
- Std: 0.
|
| 104 |
-
- Range: [-0.
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
**Scale 1280D**:
|
| 107 |
-
- Mean: 0.
|
| 108 |
-
- Std: 0.
|
| 109 |
-
- Range: [-0.
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
Most classes cluster around 0.5 (middle Cantor region), with smooth spread across [0,1].
|
|
@@ -116,11 +116,11 @@ This creates a continuous manifold rather than discrete bins.
|
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
Each scale learns optimal weights for combining geometric components:
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
-
**Scale 384D**: Feature=0.
|
| 120 |
-
**Scale 512D**: Feature=0.
|
| 121 |
-
**Scale 768D**: Feature=0.
|
| 122 |
-
**Scale 1024D**: Feature=0.
|
| 123 |
-
**Scale 1280D**: Feature=0.
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
|
| 126 |
**Pattern**: Lower scales rely on feature similarity, higher scales use crystal geometry.
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
type: imagenet-1k
|
| 24 |
metrics:
|
| 25 |
- type: accuracy
|
| 26 |
+
value: 71.40
|
| 27 |
name: Validation Accuracy
|
| 28 |
---
|
| 29 |
|
|
|
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
## 🎯 Performance
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
+
- **Best Validation Accuracy**: 71.40%
|
| 38 |
+
- **Epoch**: 10/10
|
| 39 |
+
- **Training Time**: 18m
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
### Per-Scale Performance
|
| 42 |
+
- **Scale 384D**: 61.25%
|
| 43 |
+
- **Scale 512D**: 60.67%
|
| 44 |
+
- **Scale 768D**: 70.50%
|
| 45 |
+
- **Scale 1024D**: 51.69%
|
| 46 |
+
- **Scale 1280D**: 44.72%
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
## 🏗️ Architecture
|
|
|
|
| 71 |
The alpha parameter controls middle-interval weighting in the Cantor staircase.
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
- **Initial**: 0.3290
|
| 74 |
+
- **Final**: -0.0764
|
| 75 |
+
- **Change**: -0.4055
|
| 76 |
- **Converged to 0.5**: False
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
The Cantor staircase uses soft triadic decomposition with learnable alpha to map
|
|
|
|
| 84 |
their class's Cantor position.
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
**Scale 384D**:
|
| 87 |
+
- Mean: 0.0226
|
| 88 |
+
- Std: 0.0784
|
| 89 |
+
- Range: [-0.1377, 0.1894]
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
**Scale 512D**:
|
| 92 |
+
- Mean: 0.0226
|
| 93 |
+
- Std: 0.0784
|
| 94 |
+
- Range: [-0.1377, 0.1895]
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
**Scale 768D**:
|
| 97 |
+
- Mean: 0.0227
|
| 98 |
+
- Std: 0.0784
|
| 99 |
+
- Range: [-0.1373, 0.1897]
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
**Scale 1024D**:
|
| 102 |
+
- Mean: 0.0226
|
| 103 |
+
- Std: 0.0784
|
| 104 |
+
- Range: [-0.1375, 0.1896]
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
**Scale 1280D**:
|
| 107 |
+
- Mean: 0.0227
|
| 108 |
+
- Std: 0.0784
|
| 109 |
+
- Range: [-0.1375, 0.1898]
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
Most classes cluster around 0.5 (middle Cantor region), with smooth spread across [0,1].
|
|
|
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
Each scale learns optimal weights for combining geometric components:
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
+
**Scale 384D**: Feature=0.929, Cantor=0.020, Crystal=0.051
|
| 120 |
+
**Scale 512D**: Feature=0.885, Cantor=0.023, Crystal=0.092
|
| 121 |
+
**Scale 768D**: Feature=0.996, Cantor=0.001, Crystal=0.003
|
| 122 |
+
**Scale 1024D**: Feature=0.952, Cantor=0.005, Crystal=0.043
|
| 123 |
+
**Scale 1280D**: Feature=0.411, Cantor=0.003, Crystal=0.587
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
|
| 126 |
**Pattern**: Lower scales rely on feature similarity, higher scales use crystal geometry.
|