Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,52 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: mit
|
| 3 |
-
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: mit
|
| 3 |
+
---
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
# What is this?
|
| 6 |
+
This is to be the home for potential extensions to the geofractal router concept.
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
Multiple global fractal router weights will be saved here.
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
These are meant to be pretrained for specific numeric use-cases and finetuned for extension.
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
These include message moving, prime valuation, geometric accuracy assessment, structural awareness, global wormhole fingerprints, and structural analysis utility.
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
Each router is highly experimental and the structure may change. Consider this the natural extension of the wormhole router structure from geovit-david-beans.
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
# What is a geofractal router?
|
| 17 |
+
A router in standard-sense has a network topology that allows multiple devices to rapidly communicate through a unified structure.
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
A GEOFRACTAL router directly leverages pytorch utilities in an attempt to provide a fully request-oriented structure for collectives to interface with.
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
# What is the target goal?
|
| 22 |
+
A collective fingerprint-centric collective coordination that can be rapidly learned, enhanced, predicted, and expanded upon.
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
# Why?
|
| 25 |
+
The larger a network becomes, the slower the network becomes at transferring information from A to B. This is a natural extension to mitigate this and provide
|
| 26 |
+
reusable learning based on cantor fingerprinting.
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
Experiments show; when collectives begin with geofractal designs, they orient along those constraints with independent losses, objectives, and applied offsets.
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
# Hypothesis
|
| 31 |
+
A centralized routing hub for all collective representations will allow a more cohesive delegation vote between all collectives.
|
| 32 |
+
This will enable a more organized and coordinated fusion between many divergent structures with easily extensible progressions from the fusion route.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
This router process is currently unproven. The fusion is touchy as-is, but the most recent experiments show that a converged fusion is rock solid.
|
| 35 |
+
They have trouble unlearning crystalline structures, which means as earlier david experiments show they rapidly converge to MAYBE the incorrect relational behavior.
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
My hypothesis is, a more centralized weighting with more potential routing options will allow for rapid expansion in a more organized fashion.
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
# Potential upsides
|
| 40 |
+
Faster collectives, more rapid experiments, easier to use extensions, global anchor registry aka cantor fingerprint address, and a few other benefits.
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
Attaching additional models that are entirely external to the structure with much easier measures than setting up entire hook/extraction systems.
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
# Potential downsides
|
| 45 |
+
Added overhead from the learning mechanisms.
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
# Citation
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
Author: AbstractPhil + Claude Opus 4.5
|
| 50 |
+
License: MIT
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
A cite isn't required but it would be nice.
|