Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,134 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
-
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
+
---
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 6 |
+
<h1>ERank: Fusing Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning for Effective and Efficient Text Reranking</h1>
|
| 7 |
+
</div>
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
<p align="center">
|
| 10 |
+
<a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/">Arxiv</a>  |  <a href="https://github.com/YZ-Cai/ERank">Github</a>
|
| 11 |
+
</p>
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
## Introduction
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
We introduce ERANK, a highly effective and efficient pointwise reranker built from a reasoning LLM, which excels across diverse relevance scenarios with low latency.
|
| 16 |
+
Surprisingly, it also outperforms recent listwise rerankers on the most challenging reasoning-intensive tasks.
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
<img src="./assets/overview.png">
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
ERank is trained with a novel two-stage training pipeline, i.e., Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement
|
| 21 |
+
Learning (RL).
|
| 22 |
+
During the SFT stage, unlike traidtional pointwise rerankers that train the LLMs for binary relevance classification, we encourage the LLM to generatively output fine grained integer scores.
|
| 23 |
+
In the RL training, we introduce a novel listwise derived reward, which instills global ranking awareness into the efficient
|
| 24 |
+
pointwise architecture.
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
## Model List
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
We provide the trained reranking models in various sizes (4B, 14B and 32B), all of which support customizing the input instruction according to different tasks.
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
| Model | Size | Layers | Sequence Length | Instruction Aware |
|
| 31 |
+
|------------------------------------------|------|--------|-----------------|-------------------|
|
| 32 |
+
| [ERank-4B](https://huggingface.co/Alibaba-NLP/ERank-4B) | 4B | 36 | 32K | Yes |
|
| 33 |
+
| [ERank-14B](https://huggingface.co/Alibaba-NLP/ERank-14B) | 14B | 40 | 128K | Yes |
|
| 34 |
+
| [ERank-32B](https://huggingface.co/Alibaba-NLP/ERank-32B) | 32B | 64 | 128K | Yes |
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
## Evaluation
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
We evaluate ERank on both reasoning-intensive benchmarks (BRIGHT and FollowIR) and traditional semantic relevance benchmarks (BEIR and TREC DL).
|
| 39 |
+
All methods use the original queries without hybrid scores.
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
| Paradigm | Method | Average | BRIGHT | FollowIR | BEIR | TREC DL |
|
| 42 |
+
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
| 43 |
+
| - | First-stage retriever | 25.9 | 13.7 | 0 | 40.8 | 49.3 |
|
| 44 |
+
| Listwise | Rank-R1-7B | 34.6 | 15.7 | 3.6 | **49.0** | 70.0 |
|
| 45 |
+
| Listwise | Rearank-7B | 35.3 | 17.4 | 2.3 | **49.0** | **72.5** |
|
| 46 |
+
| Pointwise | JudgeRank-8B | 32.1 | 17.0 | 9.9 | 39.1 | 62.6 |
|
| 47 |
+
| Pointwise | Rank1-7B | 34.6 | 18.2 | 9.1 | 44.2 | 67.1 |
|
| 48 |
+
| Pointwise | **ERank-4B (Ours)** | 36.8 | 22.7 | 11.0 | 44.8 | 68.9 |
|
| 49 |
+
| Pointwise | **ERank-14B (Ours)** | 36.9 | 23.1 | 10.3 | 47.1 | 67.1 |
|
| 50 |
+
| Pointwise | **ERank-32B (Ours)** | **38.1** | **24.4** | **12.1** | 47.7 | 68.1 |
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
On the most challenging BRIGHT benchmark, with top-100 documents retrieved by ReasonIR-8B using GPT-4 reason-query, ERank with BM25 hybrid achieves the state-of-the-art NDCG@10.
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
| Method | nDCG@10 |
|
| 55 |
+
| :--- | :--- |
|
| 56 |
+
| ReasonIR-8B | 30.5 |
|
| 57 |
+
| Rank-R1-7B | 24.1 |
|
| 58 |
+
| Rank1-7B | 24.3 |
|
| 59 |
+
| Rearank-7B | 27.5 |
|
| 60 |
+
| JudgeRank-8B | 20.2 |
|
| 61 |
+
| *+ BM25 hybrid* | 22.7 |
|
| 62 |
+
| Rank-R1-32B-v0.2 | 37.7 |
|
| 63 |
+
| *+ BM25 hybrid* | 40.0 |
|
| 64 |
+
| **ERank-4B (Ours)** | 30.5 |
|
| 65 |
+
| *+ BM25 hybrid* | 38.7 |
|
| 66 |
+
| **ERank-14B (Ours)** | 31.8 |
|
| 67 |
+
| *+ BM25 hybrid* | 39.3 |
|
| 68 |
+
| **ERank-32B (Ours)** | 32.8 |
|
| 69 |
+
| *+ BM25 hybrid* | **40.2** |
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
Since ERank is a pointwise reranker, it has low latency compared with listwise models.
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 74 |
+
<img src="./assets/latency.png" width=400px>
|
| 75 |
+
</div>
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
For more details, please refer to our [Paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/).
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
## Usage
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
We have implemented the inference code based on Transformer and vLLM, respectively.
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
```python
|
| 84 |
+
from examples.ERank_Transformer import ERank_Transformer
|
| 85 |
+
from examples.ERank_vLLM import ERank_vLLM
|
| 86 |
+
from examples.utils import hybrid_scores
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
# select a model
|
| 89 |
+
model_name_or_path = "Ucreate/ERank-4B"
|
| 90 |
+
# model_name_or_path = "Ucreate/ERank-14B"
|
| 91 |
+
# model_name_or_path = "Ucreate/ERank-32B"
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
# use vLLM or Transformer
|
| 94 |
+
# reranker = ERank_Transformer(model_name_or_path)
|
| 95 |
+
reranker = ERank_vLLM(model_name_or_path)
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
# input data
|
| 98 |
+
instruction = "Retrieve relevant documents for the query."
|
| 99 |
+
query = "I am happy"
|
| 100 |
+
docs = [
|
| 101 |
+
{"content": "excited", "first_stage_score": 46.7},
|
| 102 |
+
{"content": "sad", "first_stage_score": 1.5},
|
| 103 |
+
{"content": "peaceful", "first_stage_score": 2.3},
|
| 104 |
+
]
|
| 105 |
+
|
| 106 |
+
# rerank
|
| 107 |
+
results = reranker.rerank(query, docs, instruction, truncate_length=2048)
|
| 108 |
+
print(results)
|
| 109 |
+
# [
|
| 110 |
+
# {'content': 'excited', 'first_stage_score': 46.7, 'rank_score': 4.84},
|
| 111 |
+
# {'content': 'peaceful', 'first_stage_score': 2.3, 'rank_score': 2.98}
|
| 112 |
+
# {'content': 'sad', 'first_stage_score': 1.5, 'rank_score': 0.0},
|
| 113 |
+
# ]
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
# Optional: hybrid with first-stage scores
|
| 116 |
+
alpha = 0.2
|
| 117 |
+
hybrid_results = hybrid_scores(results, alpha)
|
| 118 |
+
print(hybrid_results)
|
| 119 |
+
# [
|
| 120 |
+
# {'content': 'excited', 'first_stage_score': 46.7, 'rank_score': 4.84, 'hybrid_score': 1.18},
|
| 121 |
+
# {'content': 'peaceful', 'first_stage_score': 2.3, 'rank_score': 2.98, 'hybrid_score':0.01},
|
| 122 |
+
# {'content': 'sad', 'first_stage_score': 1.5, 'rank_score': 0.0, 'hybrid_score': -1.19}
|
| 123 |
+
# ]
|
| 124 |
+
```
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
Please refer to the `examples` directory for details, in which we also provide the instructions used in the prompt during evaluation.
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
## Citation
|
| 130 |
+
If you find our work helpful, feel free to give us a cite.
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
```
|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |
+
```
|