readme.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Different launch sequences result in different completion times of all the jobs.
|
|
| 24 |
# Proposed approach
|
| 25 |
Given an PFSP instance, i.e. a Jobs x Machines matrix, the idea we would like to investigate is to recover an optimal/pseudo-optimal schedule using a two learning phases process:
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-
<img src="presentation/schemas/global_architecture.png" width="
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
**Phase 1:** In this phase, the goal is to train a neural model (which we will call the objective surrogate or simply surrogate) to learn latent job embeddings and to predict/estimate the MakeSpan associated with job schedules that are represented as sequences of those job embeddings, specifically:
|
| 30 |
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
# Proposed approach
|
| 25 |
Given an PFSP instance, i.e. a Jobs x Machines matrix, the idea we would like to investigate is to recover an optimal/pseudo-optimal schedule using a two learning phases process:
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
+
<img src="presentation/schemas/global_architecture.png" width="1200">
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
**Phase 1:** In this phase, the goal is to train a neural model (which we will call the objective surrogate or simply surrogate) to learn latent job embeddings and to predict/estimate the MakeSpan associated with job schedules that are represented as sequences of those job embeddings, specifically:
|
| 30 |
|