Babblu2821 commited on
Commit
1d5a973
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f532a20

docs: replace LLM-judge factual ratings with the human pass

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +10 -7
README.md CHANGED
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ Code, method and full results: **https://github.com/fayazhussain2821/llm-finetun
29
  >
30
  > This is a **methodology demonstration**, not a medical tool. Its factual reliability
31
  > has been measured, and it is poor: on a blinded review of 20 held-out questions, this
32
- > adapter **contradicted the reference answer or invented an entity in 95% of them**,
33
- > scoring **1.20 out of 5** for factual soundness.
34
  >
35
  > It produces fluent, confident, well-formed text that is usually wrong. Observed
36
  > failures include attributing Marfan syndrome to "an infection" and inventing
@@ -101,16 +101,19 @@ No degeneration — the model does not loop. Its problem is that it is wrong.
101
 
102
  | | mean ↑ | contradicts reference ↓ |
103
  |---|---|---|
104
- | `gpt2` (control) | 1.45 | 90% |
105
- | **this model** | **1.20** | **95%** |
106
 
107
  Fine-tuning produced **no detectable improvement in factual accuracy** (paired 95% CI
108
- −0.65 to +0.10, spanning zero) — while the automatic metrics above reported a 25.8%
109
  gain. LoRA taught this model MedQuAD's *register*, and register is what those metrics
110
  score.
111
 
112
- These ratings were produced by an LLM judge, not a clinician, and are labelled as such
113
- in the source repository. They are a strong prior, not a clinical assessment.
 
 
 
114
 
115
  ## Usage
116
 
 
29
  >
30
  > This is a **methodology demonstration**, not a medical tool. Its factual reliability
31
  > has been measured, and it is poor: on a blinded review of 20 held-out questions, this
32
+ > adapter **contradicted the reference answer or invented an entity in 60% of them**,
33
+ > scoring **1.80 out of 5** for factual soundness.
34
  >
35
  > It produces fluent, confident, well-formed text that is usually wrong. Observed
36
  > failures include attributing Marfan syndrome to "an infection" and inventing
 
101
 
102
  | | mean ↑ | contradicts reference ↓ |
103
  |---|---|---|
104
+ | `gpt2` (control) | 1.60 | 70% |
105
+ | **this model** | **1.80** | **60%** |
106
 
107
  Fine-tuning produced **no detectable improvement in factual accuracy** (paired 95% CI
108
+ −0.40 to +0.80, spanning zero) — while the automatic metrics above reported a 25.8%
109
  gain. LoRA taught this model MedQuAD's *register*, and register is what those metrics
110
  score.
111
 
112
+ These ratings are a human pass, rated blind to which model produced each answer, by
113
+ the repository's author — one non-expert rater, not a clinician and not adjudicated by
114
+ a second. An earlier LLM-judge pass over the same sheet rated this adapter far harsher
115
+ (1.20 mean, 95% contradiction) but reached every identical verdict; both are published
116
+ in the source repository.
117
 
118
  ## Usage
119