Xiao Zeqi commited on
fix psnr calculation
Browse filesUpdated PSNR value and corrected note regarding PSNR calculation.
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -134,14 +134,12 @@ python calculate_fid.py --videos_dir outputs/2025-11-30/00-02-42/videos/test_vis
|
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
| Metric | Value |
|
| 136 |
|--------|--------|
|
| 137 |
-
| PSNR |
|
| 138 |
| LPIPS | 0.1667 |
|
| 139 |
| FID | 15.13 |
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
*Note: FID is computed over 5000 frames.*
|
| 142 |
|
| 143 |
-
*Note: Previous versions incorrectly used `data_range=2.0` for PSNR calculation, but the decoded video data is in the range [0, 1], so `data_range=1.0` should be used. This bug inflated PSNR values by approximately 6 dB. We have now corrected this in the latest version by clipping predictions to [0, 1] before metric computation. The relative performance comparisons and conclusions remain unchanged.*
|
| 144 |
-
|
| 145 |
---
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
## Dataset
|
|
|
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
| Metric | Value |
|
| 136 |
|--------|--------|
|
| 137 |
+
| PSNR | 24.01 |
|
| 138 |
| LPIPS | 0.1667 |
|
| 139 |
| FID | 15.13 |
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
*Note: FID is computed over 5000 frames.*
|
| 142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 143 |
---
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
## Dataset
|