anthonymartinez1 commited on
Commit
0cff308
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 3d03a47

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +3 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -128,6 +128,9 @@ div.sk-label-container:hover .sk-estimator-doc-link.fitted:hover,
128
  macro avg 0.92 0.87 0.88 47159
129
  weighted avg 0.91 0.89 0.88 47159
130
 
 
 
 
131
  # Model Card Authors
132
 
133
  Anthony Martinez
 
128
  macro avg 0.92 0.87 0.88 47159
129
  weighted avg 0.91 0.89 0.88 47159
130
 
131
+ The overall accuracy of the model was 89%, which is consistent with its previous results. For Class 0, the precision score was 100%, meaning it was able to predict every phishing website correctly. Its recall score was 74%, meaning it missed about 26% of actual phishing samples. For Class 1, its precision score was 84% and its recall score was 100%. This shows that the model leans toward predicting '1,' while favoring recall rather than precision.
132
+ The model could possibly be used for real scenarios, but not for high risk use. It would be helpful in situations where you only need a general screening of phishing vs legitimate websites. So although it is accurate, it is not accurate enough. However, I would still trust this model. It performs well and behaves predictably. If more precision/recall is needed, then it would certainly make sense to use a more complex model. It all depends on what the model is being used for.
133
+
134
  # Model Card Authors
135
 
136
  Anthony Martinez