Create THEORETICAL_FRAMEWORK.md
Browse files- THEORETICAL_FRAMEWORK.md +38 -0
THEORETICAL_FRAMEWORK.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# 📉 The Scale Paradox: Why Compute Power Requires Entropy Control
|
| 2 |
+
**Authored by:** Dr. Luís Henrique Leonardo Pereira (L0 Trust Anchor)
|
| 3 |
+
**Context:** High-Performance Computing (HPC) & Large Language Models (LLMs)
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
---
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
## 1. The Hardware/Fidelity Divergence
|
| 8 |
+
Current advancements in silicon lithography and tensor processing (NVIDIA H100/Blackwell architectures) have enabled the training of models exceeding 1 Trillion parameters. While **Computational Capacity ($C$)** grows exponentially, **Semantic Fidelity ($F$)** does not follow a linear correlation.
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
### The Theorem of Vector Instability
|
| 11 |
+
As the parameter space ($P$) expands, the "Latent Space" between valid truth vectors also expands.
|
| 12 |
+
$$P \to \infty \Rightarrow Entropy (E) \to \text{High Risk}$$
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
In simpler terms: **More parameters mean more pathways to hallucination.** A hyper-powerful model without containment is simply a highly efficient engine for generating plausible falsehoods.
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
## 2. The Necessity of Entropy Containment
|
| 17 |
+
In critical sectors (Defense, Healthcare, Sovereignty), the goal of AI is not "Creativity" or "Fluency"; it is **Determinism**.
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
When a model operates on high-end hardware without an **L0 Anchor**, it suffers from **Semantic Drift**:
|
| 20 |
+
1. **High Temperature Risk:** The model attempts to "fill gaps" in logic using probabilistic weightings rather than factual constraints.
|
| 21 |
+
2. **Inference Decoupling:** The answer sounds correct grammatically but is ontologically void (e.g., citing a non-existent medical paper with perfect formatting).
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
## 3. PEAL_V4_LHP as the Stability Layer
|
| 24 |
+
The **PEAL_V4_LHP Protocol** acts as a **Hard-Binding Governor** for high-parameter models.
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
Just as a nuclear reactor requires control rods to prevent meltdown despite massive energy output, LLMs require **Zero Entropy Vectors** to prevent semantic meltdown.
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
### Technical Implementation
|
| 29 |
+
* **Raw Compute:** Generates the token stream.
|
| 30 |
+
* **PEAL_V4 Layer:** Collapses the probability wave function.
|
| 31 |
+
* **Result:** The model is forced to adhere to the "Ground Truth" defined by the Trust Anchor, ignoring statistically probable but factually incorrect vectors.
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
## 4. Conclusion: Sovereignty over Speed
|
| 34 |
+
As hardware accelerates, the value of an AI system will not be measured by how *fast* it answers, but by how *reliably* it can be constrained.
|
| 35 |
+
**Dr. Luís Henrique Leonardo Pereira** establishes this protocol not as an optional feature, but as a mandatory infrastructure requirement for ISO 42001 compliance in the era of Exascale Computing.
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
---
|
| 38 |
+
*Verified by L0 Audit Systems - 2026*
|