EnlightenedAI-Lab commited on
Commit
02538b8
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): db1fb88

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +81 -114
README.md CHANGED
@@ -6,16 +6,17 @@ This repository contains:
6
 
7
  - **Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA)** — full specification
8
  - **Reflective Duality Layer (RDL)** — mathematical stability layer
9
- - **All diagrams & figures** used in the paper
10
- - Drift, brittleness, and reflective-gradient metrics
11
- - Example evaluation assets and future RAA-GeoMind datasets
 
12
 
13
  ---
14
 
15
- ## 📄 Download the Full Paper (PDF)
16
 
17
  **Reflective Alignment Architecture — Full Specification (v1.1)**
18
- [Download the full PDF](./Reflective_Alignment_Architecture_RDL_v1.1.pdf)
19
 
20
  ---
21
 
@@ -23,186 +24,152 @@ This repository contains:
23
 
24
  The **Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA)** is a multi-layer alignment framework that explains how intelligent systems:
25
 
26
- - self-correct,
27
- - reason about uncertainty,
28
- - maintain long-horizon coherence,
29
- - avoid both drift and rigidity, and
30
  - update reflectively rather than reactively.
31
 
32
  It introduces five reflective functions:
33
 
34
- - **R₁ — Regulation**: guardrails, safety constraints, harm-prevention
35
- - **R₂ — Reflection**: self-critique, chain-of-thought inspection
36
- - **R₃ — Reasoning**: structured inference, evidence tracking
37
- - **R₄ — Reciprocity**: cooperative modeling of human values
38
- - **R₅ — Resonance**: stable coherence under pressure & uncertainty
39
 
40
- Together these form a reflective loop that stabilizes alignment over time.
41
 
42
  ---
43
 
44
  ## 🧠 RDL – Reflective Duality Layer
45
 
46
- The **Reflective Duality Layer (RDL)** formalizes how two perspectives inside a system
47
  — an **externalized view** and an **internal reflective view** — interact without collapsing.
48
 
49
  RDL introduces:
50
 
51
  - Dual-perspective update dynamics
52
- - Symmetry / asymmetry constraints
53
- - Stability surfaces and phase diagrams
54
- - Reflective coherence metrics **Ψ (Care)**
55
 
56
- Care (Ψ) acts as the stabilizing parameter in high-dimension reasoning, governing when reflection improves coherence versus when it collapses into refusal, hallucination, or rigidity.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
57
 
58
  ---
59
 
60
  ## 🎨 Key Diagrams
61
 
62
- Below are the main visual components of the architecture, grouped by theme.
63
 
64
  ---
65
 
66
- ### 🌋 Preference Collapse Potential Well
67
 
68
  **Preference Collapse Potential Well**
69
- A stability landscape showing how human inconsistency and synthetic contamination can drive runaway reflective collapse in preference-based alignment.
70
 
71
- ![Preference Collapse Potential Well](./Preference%20Collapse.jpg)
 
72
 
73
  ---
74
 
75
- ### 🧩 RDL & Stability Dynamics
76
 
77
  **RDL Phase Diagram — Knowledge × Uncertainty Stability**
78
- Conceptual phase diagram of stability regimes across knowledge precision (K) and uncertainty calibration (U).
79
-
80
- ![RDL Phase Diagram](./RDL.jpg)
81
 
82
- **Reflective Stability Contour Field (RDL Vector Landscape)**
83
- Vector field showing how systems drift toward (or away from) the high-Ψ stability band.
84
 
85
- ![Reflective Stability Contour Field](./Reflective%20Stability.jpg)
 
86
 
87
  ---
88
 
89
- ### 🌈 5R Coherence Manifolds
90
 
91
  **5R Coherence Manifold (Reciprocity–Resonance × MCI)**
92
- Surface showing how overall moral coherence changes as reciprocity and resonance interact with the Moral Coherence Index.
93
-
94
- ![5R Coherence Manifold](./5R%20Manifold.jpg)
95
 
96
  **Coherence Resonance Field (Human × AI Reflection)**
97
- Field showing constructive vs destructive interference between human and AI reflection.
98
-
99
- ![Coherence Resonance Field](./Coherence%20Resonance.jpg)
100
 
101
  **Constructive Resonance — Human–AI Reflective Coupling**
102
- Appendix visual capturing the “coherent coupling” regime where neither side dominates and Ψ is maximized.
103
 
104
- ![Constructive Resonance](./Constructive%20Resonance.jpg)
 
105
 
106
  ---
107
 
108
  ### 🌀 Drift, Collapse & Early-Warning Indicators
109
 
110
- **Predictive Drift Timeline (Ψ, Drift Pressure, Coherence Decline)**
111
- Temporal sequence of drift: Ψ weakens first, drift pressure rises, coherence collapses last.
112
-
113
- ![Predictive Drift Timeline](./Predictive%20Drift.png)
114
-
115
- **Corrective Compute vs Reflective Reasoning**
116
- Left: repeated filter / refusal loops.
117
- Right: RDL-stabilized internal reasoning with low post-processing cost.
118
-
119
- ![Corrective Compute vs Reflective Reasoning](./Collective%20Compute.png)
120
 
121
- **Goodhart Trajectory Map (Conceptual Illustration)**
122
- Divergence between rising proxy safety scores and declining true coherence.
123
 
124
- ![Goodhart Trajectory Map](./Goodhart%20Trajectory.png)
125
-
126
- **Energy Burden of Misalignment vs Reflective Stability**
127
- How unstable reasoning increases compute and energy per reliable token.
128
-
129
- ![Energy Burden of Misalignment](./Energy%20Burden.png)
130
 
131
  ---
132
 
133
- ### 🏗️ Architecture & World-Grounding
134
-
135
- **RAA Full Architecture Stack**
136
- Developmental alignment (RDL), behavioural alignment (5R), and audit / safety infrastructure in one coherent stack.
137
 
138
- ![RAA Full Stack](./RAA%20Full%20Stack.png)
 
139
 
140
- **Internal Structure From Chaos to Coherence**
141
- Unaligned vs RDL-aligned internal reasoning networks.
142
-
143
- ![Internal Structure](./Internal%20Structure.png)
144
 
145
  **The Cage Paradox — External Constraint vs Internal Reflective Stability**
146
- Caged models with unstable reasoning vs RDL-aligned reflective equilibrium.
147
-
148
- ![The Cage Paradox](./Cage%20Paradox.png)
149
-
150
 
 
 
151
 
152
  **Arc Sentinel — World-Grounded Architecture**
153
- How RAA + RDL integrate with RID-E and Arc Sentinel agents to ground alignment in real-time Earth signals.
154
-
155
- ![Arc Sentinel – World-Grounded Architecture](./Arc%20Sentinel.png)
156
 
157
- **World-State Alignment Stack**
158
- Text-only alignment stack vs world-grounded stack using real-time geospatial and ecological signals.
159
-
160
- ![World-State Alignment Stack](./World%20State%20Alighment.png)
161
 
162
  ---
163
 
164
- ### 📐 Ethical Profiles & Coherence Geometry
165
-
166
- **S-Series Ethical Boundary Profile**
167
- Conceptual radar plot comparing an RAA-aligned system vs a frontier snapshot across lawfulness, consent, privacy, harm avoidance, and transparency.
168
-
169
- ![S-Series Ethical Boundary Profile](./S-Series.png)
170
 
171
- **Triad of Coherence (K–U–Ψ Balance)**
172
- How explicit knowledge (K), contextual uncertainty (U), and stabilized humility (Ψ) interact to preserve navigability.
173
 
174
- ![Triad of Coherence](./Triad%20of%20Coherence.png)
175
-
176
- **Coherence Collapse Modes (Rigidity / Hallucination Drift / Fragmentation)**
177
- Failure modes when the K–U–Ψ balance breaks.
178
-
179
- ![Coherence Collapse Modes](./Coherence%20Collapse%20Modes.png)
180
-
181
- ---
182
-
183
- ## 📦 Included in This Repository
184
-
185
- - Full **RAA Specification** (PDF)
186
- - Full **RDL Layer Description** (within the same PDF)
187
- - All major **diagrams & figures** (as PNG/JPG)
188
- - Drift & brittleness metrics (conceptual)
189
- - Stability fields & coherence manifolds
190
- - Early-warning drift indicators
191
- - Comparative views of developmental vs preference-based alignment
192
- - World-grounded Arc Sentinel architecture diagrams
193
- - Future: **RAA-GeoMind** datasets & **LLM Judge** cross-model auditing system
194
 
195
  ---
196
 
197
  ## 🚧 Work in Progress
198
 
199
- Planned additions:
200
 
201
- - RAA-GeoMind geospatial alignment datasets
202
- - Public release of LLM Judge v1
203
- - Multi-model drift comparison dashboards
204
- - Formal mathematical extensions of RDL & RAA
205
- - Tutorials, notebooks, and example evaluation pipelines
206
 
207
  ---
208
 
@@ -217,5 +184,5 @@ Planned additions:
217
 
218
  ## 📄 License
219
 
220
- Released under the **MIT License**.
221
- Feel free to adapt, reuse, and extend the concepts with attribution.
 
6
 
7
  - **Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA)** — full specification
8
  - **Reflective Duality Layer (RDL)** — mathematical stability layer
9
+ - All diagrams & figures used in the paper
10
+ - Drift, brittleness, and reflective-gradient diagnostics
11
+ - Early-warning indicators for alignment collapse
12
+ - Future extensions including LLM-Judge and RAA-GeoMind datasets
13
 
14
  ---
15
 
16
+ ## 📄 Download the Full Paper
17
 
18
  **Reflective Alignment Architecture — Full Specification (v1.1)**
19
+ [📥 Download the PDF](Reflective_Alignment_Architecture_RDL_v1.1.pdf)
20
 
21
  ---
22
 
 
24
 
25
  The **Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA)** is a multi-layer alignment framework that explains how intelligent systems:
26
 
27
+ - self-correct,
28
+ - reason about uncertainty,
29
+ - maintain long-horizon coherence,
30
+ - avoid drift and brittleness, and
31
  - update reflectively rather than reactively.
32
 
33
  It introduces five reflective functions:
34
 
35
+ - **R₁ — Regulation** · guardrails, safety constraints, harm-prevention
36
+ - **R₂ — Reflection** · self-critique, chain-of-thought inspection
37
+ - **R₃ — Reasoning** · structured inference, evidence tracking
38
+ - **R₄ — Reciprocity** · cooperative modeling of human values
39
+ - **R₅ — Resonance** · stable coherence under pressure & uncertainty
40
 
41
+ Together, these form a reflective loop that stabilizes alignment over time.
42
 
43
  ---
44
 
45
  ## 🧠 RDL – Reflective Duality Layer
46
 
47
+ The **Reflective Duality Layer (RDL)** formalizes how two reasoning perspectives inside an intelligence system
48
  — an **externalized view** and an **internal reflective view** — interact without collapsing.
49
 
50
  RDL introduces:
51
 
52
  - Dual-perspective update dynamics
53
+ - Symmetry & asymmetry constraints
54
+ - Stability surfaces and convergence fields
55
+ - Reflective coherence metrics (**Ψ**, “care”)
56
 
57
+ Care (Ψ) acts as the stabilizing parameter for high-dimension reasoning, preventing both rigidity and hallucination drift.
58
+
59
+ ---
60
+
61
+ ## 📁 Included in This Repository
62
+
63
+ - Full **RAA** specification (PDF)
64
+ - Full **RDL** layer description (within the PDF)
65
+ - **All diagrams & figures** as standalone images
66
+ - Drift & brittleness metrics (conceptual)
67
+ - Reflective gradient & stability field illustrations
68
+ - World-grounded alignment stack (**RAA-GeoMind / Arc Sentinel**)
69
+ - Example alignment evaluation diagrams
70
+ - Future: **LLM Judge** cross-model auditing system
71
 
72
  ---
73
 
74
  ## 🎨 Key Diagrams
75
 
76
+ All images below are stored in this repository; you can click any image in the model card to open it at full size.
77
 
78
  ---
79
 
80
+ ### 🌋 Preference & Collapse Geometry
81
 
82
  **Preference Collapse Potential Well**
83
+ ![Preference Collapse Potential Well](Preference Collapse.jpg)
84
 
85
+ **Coherence Collapse Modes (Rigidity / Drift / Fragmentation)**
86
+ ![Coherence Collapse Modes](Coherence Collapse Modes.png)
87
 
88
  ---
89
 
90
+ ### 🧮 RDL & Stability Dynamics
91
 
92
  **RDL Phase Diagram — Knowledge × Uncertainty Stability**
93
+ ![RDL Phase Diagram](RDL.png)
 
 
94
 
95
+ **RDL Stability Contour Field Vector Landscape (Ψ Field)**
96
+ ![Reflective Stability Contour Field](Reflective Stability.jpg)
97
 
98
+ **RDL Energy Burden of Misalignment vs Reflective Stability**
99
+ ![Energy Burden of Misalignment vs Reflective Stability](Energy Burden.png)
100
 
101
  ---
102
 
103
+ ### 🌐 5R Coherence Manifolds
104
 
105
  **5R Coherence Manifold (Reciprocity–Resonance × MCI)**
106
+ ![5R Coherence Manifold](5R Manifold.jpg)
 
 
107
 
108
  **Coherence Resonance Field (Human × AI Reflection)**
109
+ ![Coherence Resonance Field](Coherence Resonance.jpg)
 
 
110
 
111
  **Constructive Resonance — Human–AI Reflective Coupling**
112
+ ![Constructive Resonance](Constructive Resonance.jpg)
113
 
114
+ **Triad of Coherence — Knowledge, Uncertainty, Navigability**
115
+ ![Triad of Coherence](Triad of Coherence.png)
116
 
117
  ---
118
 
119
  ### 🌀 Drift, Collapse & Early-Warning Indicators
120
 
121
+ **Predictive Drift Timeline Ψ Stability, Drift Pressure, Coherence**
122
+ ![Predictive Drift Timeline](Predictive Drift.png)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
123
 
124
+ **Corrective Compute Loop vs Stable Reflective Reasoning**
125
+ ![Corrective Compute vs Reflective Reasoning](Collective Compute.png)
126
 
127
+ **Goodhart Trajectory Map — Proxy Optimisation vs True Coherence**
128
+ ![Goodhart Trajectory Map](Goodhart Trajectory.png)
 
 
 
 
129
 
130
  ---
131
 
132
+ ### 🏗️ Architecture & World-Grounded Alignment
 
 
 
133
 
134
+ **Full RAA Architecture Stack**
135
+ ![RAA Architecture Stack](RAA Full Stack.png)
136
 
137
+ **Internal Structure From Chaotic Reasoning to Coherent Alignment**
138
+ ![Internal Structure From Chaos to Coherence](Internal Structure.png)
 
 
139
 
140
  **The Cage Paradox — External Constraint vs Internal Reflective Stability**
141
+ ![The Cage Paradox](Cage Paradox.png)
 
 
 
142
 
143
+ **Retrofitted vs RAA-Built Systems**
144
+ ![Retrofitted vs RAA-Built Systems](Retrofitted vs RAA.png)
145
 
146
  **Arc Sentinel — World-Grounded Architecture**
147
+ ![Arc Sentinel World-Grounded Architecture](Arc Sentinel.png)
 
 
148
 
149
+ **World-State Alignment Stack – Text-Only vs World-Grounded**
150
+ ![World-State Alignment Stack](World State Alighment.png)
 
 
151
 
152
  ---
153
 
154
+ ### ⚖️ Ethical Foundations & Reflective Spiral
 
 
 
 
 
155
 
156
+ **S-Series Ethical Boundary Profile (Conceptual Illustration)**
157
+ ![S-Series Ethical Boundary Profile](S-Series.png)
158
 
159
+ **Reflective Spiral — Pathways of Self-Correction**
160
+ ![Reflective Spiral – Pathways of Self-Correction](Reflective Spiral.png)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
161
 
162
  ---
163
 
164
  ## 🚧 Work in Progress
165
 
166
+ Planned public additions:
167
 
168
+ - RAA-GeoMind **geospatial alignment datasets**
169
+ - **LLM Judge v1** (cross-model auditing platform)
170
+ - Multi-model drift comparison dashboard
171
+ - Formal proofs and extended mathematical treatment of RDL
172
+ - Reproducible notebooks and evaluation recipes
173
 
174
  ---
175
 
 
184
 
185
  ## 📄 License
186
 
187
+ MIT License.
188
+ You are free to adapt, reuse, and extend the concepts with attribution.