Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -6,16 +6,17 @@ This repository contains:
|
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
- **Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA)** — full specification
|
| 8 |
- **Reflective Duality Layer (RDL)** — mathematical stability layer
|
| 9 |
-
-
|
| 10 |
-
- Drift, brittleness, and reflective-gradient
|
| 11 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
---
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-
## 📄 Download the Full Paper
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
**Reflective Alignment Architecture — Full Specification (v1.1)**
|
| 18 |
-
[Download the
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
---
|
| 21 |
|
|
@@ -23,186 +24,152 @@ This repository contains:
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
The **Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA)** is a multi-layer alignment framework that explains how intelligent systems:
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-
- self-correct,
|
| 27 |
-
- reason about uncertainty,
|
| 28 |
-
- maintain long-horizon coherence,
|
| 29 |
-
- avoid
|
| 30 |
- update reflectively rather than reactively.
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
It introduces five reflective functions:
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-
- **R₁ — Regulation
|
| 35 |
-
- **R₂ — Reflection
|
| 36 |
-
- **R₃ — Reasoning
|
| 37 |
-
- **R₄ — Reciprocity
|
| 38 |
-
- **R₅ — Resonance
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-
Together these form a reflective loop that stabilizes alignment over time.
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
---
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
## 🧠 RDL – Reflective Duality Layer
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-
The **Reflective Duality Layer (RDL)** formalizes how two perspectives inside
|
| 47 |
— an **externalized view** and an **internal reflective view** — interact without collapsing.
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
RDL introduces:
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
- Dual-perspective update dynamics
|
| 52 |
-
- Symmetry
|
| 53 |
-
- Stability surfaces and
|
| 54 |
-
- Reflective coherence metrics
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
-
Care (Ψ) acts as the stabilizing parameter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
---
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
## 🎨 Key Diagrams
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
---
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
-
### 🌋 Preference Collapse
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
**Preference Collapse Potential Well**
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
---
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
-
###
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
**RDL Phase Diagram — Knowledge × Uncertainty Stability**
|
| 78 |
-
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-

|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
-
**
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
---
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
-
###
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
**5R Coherence Manifold (Reciprocity–Resonance × MCI)**
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
-
|
| 94 |
-

|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
**Coherence Resonance Field (Human × AI Reflection)**
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-

|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
**Constructive Resonance — Human–AI Reflective Coupling**
|
| 102 |
-
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
---
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
### 🌀 Drift, Collapse & Early-Warning Indicators
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
-
**Predictive Drift Timeline
|
| 111 |
-
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-

|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
**Corrective Compute vs Reflective Reasoning**
|
| 116 |
-
Left: repeated filter / refusal loops.
|
| 117 |
-
Right: RDL-stabilized internal reasoning with low post-processing cost.
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-

|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
-
**
|
| 122 |
-
|
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
|
| 126 |
-
**Energy Burden of Misalignment vs Reflective Stability**
|
| 127 |
-
How unstable reasoning increases compute and energy per reliable token.
|
| 128 |
-
|
| 129 |
-

|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
---
|
| 132 |
|
| 133 |
-
### 🏗️ Architecture & World-
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
**RAA Full Architecture Stack**
|
| 136 |
-
Developmental alignment (RDL), behavioural alignment (5R), and audit / safety infrastructure in one coherent stack.
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 139 |
|
| 140 |
-
**Internal Structure
|
| 141 |
-
|
| 142 |
-
|
| 143 |
-

|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
**The Cage Paradox — External Constraint vs Internal Reflective Stability**
|
| 146 |
-
|
| 147 |
-
|
| 148 |
-

|
| 149 |
-
|
| 150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 151 |
|
| 152 |
**Arc Sentinel — World-Grounded Architecture**
|
| 153 |
-
|
| 154 |
-
|
| 155 |
-

|
| 156 |
|
| 157 |
-
**World-State Alignment Stack**
|
| 158 |
-
|
| 159 |
-
|
| 160 |
-

|
| 161 |
|
| 162 |
---
|
| 163 |
|
| 164 |
-
###
|
| 165 |
-
|
| 166 |
-
**S-Series Ethical Boundary Profile**
|
| 167 |
-
Conceptual radar plot comparing an RAA-aligned system vs a frontier snapshot across lawfulness, consent, privacy, harm avoidance, and transparency.
|
| 168 |
-
|
| 169 |
-

|
| 170 |
|
| 171 |
-
**
|
| 172 |
-
|
| 173 |
|
| 174 |
-
|
| 175 |
-
|
| 176 |
-
**Coherence Collapse Modes (Rigidity / Hallucination Drift / Fragmentation)**
|
| 177 |
-
Failure modes when the K–U–Ψ balance breaks.
|
| 178 |
-
|
| 179 |
-

|
| 180 |
-
|
| 181 |
-
---
|
| 182 |
-
|
| 183 |
-
## 📦 Included in This Repository
|
| 184 |
-
|
| 185 |
-
- Full **RAA Specification** (PDF)
|
| 186 |
-
- Full **RDL Layer Description** (within the same PDF)
|
| 187 |
-
- All major **diagrams & figures** (as PNG/JPG)
|
| 188 |
-
- Drift & brittleness metrics (conceptual)
|
| 189 |
-
- Stability fields & coherence manifolds
|
| 190 |
-
- Early-warning drift indicators
|
| 191 |
-
- Comparative views of developmental vs preference-based alignment
|
| 192 |
-
- World-grounded Arc Sentinel architecture diagrams
|
| 193 |
-
- Future: **RAA-GeoMind** datasets & **LLM Judge** cross-model auditing system
|
| 194 |
|
| 195 |
---
|
| 196 |
|
| 197 |
## 🚧 Work in Progress
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
-
Planned additions:
|
| 200 |
|
| 201 |
-
- RAA-GeoMind geospatial alignment datasets
|
| 202 |
-
-
|
| 203 |
-
- Multi-model drift comparison
|
| 204 |
-
- Formal mathematical
|
| 205 |
-
-
|
| 206 |
|
| 207 |
---
|
| 208 |
|
|
@@ -217,5 +184,5 @@ Planned additions:
|
|
| 217 |
|
| 218 |
## 📄 License
|
| 219 |
|
| 220 |
-
|
| 221 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
- **Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA)** — full specification
|
| 8 |
- **Reflective Duality Layer (RDL)** — mathematical stability layer
|
| 9 |
+
- All diagrams & figures used in the paper
|
| 10 |
+
- Drift, brittleness, and reflective-gradient diagnostics
|
| 11 |
+
- Early-warning indicators for alignment collapse
|
| 12 |
+
- Future extensions including LLM-Judge and RAA-GeoMind datasets
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
---
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
## 📄 Download the Full Paper
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
**Reflective Alignment Architecture — Full Specification (v1.1)**
|
| 19 |
+
[📥 Download the PDF](Reflective_Alignment_Architecture_RDL_v1.1.pdf)
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
---
|
| 22 |
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
The **Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA)** is a multi-layer alignment framework that explains how intelligent systems:
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
+
- self-correct,
|
| 28 |
+
- reason about uncertainty,
|
| 29 |
+
- maintain long-horizon coherence,
|
| 30 |
+
- avoid drift and brittleness, and
|
| 31 |
- update reflectively rather than reactively.
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
It introduces five reflective functions:
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
+
- **R₁ — Regulation** · guardrails, safety constraints, harm-prevention
|
| 36 |
+
- **R₂ — Reflection** · self-critique, chain-of-thought inspection
|
| 37 |
+
- **R₃ — Reasoning** · structured inference, evidence tracking
|
| 38 |
+
- **R₄ — Reciprocity** · cooperative modeling of human values
|
| 39 |
+
- **R₅ — Resonance** · stable coherence under pressure & uncertainty
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
+
Together, these form a reflective loop that stabilizes alignment over time.
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
---
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
## 🧠 RDL – Reflective Duality Layer
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
+
The **Reflective Duality Layer (RDL)** formalizes how two reasoning perspectives inside an intelligence system
|
| 48 |
— an **externalized view** and an **internal reflective view** — interact without collapsing.
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
RDL introduces:
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
- Dual-perspective update dynamics
|
| 53 |
+
- Symmetry & asymmetry constraints
|
| 54 |
+
- Stability surfaces and convergence fields
|
| 55 |
+
- Reflective coherence metrics (**Ψ**, “care”)
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
+
Care (Ψ) acts as the stabilizing parameter for high-dimension reasoning, preventing both rigidity and hallucination drift.
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
---
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
## 📁 Included in This Repository
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
- Full **RAA** specification (PDF)
|
| 64 |
+
- Full **RDL** layer description (within the PDF)
|
| 65 |
+
- **All diagrams & figures** as standalone images
|
| 66 |
+
- Drift & brittleness metrics (conceptual)
|
| 67 |
+
- Reflective gradient & stability field illustrations
|
| 68 |
+
- World-grounded alignment stack (**RAA-GeoMind / Arc Sentinel**)
|
| 69 |
+
- Example alignment evaluation diagrams
|
| 70 |
+
- Future: **LLM Judge** cross-model auditing system
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
---
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
## 🎨 Key Diagrams
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
+
All images below are stored in this repository; you can click any image in the model card to open it at full size.
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
---
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
+
### 🌋 Preference & Collapse Geometry
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
**Preference Collapse Potential Well**
|
| 83 |
+

|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
+
**Coherence Collapse Modes (Rigidity / Drift / Fragmentation)**
|
| 86 |
+

|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
---
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
+
### 🧮 RDL & Stability Dynamics
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
**RDL Phase Diagram — Knowledge × Uncertainty Stability**
|
| 93 |
+

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
+
**RDL Stability Contour Field — Vector Landscape (Ψ Field)**
|
| 96 |
+

|
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
+
**RDL Energy Burden of Misalignment vs Reflective Stability**
|
| 99 |
+

|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
---
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
+
### 🌐 5R Coherence Manifolds
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
**5R Coherence Manifold (Reciprocity–Resonance × MCI)**
|
| 106 |
+

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
**Coherence Resonance Field (Human × AI Reflection)**
|
| 109 |
+

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
**Constructive Resonance — Human–AI Reflective Coupling**
|
| 112 |
+

|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
+
**Triad of Coherence — Knowledge, Uncertainty, Navigability**
|
| 115 |
+

|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
---
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
### 🌀 Drift, Collapse & Early-Warning Indicators
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
+
**Predictive Drift Timeline — Ψ Stability, Drift Pressure, Coherence**
|
| 122 |
+

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
+
**Corrective Compute Loop vs Stable Reflective Reasoning**
|
| 125 |
+

|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
+
**Goodhart Trajectory Map — Proxy Optimisation vs True Coherence**
|
| 128 |
+

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |
---
|
| 131 |
|
| 132 |
+
### 🏗️ Architecture & World-Grounded Alignment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
+
**Full RAA Architecture Stack**
|
| 135 |
+

|
| 136 |
|
| 137 |
+
**Internal Structure — From Chaotic Reasoning to Coherent Alignment**
|
| 138 |
+

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 139 |
|
| 140 |
**The Cage Paradox — External Constraint vs Internal Reflective Stability**
|
| 141 |
+

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 142 |
|
| 143 |
+
**Retrofitted vs RAA-Built Systems**
|
| 144 |
+

|
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
**Arc Sentinel — World-Grounded Architecture**
|
| 147 |
+

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 148 |
|
| 149 |
+
**World-State Alignment Stack – Text-Only vs World-Grounded**
|
| 150 |
+

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 151 |
|
| 152 |
---
|
| 153 |
|
| 154 |
+
### ⚖️ Ethical Foundations & Reflective Spiral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 155 |
|
| 156 |
+
**S-Series Ethical Boundary Profile (Conceptual Illustration)**
|
| 157 |
+

|
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
+
**Reflective Spiral — Pathways of Self-Correction**
|
| 160 |
+

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 161 |
|
| 162 |
---
|
| 163 |
|
| 164 |
## 🚧 Work in Progress
|
| 165 |
|
| 166 |
+
Planned public additions:
|
| 167 |
|
| 168 |
+
- RAA-GeoMind **geospatial alignment datasets**
|
| 169 |
+
- **LLM Judge v1** (cross-model auditing platform)
|
| 170 |
+
- Multi-model drift comparison dashboard
|
| 171 |
+
- Formal proofs and extended mathematical treatment of RDL
|
| 172 |
+
- Reproducible notebooks and evaluation recipes
|
| 173 |
|
| 174 |
---
|
| 175 |
|
|
|
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 |
## 📄 License
|
| 186 |
|
| 187 |
+
MIT License.
|
| 188 |
+
You are free to adapt, reuse, and extend the concepts with attribution.
|