--- license: cc-by-nc-4.0 language: - en pipeline_tag: feature-extraction tags: - embeddings - tactile - pressure - force - fsr - taxel - sensor - robotics - qwen3-vl base_model: EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-2b-preview --- # fusion-embedding-2-tactus

Tactus, the tactile sense for Fusion Embedding 2 (2B-Preview), Eximius Labs

[![Python](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.10+-blue.svg)](https://github.com/Eximius-Labs/fusion-embedding) [![PyTorch](https://img.shields.io/badge/PyTorch-2.x-ee4c2c.svg)](https://github.com/Eximius-Labs/fusion-embedding) [![Weights](https://img.shields.io/badge/weights-CC--BY--NC--4.0-green.svg)](#license) [![Status](https://img.shields.io/badge/status-research%20preview%20v0.1-orange.svg)](#) [![Code](https://img.shields.io/badge/code-GitHub-black.svg)](https://github.com/Eximius-Labs/fusion-embedding)
**Tactus** is the tactile sensor pack for Eximius Labs' fusion-embedding stack. It maps a short window of pressure-array frames (a 32x32 taxel grid, the signal class produced by resistive/FSR gloves, e-skins, and instrumented robot hands) into the [Qwen3-VL-Embedding-2B](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-2B) text embedding space, so touch becomes searchable in plain language: recognition is a text query, not a trained classifier head. Tactus reads **low-dimensional pressure arrays**, not optical tactile images. Optical sensors (GelSight, DIGIT) already have strong models (TVL, UniTouch, Sparsh); the cheap, widely-shipped resistive arrays did not. To our knowledge Tactus is the first open model to put this sensor class in a text-aligned, cross-modal embedding space. Tactus is part of the **fusion-embedding family** alongside [Tactus Mat](https://huggingface.co/EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-tactus-mat) (the same pack trained for a 64x32 body pressure mat), [Tremor](https://huggingface.co/EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-tremor) (motion) and [Ember](https://huggingface.co/EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-ember) (thermal). Its embeddings target the canonical readout of [fusion-embedding-2](https://huggingface.co/EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-2b-preview), so tactile windows are directly comparable to that model's text, image, video, and audio in one 2048-d space, and drop into the [Engram](https://github.com/Eximius-Labs/engram) memory layer (`pip install engram-robomem`) as a first-class sense. [GitHub](https://github.com/Eximius-Labs/fusion-embedding) | [fusion-embedding-2](https://huggingface.co/EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-2b-preview) | [Live playground](https://www.eximiuslabs.com/playground) | [Family report (arXiv:2607.18666)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18666) | Tactus report: arXiv link lands with this week's submission ## Model Overview

Tactus architecture: calibrated pressure windows pass through an MAE-pretrained per-frame trunk, a learned frame fusion, and a trained projector into the fusion-embedding shared space, where touch becomes searchable in natural language alongside every other modality

Tactus is a **trained CNN trunk plus projector** over pressure windows. Each 32x32 frame passes through a ResNet-18-width trunk (3x3 stem, four stages; 32x32 -> 4x4 spatial map); the K frames of a grasp window are fused by a learned 1x1 convolution over their concatenated feature maps, pooled, and projected into the frozen base's 2048-d text space. The trunk is initialized by masked-autoencoder pretraining (mask 0.6, per-patch normalized targets) on 144k unlabeled STAG-family pressure frames, then fine-tuned contrastively against canonical text embeddings of natural grasp phrases. The design choice that matters is the data path: pressure is normalized with the sensor's own calibration affine (`clip((raw - 500) / 150, 0, 1)`, the STAG reference preprocessing), and pretraining stays same-sensor. In our ablations, correct normalization and same-sensor MAE were worth more than every architecture change combined, while cross-sensor pretraining pooling gave nothing, consistent with published findings (HTT, TacVerse). | Feature | Value | | --- | --- | | Parameters | ~2.06B frozen Qwen base (text side); **16.2M trained** (13.5M trunk + 2.6M projector) | | Modality | tactile pressure (32x32 taxel array; 548 active sensors in the training glove) | | Supported tasks | `zero-shot object recognition from touch`, `text -> touch retrieval` | | Input | one grasp window `[F, 32, 32]` (F frames, any F; trained at K=8) or a single frame | | Input scale | STAG calibration affine `clip((raw - 500) / 150, 0, 1)`; uint8 0-255 maps accepted | | Embedding dimension | 2048 (canonical whitened readout; directly comparable across modalities) | | Pooling strategy | last-token pooling (text side) | | Base model | Qwen/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-2B via fusion-embedding-2-2b-preview (frozen) | | Pretraining | same-sensor MAE, 144k frames incl. unlabeled; supervised test frames excluded | | Trained components | trunk + conv frame-fusion + projector, 16.2M; shipped as `model.safetensors` | | Distribution | ~65 MB trained head; the frozen base downloads from its own repository | ## See it in action **Real held-out grasps, recognized from pressure alone.** Each panel is a genuine STAG test frame (the most active frame of that class in the held-out split, by total pressure) with the text query the model matches it against: no camera, no trained classifier head. Across the full test split the model averages 0.77 top-1 and 0.94 top-3 over 27 such queries.

Four real held-out STAG test pressure maps with their text queries: a mug, scissors, a full can, safety glasses, each recognized from the 32x32 pressure pattern alone

## Training and Evaluation Tactus trains in two stages on the [STAG](https://stag.csail.mit.edu/) datasets ([Sundaram et al., Nature 2019](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1234-z)): a masked-autoencoder pretrain over every STAG-family pressure frame (classification + blindfolded + weights + handposes, 144k frames including unlabeled ones, supervised test frames excluded), then contrastive fine-tuning of the whole head against canonical text embeddings of grasp phrases, with STAG-style cluster sampling (each training window draws diverse frames from across a recording rather than consecutive near-duplicates). Evaluation is 27-way object recognition on **fully held-out test recordings**, scored as cosine ranking against text queries (open-vocabulary; the model never trains a classifier head). | | top-1 (27-way) | top-3 | recording-level top-1 | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | **This checkpoint** | **0.817** | **0.951** | 0.741 | | Recipe mean (4 independent runs) | 0.771 +/- 0.062 | 0.935 | 0.722 | | Training from scratch (no MAE), mean of 3 | 0.705 | 0.905 | 0.691 | | STAG 2019 supervised closed-set CNN | 0.76 | - | - | | chance | 0.037 | 0.111 | 0.037 | Interpreting these numbers: the recipe's mean exceeds the original paper's supervised CNN while performing a harder task (open-vocabulary text queries against a frozen language space, versus a 27-way trained classifier), though by less than one standard error; we describe the result as **matching to exceeding the original baseline, with best runs at 0.83**, rather than claiming a definitive margin. Top-3 accuracy is stable across every run. Our evaluation mirrors STAG's cluster-sampling test protocol but is not their byte-identical harness. Same-sensor MAE pretraining accounts for about +7 points over training from scratch. Full recipe, ablations, and negative results: `results.json` and the GitHub repository. ## Usage
Requirements - `torch` (CUDA recommended), `numpy`, `safetensors` - `pip install fusion-embedding[hf]` for the text side (the canonical whitened readout Tactus was trained against; embedding text any other way will misrank) - The frozen base downloads from `EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-2b-preview`.
via inference.py (this repository) ```python import numpy as np from inference import TactusEmbedder ta = TactusEmbedder.from_pretrained("EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-tactus", revision="v0.1-preview") # a grasp window: [F, 32, 32] pressure frames (uint8 0-255 or floats in [0, 1]); # for raw sensor counts pass raw="stag" to apply the calibration affine window = np.load("grasp.npy") for text, score in ta.rank(window, ["a mug", "scissors", "a full soda can", "an empty hand"]): print(f"{score:+.3f} {text}") # or embed both sides into the shared space directly p = ta.embed_pressure(window) # 2048-d, L2-normalized t = ta.embed_text(["holding a mug"]) # canonical text embedding, same space ``` Pressure embeddings land in the same space as fusion-embedding-2's text, image, video, and audio, and as Tremor's motion, so cross-modal search over a robot session works out of the box through [Engram](https://github.com/Eximius-Labs/engram). Match text against pressure through this API rather than embedding text with the raw base model; Tactus was trained against the canonical whitened readout, and other text paths will misrank.
## Related models Tactus joins the fusion-embedding sense packs, all built on [fusion-embedding-2](https://huggingface.co/EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-2b-preview): | Model | Sense | Signal | | --- | --- | --- | | **This model** | touch | 32x32 pressure/taxel arrays | | [fusion-embedding-2-tremor](https://huggingface.co/EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-tremor) | motion | 3-axis accelerometer windows | | [fusion-embedding-2-tremor-g1](https://huggingface.co/EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-tremor-g1) | motion (Unitree G1 head) | robot IMU | | [fusion-embedding-2-ember](https://huggingface.co/EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-ember) | heat | thermal infrared images | All packs embed into one 2048-d space, so a query can match across senses. The [Engram](https://github.com/Eximius-Labs/engram) memory layer (`pip install engram-robomem`) wires them into a searchable robot session memory with temporal reasoning. ## License The trained weights in this repository are released under **[CC-BY-NC-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)** (non-commercial). This reflects the training data's lineage: Tactus is trained on the [STAG](https://stag.csail.mit.edu/) datasets, which are released for non-commercial research use. A commercially-clean retrain (on permissively licensed pressure corpora) is future work; a commercial license may follow. ## Limitations - **Run-to-run variance.** The training recipe's top-1 varies +/-0.06 across seeds (0.70-0.83 over four runs). The released checkpoint is a strong draw, and the mean is reported alongside it. Seed stabilization is active work. - **One sensor family.** Trained on one glove (STAG's 32x32 grid, 548 taxels). Our cross-sensor experiments show transfer to other taxel geometries needs fine-tuning, not zero-shot use; the input path accepts any [F,32,32] window, and other resolutions must be resampled. - **27-object vocabulary at eval.** Open-vocabulary means text queries, not tested open-set generalization to arbitrary unseen object categories; treat novel-category recognition as unvalidated. - **Research preview.** Not a production classifier. The intended use is language-addressable touch inside a multimodal memory, not high-stakes recognition. - **English text only**, through the canonical readout (`fusion-embedding` package); do not embed text with the raw base model. ## Citation If you use Tactus, please cite this repository and the dataset it builds on: ```bibtex @misc{tactus2026, title = {Tactus: a tactile pressure sensor pack for the fusion-embedding space}, author = {Tonmoy, Abdul Basit}, year = {2026}, note = {Eximius Labs. Model weights CC-BY-NC-4.0.}, url = {https://huggingface.co/EximiusLabs/fusion-embedding-2-tactus} } ``` Tactus trains on **STAG** (Sundaram et al., *Learning the signatures of the human grasp using a scalable tactile glove*, Nature 2019); please cite that work when using the benchmark numbers. The text space is **Qwen3-VL-Embedding-2B**.