[User] Verify: 'The company reported a profit of 12 million dollars last year.' The audited statement for the year shows a net loss of 4 million dollars.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim asserts a profit of 12 million. The audited statement, the authoritative record for the year, shows a net loss of 4 million. The claimed figure and the record disagree in both sign and magnitude. <|final|>I consider this false. The audited statement records a net loss of 4 million dollars, which contradicts the claimed profit of 12 million. The audited record is authoritative for the year's result.


[User] Verify: 'The vote was 8 to 1 in favor.' The recorded roll call shows 5 in favor and 4 opposed.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim states the vote was 8 to 1. The roll call is the primary record and shows 5 in favor and 4 opposed. The recorded tally does not match the claimed tally. <|final|>I consider this false. The roll call records 5 in favor and 4 opposed, not 8 to 1. The official tally contradicts the claim directly.


[User] Verify: 'The dam was completed in 2001.' The construction record dates completion to 2004.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim dates completion to 2001. The construction record, the project's official completion record, dates it to 2004. The years do not agree. <|final|>I consider this false. The construction record dates completion to 2004, contradicting the claimed 2001. The official record is the authority on the completion date.


[User] Verify: 'The officer was on duty at the time of the incident.' The shift log shows the officer was on approved leave that day.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim asserts the officer was working. The shift log, the administrative record of assignments, shows approved leave for that day. A person on leave is not on duty. <|final|>I consider this false. The shift log records approved leave for the day, so the officer was not on duty at the time. The administrative record contradicts the claim.


[User] Verify: 'The study enrolled 500 patients.' The enrollment record shows 310 patients were enrolled.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim states enrollment of 500. The enrollment record is the trial's accounting of participants. It shows 310 enrolled. The claimed count does not match the record. <|final|>I consider this false. The enrollment record shows 310 patients, not 500. The trial's own accounting contradicts the claim.


[User] Verify: 'The mayor attended the summit in person.' The travel record shows the mayor was in another city on the summit dates.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim asserts attendance in person. The travel record places the mayor in another city during the summit dates. The two facts cannot both hold. <|final|>I consider this false. The travel record places the mayor in another city on the summit dates, so attendance in person is contradicted by the record.


[User] Verify: 'The bridge was built of steel.' The engineering plan specifies a concrete structure for the bridge.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim states the material is steel. The engineering plan, the design authority for the structure, specifies concrete. The material in the plan contradicts the claim. <|final|>I consider this false. The engineering plan specifies concrete, not steel. The design record contradicts the claim about the bridge's construction material.


[User] Verify: 'The suspect fled in a red van.' The traffic camera and the witness both describe a blue sedan leaving the scene.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim says a red van. The traffic camera and an independent witness both describe a blue sedan. Two independent observations agree with each other and disagree with the claim. <|final|>I consider this false. Two independent observations describe a blue sedan, not a red van. The available evidence contradicts the claim.


[User] Verify: 'The application fee was waived.' The payment record shows the fee was charged to the applicant's account.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim says the fee was waived. The payment record shows a charge for the fee. A waived fee would not appear as a charge. <|final|>I consider this false. The payment record shows the fee was charged, so it was not waived. The financial record contradicts the claim.


[User] Verify: 'The product was recalled in 2018.' The agency's recall register lists the product's recall as 2021.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim dates the recall to 2018. The agency recall register, the official listing of recalls, records 2021. The years differ. <|final|>I consider this false. The agency recall register lists the recall as 2021, not 2018. The official register contradicts the claim.


[User] Verify: 'The bill was vetoed by the governor.' The official record shows the governor signed the bill into law.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim says the bill was vetoed. The official record of legislative action shows the governor signed it into law. A bill that is signed cannot have been vetoed. <|final|>I consider this false. The official record shows the bill was signed into law, which contradicts the claim that it was vetoed.


[User] Verify: 'The hospital has 600 beds.' The facility license lists the hospital's licensed capacity as 400 beds.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim states capacity of 600 beds. The facility license, the regulatory record of capacity, lists 400 beds. The numbers disagree. <|final|>I consider this false. The facility license lists 400 beds, not 600. The regulatory record contradicts the claim.


[User] Verify: 'The witness testified on 12 April.' The court transcript shows the witness testified on 19 April.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim gives a testimony date of 12 April. The court transcript, the official record of proceedings, shows 19 April. The dates do not match. <|final|>I consider this false. The court transcript records the testimony on 19 April, not 12 April. The official transcript contradicts the claim.


[User] Verify: 'The property tax rate was lowered last year.' The ordinance record shows the rate was raised by half a percent.

[Assistant] <|scratchpad|>The claim says the rate was lowered. The ordinance record shows a half-percent increase. The recorded action is the opposite of the claim. <|final|>I consider this false. The ordinance record shows the rate was raised, not lowered. The official record contradicts the claim.