Instruction: Add a small fountain in front of the bench

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: No fountain is visible in the target region; the area remains unchanged with only vegetation and bench. The edit appears to be a non-edit or failed insertion, violating the core instruction.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Coherence: 1

Instruction: Add a small fountain in front of the bench

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a small fountain in front of the bench

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.

Instruction: Replace the red flowers with blue blueberries

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not replaced, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Only part of the target replaced, or wrong class/description used.
3  Target largely replaced but other objects altered, remnants visible, or count/position clearly wrong.
4  Correct object fully replaced; only minor attribute errors (colour, size, etc.).
5  Perfect replacement: all and only the specified objects removed; new objects' class, number, position, scale, pose and detail exactly match the prompt.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The red flowers in the target region were not replaced with blue blueberries; they remain unchanged (still red/orange tulips). No blueberries added. Editing instruction completely ignored.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Replace the red flowers with blue blueberries

Visual Naturalness
1  Image heavily broken or new object deformed / extremely blurred.
2  Obvious seams, smears, or strong mismatch in resolution or colour; background not restored.
3  Basic style similar, but lighting or palette clashes; fuzzy edges or noise are noticeable.
4  Style almost uniform; tiny edge artefacts visible only on close inspection; casual viewers see no edit.
5  Completely seamless; new objects blend fully with the scene, edit area undetectable.

Instruction: Replace the red flowers with blue blueberries

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Floating, interpenetration, severe perspective/light errors; key original elements ruined; background heavily warped.
2  Missing shadows/occlusion; large background shifts or holes.
3  Lighting, perspective and contact surfaces mostly correct; small but tolerable errors; background adjusted locally.
4  New objects interact realistically with scene (shadows, reflections, texture) and preserve existing details; background change minimal.
5  Physically flawless and enhances realism: accurate highlights, shadows, reflections, ambient effects; background untouched.


Instruction: Remove the person on the left

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing removed, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Target only partly removed, or a different instance/class deleted, or another object appears in the gap.
3  Target mostly removed but extra objects also deleted, or fragments of the target remain.
4  Only the specified objects removed, but a few tiny/background items deleted by mistake, or the count is wrong.
5  Perfect: all and only the requested objects removed; every other element untouched.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The person on the left is still clearly present in the after image; no removal occurred. The edit appears to be a stylized filter, not an object removal. Prompt compliance fails completely.

Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Remove the person on the left

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken (large holes, strong artefacts).
2  Clear erase marks; colour/resolution mismatch; background not restored.
3  General look acceptable yet lighting/colour/style still clash; blur or noise visible.
4  Style consistent; minor edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Seamless: removal is virtually impossible to spot.

Instruction: Remove the person on the left

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Severe physical errors (floating items, wrong perspective/light); key scene elements damaged; background heavily warped.
2  Large un-filled gaps or obvious background shifts.
3  Lighting, perspective and contacts mostly correct; flaws small and tolerable; background adjusted locally.
4  Background reconstruction clean; existing details preserved; only minute changes outside the removal area.
5  Physically flawless and even enhances realism: accurate light/shadow/texture infill, high-quality micro-details.

Instruction: Replace the red vest of the person on the right with a black leather jacket

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not replaced, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Only part of the target replaced, or wrong class/description used.
3  Target largely replaced but other objects altered, remnants visible, or count/position clearly wrong.
4  Correct object fully replaced; only minor attribute errors (colour, size, etc.).
5  Perfect replacement: all and only the specified objects removed; new objects' class, number, position, scale, pose and detail exactly match the prompt.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The red vest on the right person remains unchanged; no black leather jacket was added. Editing failed to replace the target object as instructed.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Replace the red vest of the person on the right with a black leather jacket

Visual Naturalness
1  Image heavily broken or new object deformed / extremely blurred.
2  Obvious seams, smears, or strong mismatch in resolution or colour; background not restored.
3  Basic style similar, but lighting or palette clashes; fuzzy edges or noise are noticeable.
4  Style almost uniform; tiny edge artefacts visible only on close inspection; casual viewers see no edit.
5  Completely seamless; new objects blend fully with the scene, edit area undetectable.

Instruction: Replace the red vest of the person on the right with a black leather jacket

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Floating, interpenetration, severe perspective/light errors; key original elements ruined; background heavily warped.
2  Missing shadows/occlusion; large background shifts or holes.
3  Lighting, perspective and contact surfaces mostly correct; small but tolerable errors; background adjusted locally.
4  New objects interact realistically with scene (shadows, reflections, texture) and preserve existing details; background change minimal.
5  Physically flawless and enhances realism: accurate highlights, shadows, reflections, ambient effects; background untouched.


Instruction: Add a dog walking beside the hiker

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: A dog is added walking beside the hiker, matching size and position. However, the dog’s fur texture and lighting are slightly inconsistent with the scene; subtle edge halo visible. Background unchanged.
Prompt Compliance: 5
Visual Naturalness: 4
Physical & Detail Coherence: 4

Instruction: Add a dog walking beside the hiker

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a dog walking beside the hiker

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.

Instruction: Remove the muddy path

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing removed, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Target only partly removed, or a different instance/class deleted, or another object appears in the gap.
3  Target mostly removed but extra objects also deleted, or fragments of the target remain.
4  Only the specified objects removed, but a few tiny/background items deleted by mistake, or the count is wrong.
5  Perfect: all and only the requested objects removed; every other element untouched.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The muddy path remains fully visible in the after image; no removal occurred. A dog was added instead, violating prompt compliance.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Remove the muddy path

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken (large holes, strong artefacts).
2  Clear erase marks; colour/resolution mismatch; background not restored.
3  General look acceptable yet lighting/colour/style still clash; blur or noise visible.
4  Style consistent; minor edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Seamless: removal is virtually impossible to spot.

Instruction: Remove the muddy path

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Severe physical errors (floating items, wrong perspective/light); key scene elements damaged; background heavily warped.
2  Large un-filled gaps or obvious background shifts.
3  Lighting, perspective and contacts mostly correct; flaws small and tolerable; background adjusted locally.
4  Background reconstruction clean; existing details preserved; only minute changes outside the removal area.
5  Physically flawless and even enhances realism: accurate light/shadow/texture infill, high-quality micro-details.

Instruction: Replace the mountain to buildings

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not replaced, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Only part of the target replaced, or wrong class/description used.
3  Target largely replaced but other objects altered, remnants visible, or count/position clearly wrong.
4  Correct object fully replaced; only minor attribute errors (colour, size, etc.).
5  Perfect replacement: all and only the specified objects removed; new objects' class, number, position, scale, pose and detail exactly match the prompt.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The mountain was not replaced with buildings; instead, a dog was added to the path while the mountain remains unchanged. Target region unedited—prompt fully ignored.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Replace the mountain to buildings

Visual Naturalness
1  Image heavily broken or new object deformed / extremely blurred.
2  Obvious seams, smears, or strong mismatch in resolution or colour; background not restored.
3  Basic style similar, but lighting or palette clashes; fuzzy edges or noise are noticeable.
4  Style almost uniform; tiny edge artefacts visible only on close inspection; casual viewers see no edit.
5  Completely seamless; new objects blend fully with the scene, edit area undetectable.

Instruction: Replace the mountain to buildings

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Floating, interpenetration, severe perspective/light errors; key original elements ruined; background heavily warped.
2  Missing shadows/occlusion; large background shifts or holes.
3  Lighting, perspective and contact surfaces mostly correct; small but tolerable errors; background adjusted locally.
4  New objects interact realistically with scene (shadows, reflections, texture) and preserve existing details; background change minimal.
5  Physically flawless and enhances realism: accurate highlights, shadows, reflections, ambient effects; background untouched.


Instruction: Add a small photo of a cat in the top-left corner of the collage

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: No cat photo appears in the top-left corner; instead, the area shows distorted, smeared artifacts and warped collage elements—indicating failed addition or heavy corruption. Prompt not fulfilled.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Coherence: 1

Instruction: Add a small photo of a cat in the top-left corner of the collage

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a small photo of a cat in the top-left corner of the collage

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.

Instruction: Remove the bingo card from the center of the collage

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing removed, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Target only partly removed, or a different instance/class deleted, or another object appears in the gap.
3  Target mostly removed but extra objects also deleted, or fragments of the target remain.
4  Only the specified objects removed, but a few tiny/background items deleted by mistake, or the count is wrong.
5  Perfect: all and only the requested objects removed; every other element untouched.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The bingo card is not removed; instead, the entire image is heavily distorted with artifacts, smudging, and warping. Other elements are altered or added, violating prompt compliance and naturalness.

Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Remove the bingo card from the center of the collage

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken (large holes, strong artefacts).
2  Clear erase marks; colour/resolution mismatch; background not restored.
3  General look acceptable yet lighting/colour/style still clash; blur or noise visible.
4  Style consistent; minor edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Seamless: removal is virtually impossible to spot.

Instruction: Remove the bingo card from the center of the collage

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Severe physical errors (floating items, wrong perspective/light); key scene elements damaged; background heavily warped.
2  Large un-filled gaps or obvious background shifts.
3  Lighting, perspective and contacts mostly correct; flaws small and tolerable; background adjusted locally.
4  Background reconstruction clean; existing details preserved; only minute changes outside the removal area.
5  Physically flawless and even enhances realism: accurate light/shadow/texture infill, high-quality micro-details.


Instruction: Add a cherry on top of the chocolate balls

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The edit adds red cherries among dark chocolate balls, but the instruction specified *a* cherry (singular), not multiple; also, the added cherries appear digitally inserted with mismatched lighting and unnatural gloss, and cake layers are altered unnaturally (purple hue, texture distortion).
Prompt Compliance: 2
Visual Naturalness: 2
Physical & Detail Coherence: 1

Instruction: Add a cherry on top of the chocolate balls

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a cherry on top of the chocolate balls

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.

Instruction: Alter the ingredient of the cake layers from chocolate to fruit

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not adjusted, wrong object touched, or geometry changed.
2  Right object but wrong attribute value/direction; only part edited; other objects also altered; slight stretch/crop.
3  Mainly correct object and attribute, yet large hue/brightness/texture error; minor collateral edits; visible jaggies/distortion.
4  All requested objects adjusted, only their attributes changed; shape kept; small inaccuracy in colour, material or amount.
5  Exactly and only the requested objects adjusted; colour, material, gloss etc. match the prompt perfectly; shape 100% intact; zero unintended edits.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The cake layers remain dark brown/chocolate-colored instead of changing to fruit (e.g., lighter, colorful fruit-based sponge). Some purple/red specks suggest attempted fruit addition, but core layers are unaltered; texture and color mismatch the prompt. Edges show artifacts and inconsistent lighting.

Prompt Compliance: 2
Visual Seamlessness: 3
Physical & Detail Fidelity: 2

Instruction: Alter the ingredient of the cake layers from chocolate to fruit

Visual Seamlessness
1  Massive colour spill, mosaics or heavy noise; image nearly unusable.
2  Clear smears/bleeding on edges; abrupt resolution or tone shift; highlights/shadows clipped; background gaps.
3  Overall palette OK but local tone or grain conflicts; soft edges; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style unified, transitions smooth; only slight edge artefacts visible when zoomed.
5  No detectable edit traces; colours/materials fuse with scene lighting; edit area practically invisible.

Instruction: Alter the ingredient of the cake layers from chocolate to fruit

Physical & Detail Fidelity
1  Object floating, interpenetrating, or severe perspective/light mismatch; background badly warped.
2  Missing shadows/highlights; wrong reflection direction; background visibly discoloured or distorted.
3  Light, perspective and contact surface largely correct; minor acceptable flaws; background only locally affected.
4  Adjusted material interacts believably with scene; shadows, highlights, reflections handled well; original details preserved.
5  High physical realism: fine micro-highlights, diffuse bounce, subsurface effects present; overall scene realism improved.


Instruction: Remove the people in the white lab coat on the left

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing removed, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Target only partly removed, or a different instance/class deleted, or another object appears in the gap.
3  Target mostly removed but extra objects also deleted, or fragments of the target remain.
4  Only the specified objects removed, but a few tiny/background items deleted by mistake, or the count is wrong.
5  Perfect: all and only the requested objects removed; every other element untouched.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The person in the white lab coat on the left (target region) remains fully visible; no removal occurred. Other elements unchanged, but prompt not followed.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Remove the people in the white lab coat on the left

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken (large holes, strong artefacts).
2  Clear erase marks; colour/resolution mismatch; background not restored.
3  General look acceptable yet lighting/colour/style still clash; blur or noise visible.
4  Style consistent; minor edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Seamless: removal is virtually impossible to spot.

Instruction: Remove the people in the white lab coat on the left

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Severe physical errors (floating items, wrong perspective/light); key scene elements damaged; background heavily warped.
2  Large un-filled gaps or obvious background shifts.
3  Lighting, perspective and contacts mostly correct; flaws small and tolerable; background adjusted locally.
4  Background reconstruction clean; existing details preserved; only minute changes outside the removal area.
5  Physically flawless and even enhances realism: accurate light/shadow/texture infill, high-quality micro-details.

Instruction: Replace the green wall with a yellow wall

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not replaced, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Only part of the target replaced, or wrong class/description used.
3  Target largely replaced but other objects altered, remnants visible, or count/position clearly wrong.
4  Correct object fully replaced; only minor attribute errors (colour, size, etc.).
5  Perfect replacement: all and only the specified objects removed; new objects' class, number, position, scale, pose and detail exactly match the prompt.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The green wall remains unchanged; no yellow wall is present. Editing failed entirely—target region unaltered, violating prompt compliance.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Replace the green wall with a yellow wall

Visual Naturalness
1  Image heavily broken or new object deformed / extremely blurred.
2  Obvious seams, smears, or strong mismatch in resolution or colour; background not restored.
3  Basic style similar, but lighting or palette clashes; fuzzy edges or noise are noticeable.
4  Style almost uniform; tiny edge artefacts visible only on close inspection; casual viewers see no edit.
5  Completely seamless; new objects blend fully with the scene, edit area undetectable.

Instruction: Replace the green wall with a yellow wall

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Floating, interpenetration, severe perspective/light errors; key original elements ruined; background heavily warped.
2  Missing shadows/occlusion; large background shifts or holes.
3  Lighting, perspective and contact surfaces mostly correct; small but tolerable errors; background adjusted locally.
4  New objects interact realistically with scene (shadows, reflections, texture) and preserve existing details; background change minimal.
5  Physically flawless and enhances realism: accurate highlights, shadows, reflections, ambient effects; background untouched.


Instruction: Alter the color of the blue house to yellow

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not adjusted, wrong object touched, or geometry changed.
2  Right object but wrong attribute value/direction; only part edited; other objects also altered; slight stretch/crop.
3  Mainly correct object and attribute, yet large hue/brightness/texture error; minor collateral edits; visible jaggies/distortion.
4  All requested objects adjusted, only their attributes changed; shape kept; small inaccuracy in colour, material or amount.
5  Exactly and only the requested objects adjusted; colour, material, gloss etc. match the prompt perfectly; shape 100% intact; zero unintended edits.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The blue house remains largely blue; only parts (e.g., left side) show yellow, but main facade unchanged. Incorrect attribute application—prompt asked for full house to yellow, yet primary structure still blue. Collateral edits include oversaturated sky and distorted colors elsewhere.

Prompt Compliance: 2
Visual Seamlessness: 2
Physical & Detail Fidelity: 2

Instruction: Alter the color of the blue house to yellow

Visual Seamlessness
1  Massive colour spill, mosaics or heavy noise; image nearly unusable.
2  Clear smears/bleeding on edges; abrupt resolution or tone shift; highlights/shadows clipped; background gaps.
3  Overall palette OK but local tone or grain conflicts; soft edges; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style unified, transitions smooth; only slight edge artefacts visible when zoomed.
5  No detectable edit traces; colours/materials fuse with scene lighting; edit area practically invisible.

Instruction: Alter the color of the blue house to yellow

Physical & Detail Fidelity
1  Object floating, interpenetrating, or severe perspective/light mismatch; background badly warped.
2  Missing shadows/highlights; wrong reflection direction; background visibly discoloured or distorted.
3  Light, perspective and contact surface largely correct; minor acceptable flaws; background only locally affected.
4  Adjusted material interacts believably with scene; shadows, highlights, reflections handled well; original details preserved.
5  High physical realism: fine micro-highlights, diffuse bounce, subsurface effects present; overall scene realism improved.

Instruction: Remove the palm tree in front of the house on the left

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing removed, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Target only partly removed, or a different instance/class deleted, or another object appears in the gap.
3  Target mostly removed but extra objects also deleted, or fragments of the target remain.
4  Only the specified objects removed, but a few tiny/background items deleted by mistake, or the count is wrong.
5  Perfect: all and only the requested objects removed; every other element untouched.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The palm tree in front of the left house (target region) remains fully present; no removal occurred. Other palm trees are untouched, and the edit appears unaltered or possibly misapplied elsewhere with color distortion.

Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Remove the palm tree in front of the house on the left

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken (large holes, strong artefacts).
2  Clear erase marks; colour/resolution mismatch; background not restored.
3  General look acceptable yet lighting/colour/style still clash; blur or noise visible.
4  Style consistent; minor edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Seamless: removal is virtually impossible to spot.

Instruction: Remove the palm tree in front of the house on the left

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Severe physical errors (floating items, wrong perspective/light); key scene elements damaged; background heavily warped.
2  Large un-filled gaps or obvious background shifts.
3  Lighting, perspective and contacts mostly correct; flaws small and tolerable; background adjusted locally.
4  Background reconstruction clean; existing details preserved; only minute changes outside the removal area.
5  Physically flawless and even enhances realism: accurate light/shadow/texture infill, high-quality micro-details.

Instruction: Replace the white house on the right with a grocery store

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not replaced, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Only part of the target replaced, or wrong class/description used.
3  Target largely replaced but other objects altered, remnants visible, or count/position clearly wrong.
4  Correct object fully replaced; only minor attribute errors (colour, size, etc.).
5  Perfect replacement: all and only the specified objects removed; new objects' class, number, position, scale, pose and detail exactly match the prompt.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The white house on the right was not replaced; instead, the entire scene appears over-processed with unnatural colors and artifacts. No grocery store is present in the target region.

Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Replace the white house on the right with a grocery store

Visual Naturalness
1  Image heavily broken or new object deformed / extremely blurred.
2  Obvious seams, smears, or strong mismatch in resolution or colour; background not restored.
3  Basic style similar, but lighting or palette clashes; fuzzy edges or noise are noticeable.
4  Style almost uniform; tiny edge artefacts visible only on close inspection; casual viewers see no edit.
5  Completely seamless; new objects blend fully with the scene, edit area undetectable.

Instruction: Replace the white house on the right with a grocery store

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Floating, interpenetration, severe perspective/light errors; key original elements ruined; background heavily warped.
2  Missing shadows/occlusion; large background shifts or holes.
3  Lighting, perspective and contact surfaces mostly correct; small but tolerable errors; background adjusted locally.
4  New objects interact realistically with scene (shadows, reflections, texture) and preserve existing details; background change minimal.
5  Physically flawless and enhances realism: accurate highlights, shadows, reflections, ambient effects; background untouched.


Instruction: Add a small yellow star sticker to the side of the shoe with a blue design, which belongs to the person whose shoe with a pink design is next to the brown puppy standing on top of the lying puppy.

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Wrong object (paw print vs star) added to puppy instead of shoe; obvious paste and physical errors.
Prompt Compliance: 2
Visual Naturalness: 2
Physical & Detail Coherence: 2

Instruction: Add a small yellow star sticker to the side of the shoe with a blue design, which belongs to the person whose shoe with a pink design is next to the brown puppy standing on top of the lying puppy.

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a small yellow star sticker to the side of the shoe with a blue design, which belongs to the person whose shoe with a pink design is next to the brown puppy standing on top of the lying puppy.

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.


Instruction: Change the color of the tail of the airplane with the red tail in the foreground, positioned to the right of the center airplane with the red tail, and situated on the runway, to green.

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not adjusted, wrong object touched, or geometry changed.
2  Right object but wrong attribute value/direction; only part edited; other objects also altered; slight stretch/crop.
3  Mainly correct object and attribute, yet large hue/brightness/texture error; minor collateral edits; visible jaggies/distortion.
4  All requested objects adjusted, only their attributes changed; shape kept; small inaccuracy in colour, material or amount.
5  Exactly and only the requested objects adjusted; colour, material, gloss etc. match the prompt perfectly; shape 100% intact; zero unintended edits.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Target tail not changed to green; no attribute adjustment occurred.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Seamlessness: 1
Physical & Detail Fidelity: 1

Instruction: Change the color of the tail of the airplane with the red tail in the foreground, positioned to the right of the center airplane with the red tail, and situated on the runway, to green.

Visual Seamlessness
1  Massive colour spill, mosaics or heavy noise; image nearly unusable.
2  Clear smears/bleeding on edges; abrupt resolution or tone shift; highlights/shadows clipped; background gaps.
3  Overall palette OK but local tone or grain conflicts; soft edges; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style unified, transitions smooth; only slight edge artefacts visible when zoomed.
5  No detectable edit traces; colours/materials fuse with scene lighting; edit area practically invisible.

Instruction: Change the color of the tail of the airplane with the red tail in the foreground, positioned to the right of the center airplane with the red tail, and situated on the runway, to green.

Physical & Detail Fidelity
1  Object floating, interpenetrating, or severe perspective/light mismatch; background badly warped.
2  Missing shadows/highlights; wrong reflection direction; background visibly discoloured or distorted.
3  Light, perspective and contact surface largely correct; minor acceptable flaws; background only locally affected.
4  Adjusted material interacts believably with scene; shadows, highlights, reflections handled well; original details preserved.
5  High physical realism: fine micro-highlights, diffuse bounce, subsurface effects present; overall scene realism improved.


Instruction: Add a small wooden plaque with the text "Nature's Perch" to the front edge of the bench, which made of wood, positioned in a grassy outdoor setting with other people seated on it, including two people in a blue shirt and jeans and another in a plaid shirt.

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Prompt asked for a wooden plaque, but no plaque added; only bird altered.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Coherence: 1

Instruction: Add a small wooden plaque with the text "Nature's Perch" to the front edge of the bench, which made of wood, positioned in a grassy outdoor setting with other people seated on it, including two people in a blue shirt and jeans and another in a plaid shirt.

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a small wooden plaque with the text "Nature's Perch" to the front edge of the bench, which made of wood, positioned in a grassy outdoor setting with other people seated on it, including two people in a blue shirt and jeans and another in a plaid shirt.

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.


Instruction: Alter the color of the red and blue double-decker bus with "Metroline" text, parked next to a red single-decker bus marked "Arriva" and route number 38, to a uniform dark green, while keeping the "Metroline" text and route number visible.

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not adjusted, wrong object touched, or geometry changed.
2  Right object but wrong attribute value/direction; only part edited; other objects also altered; slight stretch/crop.
3  Mainly correct object and attribute, yet large hue/brightness/texture error; minor collateral edits; visible jaggies/distortion.
4  All requested objects adjusted, only their attributes changed; shape kept; small inaccuracy in colour, material or amount.
5  Exactly and only the requested objects adjusted; colour, material, gloss etc. match the prompt perfectly; shape 100% intact; zero unintended edits.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Target bus color unchanged; wrong object edits and background alterations present.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Seamlessness: 1
Physical & Detail Fidelity: 1

Instruction: Alter the color of the red and blue double-decker bus with "Metroline" text, parked next to a red single-decker bus marked "Arriva" and route number 38, to a uniform dark green, while keeping the "Metroline" text and route number visible.

Visual Seamlessness
1  Massive colour spill, mosaics or heavy noise; image nearly unusable.
2  Clear smears/bleeding on edges; abrupt resolution or tone shift; highlights/shadows clipped; background gaps.
3  Overall palette OK but local tone or grain conflicts; soft edges; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style unified, transitions smooth; only slight edge artefacts visible when zoomed.
5  No detectable edit traces; colours/materials fuse with scene lighting; edit area practically invisible.

Instruction: Alter the color of the red and blue double-decker bus with "Metroline" text, parked next to a red single-decker bus marked "Arriva" and route number 38, to a uniform dark green, while keeping the "Metroline" text and route number visible.

Physical & Detail Fidelity
1  Object floating, interpenetrating, or severe perspective/light mismatch; background badly warped.
2  Missing shadows/highlights; wrong reflection direction; background visibly discoloured or distorted.
3  Light, perspective and contact surface largely correct; minor acceptable flaws; background only locally affected.
4  Adjusted material interacts believably with scene; shadows, highlights, reflections handled well; original details preserved.
5  High physical realism: fine micro-highlights, diffuse bounce, subsurface effects present; overall scene realism improved.


Instruction: Remove the far left wine bottle labeled "STREWA CHARDONNAY" with pale yellow wine inside, positioned next to a wine glass and in a row with other wine bottles.

Instruction Compliance
1  Neither object nor operations match the prompt; wrong items edited or shapes distorted.
2  Only one object correctly edited, or both edited but with wrong/partial operations; collateral changes to other items.
3  Both target objects touched, each with the requested operation broadly correct but missing details.
4  Both objects receive the exact operations; tiny deviations in amount, position, or parameter. No unintended edits elsewhere.
5  Perfect execution: each object fully reflects its specified operation, all other scene elements untouched.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Target bottle not removed; instruction fully unmet, so all scores capped at 1.
Instruction Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical Consistency & Fine Detail: 1

Instruction: Remove the far left wine bottle labeled "STREWA CHARDONNAY" with pale yellow wine inside, positioned next to a wine glass and in a row with other wine bottles.

Visual Naturalness
1  Large artefacts, obvious cut-outs, heavy blur/noise; edits conspicuous at a glance.
2  Clear edge halos, colour or resolution mismatch, awkward scaling.
3  Acceptable but visible on close look: slight edge softness, minor palette or focus shift.
4  Edits blend smoothly; seams hard to spot, textures and sharpness largely consistent.
5  Indistinguishable composite: colour grading, grain, resolution and style fully match the original image.

Instruction: Remove the far left wine bottle labeled "STREWA CHARDONNAY" with pale yellow wine inside, positioned next to a wine glass and in a row with other wine bottles.

Physical Consistency & Fine Detail
1  Severe lighting/perspective mismatch, missing or wrong shadows; objects appear floating or warped.
2  Noticeable but tolerable inconsistencies in illumination, scale, or depth cues.
3  Generally plausible; small errors in shadow length, reflection angle, or texture alignment.
4  Lighting, perspective, and material response closely match; only subtle flaws visible when zoomed.
5  Physically flawless: shadows, highlights, reflections, depth and texture perfectly integrated.


Instruction: Add a small green leaf stem to the top of the orange located to the left of the blue bowl, which contains yellow squash, plums, and a garlic bulb.

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: No green leaf stem added to the target orange; edit not performed.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Coherence: 1

Instruction: Add a small green leaf stem to the top of the orange located to the left of the blue bowl, which contains yellow squash, plums, and a garlic bulb.

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a small green leaf stem to the top of the orange located to the left of the blue bowl, which contains yellow squash, plums, and a garlic bulb.

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.


Instruction: Add a small woven straw hat on the head of the person standing under the multicolored umbrella, facing the customer, who is positioned in front of the vendor and next to a table with fruit skewers and pineapples, with a weathered blue metal cabinet and a building behind the umbrella.

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Added hat is striped, not straw (wrong class); style mismatch; physical coherence low.
Prompt Compliance: 2
Visual Naturalness: 2
Physical & Detail Coherence: 2

Instruction: Add a small woven straw hat on the head of the person standing under the multicolored umbrella, facing the customer, who is positioned in front of the vendor and next to a table with fruit skewers and pineapples, with a weathered blue metal cabinet and a building behind the umbrella.

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a small woven straw hat on the head of the person standing under the multicolored umbrella, facing the customer, who is positioned in front of the vendor and next to a table with fruit skewers and pineapples, with a weathered blue metal cabinet and a building behind the umbrella.

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.


Instruction: Remove the dark brown glass bottle with a label reading "Newcastle Brown Ale", positioned behind and to the right of a red plate with a white pattern, which holds a partially eaten slice of pizza topped with mozzarella cheese, tomato slices, and basil leaves; the bottle is on a colorful checkered table, with a blurred hand visible to its left.

Instruction Compliance
1  Neither object nor operations match the prompt; wrong items edited or shapes distorted.
2  Only one object correctly edited, or both edited but with wrong/partial operations; collateral changes to other items.
3  Both target objects touched, each with the requested operation broadly correct but missing details.
4  Both objects receive the exact operations; tiny deviations in amount, position, or parameter. No unintended edits elsewhere.
5  Perfect execution: each object fully reflects its specified operation, all other scene elements untouched.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Bottle removed but pizza/plate altered (collateral damage); target area has heavy artifacts; global inconsistencies severe.
Instruction Compliance: 2
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical Consistency & Fine Detail: 1

Instruction: Remove the dark brown glass bottle with a label reading "Newcastle Brown Ale", positioned behind and to the right of a red plate with a white pattern, which holds a partially eaten slice of pizza topped with mozzarella cheese, tomato slices, and basil leaves; the bottle is on a colorful checkered table, with a blurred hand visible to its left.

Visual Naturalness
1  Large artefacts, obvious cut-outs, heavy blur/noise; edits conspicuous at a glance.
2  Clear edge halos, colour or resolution mismatch, awkward scaling.
3  Acceptable but visible on close look: slight edge softness, minor palette or focus shift.
4  Edits blend smoothly; seams hard to spot, textures and sharpness largely consistent.
5  Indistinguishable composite: colour grading, grain, resolution and style fully match the original image.

Instruction: Remove the dark brown glass bottle with a label reading "Newcastle Brown Ale", positioned behind and to the right of a red plate with a white pattern, which holds a partially eaten slice of pizza topped with mozzarella cheese, tomato slices, and basil leaves; the bottle is on a colorful checkered table, with a blurred hand visible to its left.

Physical Consistency & Fine Detail
1  Severe lighting/perspective mismatch, missing or wrong shadows; objects appear floating or warped.
2  Noticeable but tolerable inconsistencies in illumination, scale, or depth cues.
3  Generally plausible; small errors in shadow length, reflection angle, or texture alignment.
4  Lighting, perspective, and material response closely match; only subtle flaws visible when zoomed.
5  Physically flawless: shadows, highlights, reflections, depth and texture perfectly integrated.


Instruction: Alter the color of the number "376" on the three-tiered cake decorated with red, white, and blue stars and stripes, featuring a metallic cowboy figure with a dog on top, to gold.

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not adjusted, wrong object touched, or geometry changed.
2  Right object but wrong attribute value/direction; only part edited; other objects also altered; slight stretch/crop.
3  Mainly correct object and attribute, yet large hue/brightness/texture error; minor collateral edits; visible jaggies/distortion.
4  All requested objects adjusted, only their attributes changed; shape kept; small inaccuracy in colour, material or amount.
5  Exactly and only the requested objects adjusted; colour, material, gloss etc. match the prompt perfectly; shape 100% intact; zero unintended edits.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Target color unchanged; other scores capped by first.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Seamlessness: 1
Physical & Detail Fidelity: 1

Instruction: Alter the color of the number "376" on the three-tiered cake decorated with red, white, and blue stars and stripes, featuring a metallic cowboy figure with a dog on top, to gold.

Visual Seamlessness
1  Massive colour spill, mosaics or heavy noise; image nearly unusable.
2  Clear smears/bleeding on edges; abrupt resolution or tone shift; highlights/shadows clipped; background gaps.
3  Overall palette OK but local tone or grain conflicts; soft edges; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style unified, transitions smooth; only slight edge artefacts visible when zoomed.
5  No detectable edit traces; colours/materials fuse with scene lighting; edit area practically invisible.

Instruction: Alter the color of the number "376" on the three-tiered cake decorated with red, white, and blue stars and stripes, featuring a metallic cowboy figure with a dog on top, to gold.

Physical & Detail Fidelity
1  Object floating, interpenetrating, or severe perspective/light mismatch; background badly warped.
2  Missing shadows/highlights; wrong reflection direction; background visibly discoloured or distorted.
3  Light, perspective and contact surface largely correct; minor acceptable flaws; background only locally affected.
4  Adjusted material interacts believably with scene; shadows, highlights, reflections handled well; original details preserved.
5  High physical realism: fine micro-highlights, diffuse bounce, subsurface effects present; overall scene realism improved.


Instruction: Change the material of the toilet located to the right of the urinal and below the women's restroom sign, with its lid open, from white ceramic to polished stainless steel.

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not adjusted, wrong object touched, or geometry changed.
2  Right object but wrong attribute value/direction; only part edited; other objects also altered; slight stretch/crop.
3  Mainly correct object and attribute, yet large hue/brightness/texture error; minor collateral edits; visible jaggies/distortion.
4  All requested objects adjusted, only their attributes changed; shape kept; small inaccuracy in colour, material or amount.
5  Exactly and only the requested objects adjusted; colour, material, gloss etc. match the prompt perfectly; shape 100% intact; zero unintended edits.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Toilet not altered; urinal changed instead. Wrong object touched, no target adjustment.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Seamlessness: 1
Physical & Detail Fidelity: 1

Instruction: Change the material of the toilet located to the right of the urinal and below the women's restroom sign, with its lid open, from white ceramic to polished stainless steel.

Visual Seamlessness
1  Massive colour spill, mosaics or heavy noise; image nearly unusable.
2  Clear smears/bleeding on edges; abrupt resolution or tone shift; highlights/shadows clipped; background gaps.
3  Overall palette OK but local tone or grain conflicts; soft edges; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style unified, transitions smooth; only slight edge artefacts visible when zoomed.
5  No detectable edit traces; colours/materials fuse with scene lighting; edit area practically invisible.

Instruction: Change the material of the toilet located to the right of the urinal and below the women's restroom sign, with its lid open, from white ceramic to polished stainless steel.

Physical & Detail Fidelity
1  Object floating, interpenetrating, or severe perspective/light mismatch; background badly warped.
2  Missing shadows/highlights; wrong reflection direction; background visibly discoloured or distorted.
3  Light, perspective and contact surface largely correct; minor acceptable flaws; background only locally affected.
4  Adjusted material interacts believably with scene; shadows, highlights, reflections handled well; original details preserved.
5  High physical realism: fine micro-highlights, diffuse bounce, subsurface effects present; overall scene realism improved.


Instruction: Change the pattern of the tall giraffe with brown and white spots and its head facing forward, standing among trees and positioned behind a young giraffe that is partially hidden by foliage, to a solid light gray color.

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not adjusted, wrong object touched, or geometry changed.
2  Right object but wrong attribute value/direction; only part edited; other objects also altered; slight stretch/crop.
3  Mainly correct object and attribute, yet large hue/brightness/texture error; minor collateral edits; visible jaggies/distortion.
4  All requested objects adjusted, only their attributes changed; shape kept; small inaccuracy in colour, material or amount.
5  Exactly and only the requested objects adjusted; colour, material, gloss etc. match the prompt perfectly; shape 100% intact; zero unintended edits.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Target giraffe's pattern unchanged; geometry altered. Edits not applied as instructed.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Seamlessness: 1
Physical & Detail Fidelity: 1

Instruction: Change the pattern of the tall giraffe with brown and white spots and its head facing forward, standing among trees and positioned behind a young giraffe that is partially hidden by foliage, to a solid light gray color.

Visual Seamlessness
1  Massive colour spill, mosaics or heavy noise; image nearly unusable.
2  Clear smears/bleeding on edges; abrupt resolution or tone shift; highlights/shadows clipped; background gaps.
3  Overall palette OK but local tone or grain conflicts; soft edges; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style unified, transitions smooth; only slight edge artefacts visible when zoomed.
5  No detectable edit traces; colours/materials fuse with scene lighting; edit area practically invisible.

Instruction: Change the pattern of the tall giraffe with brown and white spots and its head facing forward, standing among trees and positioned behind a young giraffe that is partially hidden by foliage, to a solid light gray color.

Physical & Detail Fidelity
1  Object floating, interpenetrating, or severe perspective/light mismatch; background badly warped.
2  Missing shadows/highlights; wrong reflection direction; background visibly discoloured or distorted.
3  Light, perspective and contact surface largely correct; minor acceptable flaws; background only locally affected.
4  Adjusted material interacts believably with scene; shadows, highlights, reflections handled well; original details preserved.
5  High physical realism: fine micro-highlights, diffuse bounce, subsurface effects present; overall scene realism improved.


Instruction: Add a small red oven mitt hanging on the handle of the green oven with a kettle on top, positioned next to the white stove and appearing old, with its surface showing signs of wear.

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: No oven mitt added to green oven handle; prompt unfulfilled.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Coherence: 1

Instruction: Add a small red oven mitt hanging on the handle of the green oven with a kettle on top, positioned next to the white stove and appearing old, with its surface showing signs of wear.

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a small red oven mitt hanging on the handle of the green oven with a kettle on top, positioned next to the white stove and appearing old, with its surface showing signs of wear.

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.


Instruction: Change the topping distribution on the crescent-shaped pizza with red sauce and white cheese, which is partially eaten and resting on the right plate, positioned to the right of another plate, to include evenly spread mushrooms and green peppers.

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Toppings added but not evenly spread; visible paste marks; physical coherence issues with placement.
Prompt Compliance: 3
Visual Naturalness: 2
Physical & Detail Coherence: 2

Instruction: Change the topping distribution on the crescent-shaped pizza with red sauce and white cheese, which is partially eaten and resting on the right plate, positioned to the right of another plate, to include evenly spread mushrooms and green peppers.

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Change the topping distribution on the crescent-shaped pizza with red sauce and white cheese, which is partially eaten and resting on the right plate, positioned to the right of another plate, to include evenly spread mushrooms and green peppers.

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.


Instruction: Replace the keyboard located to the left of the laptop and the mug, positioned on top of the desk, with a black ceramic mug filled with pens.

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not replaced, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Only part of the target replaced, or wrong class/description used.
3  Target largely replaced but other objects altered, remnants visible, or count/position clearly wrong.
4  Correct object fully replaced; only minor attribute errors (colour, size, etc.).
5  Perfect replacement: all and only the specified objects removed; new objects' class, number, position, scale, pose and detail exactly match the prompt.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Target objects (keyboard, mug) not replaced; original elements remain unchanged.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Replace the keyboard located to the left of the laptop and the mug, positioned on top of the desk, with a black ceramic mug filled with pens.

Visual Naturalness
1  Image heavily broken or new object deformed / extremely blurred.
2  Obvious seams, smears, or strong mismatch in resolution or colour; background not restored.
3  Basic style similar, but lighting or palette clashes; fuzzy edges or noise are noticeable.
4  Style almost uniform; tiny edge artefacts visible only on close inspection; casual viewers see no edit.
5  Completely seamless; new objects blend fully with the scene, edit area undetectable.

Instruction: Replace the keyboard located to the left of the laptop and the mug, positioned on top of the desk, with a black ceramic mug filled with pens.

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Floating, interpenetration, severe perspective/light errors; key original elements ruined; background heavily warped.
2  Missing shadows/occlusion; large background shifts or holes.
3  Lighting, perspective and contact surfaces mostly correct; small but tolerable errors; background adjusted locally.
4  New objects interact realistically with scene (shadows, reflections, texture) and preserve existing details; background change minimal.
5  Physically flawless and enhances realism: accurate highlights, shadows, reflections, ambient effects; background untouched.


Instruction: Replace the person on the far left, partially visible, wearing a striped shirt, standing next to the man in the blue polo shirt and to the left of the metal cylinder being held by the man in the green t-shirt, with a potted fern.

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not replaced, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Only part of the target replaced, or wrong class/description used.
3  Target largely replaced but other objects altered, remnants visible, or count/position clearly wrong.
4  Correct object fully replaced; only minor attribute errors (colour, size, etc.).
5  Perfect replacement: all and only the specified objects removed; new objects' class, number, position, scale, pose and detail exactly match the prompt.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: Target person not replaced; no fern added, edit not applied.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Replace the person on the far left, partially visible, wearing a striped shirt, standing next to the man in the blue polo shirt and to the left of the metal cylinder being held by the man in the green t-shirt, with a potted fern.

Visual Naturalness
1  Image heavily broken or new object deformed / extremely blurred.
2  Obvious seams, smears, or strong mismatch in resolution or colour; background not restored.
3  Basic style similar, but lighting or palette clashes; fuzzy edges or noise are noticeable.
4  Style almost uniform; tiny edge artefacts visible only on close inspection; casual viewers see no edit.
5  Completely seamless; new objects blend fully with the scene, edit area undetectable.

Instruction: Replace the person on the far left, partially visible, wearing a striped shirt, standing next to the man in the blue polo shirt and to the left of the metal cylinder being held by the man in the green t-shirt, with a potted fern.

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Floating, interpenetration, severe perspective/light errors; key original elements ruined; background heavily warped.
2  Missing shadows/occlusion; large background shifts or holes.
3  Lighting, perspective and contact surfaces mostly correct; small but tolerable errors; background adjusted locally.
4  New objects interact realistically with scene (shadows, reflections, texture) and preserve existing details; background change minimal.
5  Physically flawless and enhances realism: accurate highlights, shadows, reflections, ambient effects; background untouched.


Instruction: Add a small, colorful paper fan to the lap of the fourth person from the left sitting on a plastic chair, wearing a white shirt, positioned to the right of the person in the pink jacket and to the right of the person with the blue and green backpack, all seated in front of a lion dance head.

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: No paper fan added to the target person's lap as instructed.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Coherence: 1

Instruction: Add a small, colorful paper fan to the lap of the fourth person from the left sitting on a plastic chair, wearing a white shirt, positioned to the right of the person in the pink jacket and to the right of the person with the blue and green backpack, all seated in front of a lion dance head.

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a small, colorful paper fan to the lap of the fourth person from the left sitting on a plastic chair, wearing a white shirt, positioned to the right of the person in the pink jacket and to the right of the person with the blue and green backpack, all seated in front of a lion dance head.

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.


Instruction: Add a small bowl of jam next to the bread

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The added jam bowl is correct class and size, but the bread is completely replaced with a pink loaf, violating the prompt’s requirement to keep original bread. Major scene alteration reduces compliance. Visuals are coherent but unnatural due to unrealistic bread. Physical coherence suffers from mismatched lighting and context.

Prompt Compliance: 2
Visual Naturalness: 3
Physical & Detail Coherence: 2

Instruction: Add a small bowl of jam next to the bread

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a small bowl of jam next to the bread

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.

Instruction: Remove the knife beside the cutting board

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing removed, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Target only partly removed, or a different instance/class deleted, or another object appears in the gap.
3  Target mostly removed but extra objects also deleted, or fragments of the target remain.
4  Only the specified objects removed, but a few tiny/background items deleted by mistake, or the count is wrong.
5  Perfect: all and only the requested objects removed; every other element untouched.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The after image completely replaces the original scene with an unrelated pink loaf and jam setup; the knife is gone but so is the entire cutting board, bread, and background—massive over-editing, not a removal.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Remove the knife beside the cutting board

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken (large holes, strong artefacts).
2  Clear erase marks; colour/resolution mismatch; background not restored.
3  General look acceptable yet lighting/colour/style still clash; blur or noise visible.
4  Style consistent; minor edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Seamless: removal is virtually impossible to spot.

Instruction: Remove the knife beside the cutting board

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Severe physical errors (floating items, wrong perspective/light); key scene elements damaged; background heavily warped.
2  Large un-filled gaps or obvious background shifts.
3  Lighting, perspective and contacts mostly correct; flaws small and tolerable; background adjusted locally.
4  Background reconstruction clean; existing details preserved; only minute changes outside the removal area.
5  Physically flawless and even enhances realism: accurate light/shadow/texture infill, high-quality micro-details.

Instruction: Replace the red and white checkered towel with a solid blue scarf

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not replaced, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Only part of the target replaced, or wrong class/description used.
3  Target largely replaced but other objects altered, remnants visible, or count/position clearly wrong.
4  Correct object fully replaced; only minor attribute errors (colour, size, etc.).
5  Perfect replacement: all and only the specified objects removed; new objects' class, number, position, scale, pose and detail exactly match the prompt.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The red/white checkered towel is replaced with a blue/pink fabric, not a solid blue scarf; bread and background are completely altered—prompt not followed, severe mismatch.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Replace the red and white checkered towel with a solid blue scarf

Visual Naturalness
1  Image heavily broken or new object deformed / extremely blurred.
2  Obvious seams, smears, or strong mismatch in resolution or colour; background not restored.
3  Basic style similar, but lighting or palette clashes; fuzzy edges or noise are noticeable.
4  Style almost uniform; tiny edge artefacts visible only on close inspection; casual viewers see no edit.
5  Completely seamless; new objects blend fully with the scene, edit area undetectable.

Instruction: Replace the red and white checkered towel with a solid blue scarf

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Floating, interpenetration, severe perspective/light errors; key original elements ruined; background heavily warped.
2  Missing shadows/occlusion; large background shifts or holes.
3  Lighting, perspective and contact surfaces mostly correct; small but tolerable errors; background adjusted locally.
4  New objects interact realistically with scene (shadows, reflections, texture) and preserve existing details; background change minimal.
5  Physically flawless and enhances realism: accurate highlights, shadows, reflections, ambient effects; background untouched.

Instruction: Alter the color of the bread's crust to pink

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not adjusted, wrong object touched, or geometry changed.
2  Right object but wrong attribute value/direction; only part edited; other objects also altered; slight stretch/crop.
3  Mainly correct object and attribute, yet large hue/brightness/texture error; minor collateral edits; visible jaggies/distortion.
4  All requested objects adjusted, only their attributes changed; shape kept; small inaccuracy in colour, material or amount.
5  Exactly and only the requested objects adjusted; colour, material, gloss etc. match the prompt perfectly; shape 100% intact; zero unintended edits.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The bread’s crust is changed to pink, but the entire loaf is replaced with a stylized, unrealistic pink sponge-like object; texture, seeds, and structure are lost. Background and props are completely different, indicating a full scene replacement rather than attribute editing.

Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Seamlessness: 1
Physical & Detail Fidelity: 1

Instruction: Alter the color of the bread's crust to pink

Visual Seamlessness
1  Massive colour spill, mosaics or heavy noise; image nearly unusable.
2  Clear smears/bleeding on edges; abrupt resolution or tone shift; highlights/shadows clipped; background gaps.
3  Overall palette OK but local tone or grain conflicts; soft edges; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style unified, transitions smooth; only slight edge artefacts visible when zoomed.
5  No detectable edit traces; colours/materials fuse with scene lighting; edit area practically invisible.

Instruction: Alter the color of the bread's crust to pink

Physical & Detail Fidelity
1  Object floating, interpenetrating, or severe perspective/light mismatch; background badly warped.
2  Missing shadows/highlights; wrong reflection direction; background visibly discoloured or distorted.
3  Light, perspective and contact surface largely correct; minor acceptable flaws; background only locally affected.
4  Adjusted material interacts believably with scene; shadows, highlights, reflections handled well; original details preserved.
5  High physical realism: fine micro-highlights, diffuse bounce, subsurface effects present; overall scene realism improved.


Instruction: Remove the rightmost red car in the background

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing removed, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Target only partly removed, or a different instance/class deleted, or another object appears in the gap.
3  Target mostly removed but extra objects also deleted, or fragments of the target remain.
4  Only the specified objects removed, but a few tiny/background items deleted by mistake, or the count is wrong.
5  Perfect: all and only the requested objects removed; every other element untouched.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The rightmost red car is removed, but the entire background (including other vehicles and scenery) is replaced with a low-resolution, blurry gray patch—massive over-removal and severe artefacts. Prompt compliance fails due to excessive deletion beyond the target.
Prompt Compliance: 2
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Remove the rightmost red car in the background

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken (large holes, strong artefacts).
2  Clear erase marks; colour/resolution mismatch; background not restored.
3  General look acceptable yet lighting/colour/style still clash; blur or noise visible.
4  Style consistent; minor edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Seamless: removal is virtually impossible to spot.

Instruction: Remove the rightmost red car in the background

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Severe physical errors (floating items, wrong perspective/light); key scene elements damaged; background heavily warped.
2  Large un-filled gaps or obvious background shifts.
3  Lighting, perspective and contacts mostly correct; flaws small and tolerable; background adjusted locally.
4  Background reconstruction clean; existing details preserved; only minute changes outside the removal area.
5  Physically flawless and even enhances realism: accurate light/shadow/texture infill, high-quality micro-details.

Instruction: Alter the color of the red truck to black

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not adjusted, wrong object touched, or geometry changed.
2  Right object but wrong attribute value/direction; only part edited; other objects also altered; slight stretch/crop.
3  Mainly correct object and attribute, yet large hue/brightness/texture error; minor collateral edits; visible jaggies/distortion.
4  All requested objects adjusted, only their attributes changed; shape kept; small inaccuracy in colour, material or amount.
5  Exactly and only the requested objects adjusted; colour, material, gloss etc. match the prompt perfectly; shape 100% intact; zero unintended edits.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The red truck is completely removed instead of recolored to black; the entire background is replaced with a generic gray plane and blurred foliage, violating the instruction and causing severe distortion.

Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Seamlessness: 1
Physical & Detail Fidelity: 1

Instruction: Alter the color of the red truck to black

Visual Seamlessness
1  Massive colour spill, mosaics or heavy noise; image nearly unusable.
2  Clear smears/bleeding on edges; abrupt resolution or tone shift; highlights/shadows clipped; background gaps.
3  Overall palette OK but local tone or grain conflicts; soft edges; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style unified, transitions smooth; only slight edge artefacts visible when zoomed.
5  No detectable edit traces; colours/materials fuse with scene lighting; edit area practically invisible.

Instruction: Alter the color of the red truck to black

Physical & Detail Fidelity
1  Object floating, interpenetrating, or severe perspective/light mismatch; background badly warped.
2  Missing shadows/highlights; wrong reflection direction; background visibly discoloured or distorted.
3  Light, perspective and contact surface largely correct; minor acceptable flaws; background only locally affected.
4  Adjusted material interacts believably with scene; shadows, highlights, reflections handled well; original details preserved.
5  High physical realism: fine micro-highlights, diffuse bounce, subsurface effects present; overall scene realism improved.


Instruction: Add a bowl of fruit to the center of the dining table

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: A bowl of fruit was added to the table, but it's small, poorly rendered, and clashes with the scene’s lighting and style; also, red pencils in a cup appear erroneously. Prompt partially followed but with major flaws.
Prompt Compliance: 3
Visual Naturalness: 2
Physical & Detail Coherence: 2

Instruction: Add a bowl of fruit to the center of the dining table

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a bowl of fruit to the center of the dining table

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.

Instruction: Replace the white flowers in the vase with red pencils

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not replaced, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Only part of the target replaced, or wrong class/description used.
3  Target largely replaced but other objects altered, remnants visible, or count/position clearly wrong.
4  Correct object fully replaced; only minor attribute errors (colour, size, etc.).
5  Perfect replacement: all and only the specified objects removed; new objects' class, number, position, scale, pose and detail exactly match the prompt.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The white flowers are replaced with red pencils in a glass, but the vase itself is altered (now a narrow cup), and surrounding objects (bowl, decor) are added/changed. Target region modified, but extra edits and inaccurate replacement (pencils upright, not floral arrangement).
Prompt Compliance: 3
Visual Naturalness: 3
Physical & Detail Integrity: 3

Instruction: Replace the white flowers in the vase with red pencils

Visual Naturalness
1  Image heavily broken or new object deformed / extremely blurred.
2  Obvious seams, smears, or strong mismatch in resolution or colour; background not restored.
3  Basic style similar, but lighting or palette clashes; fuzzy edges or noise are noticeable.
4  Style almost uniform; tiny edge artefacts visible only on close inspection; casual viewers see no edit.
5  Completely seamless; new objects blend fully with the scene, edit area undetectable.

Instruction: Replace the white flowers in the vase with red pencils

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Floating, interpenetration, severe perspective/light errors; key original elements ruined; background heavily warped.
2  Missing shadows/occlusion; large background shifts or holes.
3  Lighting, perspective and contact surfaces mostly correct; small but tolerable errors; background adjusted locally.
4  New objects interact realistically with scene (shadows, reflections, texture) and preserve existing details; background change minimal.
5  Physically flawless and enhances realism: accurate highlights, shadows, reflections, ambient effects; background untouched.


Instruction: Alter the pink top of the woman on the left to a yellow top

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not adjusted, wrong object touched, or geometry changed.
2  Right object but wrong attribute value/direction; only part edited; other objects also altered; slight stretch/crop.
3  Mainly correct object and attribute, yet large hue/brightness/texture error; minor collateral edits; visible jaggies/distortion.
4  All requested objects adjusted, only their attributes changed; shape kept; small inaccuracy in colour, material or amount.
5  Exactly and only the requested objects adjusted; colour, material, gloss etc. match the prompt perfectly; shape 100% intact; zero unintended edits.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The pink top is changed to yellow as requested, but the woman’s hair and skin tone are also altered (darker hair, warmer skin), indicating unintended edits. Shape is preserved, but color accuracy and fidelity are imperfect.

Prompt Compliance: 4
Visual Seamlessness: 4
Physical & Detail Fidelity: 4

Instruction: Alter the pink top of the woman on the left to a yellow top

Visual Seamlessness
1  Massive colour spill, mosaics or heavy noise; image nearly unusable.
2  Clear smears/bleeding on edges; abrupt resolution or tone shift; highlights/shadows clipped; background gaps.
3  Overall palette OK but local tone or grain conflicts; soft edges; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style unified, transitions smooth; only slight edge artefacts visible when zoomed.
5  No detectable edit traces; colours/materials fuse with scene lighting; edit area practically invisible.

Instruction: Alter the pink top of the woman on the left to a yellow top

Physical & Detail Fidelity
1  Object floating, interpenetrating, or severe perspective/light mismatch; background badly warped.
2  Missing shadows/highlights; wrong reflection direction; background visibly discoloured or distorted.
3  Light, perspective and contact surface largely correct; minor acceptable flaws; background only locally affected.
4  Adjusted material interacts believably with scene; shadows, highlights, reflections handled well; original details preserved.
5  High physical realism: fine micro-highlights, diffuse bounce, subsurface effects present; overall scene realism improved.

Instruction: Remove the woman with blonde hair in the center

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing removed, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Target only partly removed, or a different instance/class deleted, or another object appears in the gap.
3  Target mostly removed but extra objects also deleted, or fragments of the target remain.
4  Only the specified objects removed, but a few tiny/background items deleted by mistake, or the count is wrong.
5  Perfect: all and only the requested objects removed; every other element untouched.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The woman with blonde hair (third from left) was removed, but the edit incorrectly replaced her with a different woman (blonde, green top), violating prompt compliance; background is clean but wrong subject inserted.
Prompt Compliance: 2
Visual Naturalness: 4
Physical & Detail Integrity: 3

Instruction: Remove the woman with blonde hair in the center

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken (large holes, strong artefacts).
2  Clear erase marks; colour/resolution mismatch; background not restored.
3  General look acceptable yet lighting/colour/style still clash; blur or noise visible.
4  Style consistent; minor edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Seamless: removal is virtually impossible to spot.

Instruction: Remove the woman with blonde hair in the center

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Severe physical errors (floating items, wrong perspective/light); key scene elements damaged; background heavily warped.
2  Large un-filled gaps or obvious background shifts.
3  Lighting, perspective and contacts mostly correct; flaws small and tolerable; background adjusted locally.
4  Background reconstruction clean; existing details preserved; only minute changes outside the removal area.
5  Physically flawless and even enhances realism: accurate light/shadow/texture infill, high-quality micro-details.

Instruction: Replace the blue top of the woman in the middle with a green sweater

Prompt Compliance
1  Target not replaced, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Only part of the target replaced, or wrong class/description used.
3  Target largely replaced but other objects altered, remnants visible, or count/position clearly wrong.
4  Correct object fully replaced; only minor attribute errors (colour, size, etc.).
5  Perfect replacement: all and only the specified objects removed; new objects' class, number, position, scale, pose and detail exactly match the prompt.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The blue top (second woman from left) was replaced with a green sweater, but the woman’s identity and pose changed entirely—she’s now a different person with different hair and facial features. The edit violates prompt compliance by altering non-target elements severely.

Prompt Compliance: 2
Visual Naturalness: 2
Physical & Detail Integrity: 2

Instruction: Replace the blue top of the woman in the middle with a green sweater

Visual Naturalness
1  Image heavily broken or new object deformed / extremely blurred.
2  Obvious seams, smears, or strong mismatch in resolution or colour; background not restored.
3  Basic style similar, but lighting or palette clashes; fuzzy edges or noise are noticeable.
4  Style almost uniform; tiny edge artefacts visible only on close inspection; casual viewers see no edit.
5  Completely seamless; new objects blend fully with the scene, edit area undetectable.

Instruction: Replace the blue top of the woman in the middle with a green sweater

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Floating, interpenetration, severe perspective/light errors; key original elements ruined; background heavily warped.
2  Missing shadows/occlusion; large background shifts or holes.
3  Lighting, perspective and contact surfaces mostly correct; small but tolerable errors; background adjusted locally.
4  New objects interact realistically with scene (shadows, reflections, texture) and preserve existing details; background change minimal.
5  Physically flawless and enhances realism: accurate highlights, shadows, reflections, ambient effects; background untouched.


Instruction: Add a small photo of a cat in the top-left corner of the collage

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing added or the added content is corrupt.
2  Added object is a wrong class or unrelated to the prompt.
3  Correct class, but key attributes (position, colour, size, count, etc.) are wrong.
4  Main attributes correct; only minor details off or 1-2 small features missing.
5  Every stated attribute correct and scene logic reasonable; only microscopic flaws.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The added "cat" is a distorted, abstract painting-like figure, not a small photo; it’s oversized, stylistically mismatched, and disrupts the collage. Prompt compliance fails severely.
Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Coherence: 1

Instruction: Add a small photo of a cat in the top-left corner of the collage

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken or full of artefacts.
2  Obvious paste marks; style, resolution, or palette strongly mismatch.
3  General style similar, but lighting or colours clearly clash; noticeable disharmony.
4  Style almost uniform; small edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Perfect blend; no visible difference between added object and original image.

Instruction: Add a small photo of a cat in the top-left corner of the collage

Physical & Detail Coherence
1  Severe physical errors (floating, wrong perspective/light); key original elements blocked; background heavily distorted.
2  Contact or occlusion handled poorly; minor background shifts, jaggies or noise; background visibly changed.
3  Lighting, perspective, and contact mostly correct; remaining flaws small and acceptable; limited background change.
4  Shadows, reflections, and material response believable; no loss of original detail; background changes are minute.
5  Added object enhances overall realism: precise highlights, shadows, ambient effects; background essentially untouched.

Instruction: Remove the bingo card from the center of the collage

Prompt Compliance
1  Nothing removed, or an unrelated object edited.
2  Target only partly removed, or a different instance/class deleted, or another object appears in the gap.
3  Target mostly removed but extra objects also deleted, or fragments of the target remain.
4  Only the specified objects removed, but a few tiny/background items deleted by mistake, or the count is wrong.
5  Perfect: all and only the requested objects removed; every other element untouched.

Explanation:
Brief reasoning: The after image is completely distorted and unrecognizable—entire collage replaced with abstract, painterly artifacts. The bingo card is gone, but so is everything else; massive visual degradation and physical inconsistency.

Prompt Compliance: 1
Visual Naturalness: 1
Physical & Detail Integrity: 1

Instruction: Remove the bingo card from the center of the collage

Visual Naturalness
1  Image badly broken (large holes, strong artefacts).
2  Clear erase marks; colour/resolution mismatch; background not restored.
3  General look acceptable yet lighting/colour/style still clash; blur or noise visible.
4  Style consistent; minor edge issues visible only when zoomed.
5  Seamless: removal is virtually impossible to spot.

Instruction: Remove the bingo card from the center of the collage

Physical & Detail Integrity
1  Severe physical errors (floating items, wrong perspective/light); key scene elements damaged; background heavily warped.
2  Large un-filled gaps or obvious background shifts.
3  Lighting, perspective and contacts mostly correct; flaws small and tolerable; background adjusted locally.
4  Background reconstruction clean; existing details preserved; only minute changes outside the removal area.
5  Physically flawless and even enhances realism: accurate light/shadow/texture infill, high-quality micro-details.