Update model card framing for slab benchmark artifact
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,55 +1,50 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
library_name: pytorch
|
| 3 |
tags:
|
| 4 |
-
-
|
| 5 |
-
-
|
| 6 |
- helmholtz
|
| 7 |
-
-
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
-
# Neon Slab
|
| 11 |
-
|
| 12 |
-
This repository contains the current benchmark-facing slab-family checkpoints from the Neon research codebase.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
-
- `training_summary.json`: single-model training summary
|
| 18 |
-
- `slab_hybrid_train_enhanced_benchmark.json`: training config used for the benchmark-facing model
|
| 19 |
-
- `ensemble/member_00.pt` to `ensemble/member_04.pt`: 5-member Model C ensemble checkpoints
|
| 20 |
-
- `ensemble/ensemble_manifest.json`: relative manifest for the ensemble files
|
| 21 |
-
- `ensemble/ensemble_evaluation_summary.json`: benchmark-facing ensemble evaluation summary
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-
|
| 26 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 27 |
|
|
|
|
| 28 |
- `benchmark_normalized_transmission`
|
| 29 |
- `benchmark_normalized_reflection`
|
| 30 |
- `normalized_peak_intensity`
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
-
|
| 35 |
-
-
|
| 36 |
-
- Ensemble spread is a useful heuristic diagnostic, not a calibrated uncertainty guarantee.
|
| 37 |
-
- Direct Neon reevaluation remains mandatory for reported inverse-design candidates.
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
-
## Current reported single-model result
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
From `training_summary.json`:
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-
-
|
| 50 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-
##
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
-
This bundle corresponds to the benchmark-facing scalar dielectric-slab milestone described in the repository README and companion docs.
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
library_name: pytorch
|
| 3 |
tags:
|
| 4 |
+
- research-artifact
|
| 5 |
+
- computational-photonics
|
| 6 |
- helmholtz
|
| 7 |
+
- surrogate-model
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
+
# Neon: Scalar Slab Benchmark Research Artifact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
+
This repository contains benchmark-specific research artifacts from the Neon codebase. It is not a general-purpose photonics model and it should not be treated as a deployable surrogate.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
+
## What is included
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
The main checkpoint is Model C, a reduced hybrid model trained on Neon’s current 2D scalar normal-incidence rectangular dielectric slab benchmark. A 5-member ensemble and evaluation summaries are also included.
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
+
Inputs:
|
| 19 |
+
- slab thickness
|
| 20 |
+
- slab relative permittivity real part
|
| 21 |
+
- wavelength
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+
Outputs:
|
| 24 |
- `benchmark_normalized_transmission`
|
| 25 |
- `benchmark_normalized_reflection`
|
| 26 |
- `normalized_peak_intensity`
|
| 27 |
+
- a cropped 145-point complex centerline field
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
+
Training data:
|
| 30 |
+
- 18 slab designs x 6 wavelengths = 108 total samples
|
| 31 |
+
- 72 train, 18 validation, 18 test
|
| 32 |
+
- one fixed benchmark geometry, source, grid, monitor layout, and absorber configuration from the Neon slab base case
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
+
## Intended use
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
+
Use these files only to reproduce or inspect the slab-benchmark results reported by Neon.
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
+
- This model was trained only on the current scalar normal-incidence rectangular dielectric slab benchmark.
|
| 41 |
+
- It cannot be used as a general model for metasurfaces, waveguides, photonic crystals, arbitrary multilayer structures, arbitrary source conditions, or full-vector Maxwell problems.
|
| 42 |
+
- It does not predict a full 2D field; it predicts slab-response scalars and a cropped centerline field only.
|
| 43 |
+
- Any uncertainty values here are ensemble disagreement, not calibrated uncertainty.
|
| 44 |
+
- Direct Neon reevaluation remains mandatory for any reported inverse-design candidate.
|
| 45 |
+
- The trained weights are a byproduct of an investigation into simulation-driven ML workflows on a controlled benchmark, not a deployable tool.
|
| 46 |
+
- The research contribution of Neon is the methodology, validation discipline, and benchmark findings, not the model weights themselves.
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
+
## Research contribution
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
+
Neon’s contribution is the benchmark methodology and the findings about target definition, reduced physics-informed losses, uncertainty diagnostics, active learning, and direct-solver-verified screening on a controlled slab problem.
|
|
|