Herrprofessor commited on
Commit
b135bd0
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 93520e9

Update model card framing for slab benchmark artifact

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +29 -34
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,55 +1,50 @@
1
  ---
2
  library_name: pytorch
3
  tags:
4
- - physics-informed-ml
5
- - surrogate-model
6
  - helmholtz
7
- - photonics
8
  ---
9
 
10
- # Neon Slab Models
11
-
12
- This repository contains the current benchmark-facing slab-family checkpoints from the Neon research codebase.
13
 
14
- ## Included assets
15
 
16
- - `model_c_benchmark_best.pt`: best single Model C checkpoint
17
- - `training_summary.json`: single-model training summary
18
- - `slab_hybrid_train_enhanced_benchmark.json`: training config used for the benchmark-facing model
19
- - `ensemble/member_00.pt` to `ensemble/member_04.pt`: 5-member Model C ensemble checkpoints
20
- - `ensemble/ensemble_manifest.json`: relative manifest for the ensemble files
21
- - `ensemble/ensemble_evaluation_summary.json`: benchmark-facing ensemble evaluation summary
22
 
23
- ## Benchmark scope
24
 
25
- These checkpoints are for the current Neon scalar normal-incidence dielectric slab benchmark only.
26
- The scalar targets are:
 
 
27
 
 
28
  - `benchmark_normalized_transmission`
29
  - `benchmark_normalized_reflection`
30
  - `normalized_peak_intensity`
 
31
 
32
- ## Important limitations
33
-
34
- - This is a reduced scalar Helmholtz benchmark model, not a full-vector Maxwell model.
35
- - The hybrid model predicts scalar targets and a cropped centerline field, not a full 2D field.
36
- - Ensemble spread is a useful heuristic diagnostic, not a calibrated uncertainty guarantee.
37
- - Direct Neon reevaluation remains mandatory for reported inverse-design candidates.
38
-
39
- ## Current reported single-model result
40
-
41
- From `training_summary.json`:
42
 
43
- - test mean MAE: `0.1145`
44
 
45
- ## Current reported ensemble result
46
 
47
- From `ensemble/ensemble_evaluation_summary.json`:
48
 
49
- - test mean MAE: `0.1155`
50
- - OOD mean MAE: `0.1293`
 
 
 
 
 
51
 
52
- ## Provenance
53
 
54
- Generated from a local checkout of the Neon research repository on 2026-03-22.
55
- This bundle corresponds to the benchmark-facing scalar dielectric-slab milestone described in the repository README and companion docs.
 
1
  ---
2
  library_name: pytorch
3
  tags:
4
+ - research-artifact
5
+ - computational-photonics
6
  - helmholtz
7
+ - surrogate-model
8
  ---
9
 
10
+ # Neon: Scalar Slab Benchmark Research Artifact
 
 
11
 
12
+ This repository contains benchmark-specific research artifacts from the Neon codebase. It is not a general-purpose photonics model and it should not be treated as a deployable surrogate.
13
 
14
+ ## What is included
 
 
 
 
 
15
 
16
+ The main checkpoint is Model C, a reduced hybrid model trained on Neon’s current 2D scalar normal-incidence rectangular dielectric slab benchmark. A 5-member ensemble and evaluation summaries are also included.
17
 
18
+ Inputs:
19
+ - slab thickness
20
+ - slab relative permittivity real part
21
+ - wavelength
22
 
23
+ Outputs:
24
  - `benchmark_normalized_transmission`
25
  - `benchmark_normalized_reflection`
26
  - `normalized_peak_intensity`
27
+ - a cropped 145-point complex centerline field
28
 
29
+ Training data:
30
+ - 18 slab designs x 6 wavelengths = 108 total samples
31
+ - 72 train, 18 validation, 18 test
32
+ - one fixed benchmark geometry, source, grid, monitor layout, and absorber configuration from the Neon slab base case
 
 
 
 
 
 
33
 
34
+ ## Intended use
35
 
36
+ Use these files only to reproduce or inspect the slab-benchmark results reported by Neon.
37
 
38
+ ## Limitations
39
 
40
+ - This model was trained only on the current scalar normal-incidence rectangular dielectric slab benchmark.
41
+ - It cannot be used as a general model for metasurfaces, waveguides, photonic crystals, arbitrary multilayer structures, arbitrary source conditions, or full-vector Maxwell problems.
42
+ - It does not predict a full 2D field; it predicts slab-response scalars and a cropped centerline field only.
43
+ - Any uncertainty values here are ensemble disagreement, not calibrated uncertainty.
44
+ - Direct Neon reevaluation remains mandatory for any reported inverse-design candidate.
45
+ - The trained weights are a byproduct of an investigation into simulation-driven ML workflows on a controlled benchmark, not a deployable tool.
46
+ - The research contribution of Neon is the methodology, validation discipline, and benchmark findings, not the model weights themselves.
47
 
48
+ ## Research contribution
49
 
50
+ Neon’s contribution is the benchmark methodology and the findings about target definition, reduced physics-informed losses, uncertainty diagnostics, active learning, and direct-solver-verified screening on a controlled slab problem.