Upload README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,176 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- en
|
| 5 |
+
tags:
|
| 6 |
+
- scikit-learn
|
| 7 |
+
- xgboost
|
| 8 |
+
- random-forest
|
| 9 |
+
- regression
|
| 10 |
+
- weather-radar
|
| 11 |
+
- quantitative-precipitation-estimation
|
| 12 |
+
- dual-polarization-radar
|
| 13 |
+
- geoscience
|
| 14 |
+
- taiwan
|
| 15 |
---
|
| 16 |
+
# Tree-Based Radar Quantitative Precipitation Estimation Models
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
## Overview
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
This archive contains trained Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting
|
| 21 |
+
(XGB) models used to evaluate how radar predictor representation affects
|
| 22 |
+
quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE). Models are provided for 10-minute
|
| 23 |
+
and 1-hour rainfall estimation and for Experiments A-G described below.
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
The RF models were trained with scikit-learn, and the XGB models were trained
|
| 26 |
+
with XGBoost. The restricted radar, rain-gauge, training, and validation data
|
| 27 |
+
are not included in this archive.
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
## File Naming
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
Model filenames follow this pattern:
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
```text
|
| 34 |
+
{model}_{timescale}_Exp{experiment}[_{KDP_variant}].joblib
|
| 35 |
+
```
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
- `model`: `RF` or `XGB`
|
| 38 |
+
- `timescale`: `10min` or `1h`
|
| 39 |
+
- `experiment`: `A` through `G`
|
| 40 |
+
- `KDP_variant`: present only for Experiments F and G
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
Examples:
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
- `RF_10min_ExpA.joblib`: 10-minute RF model for Experiment A
|
| 45 |
+
- `XGB_1h_ExpE.joblib`: 1-hour XGB model for Experiment E
|
| 46 |
+
- `RF_10min_ExpF_3d.joblib`: 10-minute RF model using the formal
|
| 47 |
+
three-dimensional KDP representation in Experiment F
|
| 48 |
+
- `XGB_1h_ExpG_3d_plus_max.joblib`: 1-hour XGB model using the vertical KDP
|
| 49 |
+
profile together with maximum KDP in Experiment G
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
## Experiments
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
| Experiment | Predictor representation |
|
| 54 |
+
| --- | --- |
|
| 55 |
+
| A | Composite reflectivity: two-dimensional maximum dBZ |
|
| 56 |
+
| B | Experiment A plus latitude, longitude, and elevation |
|
| 57 |
+
| C | Vertical reflectivity profiles sampled from CAPPI data |
|
| 58 |
+
| D | Experiment C plus maximum dBZ, 18-dBZ echo top, 45-dBZ echo top, and vertically integrated liquid (VIL) |
|
| 59 |
+
| E | Experiment D plus latitude, longitude, and elevation |
|
| 60 |
+
| F | Experiment D plus a KDP representation |
|
| 61 |
+
| G | Experiment E plus a KDP representation |
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
The formal Experiments F and G use the vertical KDP profile (`3d`). Additional
|
| 64 |
+
F/G files are sensitivity experiments that use alternative KDP
|
| 65 |
+
representations:
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
| Suffix | KDP representation |
|
| 68 |
+
| --- | --- |
|
| 69 |
+
| `3d` | Vertical KDP profile |
|
| 70 |
+
| `low` | Low-level KDP representation |
|
| 71 |
+
| `max` | Maximum KDP representation |
|
| 72 |
+
| `3d_plus_max` | Vertical KDP profile plus maximum KDP |
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
The reflectivity profile contains 21 CAPPI levels from 1.0 to 17.0 km. The KDP
|
| 75 |
+
profile contains 34 levels from 0.5 to 17.0 km. Radar predictors use seven
|
| 76 |
+
temporal lags from `t-60` to `t0`, matched to the nearest radar observation
|
| 77 |
+
within 5 minutes.
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
The formal A-G representations contain 7, 10, 147, 175, 178, 413, and 416
|
| 80 |
+
predictors, respectively. Sensitivity variants of F and G may have different
|
| 81 |
+
predictor counts.
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
## Prediction Targets
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
- `10min`: rainfall accumulated over 10 minutes and expressed as an
|
| 86 |
+
hourly-equivalent intensity in mm h^-1. It is not a 1-hour accumulation.
|
| 87 |
+
- `1h`: hourly rainfall intensity in mm h^-1.
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
Model predictions therefore use units of mm h^-1 for both time scales.
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
## Joblib Contents
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
Each joblib file contains a dictionary with these entries:
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
| Key | Meaning |
|
| 96 |
+
| --- | --- |
|
| 97 |
+
| `model` | Trained RF or XGB model |
|
| 98 |
+
| `features` | Ordered feature names required by the model |
|
| 99 |
+
| `feature_importances` | Stored feature-importance table |
|
| 100 |
+
| `importance_type` | `impurity` for RF or `gain` for XGB |
|
| 101 |
+
| `model_type` | `RF` or `XGB` |
|
| 102 |
+
| `target` | `10min` or `1h` |
|
| 103 |
+
| `experiment` | Experiment identifier |
|
| 104 |
+
| `kdp_shape` | KDP representation, where applicable |
|
| 105 |
+
| `backend` | Model implementation recorded during export |
|
| 106 |
+
| `versions` | Relevant package versions recorded during export |
|
| 107 |
+
|
| 108 |
+
Always prepare input columns in the exact order stored in `features`. A model
|
| 109 |
+
should not be applied to data with a different preprocessing procedure, feature
|
| 110 |
+
definition, vertical level, temporal lag, unit, or column order.
|
| 111 |
+
|
| 112 |
+
## Loading and Prediction
|
| 113 |
+
|
| 114 |
+
The following example loads an artifact and produces predictions from a pandas
|
| 115 |
+
DataFrame named `frame`:
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
```python
|
| 118 |
+
import joblib
|
| 119 |
+
import numpy as np
|
| 120 |
+
import xgboost as xgb
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
artifact = joblib.load("RF_10min_ExpA.joblib")
|
| 123 |
+
model = artifact["model"]
|
| 124 |
+
feature_names = artifact["features"]
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
X = frame.loc[:, feature_names].to_numpy(dtype=np.float32)
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
if artifact["model_type"] == "XGB":
|
| 129 |
+
predictions = model.predict(xgb.DMatrix(X, feature_names=feature_names))
|
| 130 |
+
else:
|
| 131 |
+
predictions = model.predict(X)
|
| 132 |
+
```
|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |
+
The required Python packages include `joblib`, `numpy`, `scikit-learn`, and
|
| 135 |
+
`xgboost`. Consult `artifact["versions"]` for the package versions recorded for
|
| 136 |
+
an individual model. Matching those versions as closely as possible is
|
| 137 |
+
recommended for reproducible loading and prediction.
|
| 138 |
+
|
| 139 |
+
## Feature Importance
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
Feature importance is available in `artifact["feature_importances"]`:
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
- RF importance is the scikit-learn impurity-based importance.
|
| 144 |
+
- XGB importance is the XGBoost gain importance.
|
| 145 |
+
|
| 146 |
+
These definitions measure different quantities. Importance values should be
|
| 147 |
+
interpreted within the context of each model and should not be treated as
|
| 148 |
+
directly equivalent between RF and XGB. Correlated radar predictors can also
|
| 149 |
+
share or redistribute importance.
|
| 150 |
+
|
| 151 |
+
## Validation Design
|
| 152 |
+
|
| 153 |
+
The models were developed using observations from 2020-2023 at 252 stations in
|
| 154 |
+
the training region. Spatial validation used 30 held-out stations from the same
|
| 155 |
+
period, and temporal validation used 2024 observations from the training-region
|
| 156 |
+
stations. Validation data and results are not part of this model-only archive.
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
## Data Availability and Limitations
|
| 159 |
+
|
| 160 |
+
The source radar products, including three-dimensional CAPPI reflectivity were
|
| 161 |
+
provided by the Central Weather Administration and the National Science and
|
| 162 |
+
Technology Center for Disaster Reduction. Redistribution restrictions prevent
|
| 163 |
+
their inclusion. Rain-gauge observations and derived training or validation
|
| 164 |
+
samples are also not included here.
|
| 165 |
+
|
| 166 |
+
Reusing these models requires independently obtained data with matching
|
| 167 |
+
variables and identical preprocessing. The archive alone is not sufficient to
|
| 168 |
+
reconstruct the restricted input dataset or reproduce model training from raw
|
| 169 |
+
observations.
|
| 170 |
+
|
| 171 |
+
## Security Notice
|
| 172 |
+
|
| 173 |
+
Joblib files use Python's pickle-based serialization. Load these files only
|
| 174 |
+
from a trusted source, because loading an untrusted pickle or joblib file can
|
| 175 |
+
execute arbitrary code.
|
| 176 |
+
|