File size: 25,951 Bytes
1556404 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 | # Eval Service 重新设计方案(通用 + 职责清晰)
## 🎯 核心问题
### 当前设计的问题
1. **❌ 过于针对 circle packing**: 假设了 centers/radii 特定数据格式
2. **❌ 职责不清**: ShinkaEvolve 负责评估,Eval Service 只是"旁观者"
3. **❌ 重复工作**: 如果要运行 auxiliary metrics,需要重新加载程序输出
### 理想设计
1. **✅ 任务无关**: 适用于任何优化问题(TSP, circuit design, code optimization, etc.)
2. **✅ 职责清晰**: Eval Service **完全负责**评估(primary + auxiliary)
3. **✅ 一次性完成**: 一次运行完成所有评估,避免重复
---
## 🏗️ 重新设计的架构
### 新的职责划分
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ShinkaEvolve (Evolution Loop) │
│ 职责: │
│ • 生成新代码 (mutation/crossover) │
│ • 管理演化流程 (parent selection, population, etc.) │
│ • 存储结果到 database │
│ • 决策下一代的演化策略 │
│ │
│ 不负责:❌ 运行和评估程序 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓ 提交代码
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Eval Service (Evaluation Service) │
│ 职责: │
│ • 接收待评估的程序代码 │
│ • 运行 PRIMARY evaluator (ground truth) │
│ • 运行 AUXILIARY evaluators (if available) │
│ • 生成完整的 metrics.json │
│ • [可选] 触发 agent 更新 auxiliary evaluators │
│ │
│ 输出:完整的 evaluation results │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓ 返回结果
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ShinkaEvolve (继续演化) │
│ • 读取 metrics.json │
│ • 提取 combined_score → 演化决策 │
│ • [可选] 读取 auxiliary metrics → 用于 LLM prompt │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
---
## 📊 通用接口设计
### 核心原则:Evaluator Contract(评估器契约)
**任何任务的 evaluator 必须遵循标准接口**:
```python
# Standard Evaluator Interface (任务无关)
def evaluate(
program_path: str,
results_dir: str,
**kwargs
) -> EvaluationResult:
"""
标准评估接口
Args:
program_path: 待评估程序的路径
results_dir: 结果保存目录
**kwargs: 任务特定的额外参数
Returns:
EvaluationResult: 包含 primary metrics, auxiliary metrics, metadata
"""
pass
@dataclass
class EvaluationResult:
"""Standard evaluation result (任务无关)"""
# PRIMARY (必须,决定演化)
combined_score: float # Ground truth score
correct: bool # 是否通过验证
error: Optional[str] # 如果失败,错误信息
# PUBLIC METRICS (可选,可见给 LLM)
public_metrics: Dict[str, Any]
# PRIVATE METRICS (可选,不可见给 LLM)
private_metrics: Dict[str, Any]
# AUXILIARY METRICS (可选,由 eval agent 动态生成)
auxiliary_metrics: Dict[str, Any]
auxiliary_definitions: Dict[str, MetricDefinition]
# PROGRAM OUTPUT (可选,用于后续分析/可视化)
program_output: Any # 任务特定的输出
# METADATA
execution_time: float
num_runs: int
timestamp: str
@dataclass
class MetricDefinition:
"""Metric definition (任务无关)"""
name: str
description: str
interpretation: str # "higher_better", "lower_better", "neutral"
unit: str
formula: Optional[str]
source: str # "primary", "auxiliary_static", "auxiliary_dynamic"
```
---
## 🔧 Eval Service 重新实现
### 新的 API 设计
#### 1. Evaluation Request (同步/异步)
```python
# POST /api/v1/evaluate
{
"program_path": "gen_42/main.py", # 相对于 experiment root
"results_dir": "gen_42/results", # 相对于 experiment root
"generation": 42,
"experiment_root": "/path/to/results_...", # 实验根目录
"evaluation_config": {
"primary_evaluator": "examples/circle_packing/evaluate.py",
"num_runs": 1,
"timeout": 300, # seconds
"extra_args": {}
},
"auxiliary_config": {
"enabled": true,
"use_dynamic": true, # 使用 agent 生成的 metrics
"use_static": false, # 使用预定义的 metrics
"timeout": 10 # per metric
}
}
# Response (如果异步)
{
"status": "accepted",
"job_id": "eval_job_42",
"estimated_time": 15 # seconds
}
# 或者 (如果同步)
{
"status": "completed",
"evaluation_result": {...} # EvaluationResult
}
```
#### 2. Query Evaluation Result
```python
# GET /api/v1/evaluate/{job_id}
{
"status": "completed", # "pending", "running", "completed", "failed"
"evaluation_result": {
"combined_score": 2.34,
"correct": true,
"error": null,
"public_metrics": {
"num_circles": 26,
"aux_radius_std_dev": 0.031,
"aux_spatial_uniformity": 0.82
},
"private_metrics": {...},
"auxiliary_metrics": {...},
"auxiliary_definitions": {...},
"program_output": {...}, # task-specific
"execution_time": 12.5,
"timestamp": "2026-02-03T04:00:00Z"
}
}
```
---
## 🔄 完整流程(新架构)
### Step 1: ShinkaEvolve 提交评估请求
```python
# shinka/core/runner.py
def _submit_new_job(self):
current_gen = self.next_generation_to_submit
exec_fname = f"{self.results_dir}/gen_{current_gen}/main.py"
results_dir = f"{self.results_dir}/gen_{current_gen}/results"
# 创建目录
Path(results_dir).mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
# ✅ 新方案:提交到 Eval Service (如果配置)
if self.eval_service_url:
job_id = self._submit_to_eval_service(
exec_fname=exec_fname,
results_dir=results_dir,
generation=current_gen
)
else:
# 兼容旧方案:使用 local scheduler
job_id = self.scheduler.submit_async(exec_fname, results_dir)
# 跟踪 job
running_job = RunningJob(
job_id=job_id,
exec_fname=exec_fname,
results_dir=results_dir,
generation=current_gen,
...
)
self.running_jobs.append(running_job)
def _submit_to_eval_service(
self,
exec_fname: str,
results_dir: str,
generation: int
) -> str:
"""Submit evaluation request to Eval Service"""
import requests
payload = {
"program_path": exec_fname,
"results_dir": results_dir,
"generation": generation,
"experiment_root": str(self.results_dir),
"evaluation_config": {
"primary_evaluator": self.job_config.eval_program_path,
"num_runs": 1,
"timeout": 300,
"extra_args": self.job_config.extra_cmd_args or {}
},
"auxiliary_config": {
"enabled": True,
"use_dynamic": True,
"timeout": 10
}
}
response = requests.post(
f"{self.eval_service_url}/api/v1/evaluate",
json=payload,
timeout=5.0 # 快速提交
)
if response.status_code == 200:
data = response.json()
return data["job_id"] # 返回 eval service 的 job_id
else:
raise RuntimeError(f"Eval service submission failed: {response.status_code}")
def _check_completed_jobs(self) -> List[RunningJob]:
"""Check for completed jobs"""
completed = []
still_running = []
for job in self.running_jobs:
if self.eval_service_url:
# ✅ 新方案:查询 eval service
is_complete, result = self._query_eval_service(job.job_id)
if is_complete:
# 结果已经保存在 job.results_dir/metrics.json
completed.append(job)
else:
still_running.append(job)
else:
# 兼容旧方案:使用 local scheduler
is_running = self.scheduler.check_job_status(job)
if not is_running:
completed.append(job)
else:
still_running.append(job)
self.running_jobs = still_running
return completed
def _query_eval_service(self, job_id: str) -> Tuple[bool, Optional[Dict]]:
"""Query evaluation result from Eval Service"""
import requests
try:
response = requests.get(
f"{self.eval_service_url}/api/v1/evaluate/{job_id}",
timeout=2.0
)
if response.status_code == 200:
data = response.json()
if data["status"] == "completed":
return True, data["evaluation_result"]
elif data["status"] == "failed":
return True, None # Failed but done
else:
return False, None # Still running
else:
return False, None
except Exception as e:
logger.warning(f"Failed to query eval service: {e}")
return False, None
```
### Step 2: Eval Service 处理评估请求
```python
# eval_agent/ev2_service_standalone.py
@app.post("/api/v1/evaluate")
async def evaluate_program(
request: EvaluationRequest,
background_tasks: BackgroundTasks
):
"""
Main evaluation endpoint
Handles both primary and auxiliary evaluation in one place.
"""
# 生成 job_id
job_id = f"eval_{request.generation}_{int(time.time())}"
# 创建 job tracking
eval_jobs[job_id] = {
"status": "pending",
"request": request,
"started_at": time.time(),
"result": None
}
# 启动后台评估任务
background_tasks.add_task(
run_full_evaluation,
job_id=job_id,
request=request
)
# 立即返回 (异步)
return {
"status": "accepted",
"job_id": job_id,
"estimated_time": 15
}
async def run_full_evaluation(job_id: str, request: EvaluationRequest):
"""
Complete evaluation pipeline (primary + auxiliary)
This runs in the background.
"""
logger.info(f"=" * 60)
logger.info(f"🔄 Starting Evaluation: {job_id}")
logger.info(f"=" * 60)
try:
eval_jobs[job_id]["status"] = "running"
# ===== Step 1: Run Primary Evaluator =====
logger.info("📊 Step 1: Running primary evaluator...")
primary_result = await run_primary_evaluator(request)
if not primary_result["success"]:
eval_jobs[job_id]["status"] = "failed"
eval_jobs[job_id]["error"] = primary_result["error"]
return
logger.info(f"✅ Primary evaluation completed: score={primary_result['combined_score']:.4f}")
# ===== Step 2: Load Auxiliary Evaluators (if enabled) =====
auxiliary_results = {}
auxiliary_definitions = {}
if request.auxiliary_config.enabled:
logger.info("🔧 Step 2: Running auxiliary evaluators...")
# 2a. Dynamic metrics (agent-generated)
if request.auxiliary_config.use_dynamic:
dynamic_results = await run_dynamic_auxiliary(
experiment_root=request.experiment_root,
program_output=primary_result.get("program_output"),
timeout=request.auxiliary_config.timeout
)
if dynamic_results:
auxiliary_results.update(dynamic_results["metrics"])
auxiliary_definitions.update(dynamic_results["definitions"])
logger.info(f"✅ Dynamic auxiliary: {len(dynamic_results['metrics'])} metrics")
# 2b. Static metrics (pre-defined)
if request.auxiliary_config.use_static:
static_results = await run_static_auxiliary(
experiment_root=request.experiment_root,
program_output=primary_result.get("program_output")
)
if static_results:
auxiliary_results.update(static_results["metrics"])
auxiliary_definitions.update(static_results["definitions"])
logger.info(f"✅ Static auxiliary: {len(static_results['metrics'])} metrics")
# ===== Step 3: Merge and Save Results =====
logger.info("💾 Step 3: Saving complete evaluation results...")
complete_result = {
"combined_score": primary_result["combined_score"],
"correct": primary_result["correct"],
"error": primary_result.get("error"),
"public_metrics": {
**primary_result.get("public_metrics", {}),
**{f"aux_{k}": v for k, v in auxiliary_results.items()}
},
"private_metrics": primary_result.get("private_metrics", {}),
"auxiliary_metric_definitions": auxiliary_definitions,
"auxiliary_metadata": {
"executed": len(auxiliary_results) > 0,
"num_metrics_computed": len(auxiliary_results),
"timestamp": time.strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ", time.gmtime())
},
"execution_time_mean": primary_result.get("execution_time", 0),
"num_valid_runs": primary_result.get("num_valid_runs", 0),
"all_validation_errors": primary_result.get("all_validation_errors", [])
}
# 保存到 metrics.json
metrics_file = Path(request.experiment_root) / request.results_dir / "metrics.json"
with open(metrics_file, 'w') as f:
json.dump(complete_result, f, indent=2)
# 保存 correct.json
correct_file = Path(request.experiment_root) / request.results_dir / "correct.json"
with open(correct_file, 'w') as f:
json.dump({
"correct": primary_result["correct"],
"error": primary_result.get("error")
}, f, indent=2)
logger.info(f"✅ Results saved to: {metrics_file}")
# ===== Step 4: Update Job Status =====
eval_jobs[job_id]["status"] = "completed"
eval_jobs[job_id]["result"] = complete_result
logger.info(f"=" * 60)
logger.info(f"✅ Evaluation Completed: {job_id}")
logger.info(f"=" * 60)
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"❌ Evaluation failed: {e}", exc_info=True)
eval_jobs[job_id]["status"] = "failed"
eval_jobs[job_id]["error"] = str(e)
async def run_primary_evaluator(request: EvaluationRequest) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Run the primary evaluator (task-specific)
This calls the existing evaluate.py or equivalent.
"""
import subprocess
# 构建命令
program_path = Path(request.experiment_root) / request.program_path
results_dir = Path(request.experiment_root) / request.results_dir
evaluator_path = request.evaluation_config.primary_evaluator
cmd = [
"python",
evaluator_path,
"--program_path", str(program_path),
"--results_dir", str(results_dir)
]
# 添加额外参数
for key, value in request.evaluation_config.extra_args.items():
if isinstance(value, bool):
if value:
cmd.append(f"--{key}")
else:
cmd.extend([f"--{key}", str(value)])
# 运行评估器
try:
process = await asyncio.create_subprocess_exec(
*cmd,
stdout=asyncio.subprocess.PIPE,
stderr=asyncio.subprocess.PIPE
)
stdout, stderr = await asyncio.wait_for(
process.communicate(),
timeout=request.evaluation_config.timeout
)
if process.returncode != 0:
return {
"success": False,
"error": f"Evaluator failed: {stderr.decode()}"
}
# 读取结果
metrics_file = results_dir / "metrics.json"
if not metrics_file.exists():
return {
"success": False,
"error": "metrics.json not found"
}
with open(metrics_file) as f:
metrics = json.load(f)
# 尝试加载程序输出(用于 auxiliary evaluation)
program_output = load_program_output(results_dir)
return {
"success": True,
"combined_score": metrics["combined_score"],
"correct": True, # 如果执行到这里
"public_metrics": metrics.get("public", {}),
"private_metrics": metrics.get("private", {}),
"execution_time": metrics.get("execution_time_mean", 0),
"num_valid_runs": metrics.get("num_valid_runs", 0),
"all_validation_errors": metrics.get("all_validation_errors", []),
"program_output": program_output
}
except asyncio.TimeoutError:
return {
"success": False,
"error": f"Evaluation timeout after {request.evaluation_config.timeout}s"
}
except Exception as e:
return {
"success": False,
"error": f"Evaluation error: {str(e)}"
}
async def run_dynamic_auxiliary(
experiment_root: str,
program_output: Any,
timeout: int
) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
"""
Run dynamically generated auxiliary metrics (任务无关)
Key: This works with ANY task by using the generic program_output
"""
metrics_file = Path(experiment_root) / "eval_agent_memory" / "auxiliary_metrics.py"
if not metrics_file.exists():
return None
try:
# 动态导入
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("dynamic_aux", metrics_file)
module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
spec.loader.exec_module(module)
# 查找标准接口
if not hasattr(module, 'evaluate_auxiliary_metrics'):
logger.warning("No 'evaluate_auxiliary_metrics' function found")
return None
eval_fn = module.evaluate_auxiliary_metrics
# ✅ 关键:任务无关的调用
# program_output 可以是任何格式(dict, tuple, object, etc.)
# 由 auxiliary_metrics.py 自己知道如何处理
aux_results = await asyncio.wait_for(
asyncio.to_thread(eval_fn, program_output),
timeout=timeout
)
# 提取定义
definitions = {}
if hasattr(module, 'METRIC_DEFINITIONS'):
definitions = module.METRIC_DEFINITIONS
return {
"metrics": aux_results,
"definitions": definitions
}
except asyncio.TimeoutError:
logger.warning(f"Auxiliary metrics timeout after {timeout}s")
return None
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"Auxiliary metrics failed: {e}", exc_info=True)
return None
def load_program_output(results_dir: Path) -> Any:
"""
Load program output (任务无关)
尝试多种格式,返回最通用的表示
"""
# 1. 尝试 extra.npz (numpy arrays)
npz_file = results_dir / "extra.npz"
if npz_file.exists():
try:
data = np.load(npz_file)
return {k: data[k] for k in data.files}
except:
pass
# 2. 尝试 extra.pkl (pickle)
pkl_file = results_dir / "extra.pkl"
if pkl_file.exists():
try:
import pickle
with open(pkl_file, 'rb') as f:
return pickle.load(f)
except:
pass
# 3. 尝试 extra.json (json)
json_file = results_dir / "extra.json"
if json_file.exists():
try:
with open(json_file) as f:
return json.load(f)
except:
pass
# 4. 从 metrics.json 提取
metrics_file = results_dir / "metrics.json"
if metrics_file.exists():
try:
with open(metrics_file) as f:
metrics = json.load(f)
# 返回 public + private 作为 output
return {
"public": metrics.get("public", {}),
"private": metrics.get("private", {})
}
except:
pass
return None
```
---
## 🎨 Agent Prompt 的通用化
### 新的 Prompt 要求
```jinja2
You are an evaluation expert for optimization problems.
<TASK_CONTEXT>
Task: {{ task_name }}
Objective: {{ objective }}
Primary Metric: {{ primary_metric_name }} ({{ primary_metric_interpretation }})
</TASK_CONTEXT>
<YOUR_ROLE>
Design AUXILIARY metrics that complement the primary metric.
These metrics should:
1. Measure aspects NOT captured by primary metric
2. Work with the program output format
3. Be computationally efficient
</YOUR_ROLE>
<PROGRAM_OUTPUT_FORMAT>
The program output is available as a Python object with structure:
{{ program_output_structure }}
Example:
{{ program_output_example }}
</PROGRAM_OUTPUT_FORMAT>
<REQUIRED_INTERFACE>
You MUST create auxiliary_metrics.py with:
```python
def evaluate_auxiliary_metrics(program_output) -> dict:
"""
Evaluate auxiliary metrics.
Args:
program_output: Program output (format depends on task)
For circle packing: {"centers": ndarray, "radii": ndarray}
For TSP: {"tour": list, "distance": float}
For code: {"code": str, "ast": dict}
Returns:
dict: Auxiliary metrics
"""
# Extract what you need from program_output
# Task-specific logic here
return {
"metric_name_1": value1,
"metric_name_2": value2,
}
METRIC_DEFINITIONS = {
"metric_name_1": {
"name": "Human Readable Name",
"description": "What this metric measures",
"interpretation": "higher_better" | "lower_better" | "neutral",
"unit": "...",
"formula": "..."
},
...
}
```
</REQUIRED_INTERFACE>
<EXAMPLES>
{% for example in auxiliary_examples %}
{{ example }}
{% endfor %}
</EXAMPLES>
```
---
## 📋 迁移路径
### Phase 1: 保持向后兼容 (1周)
**目标**: 支持新旧两种模式
```python
# Config option
class EvolutionConfig:
eval_service_url: Optional[str] = None
use_eval_service_for_evaluation: bool = False # ← 新选项
```
- `use_eval_service_for_evaluation = False`: 使用旧方案(scheduler → evaluate.py)
- `use_eval_service_for_evaluation = True`: 使用新方案(eval service 负责)
### Phase 2: 实现新的 Eval Service API (2周)
- [ ] 实现 `/api/v1/evaluate` endpoint
- [ ] 实现 `run_full_evaluation` pipeline
- [ ] 实现通用的 `load_program_output`
- [ ] 测试多种任务格式
### Phase 3: 更新 Agent Prompt (1周)
- [ ] 通用化 prompt 模板
- [ ] 添加 task-specific examples
- [ ] 测试 agent 生成的代码
### Phase 4: 全面切换 (1周)
- [ ] 默认启用新模式
- [ ] 废弃旧 scheduler 调用方式
- [ ] 文档更新
---
## 🎯 成功标准
### 通用性验证
测试 3 个不同类型的任务:
1. **Circle Packing** (几何优化)
- program_output: `{"centers": ndarray, "radii": ndarray}`
- auxiliary metrics: spatial uniformity, radius distribution
2. **TSP** (组合优化)
- program_output: `{"tour": list, "distance": float}`
- auxiliary metrics: tour smoothness, cluster quality
3. **Code Optimization** (程序综合)
- program_output: `{"code": str, "ast": dict, "runtime": float}`
- auxiliary metrics: code complexity, readability, efficiency
如果所有3个任务都能用同样的架构,则验证通过 ✅
### 职责清晰性验证
- [ ] ShinkaEvolve 不直接调用 evaluate.py
- [ ] Eval Service 完全负责评估
- [ ] Primary 和 auxiliary 在同一次调用中完成
- [ ] 结果格式统一
---
## 📄 总结
### 关键改进
1. **✅ 任务无关**:
- 使用通用的 `program_output` 格式
- Agent 适应不同任务的输出结构
2. **✅ 职责清晰**:
- ShinkaEvolve: 演化逻辑
- Eval Service: 完整评估(primary + auxiliary)
3. **✅ 一次完成**:
- 一次运行得到所有 metrics
- 避免重复加载程序输出
### 下一步
1. **立即开始**: 实现新的 `/api/v1/evaluate` API
2. **保持兼容**: 通过 config flag 支持新旧模式
3. **逐步迁移**: Phase 1-4 按顺序实施
|