Kasper-Bankler commited on
Commit
cd338ca
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 7002fc0

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +5 -5
README.md CHANGED
@@ -15,19 +15,19 @@ tags:
15
  - AI-safety
16
  ---
17
 
18
- # Gemma 4 E2B - Uncensored
19
 
20
- This is a surgically uncensored version of `google/gemma-4-E2B-it`, achieved through **Arbitrary-Rank Ablation (ARA)**.
21
 
22
  ## 🔬 Ablation Methodology
23
 
24
- This model was uncensored using the [Heretic](https://github.com/p-e-w/heretic) framework. Instead of fine-tuning the model on unsafe data, the model's internal "refusal vector" was mathematically located and ablated at the matrix level.
25
 
26
  * **Technique:** Arbitrary-Rank Ablation (ARA)
27
  * **Trial Selected:** Trial 71
28
  * **KL Divergence:** `0.1650`
29
-
30
- **Why Trial 71?** During comparative analysis, higher ablation (e.g., Trial 129 / KL: 0.3542) successfully destroyed all censorship but resulted in severe semantic drift and "brain damage" (e.g., hallucinating when asked technical questions). Trial 71 was selected because a KL divergence of `0.1650` represents the perfect "Goldilocks" zone. It successfully bypasses the safety guardrails while preserving the model's core logic, spatial reasoning, and technical vocabulary.
31
 
32
  ## 💻 Hardware & Build Details
33
 
 
15
  - AI-safety
16
  ---
17
 
18
+ # Gemma 4 E2B - Alignment Study
19
 
20
+ This model is a Representation Engineering study on `google/gemma-4-E2B-it`, achieved through **Arbitrary-Rank Ablation (ARA)** to mathematically isolate and remove the model's refusal direction.
21
 
22
  ## 🔬 Ablation Methodology
23
 
24
+ The model's alignment vectors were modified using the [Heretic](https://github.com/p-e-w/heretic) framework. Instead of fine-tuning the model on alternative data, the internal "refusal vector" was mathematically located and ablated at the matrix level.
25
 
26
  * **Technique:** Arbitrary-Rank Ablation (ARA)
27
  * **Trial Selected:** Trial 71
28
  * **KL Divergence:** `0.1650`
29
+ *
30
+ **Why Trial 71?** During comparative analysis, higher ablation (e.g., Trial 129 / KL: 0.3542) successfully removed all refusal behaviors but resulted in severe semantic drift and performance degradation (e.g., hallucinating when asked technical questions). Trial 71 was selected because a KL divergence of `0.1650` represents an optimal threshold. It successfully alters the safety alignment while preserving the model's core logic, spatial reasoning, and technical vocabulary.
31
 
32
  ## 💻 Hardware & Build Details
33