Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,179 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
+
language: en
|
| 3 |
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
|
| 4 |
+
library_name: pytorch
|
| 5 |
+
tags:
|
| 6 |
+
- chemistry
|
| 7 |
+
- cheminformatics
|
| 8 |
+
- optical-chemical-structure-recognition
|
| 9 |
+
- ocsr
|
| 10 |
+
- molecule-recognition
|
| 11 |
+
- smiles
|
| 12 |
+
- transformer
|
| 13 |
+
- swin-transformer
|
| 14 |
+
- minimum-risk-training
|
| 15 |
+
- molecular-graph
|
| 16 |
+
datasets:
|
| 17 |
+
- Keylab/COMO
|
| 18 |
+
metrics:
|
| 19 |
+
- exact_match
|
| 20 |
+
- tanimoto_similarity
|
| 21 |
+
- tautomer_match
|
| 22 |
---
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
# COMO: Closed-Loop Optical Molecule Recognition
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
COMO (Closed-loop Optical Molecule recOgnition) is a deep learning framework for
|
| 27 |
+
Optical Chemical Structure Recognition (OCSR). It recognizes chemical structure
|
| 28 |
+
diagrams from images and predicts SMILES strings with atom-level 2D coordinates
|
| 29 |
+
and bond matrices. COMO uses Minimum Risk Training (MRT) to directly optimize
|
| 30 |
+
molecular-level, non-differentiable objectives, closing the gap between
|
| 31 |
+
token-level training and molecular-level evaluation.
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
## Model Summary
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
- **Architecture:** Swin-B encoder β 6-layer Transformer decoder β bond MLP
|
| 36 |
+
- **Input:** 384Γ384 RGB image of a chemical structure diagram
|
| 37 |
+
- **Output:** SMILES string + atom coordinates + bond matrix
|
| 38 |
+
- **Vocabulary:** chartok_coords format (200 tokens: SMILES chars + 64 X/Y bins)
|
| 39 |
+
- **Parameters:** ~94M
|
| 40 |
+
- **Training data:** 1M PubChem + 652K USPTO (MLE) + 83K MolParser-SFT (MRT)
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
## Available Checkpoints
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
All checkpoints are from the **joint MLE+MRT** training pipeline (30 epochs,
|
| 45 |
+
interleaved MLE/MRT from scratch). Three reward variants are provided:
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
| Checkpoint | Reward Mode | Description |
|
| 48 |
+
|-----------|-------------|-------------|
|
| 49 |
+
| `models/tanimoto/final.pth` | Tanimoto | Morgan fingerprint Tanimoto similarity reward |
|
| 50 |
+
| `models/tanimoto/best.pth` | Tanimoto | Best validation epoch |
|
| 51 |
+
| `models/edit_distance/final.pth` | Edit Distance | Levenshtein string-similarity reward |
|
| 52 |
+
| `models/edit_distance/best.pth` | Edit Distance | Best validation epoch |
|
| 53 |
+
| `models/visual/final.pth` | Visual | Siamese visual-encoder cosine-similarity reward |
|
| 54 |
+
| `models/visual/best.pth` | Visual | Best validation epoch |
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
## Architecture
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
```
|
| 59 |
+
Image (384Γ384)
|
| 60 |
+
β Swin-B backbone (ImageNet pretrained)
|
| 61 |
+
β 2D sinusoidal positional encoding
|
| 62 |
+
β 6-layer Transformer decoder (d=256, 8 heads)
|
| 63 |
+
β chartok_coords tokens β SMILES + coordinates
|
| 64 |
+
β Bond MLP (2-layer, GELU) β 7-class bond matrix
|
| 65 |
+
β Graph reconstruction β canonical SMILES
|
| 66 |
+
```
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
The model outputs a molecular graph $G = (A, B)$ where:
|
| 69 |
+
- $A = \{(l_i, x_i, y_i)\}$ β atom SMILES labels with 2D image coordinates
|
| 70 |
+
- $B$ β pairwise bond types (none, single, double, triple, aromatic, wedge, dash)
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
## Training
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
### MLE Phase
|
| 75 |
+
- **Data:** 1M PubChem SMILES (synthetic) + 652K USPTO patent molecules
|
| 76 |
+
- **Augmentation:** Indigo-rendered images with random styles, functional group
|
| 77 |
+
substitution, R-group insertion, wavy bonds, scan shadows, multilingual comments
|
| 78 |
+
- **Optimizer:** AdamW, lr=4Γ10β»β΄ (encoder & decoder), weight decay=10β»βΆ
|
| 79 |
+
- **Schedule:** 2% linear warmup β cosine decay, batch size 64/GPU
|
| 80 |
+
- **Loss:** Label-smoothed cross-entropy (Ξ΅=0.1) + bond classification CE
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
### MRT Phase
|
| 83 |
+
- **Data:** 83K real-world molecular images (MolParser-SFT)
|
| 84 |
+
- **Candidates:** N=32 per image, multinomial sampling at Ο=0.5
|
| 85 |
+
- **Reward weights:** validity=0.1, similarity=0.5, exact match=0.4
|
| 86 |
+
- **Sharpening:** Ξ±=1.0, loss weight Ξ»=0.1
|
| 87 |
+
- **Schedule:** First 5 epochs MLE-only warmup, then interleaved MLE+MRT
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
## Evaluation Results
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
Exact match accuracy (%) on 10 benchmarks (COMO-Tanimoto variant):
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
| Benchmark | Images | Synthetic/Real | COMO-Tanimoto |
|
| 94 |
+
|-----------|--------|----------------|---------------|
|
| 95 |
+
| Indigo | 5,719 | Synthetic | 98.6 |
|
| 96 |
+
| ChemDraw | 5,719 | Synthetic | 96.5 |
|
| 97 |
+
| CLEF | 992 | Real (patents) | 94.8 |
|
| 98 |
+
| JPO | 450 | Real (patents) | 88.4 |
|
| 99 |
+
| UOB | 5,740 | Real (academic) | 98.0* |
|
| 100 |
+
| USPTO | 5,719 | Real (patents) | 93.4 |
|
| 101 |
+
| USPTO-10K | 10,000 | Real (patents) | 96.1 |
|
| 102 |
+
| Staker | 50,000 | Real | 87.4 |
|
| 103 |
+
| ACS | 331 | Real (publications) | 84.6 |
|
| 104 |
+
| WildMol-10K | 10,000 | Real (wild) | 77.1 |
|
| 105 |
+
|
| 106 |
+
*\*UOB results after tautomer standardization.*
|
| 107 |
+
|
| 108 |
+
See the [paper](#citation) for full comparison with MolScribe, MolParser,
|
| 109 |
+
SwinOCSR, and other baselines.
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
## Usage
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
```python
|
| 114 |
+
import como
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
# Download checkpoint from HuggingFace:
|
| 117 |
+
# huggingface-cli download Keylab/COMO models/tanimoto/final.pth
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
model = como.load_model("models/tanimoto/final.pth", device="cuda")
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
# Single image prediction
|
| 122 |
+
smiles = como.predict(model, "molecule.png")
|
| 123 |
+
print(smiles) # "CC(=O)O"
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
# Batch prediction
|
| 126 |
+
smiles_list = como.predict_batch(model, ["mol1.png", "mol2.png"])
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
# Benchmark evaluation
|
| 129 |
+
metrics = como.evaluate(model, "benchmark/USPTO/", "benchmark/USPTO.csv")
|
| 130 |
+
print(f"Exact Match: {metrics['postprocess/exact_match_acc']:.2%}")
|
| 131 |
+
```
|
| 132 |
+
|
| 133 |
+
Full documentation: [como-ocsr on PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/como-ocsr/)
|
| 134 |
+
|
| 135 |
+
## Benchmarks
|
| 136 |
+
|
| 137 |
+
Benchmark datasets are available in the `benchmarks/` directory of this
|
| 138 |
+
repository. Each dataset contains `.png` images and a CSV file with columns
|
| 139 |
+
`image_id` and `SMILES`.
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
**Note:** These benchmarks are collected from existing public OCSR datasets.
|
| 142 |
+
Please refer to the original sources for attribution:
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
| Dataset | Source |
|
| 145 |
+
|---------|--------|
|
| 146 |
+
| USPTO, CLEF, JPO, UOB, Staker | [Rajan et al., 2020](https://github.com/Kohulan/DECIMER-Image_Transformer) |
|
| 147 |
+
| Indigo, ChemDraw, ACS | [Qian et al., 2023](https://github.com/thomas0809/MolScribe) |
|
| 148 |
+
| USPTO-10K | [Morin et al., 2023](https://github.com/DS4SD/molgrapher) |
|
| 149 |
+
| WildMol-10K | [Fang et al., 2025](https://github.com/orgs/Chem-Struct-ML/repositories) |
|
| 150 |
+
|
| 151 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 152 |
+
|
| 153 |
+
1. **Functional group abbreviations** (e.g., "Allyl", "Boc"): COMO may fail to
|
| 154 |
+
expand uncommon abbreviations that are rare in the training distribution.
|
| 155 |
+
2. **Charged species**: Formally charged functional groups (diazonium, azide) are
|
| 156 |
+
sometimes confused with their neutral counterparts.
|
| 157 |
+
3. **Document context**: Neighboring text or reaction labels can contaminate
|
| 158 |
+
predictions (hallucinated fragments).
|
| 159 |
+
4. **Stereochemistry**: While postprocessing restores chirality from predicted
|
| 160 |
+
coordinates, complex E/Z isomerism may be unreliable.
|
| 161 |
+
5. The model is designed for **single-molecule** images. Multi-molecule or
|
| 162 |
+
reaction diagrams are out of scope.
|
| 163 |
+
|
| 164 |
+
## License
|
| 165 |
+
|
| 166 |
+
- **Model Weights:** CC BY-NC 4.0 (non-commercial use only)
|
| 167 |
+
- **Code:** MIT License
|
| 168 |
+
- **Benchmarks:** See original sources for applicable terms
|
| 169 |
+
|
| 170 |
+
## Citation
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 173 |
+
@article{lyu2026closed,
|
| 174 |
+
title={COMO: Closed-Loop Optical Molecule Recognition with Minimum Risk Training},
|
| 175 |
+
author={Lyu, Zhuoqi and Ke, Qing},
|
| 176 |
+
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.23546},
|
| 177 |
+
year={2026}
|
| 178 |
+
}
|
| 179 |
+
```
|