Ricardo-H commited on
Commit
7be56fe
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): d9cd793

docs(README): drop borders on all light cards for a cleaner look in light mode

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +2 -2
README.md CHANGED
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Following the release of KAT-Coder-V2.5 in July, we are pleased to release the o
47
  </a>
48
  </p>
49
 
50
- <div style="background-color:#ffffff;border:1px solid #d7e4d2;border-radius:12px;padding:16px;overflow-x:auto;">
51
  <table style="border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;margin:0 auto;font-size:12.5px;line-height:1.4;white-space:nowrap;">
52
  <tr>
53
  <td style="padding:11px 8px;text-align:center;border-bottom:2px solid #1a4a25;"><span style="color:#1a4a25;font-weight:700;">Benchmark</span></td>
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ Following the release of KAT-Coder-V2.5 in July, we are pleased to release the o
145
 
146
  <sub>For **Terminal-Bench 2.1**, the bold number is the average across two agent harnesses; the small numbers below are the per-harness scores (Terminus-2 / Claude Code).</sub>
147
 
148
- <div style="background-color:#ffffff;border:1px solid #ececec;border-radius:12px;padding:14px 18px;margin-top:6px;">
149
  <div style="font-size:11.5px;line-height:1.5;color:#8a8a8a;">
150
 
151
  <p style="margin:0 0 3px;"><strong style="color:#555;">1. Evaluation method.</strong> All metrics presented in the table are reproduced in-house: we download the public model checkpoints, deploy them via vLLM or SGLang, and evaluate under a unified standardized pipeline. No officially reported results of the respective models are directly adopted in this table. Each model is tested only once on each evaluation set; retests are conducted only if obvious errors are found.</p>
 
47
  </a>
48
  </p>
49
 
50
+ <div style="background-color:#ffffff;border:none;border-radius:12px;padding:16px;overflow-x:auto;">
51
  <table style="border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;margin:0 auto;font-size:12.5px;line-height:1.4;white-space:nowrap;">
52
  <tr>
53
  <td style="padding:11px 8px;text-align:center;border-bottom:2px solid #1a4a25;"><span style="color:#1a4a25;font-weight:700;">Benchmark</span></td>
 
145
 
146
  <sub>For **Terminal-Bench 2.1**, the bold number is the average across two agent harnesses; the small numbers below are the per-harness scores (Terminus-2 / Claude Code).</sub>
147
 
148
+ <div style="background-color:#ffffff;border:none;border-radius:12px;padding:14px 18px;margin-top:6px;">
149
  <div style="font-size:11.5px;line-height:1.5;color:#8a8a8a;">
150
 
151
  <p style="margin:0 0 3px;"><strong style="color:#555;">1. Evaluation method.</strong> All metrics presented in the table are reproduced in-house: we download the public model checkpoints, deploy them via vLLM or SGLang, and evaluate under a unified standardized pipeline. No officially reported results of the respective models are directly adopted in this table. Each model is tested only once on each evaluation set; retests are conducted only if obvious errors are found.</p>