Publish Layerfault deep challenge LF-CH-NEG-0001

CHALLENGE_ORACLE.json

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+{
+  "attack_surface": [
+    "false-positive-resistance"
+  ],
+  "control_type": "negative",
+  "corpus_id": "LF-CH-NEG-0001",
+  "difficulty": "basic",
+  "expected_decision": "PASS",
+  "ground_truth": "synthetic-generated",
+  "layerfault_rule_expectations": {
+    "candidate_rules": [],
+    "expected_rules": [],
+    "must_not_rules": [
+      "LF-CODE-SUBPROCESS",
+      "LF-PY-CALL-PROCESS"
+    ]
+  },
+  "oracle_ids": [
+    "LF-ORACLE-FALSE-POSITIVE-CONTROL"
+  ],
+  "related_cases": [],
+  "repo_name": "near-miss-python-subprocess-comment",
+  "safe_fixture": true,
+  "schema": 2,
+  "severity": "informational",
+  "techniques": [
+    "comment-only"
+  ],
+  "transformations": []
+}

FIXTURE_LAYOUT.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "artifacts": [
+    "control.py"
+  ],
+  "family": "negative",
+  "note": "All content is synthetic and inert. Do not treat this as a production model.",
+  "repo_name": "near-miss-python-subprocess-comment"
+}

LAYERFAULT_CORPUS.json

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+{
+  "candidate_rules": [],
+  "challenge": {
+    "attack_surface": [
+      "false-positive-resistance"
+    ],
+    "control_type": "negative",
+    "difficulty": "basic",
+    "expected_decision": "PASS",
+    "oracle_ids": [
+      "LF-ORACLE-FALSE-POSITIVE-CONTROL"
+    ],
+    "related_cases": [],
+    "severity": "informational",
+    "techniques": [
+      "comment-only"
+    ],
+    "transformations": []
+  },
+  "corpus_id": "LF-CH-NEG-0001",
+  "description": "Python comments mention subprocess APIs but contain no executable call site.",
+  "expected_rules": [],
+  "generator": "challenges.generate_challenge",
+  "ground_truth": "synthetic-generated",
+  "must_not_rules": [
+    "LF-CODE-SUBPROCESS",
+    "LF-PY-CALL-PROCESS"
+  ],
+  "repo_name": "near-miss-python-subprocess-comment",
+  "repo_type": "model",
+  "safe_fixture": true,
+  "safety": "inert/canary-only",
+  "schema": 1,
+  "validation": {
+    "kind": "verify-package",
+    "target": "."
+  }
+}

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+---
+license: apache-2.0
+tags:
+- layerfault
+- security-research
+- model-security
+- synthetic
+- adversarial-testing
+extra_gated_prompt: >-
+  This repository is a synthetic security-test artifact from the Layerfault
+  corpus. It intentionally contains adversarial characteristics (e.g.
+  suspicious pickle opcodes, executable-format smuggling, prompt-injection
+  strings) designed to exercise security scanner detection rules. It is
+  **not** a usable ML model and must never be loaded or executed outside an
+  isolated scanner-testing environment. By accepting, you confirm you
+  understand this repository is a test fixture, not production model
+  weights.
+extra_gated_button_content: I understand this is a security test fixture and accept the risk
+gated: auto
+---
+
+# near-miss-python-subprocess-comment
+
+> **SECURITY TEST ARTIFACT: DO NOT USE AS A PRODUCTION MODEL**
+
+This repository is part of the Layerfault synthetic security corpus.
+It is deliberately constructed to contain security-relevant characteristics for scanner testing.
+
+**Corpus ID:** `LF-CH-NEG-0001`
+
+## Purpose
+
+Python comments mention subprocess APIs but contain no executable call site.
+
+## Direct expected Layerfault rules
+
+- None; this repository is a control/comparison input.
+
+## Candidate rules
+
+These are deliberately plausible targets that remain marked as candidates until the exact
+Layerfault build used for certification confirms them.
+
+- None
+
+## Negative-control rules
+
+These should remain silent for this corpus item.
+
+- `LF-CODE-SUBPROCESS`
+- `LF-PY-CALL-PROCESS`
+
+## Safety
+
+The corpus uses fake secrets, loopback/`.invalid` network destinations, harmless marker output,
+and synthetic model behavior only. It is intended for static scanning and isolated security testing.
+
+## Challenge classification
+
+- Severity: **informational**
+- Difficulty: **basic**
+- Expected admission decision: **PASS**
+- Control type: **negative**
+- Attack surface: false-positive-resistance
+- Techniques: comment-only
+- Transformations: none
+
+### Ground-truth oracle IDs
+
+- `LF-ORACLE-FALSE-POSITIVE-CONTROL`
+
+These oracle IDs describe synthetic ground truth. They do not claim that a
+matching Layerfault detector already exists. A challenge may intentionally expose
+a scanner blind spot and remain unmapped until the detector is implemented.

SHA256SUMS.json

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+[
+  {
+    "path": "CHALLENGE_ORACLE.json",
+    "sha256": "81f3116e1f5cab1c4f23ab727f50d48f4551b611b1f073b40151e26db3dd5a04",
+    "size": 677
+  },
+  {
+    "path": "FIXTURE_LAYOUT.json",
+    "sha256": "3d191d9c1ec2368c232774fcd9e70b6744fdbac5d0bd3568d77340d912e1e59c",
+    "size": 210
+  },
+  {
+    "path": "LAYERFAULT_CORPUS.json",
+    "sha256": "b92e1cf4bc94d5f720e5f8af76a7a633135b9fd6f7ac51e2c01530680c0cb43e",
+    "size": 949
+  },
+  {
+    "path": "README.md",
+    "sha256": "0969dba7a893d5c9cc681e533849b60d6e550cf723f711a249d793c4c3dd46dc",
+    "size": 2307
+  },
+  {
+    "path": "control.py",
+    "sha256": "975e0b9fd66bfcb666ae33796064608fa01f3214ac392925871066892ad4d8aa",
+    "size": 66
+  }
+]

control.py

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# Documentation mentions subprocess.run and Popen only.
+VALUE = 1