File size: 11,665 Bytes
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
 
 
 
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
 
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
 
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
 
4b937cf
f33089b
 
4b937cf
f33089b
 
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
 
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
 
4b937cf
 
 
 
f33089b
 
4b937cf
 
f33089b
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
 
 
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
 
4b937cf
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
f33089b
4b937cf
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
---
license: apache-2.0
language:
- en
library_name: peft
pipeline_tag: text-generation
tags:
- repetition-suppression
- decode-time-intervention
- llama
- lora
- research
- degeneration
- cf-hot
base_model: LoganResearch/ARC-Base-8B
model-index:
- name: Adaptive-Repetition-Controller
  results:
  - task:
      type: text-generation
    metrics:
    - name: Repetition Reduction
      type: custom
      value: 48.4%
    - name: Risk Separation
      type: custom
      value: 125x
    - name: F1 Score
      type: f1
      value: 0.99
---

<div align="center">

# ⚑ Adaptive Repetition Controller

### *CF-HoT 125x β€” Learned Decode-Time Intervention*

[![Separation](https://img.shields.io/badge/Risk_Separation-125x-brightgreen?style=for-the-badge)](.)
[![Reduction](https://img.shields.io/badge/Repetition_Reduction-48.4%25-blue?style=for-the-badge)](.)
[![F1](https://img.shields.io/badge/F1_Score-0.99+-purple?style=for-the-badge)](.)
[![Params](https://img.shields.io/badge/Predictor-50K_params-orange?style=for-the-badge)](.)

*A learned system that predicts and prevents repetitive degeneration in language models.*

[Base Model](https://huggingface.co/LoganResearch/ARC-Base-8B) | [GitHub](https://github.com/Loganwins/HolonomyTransformer) | [Paper (forthcoming)]()

</div>

---

## 🎯 The Problem

Autoregressive language models suffer from **repetitive degeneration** β€” the tendency to fall into loops, repeat phrases, or get stuck on patterns during long-form generation.

Standard solutions apply **uniform penalties** to repeated tokens. But repetition isn't always bad, and uniform penalties can't distinguish between:
- Natural repetition (articles, pronouns, common words)
- Problematic repetition (loops, stuck patterns, degeneration)

## πŸ’‘ The Solution

The **Adaptive Repetition Controller** learns to **predict** when repetition is about to become problematic, then applies **targeted intervention** only when needed.

<div align="center">

```
╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
β•‘                    GENERATION PIPELINE                        β•‘
╠═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
β•‘                                                               β•‘
β•‘   Input  ──▢  Base Model  ──▢  Hidden States (32 layers)     β•‘
β•‘                                       β”‚                       β•‘
β•‘                                       β–Ό                       β•‘
β•‘                              β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”              β•‘
β•‘                              β”‚ Risk Predictor  β”‚              β•‘
β•‘                              β”‚   (50K params)  β”‚              β•‘
β•‘                              β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜              β•‘
β•‘                                       β”‚                       β•‘
β•‘                                       β–Ό                       β•‘
β•‘                              risk = 0.95 (HIGH)               β•‘
β•‘                                       β”‚                       β•‘
β•‘                                       β–Ό                       β•‘
β•‘                    logits[recent_tokens] -= penalty           β•‘
β•‘                                       β”‚                       β•‘
β•‘                                       β–Ό                       β•‘
β•‘                              Sample next token                β•‘
β•‘                                                               β•‘
β•šβ•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•
```

</div>

---

## πŸ“Š Results

### Risk Prediction Performance

The system achieves **125x separation** between tokens that will repeat and those that won't:

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| **F1 Score** | 0.99+ |
| **Risk @ Repeating Tokens** | 0.998 |
| **Risk @ Non-Repeating Tokens** | 0.008 |
| **Separation Factor** | **125x** |

### Generation Quality

| Metric | Baseline | With CF-HoT | Change |
|--------|----------|-------------|--------|
| Repetition Rate | 33.9% | 17.5% | **↓ 48.4%** |
| Distinct-2 (diversity) | 0.836 | 0.976 | **↑ 16.7%** |

### Comparison to Standard Methods

| Method | Adaptive | Learned | Repetition Reduction |
|--------|----------|---------|---------------------|
| HuggingFace `repetition_penalty` | ❌ | ❌ | ~20-30% |
| OpenAI `frequency_penalty` | ❌ | ❌ | ~25-35% |
| Contrastive Decoding | ❌ | ❌ | ~30-40% |
| **CF-HoT (this)** | βœ… | βœ… | **48.4%** |

---

## πŸ—οΈ Architecture

The risk predictor is remarkably small β€” only **~50,000 parameters** (0.0006% of the base model):

```python
RiskPredictor(
    # Extract features from each transformer layer
    fiber_projs = ModuleList([
        Linear(4096 β†’ 16) for _ in range(32)  # 32 layers
    ]),
    
    # Learn which layers matter most
    layer_weights = Parameter(shape=[32]),  # Softmax-normalized
    
    # Predict repetition risk
    predictor = Sequential(
        Linear(16 β†’ 64),
        GELU(),
        Linear(64 β†’ 64),
        GELU(),
        Linear(64 β†’ 1),  # Risk logit
    )
)
```

### Why It Works

1. **Hidden states contain predictive signal** β€” The model "knows" it's about to repeat before it happens
2. **Different layers encode different information** β€” Learned aggregation finds the most predictive layers
3. **Decode-time intervention preserves base model** β€” No modification to attention patterns or learned representations

---

## πŸš€ Quick Start

### Installation

```bash
pip install transformers peft accelerate torch
```

### Loading the Models

```python
import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from peft import PeftModel

# Load base model
base_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    "LoganResearch/ARC-Base-8B",
    torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
    device_map="auto"
)

# Load tokenizer
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("LoganResearch/ARC-Base-8B")

# Load CF-HoT adapter
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(
    base_model,
    "LoganResearch/Adaptive-Repetition-Controller"
)

# Load risk predictor
risk_predictor = torch.load(
    hf_hub_download("LoganResearch/Adaptive-Repetition-Controller", "risk_predictor.pt")
)
```

### Generation with CF-HoT Intervention

```python
def generate_with_cfhot(
    prompt: str,
    max_tokens: int = 512,
    penalty_scale: float = 3.0,
    threshold: float = 0.1,
    temperature: float = 0.8,
    rep_window: int = 32,
):
    """Generate text with adaptive repetition suppression."""
    
    input_ids = tokenizer.encode(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
    
    for _ in range(max_tokens):
        with torch.no_grad():
            # Forward pass with hidden states
            outputs = model(input_ids, output_hidden_states=True)
            logits = outputs.logits[:, -1, :]
            hidden_states = outputs.hidden_states
            
            # Predict repetition risk
            risk = risk_predictor(hidden_states).sigmoid().item()
            
            # Apply adaptive penalty if risk is high
            if risk > threshold:
                recent_tokens = input_ids[0, -rep_window:].tolist()
                penalty = risk * penalty_scale
                for token_id in set(recent_tokens):
                    logits[0, token_id] -= penalty
            
            # Sample next token
            probs = torch.softmax(logits / temperature, dim=-1)
            next_token = torch.multinomial(probs, num_samples=1)
            
            # Append and check for EOS
            input_ids = torch.cat([input_ids, next_token], dim=-1)
            if next_token.item() == tokenizer.eos_token_id:
                break
    
    return tokenizer.decode(input_ids[0], skip_special_tokens=True)

# Example usage
response = generate_with_cfhot(
    "Write a detailed essay on the nature of consciousness:",
    max_tokens=1000,
    penalty_scale=4.0,
)
print(response)
```

---

## πŸ“ Files

| File | Size | Description |
|------|------|-------------|
| `risk_predictor.pt` | 8.4 MB | Trained risk prediction network |
| `adapter_model.safetensors` | 218 MB | LoRA adapter weights |
| `adapter_config.json` | 1 KB | PEFT adapter configuration |

---

## βš™οΈ Training Details

### Dataset & Objective

- **Dataset:** WikiText-2
- **Task:** Binary classification β€” "Will this token appear in the next 32 tokens?"
- **Loss:** BCEWithLogitsLoss with dynamic class balancing

### Hyperparameters

| Parameter | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| `d_fiber` | 16 |
| `d_control` | 64 |
| `rep_window` | 32 |
| `lr_predictor` | 1e-4 |
| `lr_lora` | 2e-5 |
| `batch_size` | 4 |
| `gradient_accumulation` | 8 |
| `optimal_checkpoint` | Step 5000 |

### Training Progression

| Step | F1 | Risk @ Reps | Risk @ Non-Reps | Separation |
|------|-----|-------------|-----------------|------------|
| 3000 | 0.96 | 0.946 | 0.076 | 12x |
| 4000 | 0.99 | 0.997 | 0.014 | 71x |
| **5000** | **0.99+** | **0.998** | **0.008** | **125x** ⭐ |
| 6000 | 0.99+ | 0.999 | 0.021 | 48x |

*Step 5000 is optimal β€” further training reduces separation due to overfitting.*

---

## πŸ”¬ Research Context

### The Journey

This system emerged from research into geometric approaches to semantic consistency. The original theory proposed using **fiber bundles and holonomy** to detect inconsistency in transformer representations.

**What we tried:**
1. ❌ Multiplicative attention gating β€” destroyed signal
2. ❌ Log-space score modification β€” gates collapsed to uniform
3. ❌ Normalized gating β€” NaN at inference
4. ❌ Causal EMA β€” training/inference mismatch
5. ❌ Extended training β€” complete collapse

**What worked:**
- βœ… Supervised risk prediction on explicit labels
- βœ… Decode-time intervention (no attention modification)
- βœ… Adaptive penalty based on predicted risk

### What This Is (and Isn't)

<table>
<tr>
<td width="50%">

#### βœ… What It IS
- Learned repetition penalty
- Decode-time intervention
- ~50K parameter predictor
- 48% repetition reduction
- Proof that hidden states predict degeneration

</td>
<td width="50%">

#### ❌ What It's NOT
- Full Lie Holonomy Transformer
- Attention modification
- Geometric computation
- Validation of fiber bundle theory

</td>
</tr>
</table>

---

## πŸ“š Citation

```bibtex
@misc{napolitano2026arc,
  author = {Napolitano, Logan Matthew},
  title = {Adaptive Repetition Controller: Learned Decode-Time Intervention 
           for Repetition Suppression},
  year = {2026},
  publisher = {Hugging Face},
  howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/LoganResearch/Adaptive-Repetition-Controller}},
}
```

---

## πŸ”— Links

| Resource | Link |
|----------|------|
| **Base Model** | [LoganResearch/ARC-Base-8B](https://huggingface.co/LoganResearch/ARC-Base-8B) |
| **Source Code** | [GitHub: HolonomyTransformer](https://github.com/Loganwins/HolonomyTransformer) |
| **Paper** | *"The Übermensch Who Cannot Loop"* (forthcoming) |
| **Author** | [Logan Matthew Napolitano](https://github.com/Loganwins) |

---

<div align="center">

**The Übermensch who cannot loop is forced to CREATE.**

---

*Built with determination by [Logan Matthew Napolitano](https://github.com/Loganwins)*

</div>