Engine run results
Browse files- results/enhanced_summary.json +133 -99
results/enhanced_summary.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,165 +1,199 @@
|
|
| 1 |
{
|
| 2 |
"mode": "enhance",
|
| 3 |
"n_seeds": 14,
|
| 4 |
-
"n_enhanced":
|
| 5 |
"n_refined": 3,
|
| 6 |
-
"n_accepted":
|
| 7 |
-
"mean_aggregate": 7.
|
| 8 |
-
"llm_calls":
|
| 9 |
-
"output_tokens":
|
| 10 |
-
"memory_records":
|
| 11 |
"results": [
|
| 12 |
{
|
| 13 |
-
"name": "
|
| 14 |
-
"seed_name": "
|
| 15 |
"domain": "software",
|
| 16 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 17 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 18 |
-
"pitch": "
|
| 19 |
-
"mechanism": "
|
| 20 |
-
"differentiator": "
|
| 21 |
-
"extension": "Integrate with AI-driven
|
| 22 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 23 |
-
"feasibility": "Potential for over-reliance on
|
| 24 |
-
"novelty": "
|
| 25 |
-
"market": "Potential for
|
| 26 |
-
"redteam": "Assumes
|
| 27 |
}
|
| 28 |
},
|
| 29 |
{
|
| 30 |
-
"name": "
|
| 31 |
-
"seed_name": "
|
| 32 |
-
"domain": "
|
| 33 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 34 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 35 |
-
"pitch": "
|
| 36 |
-
"mechanism": "
|
| 37 |
-
"differentiator": "
|
| 38 |
-
"extension": "
|
| 39 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 40 |
-
"feasibility": "
|
| 41 |
-
"novelty": "
|
| 42 |
-
"market": "
|
| 43 |
-
"redteam": "Depends on
|
| 44 |
}
|
| 45 |
},
|
| 46 |
{
|
| 47 |
-
"name": "
|
| 48 |
-
"seed_name": "
|
| 49 |
-
"domain": "
|
| 50 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 51 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 52 |
-
"pitch": "
|
| 53 |
-
"mechanism": "
|
| 54 |
-
"differentiator": "
|
| 55 |
-
"extension": "Integrate with
|
| 56 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 57 |
-
"feasibility": "
|
| 58 |
-
"novelty": "
|
| 59 |
-
"market": "
|
| 60 |
-
"redteam": "
|
| 61 |
}
|
| 62 |
},
|
| 63 |
{
|
| 64 |
-
"name": "
|
| 65 |
-
"seed_name": "
|
| 66 |
-
"domain": "
|
| 67 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 68 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 69 |
-
"pitch": "
|
| 70 |
-
"mechanism": "
|
| 71 |
-
"differentiator": "
|
| 72 |
-
"extension": "
|
| 73 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 74 |
-
"feasibility": "
|
| 75 |
-
"novelty": "
|
| 76 |
-
"market": "
|
| 77 |
-
"redteam": "
|
| 78 |
}
|
| 79 |
},
|
| 80 |
{
|
| 81 |
-
"name": "
|
| 82 |
-
"seed_name": "
|
| 83 |
"domain": "human-ai",
|
| 84 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 85 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 86 |
-
"pitch": "
|
| 87 |
-
"mechanism": "
|
| 88 |
-
"differentiator": "
|
| 89 |
-
"extension": "
|
| 90 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 91 |
-
"feasibility": "
|
| 92 |
-
"novelty": "
|
| 93 |
-
"market": "
|
| 94 |
-
"redteam": "Depends on
|
| 95 |
}
|
| 96 |
},
|
| 97 |
{
|
| 98 |
-
"name": "
|
| 99 |
-
"seed_name": "
|
| 100 |
-
"domain": "
|
| 101 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 102 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 103 |
-
"pitch": "
|
| 104 |
-
"mechanism": "
|
| 105 |
-
"differentiator": "
|
| 106 |
-
"extension": "
|
| 107 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 108 |
-
"feasibility": "
|
| 109 |
-
"novelty": "
|
| 110 |
-
"market": "
|
| 111 |
-
"redteam": "Assumes
|
| 112 |
}
|
| 113 |
},
|
| 114 |
{
|
| 115 |
-
"name": "
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 116 |
"seed_name": null,
|
| 117 |
-
"domain": "
|
| 118 |
"aggregate": 7.75,
|
| 119 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 120 |
-
"pitch": "
|
| 121 |
-
"mechanism": "
|
| 122 |
-
"differentiator": "
|
| 123 |
"extension": null,
|
| 124 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 125 |
-
"feasibility": "
|
| 126 |
-
"novelty": "
|
| 127 |
-
"market": "
|
| 128 |
-
"redteam": "
|
| 129 |
}
|
| 130 |
},
|
| 131 |
{
|
| 132 |
-
"name": "
|
| 133 |
"seed_name": null,
|
| 134 |
-
"domain": "
|
| 135 |
-
"aggregate": 7.
|
| 136 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 137 |
-
"pitch": "
|
| 138 |
-
"mechanism": "
|
| 139 |
-
"differentiator": "
|
| 140 |
"extension": null,
|
| 141 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 142 |
-
"feasibility": "
|
| 143 |
-
"novelty": "
|
| 144 |
-
"market": "
|
| 145 |
-
"redteam": "
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 146 |
}
|
| 147 |
},
|
| 148 |
{
|
| 149 |
-
"name": "
|
| 150 |
"seed_name": null,
|
| 151 |
"domain": "software",
|
| 152 |
-
"aggregate": 7.
|
| 153 |
-
"decision": "
|
| 154 |
-
"pitch": "
|
| 155 |
-
"mechanism": "
|
| 156 |
-
"differentiator": "
|
| 157 |
"extension": null,
|
| 158 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 159 |
-
"feasibility": "
|
| 160 |
-
"novelty": "
|
| 161 |
-
"market": "Potential for over-reliance on
|
| 162 |
-
"redteam": "
|
| 163 |
}
|
| 164 |
}
|
| 165 |
]
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
{
|
| 2 |
"mode": "enhance",
|
| 3 |
"n_seeds": 14,
|
| 4 |
+
"n_enhanced": 8,
|
| 5 |
"n_refined": 3,
|
| 6 |
+
"n_accepted": 11,
|
| 7 |
+
"mean_aggregate": 7.86,
|
| 8 |
+
"llm_calls": 31,
|
| 9 |
+
"output_tokens": 3416,
|
| 10 |
+
"memory_records": 44,
|
| 11 |
"results": [
|
| 12 |
{
|
| 13 |
+
"name": "Typed Agent Harmony",
|
| 14 |
+
"seed_name": "Multi-Agent Type Protocol",
|
| 15 |
"domain": "software",
|
| 16 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 17 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 18 |
+
"pitch": "Ensures type consistency and safety between autonomous agents to prevent errors and drift.",
|
| 19 |
+
"mechanism": "Typed message contracts with runtime validators; violations are quarantined and corrected.",
|
| 20 |
+
"differentiator": "First system to enforce type safety at runtime between autonomous agents.",
|
| 21 |
+
"extension": "Integrate with AI-driven self-correction mechanisms for dynamic schema evolution.",
|
| 22 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 23 |
+
"feasibility": "Potential for over-reliance on runtime validators; may not address deeper type system inconsistencies.",
|
| 24 |
+
"novelty": "Proposes type consistency for agents, similar to existing safety mechanisms in software systems.",
|
| 25 |
+
"market": "Potential for over-reliance on runtime validators; may not address deeper architectural issues.",
|
| 26 |
+
"redteam": "Assumes type consistency across all agents without addressing potential conflicts in dynamic, evolving systems."
|
| 27 |
}
|
| 28 |
},
|
| 29 |
{
|
| 30 |
+
"name": "CodeArchitect",
|
| 31 |
+
"seed_name": "Intelligent Codebase Archaeology",
|
| 32 |
+
"domain": "software",
|
| 33 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 34 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 35 |
+
"pitch": "AI agents reconstruct legacy systems into modern, maintainable codebases.",
|
| 36 |
+
"mechanism": "Static analysis + LLM reasoning reconstructs intent from code and history; emits dependency maps and staged migration plans.",
|
| 37 |
+
"differentiator": "Automatically adapts to evolving architectures and business logic.",
|
| 38 |
+
"extension": "Integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated code migration and validation.",
|
| 39 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 40 |
+
"feasibility": "Depends on LLM quality and historical data accuracy; may require significant computational resources.",
|
| 41 |
+
"novelty": "Reconstructs legacy systems, a task already addressed by tools like Code Climate or SonarQube.",
|
| 42 |
+
"market": "Depends on the quality of the LLM and historical data; may require significant training resources.",
|
| 43 |
+
"redteam": "Depends on LLM reasoning for code reconstruction, which may fail in complex or ambiguous legacy systems."
|
| 44 |
}
|
| 45 |
},
|
| 46 |
{
|
| 47 |
+
"name": "ContextualSync",
|
| 48 |
+
"seed_name": "Dynamic Context Synthesis Agent",
|
| 49 |
+
"domain": "research",
|
| 50 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 51 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 52 |
+
"pitch": "Automates context-aware code generation for evolving technical ecosystems.",
|
| 53 |
+
"mechanism": "Analyzes documentation diffs, identifies breaking changes, generates migration patches validated by unit tests.",
|
| 54 |
+
"differentiator": "Automates context-aware code generation for evolving technical ecosystems.",
|
| 55 |
+
"extension": "Integrate with CI/CD pipelines for real-time code validation",
|
| 56 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 57 |
+
"feasibility": "Requires continuous documentation updates; may struggle with rapidly evolving technical ecosystems.",
|
| 58 |
+
"novelty": "Automates context-aware code generation, which is a common task in code generation tools.",
|
| 59 |
+
"market": "Requires continuous updates to keep up with evolving technical ecosystems.",
|
| 60 |
+
"redteam": "Relies on documentation diffs to identify breaking changes, which may not capture all evolving technical contexts."
|
| 61 |
}
|
| 62 |
},
|
| 63 |
{
|
| 64 |
+
"name": "NeuroAdaptive Reality",
|
| 65 |
+
"seed_name": "Dynamic Semantic Reality Layer",
|
| 66 |
+
"domain": "human-ai",
|
| 67 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 68 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 69 |
+
"pitch": "Adapts digital experiences to real-time user neuro-cognitive states.",
|
| 70 |
+
"mechanism": "Multi-modal attention and load estimation dynamically adjusts layout, density, and modality with explainable, real-time adjustments.",
|
| 71 |
+
"differentiator": "First real-time neuro-cognitive adaptive digital experience with explainable, bounded adjustments.",
|
| 72 |
+
"extension": "Integrate with brain-computer interfaces for fully immersive, personalized digital environments.",
|
| 73 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 74 |
+
"feasibility": "Depends on real-time data availability; may face latency issues in high-traffic scenarios.",
|
| 75 |
+
"novelty": "Adapts digital experiences to user states, similar to real-time UI adjustments in existing frameworks.",
|
| 76 |
+
"market": "Lacks clear evidence of real-world application in dynamic environments.",
|
| 77 |
+
"redteam": "Assumes real-time context awareness without handling latency or communication delays in distributed systems."
|
| 78 |
}
|
| 79 |
},
|
| 80 |
{
|
| 81 |
+
"name": "EmoSync",
|
| 82 |
+
"seed_name": "Autonomous Emotional Harmony Engine",
|
| 83 |
"domain": "human-ai",
|
| 84 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 85 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 86 |
+
"pitch": "A real-time emotional alignment system for team collaboration.",
|
| 87 |
+
"mechanism": "Detects emotional dissonance through micro-expression analysis and adjusts communication styles, tone, and pacing in real-time.",
|
| 88 |
+
"differentiator": "First to integrate real-time micro-expression analysis with adaptive communication styles.",
|
| 89 |
+
"extension": "Introduces a neural network model for predictive emotional alignment in diverse team contexts.",
|
| 90 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 91 |
+
"feasibility": "Requires emotional analysis accuracy; may face misinterpretation of micro-expressions.",
|
| 92 |
+
"novelty": "Real-time emotional alignment for teams, akin to existing collaboration tools with emotional intelligence.",
|
| 93 |
+
"market": "Depends on real-time emotional data; may not be feasible in all contexts.",
|
| 94 |
+
"redteam": "Depends on micro-expression analysis for emotional dissonance, which may not capture nuanced or subtle emotional states."
|
| 95 |
}
|
| 96 |
},
|
| 97 |
{
|
| 98 |
+
"name": "VeriPhy",
|
| 99 |
+
"seed_name": "Reality Verification Protocol",
|
| 100 |
+
"domain": "human-ai",
|
| 101 |
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 102 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 103 |
+
"pitch": "Automated verification of digital content authenticity using sensor and cryptographic layers.",
|
| 104 |
+
"mechanism": "Sensor-based provenance tracking + blockchain-based cross-verification with physical and source evidence.",
|
| 105 |
+
"differentiator": "First integration of physical and digital verification in real-time.",
|
| 106 |
+
"extension": "Adaptive verification layer for evolving synthetic media ecosystems.",
|
| 107 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 108 |
+
"feasibility": "Depends on sensor and cryptographic infrastructure; may require specialized hardware.",
|
| 109 |
+
"novelty": "Automates verification of digital content, similar to blockchain-based authenticity tools.",
|
| 110 |
+
"market": "Requires integration with physical and source evidence; may be complex to implement.",
|
| 111 |
+
"redteam": "Assumes cryptographic and sensor-based provenance tracking, which may fail in environments with limited or unreliable hardware."
|
| 112 |
}
|
| 113 |
},
|
| 114 |
{
|
| 115 |
+
"name": "CognitiveMesh",
|
| 116 |
+
"seed_name": "Decentralized Cognitive Cloud",
|
| 117 |
+
"domain": "scale",
|
| 118 |
+
"aggregate": 8.0,
|
| 119 |
+
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 120 |
+
"pitch": "A decentralized network of devices running private AI models with full data sovereignty.",
|
| 121 |
+
"mechanism": "Scheduler shards workloads across idle devices; raw data stays on-device, exchanging only outputs.",
|
| 122 |
+
"differentiator": "Full data sovereignty and decentralized AI execution.",
|
| 123 |
+
"extension": "Integrate with blockchain for secure, verifiable model deployment.",
|
| 124 |
+
"weaknesses": {
|
| 125 |
+
"feasibility": "Requires decentralized network coordination; may face scalability and security challenges.",
|
| 126 |
+
"novelty": "Decentralized network with data sovereignty, similar to blockchain-based decentralized systems.",
|
| 127 |
+
"market": "Focuses on data sovereignty but may not address broader scalability concerns.",
|
| 128 |
+
"redteam": "Assumes decentralized data sovereignty without addressing potential bottlenecks in the scheduler or device coordination."
|
| 129 |
+
}
|
| 130 |
+
},
|
| 131 |
+
{
|
| 132 |
+
"name": "Typed Agent Harmony",
|
| 133 |
"seed_name": null,
|
| 134 |
+
"domain": "software",
|
| 135 |
"aggregate": 7.75,
|
| 136 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 137 |
+
"pitch": "Ensures type consistency and safety between autonomous agents to prevent errors and drift.",
|
| 138 |
+
"mechanism": "Typed message contracts with runtime validators; violations are quarantined and corrected.",
|
| 139 |
+
"differentiator": "First system to enforce type safety at runtime between autonomous agents, with dynamic type adaptation and conflict resolution mechanisms.",
|
| 140 |
"extension": null,
|
| 141 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 142 |
+
"feasibility": "Typed Agent Harmony is a promising concept that addresses type consistency and safety in autonomous agents. However, implementing typed message contracts with runtime validators may be complex and could require significant engineering effort. The feasibility of this mechanism within 12-24 months is plausible but depends on the maturity of existing type systems and runtime validation frameworks.",
|
| 143 |
+
"novelty": "Provides type consistency and safety for autonomous agents, but lacks specific details on implementation or real-world application.",
|
| 144 |
+
"market": "Provides type consistency and safety for autonomous agents, but may lack real-world application or user adoption.",
|
| 145 |
+
"redteam": "Assumes all agents are homogeneous and well-defined, ignoring potential heterogeneity or dynamic changes in agent behavior that could lead to type mismatches."
|
| 146 |
}
|
| 147 |
},
|
| 148 |
{
|
| 149 |
+
"name": "ContextualSync",
|
| 150 |
"seed_name": null,
|
| 151 |
+
"domain": "research",
|
| 152 |
+
"aggregate": 7.75,
|
| 153 |
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 154 |
+
"pitch": "Automates context-aware code generation for evolving technical ecosystems.",
|
| 155 |
+
"mechanism": "Analyzes documentation diffs, identifies breaking changes, generates migration patches validated by unit tests.",
|
| 156 |
+
"differentiator": "Automates context-aware code generation for evolving technical ecosystems.",
|
| 157 |
"extension": null,
|
| 158 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 159 |
+
"feasibility": "ContextualSync leverages documentation diffs and unit tests for code generation, but its feasibility depends on the availability of comprehensive documentation and robust testing frameworks in evolving technical ecosystems.",
|
| 160 |
+
"novelty": "Automates context-aware code generation for evolving technical ecosystems.",
|
| 161 |
+
"market": "ContextualSync has strong potential but may lack real-world adoption due to limited ecosystem integration and validation processes.",
|
| 162 |
+
"redteam": "Fails to account for dynamic ecosystem changes without real-time feedback loops, leading to potential migration failures in rapidly evolving environments."
|
| 163 |
+
}
|
| 164 |
+
},
|
| 165 |
+
{
|
| 166 |
+
"name": "Quantum-Classic GridOptimizer",
|
| 167 |
+
"seed_name": "Quantum-Classical Hybrid Engine",
|
| 168 |
+
"domain": "scale",
|
| 169 |
+
"aggregate": 7.5,
|
| 170 |
+
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 171 |
+
"pitch": "A real-time energy and logistics optimization system combining classical and quantum methods.",
|
| 172 |
+
"mechanism": "Classical solvers handle large-scale tasks; quantum annealing optimizes complex combinatorial problems, validated by classical checks.",
|
| 173 |
+
"differentiator": "First hybrid system that combines quantum and classical strengths for scaleable optimization.",
|
| 174 |
+
"extension": "Integrate quantum error correction to enhance reliability in large-scale deployments.",
|
| 175 |
+
"weaknesses": {
|
| 176 |
+
"feasibility": "Combines classical and quantum methods, but lacks concrete validation of quantum annealing's effectiveness in real-time logistics.",
|
| 177 |
+
"novelty": "Combines classical and quantum methods, but lacks specific details on how the integration works or its unique benefits.",
|
| 178 |
+
"market": "Combines classical and quantum methods, but lacks clear user validation and market demand.",
|
| 179 |
+
"redteam": "The quantum-classic hybrid approach relies on classical validation, which may not account for quantum-specific edge cases, leading to potential suboptimal solutions in complex scenarios."
|
| 180 |
}
|
| 181 |
},
|
| 182 |
{
|
| 183 |
+
"name": "CodeArchitect",
|
| 184 |
"seed_name": null,
|
| 185 |
"domain": "software",
|
| 186 |
+
"aggregate": 7.5,
|
| 187 |
+
"decision": "accepted",
|
| 188 |
+
"pitch": "AI agents reconstruct legacy systems into modern, maintainable codebases.",
|
| 189 |
+
"mechanism": "Static analysis + LLM reasoning reconstructs intent from code and history; emits dependency maps and staged migration plans.",
|
| 190 |
+
"differentiator": "Automatically adapts to evolving architectures and business logic, while maintaining robustness in complex and ambiguous scenarios.",
|
| 191 |
"extension": null,
|
| 192 |
"weaknesses": {
|
| 193 |
+
"feasibility": "AI agents for legacy system reconstruction are novel but require significant computational resources and training data. Real-world deployment may be challenging without a robust training corpus.",
|
| 194 |
+
"novelty": "Reconstructs legacy systems into modern codebases using static analysis and LLM reasoning. May lack real-world validation and scalability.",
|
| 195 |
+
"market": "Potential for over-reliance on AI in legacy system migration; may lack real-world validation.",
|
| 196 |
+
"redteam": "Assumes complete code fidelity and historical accuracy, ignoring potential data corruption or incomplete legacy systems."
|
| 197 |
}
|
| 198 |
}
|
| 199 |
]
|