Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,202 +1,105 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
|
| 2 |
-
base_model: unsloth/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407-bnb-4bit
|
| 3 |
-
library_name: peft
|
| 4 |
-
---
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
-
# Model
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-
##
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
- **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 22 |
-
- **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 23 |
-
- **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 24 |
-
- **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
|
| 25 |
-
- **License:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 26 |
-
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
-
- **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 34 |
-
- **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
-
##
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
-
### Recommendations
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
Use the code below to get started with the model.
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
## Training Details
|
| 77 |
-
|
| 78 |
-
### Training Data
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
-
### Training Procedure
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
-
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
#### Preprocessing [optional]
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
-
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 94 |
-
|
| 95 |
-
- **Training regime:** [More Information Needed] <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
#### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
<!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 102 |
-
|
| 103 |
-
## Evaluation
|
| 104 |
-
|
| 105 |
-
<!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
|
| 106 |
-
|
| 107 |
-
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 108 |
-
|
| 109 |
-
#### Testing Data
|
| 110 |
-
|
| 111 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
#### Factors
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
-
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 120 |
-
|
| 121 |
-
#### Metrics
|
| 122 |
-
|
| 123 |
-
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 126 |
-
|
| 127 |
-
### Results
|
| 128 |
-
|
| 129 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 130 |
-
|
| 131 |
-
#### Summary
|
| 132 |
-
|
| 133 |
-
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
## Model Examination [optional]
|
| 136 |
-
|
| 137 |
-
<!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
|
| 138 |
-
|
| 139 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 140 |
-
|
| 141 |
-
## Environmental Impact
|
| 142 |
-
|
| 143 |
-
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
|
| 144 |
-
|
| 145 |
-
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
| 146 |
-
|
| 147 |
-
- **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 148 |
-
- **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 149 |
-
- **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 150 |
-
- **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 151 |
-
- **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 152 |
-
|
| 153 |
-
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
| 154 |
-
|
| 155 |
-
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 156 |
-
|
| 157 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 158 |
-
|
| 159 |
-
### Compute Infrastructure
|
| 160 |
-
|
| 161 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 162 |
-
|
| 163 |
-
#### Hardware
|
| 164 |
-
|
| 165 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 166 |
-
|
| 167 |
-
#### Software
|
| 168 |
-
|
| 169 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 170 |
-
|
| 171 |
-
## Citation [optional]
|
| 172 |
-
|
| 173 |
-
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
| 174 |
-
|
| 175 |
-
**BibTeX:**
|
| 176 |
-
|
| 177 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 178 |
-
|
| 179 |
-
**APA:**
|
| 180 |
-
|
| 181 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 182 |
-
|
| 183 |
-
## Glossary [optional]
|
| 184 |
-
|
| 185 |
-
<!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
|
| 186 |
-
|
| 187 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 188 |
-
|
| 189 |
-
## More Information [optional]
|
| 190 |
-
|
| 191 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 192 |
-
|
| 193 |
-
## Model Card Authors [optional]
|
| 194 |
-
|
| 195 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 196 |
-
|
| 197 |
-
## Model Card Contact
|
| 198 |
-
|
| 199 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 200 |
-
### Framework versions
|
| 201 |
-
|
| 202 |
-
- PEFT 0.15.1
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Mistral_calibrative_few
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
+
## Model Description
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
+
This model is the few-shot trained calibrative fine-tuned version of Multi-CONFE (Confidence-Aware Medical Feature Extraction), built on [unsloth/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407-bnb-4bit](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407-bnb-4bit). It demonstrates exceptional data efficiency by achieving near state-of-the-art performance while training on only 12.5% of the available data, with particular emphasis on confidence calibration and hallucination reduction.
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
+
## Intended Use
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
+
This model is designed for extracting clinically relevant features from medical patient notes with high accuracy and well-calibrated confidence scores in low-resource settings. It's particularly useful for automated assessment of medical documentation, such as USMLE Step-2 Clinical Skills notes, when training data is limited.
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
## Training Data
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+
The model was trained on just 100 annotated patient notes (12.5% of the full dataset) from the [NBME - Score Clinical Patient Notes](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/nbme-score-clinical-patient-notes) Kaggle competition dataset. This represents approximately 10 examples per clinical case type. The dataset contains USMLE Step-2 Clinical Skills patient notes covering 10 different clinical cases, with each note containing expert annotations for multiple medical features that need to be extracted.
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
+
## Training Procedure
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
+
Training involved a two-phase approach:
|
| 18 |
+
1. **Instructive Few-Shot Fine-Tuning**: Initial alignment of the model with the medical feature extraction task using Mistral Nemo Instruct as the base model.
|
| 19 |
+
2. **Calibrative Fine-Tuning**: Integration of confidence calibration mechanisms, including bidirectional feature mapping, complexity-aware confidence adjustment, and dynamic thresholding.
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
Training hyperparameters:
|
| 22 |
+
- Base model: unsloth/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407-bnb-4bit
|
| 23 |
+
- LoRA rank: 32
|
| 24 |
+
- Training epochs: 14 (instructive phase) + 5 (calibrative phase)
|
| 25 |
+
- Learning rate: 2e-4 (instructive phase), 1e-4 (calibrative phase)
|
| 26 |
+
- Optimizer: AdamW (8-bit)
|
| 27 |
+
- Hallucination weight: 0.2
|
| 28 |
+
- Missing feature weight: 0.5
|
| 29 |
+
- Confidence threshold: 0.7
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
+
## Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
+
On the USMLE Step-2 Clinical Skills notes dataset:
|
| 34 |
+
- Precision: 0.982
|
| 35 |
+
- Recall: 0.964
|
| 36 |
+
- F1 Score: 0.973
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
+
The model achieves this impressive performance with only 12.5% of the training data used for the full model, demonstrating exceptional data efficiency. It reduces hallucination by 84.9% and missing features by 85.0% compared to vanilla models. This makes it particularly valuable for domains where annotated data may be scarce or expensive to obtain.
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
+
## Limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
+
- The model was evaluated on standardized USMLE Step-2 Clinical Skills notes and may require adaptation for other clinical domains.
|
| 43 |
+
- Some errors stem from knowledge gaps in specific medical terminology or inconsistencies in annotation.
|
| 44 |
+
- Performance on multilingual or non-standardized clinical notes remains untested.
|
| 45 |
+
- While highly effective, it still performs slightly below the full-data model (F1 score 0.973 vs. 0.981).
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
+
## Ethical Considerations
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
+
Automated assessment systems must ensure fairness across different student populations. While the calibration mechanism enhances interpretability, systematic bias testing is recommended before deployment in high-stakes assessment scenarios. When using this model for educational assessment, we recommend:
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
+
1. Implementing a human-in-the-loop validation process
|
| 52 |
+
2. Regular auditing for demographic parity
|
| 53 |
+
3. Clear communication to students about the use of AI in assessment
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
+
## How to Use
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
+
```python
|
| 58 |
+
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
|
| 59 |
+
import torch
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
+
# Load model and tokenizer
|
| 62 |
+
model_name = "Manal0809/Mistral_calibrative_few"
|
| 63 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
|
| 64 |
+
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name, torch_dtype=torch.float16)
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
+
# Example input
|
| 67 |
+
patient_note = """HPI: 35 yo F with heavy uterine bleeding. Last normal period was 6 month ago.
|
| 68 |
+
LMP was 2 months ago. No clots.
|
| 69 |
+
Changes tampon every few hours, previously 4/day. Menarche at 12.
|
| 70 |
+
Attempted using OCPs for menstrual regulation previously but unsuccessful.
|
| 71 |
+
Two adolescent children (ages unknown) at home.
|
| 72 |
+
Last PAP 6 months ago was normal, never abnormal.
|
| 73 |
+
Gained 10-15 lbs over the past few months, eating out more though.
|
| 74 |
+
Hyperpigmented spots on hands and LT neck that she noticed 1-2 years ago.
|
| 75 |
+
SH: state social worker; no smoking or drug use; beer or two on weekends;
|
| 76 |
+
sexually active with boyfriend of 14 months, uses condoms at first but no longer uses them."""
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
+
features_to_extract = ["35-year", "Female", "heavy-periods", "symptoms-for-6-months",
|
| 79 |
+
"Weight-Gain", "Last-menstrual-period-2-months-ago",
|
| 80 |
+
"Fatigue", "Unprotected-Sex", "Infertility"]
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
+
# Format input as shown in the paper
|
| 83 |
+
input_text = f"""###instruction: Extract medical features from the patient note.
|
| 84 |
+
###patient_history: {patient_note}
|
| 85 |
+
###features: {features_to_extract}
|
| 86 |
+
### Annotation:"""
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
+
# Generate output
|
| 89 |
+
inputs = tokenizer(input_text, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
|
| 90 |
+
outputs = model.generate(
|
| 91 |
+
inputs["input_ids"],
|
| 92 |
+
max_new_tokens=512,
|
| 93 |
+
temperature=0.2,
|
| 94 |
+
num_return_sequences=1
|
| 95 |
+
)
|
| 96 |
+
result = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
|
| 97 |
+
print(result)
|
| 98 |
+
```
|
| 99 |
|
| 100 |
+
## Model Card Author
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
+
Manal Abumelha - mabumelha@kku.edu.sa
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
+
## Citation
|
| 105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|