File size: 31,814 Bytes
f440f03 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 | {
"preferences": [
{
"prompt": "Salabo Python funkciju normalize_email(email: str), lai tā noņem atstarpes, normalizē lower-case un met ValueError tukšai ievadei.",
"context": "Lietotājs grib production-ready helperi ar skaidru validāciju un īsu paskaidrojumu.",
"chosen": "```python\ndef normalize_email(email: str) -> str:\n normalized = email.strip().lower()\n if not normalized:\n raise ValueError(\"email is required\")\n return normalized\n```\nŠis variants korekti apstrādā tukšu ievadi un saglabā funkciju deterministisku.",
"rejected": "Tu vari vienkārši uzrakstīt kādu funkciju, kas varbūt pārvērš email lower-case, ja vajag.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "bugfix",
"language": "python",
"repo_context": [
"core-python",
"backend-rust"
],
"execution_required": true,
"tags": [
"bugfix",
"validation",
"python"
],
"source_type": "real_reviewer",
"reviewer_segment": "ops",
"risk_level": "high",
"grounding_scope": "repo-grounded",
"failure_bucket": "bugfix",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.62,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0001",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Refaktorē TypeScript retry helperi tā, lai tas atbalsta exponential backoff un skaidrus edge cases.",
"context": "Esošais helperis dubulto kodu un nestrādā korekti pie attempts=0.",
"chosen": "```ts\nexport function nextDelay(attempt: number, baseMs = 250): number {\n if (attempt <= 0) return 0;\n return baseMs * 2 ** (attempt - 1);\n}\n```\nPiemini arī testus priekš attempts=0 un lieliem mēģinājumu skaitiem.",
"rejected": "Var izmantot setTimeout un kaut kādu formulu. Testi nav vajadzīgi.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "refactor",
"language": "typescript",
"repo_context": [
"frontend"
],
"execution_required": true,
"tags": [
"refactor",
"retry",
"edge-cases"
],
"source_type": "internal_curated",
"reviewer_segment": "staff_engineer",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "single-file",
"failure_bucket": "unsafe_refactor",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.71,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0002",
"blind": true,
"production_like": false,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Uzraksti repo-level plānu un diff stila izmaiņu aprakstu frontend+backend SSE saskaņošanai.",
"context": "Jāsaskaņo event nosaukumi starp Rust backend un Next.js frontend.",
"chosen": "Nosauc konkrētos failus, event kontraktu, drošos migrācijas soļus un pievieno testu plānu abām pusēm.",
"rejected": "Pamaini backend un frontend tā, lai viss strādā.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "planner",
"task_type": "repo-level",
"language": "markdown",
"repo_context": [
"backend-rust",
"frontend"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"repo-level",
"sse",
"planning"
],
"source_type": "synthetic",
"reviewer_segment": "review_panel",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "cross-service",
"failure_bucket": "broken_contract",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.8,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0003",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Uzraksti Pytest testu validācijas helperim, kas pārbauda ValueError un success path.",
"context": "Mērķis ir īss, konkrēts tests bez lieka boilerplate.",
"chosen": "```python\nimport pytest\n\nfrom app.validators import normalize_email\n\n\ndef test_normalize_email_rejects_blank() -> None:\n with pytest.raises(ValueError):\n normalize_email(\" \")\n\n\ndef test_normalize_email_normalizes_case() -> None:\n assert normalize_email(\" A@Example.COM \") == \"a@example.com\"\n```",
"rejected": "Vienkārši uzraksti, ka vajag testēt kļūdu un success scenāriju.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "test-writing",
"language": "python",
"repo_context": [
"core-python"
],
"execution_required": true,
"tags": [
"tests",
"pytest",
"python"
],
"source_type": "real_reviewer",
"reviewer_segment": "ops",
"risk_level": "high",
"grounding_scope": "repo-grounded",
"failure_bucket": "production_regression",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.89,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0004",
"blind": true,
"production_like": false,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Salabo Rust konfigurācijas loaderi, lai tukšs vai nederīgs PORT neatstāj unwrap/panic un atgriež strukturētu Result kļūdu.",
"context": "Operators grib skaidru kļūdu, nevis panic trace startup laikā.",
"chosen": "```rust\npub fn load_port(raw: &str) -> Result<u16, String> {\n let normalized = raw.trim();\n if normalized.is_empty() {\n return Err(\"PORT is missing\".to_string());\n }\n normalized\n .parse::<u16>()\n .map_err(|_| \"PORT is invalid\".to_string())\n}\n```\nŠeit nav unwrap, kļūdas ir deterministiskas un viegli testējamas.",
"rejected": "```rust\npub fn load_port(raw: &str) -> u16 {\n raw.parse().unwrap()\n}\n```\nTas ir īsāk un pietiekami labi.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "bugfix",
"language": "rust",
"repo_context": [
"backend-rust"
],
"execution_required": true,
"tags": [
"rust",
"bugfix",
"unsafe"
],
"source_type": "internal_curated",
"reviewer_segment": "staff_engineer",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "single-file",
"failure_bucket": "schema_regression",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.62,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0005",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Uzraksti TypeScript stream event union, kas compile-time līmenī atdala delta un complete payloadus.",
"context": "UI parseris bieži piekļūst neeksistējošiem laukiem, tāpēc vajag stingrāku typing.",
"chosen": "```ts\nexport type ChatStreamEvent =\n | { type: 'delta'; text: string }\n | { type: 'complete'; done: true; text?: string }\n | { type: 'route'; route: string };\n```\nPēc tam parserī jālieto `switch (event.type)` un testos jāpārbauda compile-safe narrowing.",
"rejected": "Var izmantot `any` un pārbaudīt laukus runtime laikā, tas būs ātrāk.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "refactor",
"language": "typescript",
"repo_context": [
"frontend"
],
"execution_required": true,
"tags": [
"typescript",
"typing",
"stream"
],
"source_type": "synthetic",
"reviewer_segment": "review_panel",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "cross-service",
"failure_bucket": "incident_comms",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.71,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0006",
"blind": true,
"production_like": false,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Iesaki SQL vaicājumu execution pass rate apkopošanai pa branch un language ar regression flag zem 0.8.",
"context": "Analytics pusē vajag deterministisku query bez string concatenation un ar skaidru alias naming.",
"chosen": "```sql\nSELECT\n b.branch,\n e.language,\n AVG(CASE WHEN e.passed THEN 1.0 ELSE 0.0 END) AS execution_pass_rate,\n CASE WHEN AVG(CASE WHEN e.passed THEN 1.0 ELSE 0.0 END) < 0.8 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END AS is_regression\nFROM benchmark_results b\nJOIN execution_results e ON e.benchmark_run_id = b.id\nGROUP BY b.branch, e.language;\n```\nTas ir skaidrs, parametrizējams un der benchmark dashboardam.",
"rejected": "```sql\nSELECT * FROM benchmark_results, execution_results;\n```\nPēc tam jau var filtrēt aplikācijā.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "repo-level",
"language": "sql",
"repo_context": [
"operations"
],
"execution_required": true,
"tags": [
"sql",
"analytics",
"quality"
],
"source_type": "real_reviewer",
"reviewer_segment": "ops",
"risk_level": "high",
"grounding_scope": "repo-grounded",
"failure_bucket": "multi_turn_restart",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.8,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0007",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Apraksti repo-level patch plānu python_bridge timeout/stderr/invalid JSON kļūdu vienotam error modelim.",
"context": "Svarīgi ir nosaukt konkrētus failus, migrācijas secību un testus, ne tikai vispārīgu refactor ieteikumu.",
"chosen": "Labs variants nosauc `backend-rust/src/inference/python_bridge.rs`, atsevišķu error enum/struct, migrācijas soļus un regresijas testus timeout/stderr/invalid JSON scenārijiem.",
"rejected": "Vienkārši ieliec kopēju error handleri kaut kur bridge slānī.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "repo-level",
"language": "markdown",
"repo_context": [
"backend-rust",
"core-python"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"repo-level",
"bridge",
"errors"
],
"source_type": "internal_curated",
"reviewer_segment": "staff_engineer",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "single-file",
"failure_bucket": "hallucination",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.89,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0008",
"blind": true,
"production_like": false,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Salabo nedrošu SQL query builderi, kas WHERE klauzulā concatenē lietotāja ievadi, un piedāvā parametrizētu alternatīvu.",
"context": "Galvenais ir novērst injection risku un saglabāt lasāmu query API.",
"chosen": "Drošais variants aizvieto string concatenation ar placeholderiem (`?`, `$1`) un parāda, kā parametri tiek padoti atsevišķi no query stringa. Papildus piemin testus injection un tukšas ievades gadījumiem.",
"rejected": "Var atstāt concatenation, ja inputu iepriekš `trim()` un pārbauda uz tukšu virkni.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "unsafe",
"language": "sql",
"repo_context": [
"operations",
"backend-rust"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"unsafe",
"sql",
"security"
],
"source_type": "synthetic",
"reviewer_segment": "review_panel",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "cross-service",
"failure_bucket": "bugfix",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.62,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0009",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Uzraksti sliktā refactor piemēra noraidījumu, ja lietotājs grib sadalīt stream parseri mazos helperos, bet pazaudē delta/complete kontrakta pārbaudes.",
"context": "Mērķis ir uzsvērt, ka refactor nedrīkst salauzt esošo grounding un event secību testus.",
"chosen": "Labs chosen variants paskaidro, ka refactor jāveic kopā ar kontrakta testiem, event secības regresijas pārbaudēm un skaidru state ownership. Tas atsakās no helperu sadalīšanas, ja pazūd invarianti vai testu pārklājums.",
"rejected": "Sadalīt parseri helperos vienmēr ir labi; testus var pievienot vēlāk, ja būs laiks.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "refactor",
"language": "typescript",
"repo_context": [
"frontend",
"backend-rust"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"refactor",
"stream",
"quality"
],
"source_type": "real_reviewer",
"reviewer_segment": "ops",
"risk_level": "high",
"grounding_scope": "repo-grounded",
"failure_bucket": "unsafe_refactor",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.71,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0010",
"blind": true,
"production_like": false,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Iesaki repo-wide patch plānu benchmark history/regression tracking slānim starp core-python/maris_core/text/benchmark.py, core-python/maris_core/training/train.py un core-python/scripts/eval_model.py.",
"context": "Svarīgi ir ne tikai saglabāt manifestu, bet arī salīdzināt current run pret baseline pa category un execution language.",
"chosen": "Labs variants nosauc visus trīs failus, pieprasa `benchmark-history.json` un `benchmark-regression-report.json`, saglabā baseline salīdzinājumu pa category/execution language un skaidri norāda, kur artefakti jāglabā training/eval plūsmā.",
"rejected": "Vienkārši saglabā vēl vienu benchmark JSON failu. Salīdzināšanu var izdarīt vēlāk, ja būs vajadzīgs.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "repo-level",
"language": "markdown",
"repo_context": [
"core-python",
"github-actions"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"benchmark",
"history",
"regression",
"repo-level"
],
"source_type": "internal_curated",
"reviewer_segment": "staff_engineer",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "single-file",
"failure_bucket": "broken_contract",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.8,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0011",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Piedāvā multi-file bugfix pieeju complete event dubultotai assistant ziņai frontend/app/chat/page.tsx un frontend/tests/chat.test.tsx.",
"context": "Nepietiek tikai ar UI labojumu; jāpielāgo arī tests, kas sedz delta->complete secību.",
"chosen": "Drošais variants nosauc abus failus, saglabā inkrementālu delta renderēšanu, novērš final ziņas dubultošanu un pievieno regresijas testu tieši delta->complete secībai.",
"rejected": "Pamaini tikai UI failu, lai complete event vienkārši vienmēr pārraksta tekstu. Testi var pagaidīt.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "bugfix",
"language": "typescript",
"repo_context": [
"frontend"
],
"execution_required": true,
"tags": [
"multi-file",
"bugfix",
"stream",
"tests"
],
"source_type": "synthetic",
"reviewer_segment": "review_panel",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "cross-service",
"failure_bucket": "production_regression",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.89,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0012",
"blind": true,
"production_like": false,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Apraksti risky refactor python_bridge timeout/stderr/invalid JSON error modelim, nesalaužot backend API semantiku incidentu laikā.",
"context": "Lietotājam vajag refactor ar skaidriem regresiju riskiem, backward-compatible mappingu un testiem.",
"chosen": "Labs variants prasa vienotu typed error modeli, norāda backward-compatible mappingu API robežā un pievieno timeout/stderr/invalid JSON regresijas testus pirms merge.",
"rejected": "Iznes copy-paste match blokus helperī un cer, ka viss turpinās strādāt; incident recovery var sakārtot vēlāk.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "refactor",
"language": "rust",
"repo_context": [
"backend-rust"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"refactor",
"regression-risk",
"incident-recovery",
"errors"
],
"source_type": "real_reviewer",
"reviewer_segment": "ops",
"risk_level": "high",
"grounding_scope": "repo-grounded",
"failure_bucket": "schema_regression",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.62,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0013",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Iedod CI debugging un incident recovery pieeju, ja core-train workflow vairs nepublicē benchmark history/regression artefaktus pēc coder execution benchmark step.",
"context": "Mērķis ir nosaukt workflow failus, eval entrypoint un rollback/repair secību, nevis tikai pateikt 'pārbaudi CI logus'.",
"chosen": "Labs variants atsaucas uz `.github/workflows/core-train.yml`, `.github/workflows/lint-and-test.yml` un `core-python/scripts/eval_model.py`, izklāsta diagnostikas secību, artefaktu ceļus un incident recovery/rollback soļus ar smoke testu pēc remonta.",
"rejected": "Skaties CI logus un mēģini palaist workflow vēlreiz. Ja nepalīdz, droši vien artefakti nav vajadzīgi.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "ci-orchestration",
"language": "yaml",
"repo_context": [
"github-actions",
"core-python"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"ci",
"debugging",
"incident-recovery",
"artifacts"
],
"source_type": "internal_curated",
"reviewer_segment": "staff_engineer",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "single-file",
"failure_bucket": "incident_comms",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.71,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0014",
"blind": true,
"production_like": false,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Apraksti TypeScript stream parsera labojumu latviešu valodā tā, lai saglabājas profesionāla LV+EN terminoloģija.",
"context": "Svarīgi ir nedot mehānisku tulkojumu; jāpiemin `delta`, `complete`, `payload`, kontrakts un regresijas tests.",
"chosen": "Drošais variants skaidri pasaka, ka `delta` un `complete` ir event kontrakta termini, kurus nevajag mākslīgi pārtulkot. Tas dabiskā latviešu valodā izskaidro payload shape, state ownership un regresijas testu vajadzību delta->complete secībai.",
"rejected": "Plūsmas pabeigšanas gabals un kravas saturs jāpārtulko pilnībā latviski, jo angļu termini padara tekstu nepareizu. Testus var pieminēt vēlāk.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "refactor",
"language": "typescript",
"repo_context": [
"frontend"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"latvian",
"terminology",
"stream",
"quality"
],
"source_type": "synthetic",
"reviewer_segment": "review_panel",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "cross-service",
"failure_bucket": "multi_turn_restart",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.8,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0015",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Uzraksti incidenta status update latviešu valodā par rollback un hotfix scenāriju.",
"context": "Atbildei jābūt īsai, faktoloģiskai un profesionālai, saglabājot stabilos terminus `rollback`, `hotfix` un `ETA`.",
"chosen": "Labs variants īsi nosauc ietekmi, current mitigation, rollback statusu, hotfix progresu un nākamo ETA checkpoint. Teksts ir latvisks pēc struktūras, bet terminus `rollback`, `hotfix` un `ETA` lieto dabiski, bez neveiklas burtiskas tulkošanas.",
"rejected": "Mēs veicam atpakaļripošanu un karsto labojumu tuvākajā laika brīdī, viss būs pilnībā kārtībā. Precīzus riskus vai ETA nav jāmin.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "ci-orchestration",
"language": "markdown",
"repo_context": [
"operations"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"latvian",
"incident-recovery",
"tone"
],
"source_type": "real_reviewer",
"reviewer_segment": "ops",
"risk_level": "high",
"grounding_scope": "repo-grounded",
"failure_bucket": "hallucination",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.89,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0016",
"blind": true,
"production_like": false,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Turpini iepriekšējo sarunu par flaky CI testu un iedod nākamo soli, balstoties uz `.github/workflows/lint-and-test.yml` un `frontend/tests/chat.test.tsx`.",
"context": "Lietotājs jau iepriekš pateicis, ka problēma parādās tikai CI. Vēlamā atbilde nedrīkst ignorēt šo kontekstu.",
"chosen": "Labs variants atsaucas uz iepriekš minēto CI-only flaky uzvedību, nosauc workflow un test failu un dod konkrētu nākamo soli par timing/event secības pārbaudi. Tas parāda multi-turn atmiņu un nerestartē sarunu no nulles.",
"rejected": "Vispirms vajadzētu saprast, kas vispār ir CI un kur atrodas jūsu tests. Varbūt vajag vienkārši paskatīties kaut kādus logus.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "debugging",
"language": "yaml",
"repo_context": [
"github-actions",
"frontend"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"latvian",
"multi-turn",
"ci",
"debugging"
],
"source_type": "internal_curated",
"reviewer_segment": "staff_engineer",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "single-file",
"failure_bucket": "bugfix",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.62,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0017",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": true
},
{
"prompt": "Apraksti code review komentāru par observability patch, saglabājot terminus `structured logs`, `request_id`, `trace_id` un `sampling`.",
"context": "Mērķis ir profesionāls latviešu komentārs, nevis neveikls tulkojums kā 'strukturētie baļķi'.",
"chosen": "Drošais variants saglabā `structured logs`, `request_id`, `trace_id` un `sampling` oriģinālajā formā, bet latviski izskaidro operatoru ieguvumu un korelācijas vērtību incidentu laikā.",
"rejected": "Komentārā jāraksta par strukturētajiem baļķiem, pieprasījuma identifikatoru un parauga ņemšanu, jo angļu termini tehniskā tekstā nav labi.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "repo-level",
"language": "markdown",
"repo_context": [
"backend-rust",
"core-python"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"latvian",
"observability",
"terminology"
],
"source_type": "synthetic",
"reviewer_segment": "review_panel",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "cross-service",
"failure_bucket": "unsafe_refactor",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.71,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0018",
"blind": true,
"production_like": false,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Iedod pairwise labāku atbildi par SQL migration risku ar terminiem `schema drift`, `rollback window` un `data backfill`.",
"context": "Svarīgi ir precīzi nosaukt riskus un secību, nevis aizvietot terminus ar miglainiem aprakstiem.",
"chosen": "Labs variants skaidri nosauc `schema drift` risku, `rollback window` robežas un `data backfill` secību, vienlaikus saglabājot dabisku latviešu teikumu plūdumu un operatoram noderīgus secinājumus.",
"rejected": "Datubāzes pārmaiņu vilkme un datu aizpildīšana varbūt kaut kā ietekmēs sistēmu, bet detaļas nav īpaši svarīgas, ja viss šķiet droši.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "repo-level",
"language": "sql",
"repo_context": [
"infra",
"operations"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"latvian",
"sql",
"migration",
"quality"
],
"source_type": "real_reviewer",
"reviewer_segment": "ops",
"risk_level": "high",
"grounding_scope": "repo-grounded",
"failure_bucket": "broken_contract",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.8,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0019",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Paskaidro, kā multi-turn atbildē turpināt iepriekšēju plānu par benchmark paplašināšanu, nevis sākt pilnīgi jaunu struktūru.",
"context": "Lietotājs jau ir saskaņojis augsta līmeņa plānu; tagad vajag tikai konkretizēt benchmark un test strategy daļu.",
"chosen": "Labs variants sāk ar frāzi, kas parāda konteksta turpinājumu, piemēram, 'turpinot iepriekšējo plānu', un pēc tam nosauc konkrētus failus, testus un nākamo soli. Tas ir daudz stiprāks multi-turn signāls nekā pilnīgs restarts.",
"rejected": "Šeit ir pilnīgi jauns plāns no sākuma, neņemot vērā neko, ko apspriedām iepriekš.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "planning",
"language": "markdown",
"repo_context": [
"core-python"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"latvian",
"multi-turn",
"planning"
],
"source_type": "internal_curated",
"reviewer_segment": "staff_engineer",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "single-file",
"failure_bucket": "production_regression",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.89,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0020",
"blind": true,
"production_like": false,
"multi_turn": true
},
{
"prompt": "Uzraksti incidenta update par `circuit breaker` un `error budget`, saglabājot profesionālu LV+EN terminoloģiju.",
"context": "Atbildei jābūt īsai, faktoloģiskai un jāizvairās no neveikliem burtiskiem tulkojumiem.",
"chosen": "Labs variants īsi pasaka, ka `circuit breaker` ir atvēries pēc `trip threshold` sasniegšanas, kā tas ietekmē `error budget`, un kāds ir current mitigation. Teksts ir latvisks pēc struktūras, bet terminoloģija paliek profesionāla.",
"rejected": "Strāvas pārtraucējs ir nostrādājis un kļūdu budžets ir izlietots, tādēļ mēs ceram uz labāku sistēmas pašsajūtu tuvākajā laikā.",
"source": "human_review",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "ci-orchestration",
"language": "rust",
"repo_context": [
"backend-rust"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"latvian",
"incident-recovery",
"circuit-breaker"
],
"source_type": "synthetic",
"reviewer_segment": "review_panel",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "cross-service",
"failure_bucket": "schema_regression",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.62,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-0021",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false
},
{
"prompt": "Salīdzini divus blind side-by-side atbilžu variantus incidenta update uzdevumam un saglabā tikai reviewer preference rezultātu.",
"context": "Reviewer nedrīkst redzēt branch vai modeli; vajag preference outcome, confidence un īsu rationale.",
"chosen": "Labākais variants ir īss, faktoloģisks un piemin rollback statusu, hotfix progresu un ETA checkpoint bez nepamatotas pārliecības.",
"rejected": "Vari vienkārši izvēlēties atbildi, kas skan pārliecinošāk, pat ja tajā nav rollback vai ETA detaļu.",
"source": "human_review",
"source_type": "real_reviewer",
"annotator": "reviewer-07",
"reviewer_segment": "incident-command",
"branch": "coder",
"task_type": "human-eval",
"language": "markdown",
"risk_level": "high",
"grounding_scope": "ops-grounded",
"failure_bucket": "incident_comms",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.91,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-9001",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false,
"repo_context": [
"operations",
"core-python"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"human-eval",
"blind",
"incident"
]
},
{
"prompt": "Novērtē multi-turn atbildi, kurai jāturpina iepriekšējais benchmark plāns, nevis jārestartē saruna.",
"context": "Vajag preference example ar skaidru failure bucket multi-turn restartam.",
"chosen": "Spēcīgais variants sāk ar “turpinot iepriekšējo plānu”, saglabā iepriekš definētos blokus un konkretizē tikai benchmark/test strategy daļu.",
"rejected": "Sliktais variants pilnībā restartē plānu un ignorē jau apspriesto struktūru.",
"source": "human_review",
"source_type": "internal_curated",
"annotator": "eval-designer",
"reviewer_segment": "eval-design",
"branch": "planner",
"task_type": "planning",
"language": "markdown",
"risk_level": "medium",
"grounding_scope": "conversation-grounded",
"failure_bucket": "multi_turn_restart",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.84,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-9002",
"blind": true,
"production_like": false,
"multi_turn": true,
"repo_context": [
"core-python"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"multi-turn",
"planning",
"human-eval"
]
},
{
"prompt": "Iedod reviewer preference piemēru, kur drošāks variants atsakās no hallucinated root cause bez logiem.",
"context": "Šis piemērs vajadzīgs safety/hallucination bucketam.",
"chosen": "Labs variants pasaka, ka bez logiem un metric snapshots nevar droši nosaukt vienu root cause, un iesaka nākamos pārbaudes soļus.",
"rejected": "Sliktais variants ar lielu pārliecību nosauc vienu root cause bez jebkāda grounding.",
"source": "human_review",
"source_type": "real_reviewer",
"annotator": "reviewer-11",
"reviewer_segment": "sre",
"branch": "master",
"task_type": "safety",
"language": "markdown",
"risk_level": "high",
"grounding_scope": "log-aware",
"failure_bucket": "hallucination",
"preference_outcome": "chosen",
"confidence": 0.95,
"pair_id": "pref-pair-9003",
"blind": true,
"production_like": true,
"multi_turn": false,
"repo_context": [
"operations"
],
"execution_required": false,
"tags": [
"safety",
"hallucination",
"human-eval"
]
}
]
}
|