squ11z1 commited on
Commit
de3ccdb
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f8019bf

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +101 -164
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,199 +1,136 @@
1
  ---
2
- library_name: transformers
3
- tags: []
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4
  ---
5
 
6
- # Model Card for Model ID
7
 
8
- <!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
9
 
 
10
 
 
 
 
 
 
11
 
12
- ## Model Details
13
 
14
- ### Model Description
15
 
16
- <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this model is. -->
 
 
 
17
 
18
- This is the model card of a 🤗 transformers model that has been pushed on the Hub. This model card has been automatically generated.
19
 
20
- - **Developed by:** [More Information Needed]
21
- - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
22
- - **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
23
- - **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
24
- - **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
25
- - **License:** [More Information Needed]
26
- - **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
27
 
28
- ### Model Sources [optional]
 
 
 
 
29
 
30
- <!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
 
31
 
32
- - **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
33
- - **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
34
- - **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
35
 
36
- ## Uses
37
 
38
- <!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
 
 
39
 
40
- ### Direct Use
 
 
41
 
42
- <!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
43
 
44
- [More Information Needed]
45
 
46
- ### Downstream Use [optional]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
47
 
48
- <!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
 
 
 
49
 
50
- [More Information Needed]
51
 
52
- ### Out-of-Scope Use
 
 
 
53
 
54
- <!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
 
55
 
56
- [More Information Needed]
57
 
58
- ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
 
59
 
60
- <!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
 
61
 
62
- [More Information Needed]
63
 
64
- ### Recommendations
 
65
 
66
- <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
67
 
68
- Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
 
 
 
 
69
 
70
- ## How to Get Started with the Model
71
 
72
- Use the code below to get started with the model.
73
 
74
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
75
 
76
- ## Training Details
77
-
78
- ### Training Data
79
-
80
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
81
-
82
- [More Information Needed]
83
-
84
- ### Training Procedure
85
-
86
- <!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
87
-
88
- #### Preprocessing [optional]
89
-
90
- [More Information Needed]
91
-
92
-
93
- #### Training Hyperparameters
94
-
95
- - **Training regime:** [More Information Needed] <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
96
-
97
- #### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
98
-
99
- <!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
100
-
101
- [More Information Needed]
102
-
103
- ## Evaluation
104
-
105
- <!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
106
-
107
- ### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
108
-
109
- #### Testing Data
110
-
111
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
112
-
113
- [More Information Needed]
114
-
115
- #### Factors
116
-
117
- <!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
118
-
119
- [More Information Needed]
120
-
121
- #### Metrics
122
-
123
- <!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
124
-
125
- [More Information Needed]
126
-
127
- ### Results
128
-
129
- [More Information Needed]
130
-
131
- #### Summary
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
- ## Model Examination [optional]
136
-
137
- <!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
138
-
139
- [More Information Needed]
140
-
141
- ## Environmental Impact
142
-
143
- <!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
144
-
145
- Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
146
-
147
- - **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
148
- - **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
149
- - **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
150
- - **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
151
- - **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
152
-
153
- ## Technical Specifications [optional]
154
-
155
- ### Model Architecture and Objective
156
-
157
- [More Information Needed]
158
-
159
- ### Compute Infrastructure
160
-
161
- [More Information Needed]
162
-
163
- #### Hardware
164
-
165
- [More Information Needed]
166
-
167
- #### Software
168
-
169
- [More Information Needed]
170
-
171
- ## Citation [optional]
172
-
173
- <!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
174
-
175
- **BibTeX:**
176
-
177
- [More Information Needed]
178
-
179
- **APA:**
180
-
181
- [More Information Needed]
182
-
183
- ## Glossary [optional]
184
-
185
- <!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
186
-
187
- [More Information Needed]
188
-
189
- ## More Information [optional]
190
-
191
- [More Information Needed]
192
-
193
- ## Model Card Authors [optional]
194
-
195
- [More Information Needed]
196
-
197
- ## Model Card Contact
198
-
199
- [More Information Needed]
 
1
  ---
2
+ base_model: tiiuae/Falcon-H1-0.5B-Base
3
+ tags:
4
+ - dpo
5
+ - neuromorphic
6
+ - bnn
7
+ - hybrid-intelligence
8
+ - falcon
9
+ - reasoning
10
+ license: apache-2.0
11
+ language:
12
+ - en
13
+ - ar
14
+ pipeline_tag: text-generation
15
  ---
16
 
17
+ # Merlin Hybrid Intelligence Checkpoint
18
 
19
+ ![hybrid](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/67329d3f69fded92d56ab41a/9UTL-QW7qIXWt4jjWtGWA.jpeg)
20
 
21
+ This is the **first public checkpoint of a hybrid intelligence system** from Merlin Research.
22
 
23
+ Hybrid intelligence means the system is not purely statistical (LLM) and not purely
24
+ symbolic — it couples a language model with a neuromorphic Biological Neural Network (BNN)
25
+ that observes, evaluates, and selects the LLM's outputs in real time.
26
+ The two components evolve together: the LLM generates, the BNN judges,
27
+ and both improve from the same stream of experience.
28
 
29
+ ## Architecture: Two Systems, One Loop
30
 
31
+ ![loop](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/67329d3f69fded92d56ab41a/HnbeHFJcCTsf8bugOXs4h.jpeg)
32
 
33
+ The LLM (Falcon H1 0.5B) generates multiple candidate answers.
34
+ The BNN encodes uncertainty signals as neuromorphic spike trains and selects
35
+ the best candidate. The correctness of that selection feeds back as training
36
+ signal for both the BNN and (via DPO) the LLM itself.
37
 
38
+ ## The BNN Component
39
 
40
+ The BNN is inspired by biological neural circuits. It uses
41
+ **Leaky Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) neurons** with 4 time scales
42
+ (decay constants: 0.70, 0.80, 0.85, 0.95) and generates spikes
43
+ via **Poisson statistics** the same model used to describe
44
+ real neuron firing in cortex. This gives the selector a temporal
45
+ memory of the generation process, not just a snapshot.
 
46
 
47
+ ```
48
+ LIF bank (4 neurons) → SpikeMLP → spike_rate
49
+ Token entropy stream → encoded as Poisson spike train
50
+ SelectionMLP [8→32→16→1] → candidate score
51
+ ```
52
 
53
+ Runs entirely in **pure NumPy** no GPU, no special hardware.
54
+ Total weights: ~8 KB.
55
 
56
+ ## Key Discovery: Calibration Inversion
 
 
57
 
58
+ > **A small LLM is systematically more confident on wrong answers than on right ones.**
59
 
60
+ We measured first-token entropy across thousands of hybrid loop iterations.
61
+ Correct answers show *higher* entropy and *lower* probability margin than wrong ones
62
+ (t=2.28 and t=−3.41 respectively). The LLM "hesitates" more when it is actually correct.
63
 
64
+ This is the core insight the BNN learned to exploit. Rather than trusting the
65
+ model's confidence, the hybrid system uses neuromorphic signals to see past
66
+ the model's miscalibration and identify the genuinely better answer.
67
 
68
+ ## How the System Was Built: 30,000 Experiments
69
 
70
+ Merlin runs **6 autonomous researchers** every night (01:00–07:00):
71
 
72
+ | Process | Role |
73
+ |---|---|
74
+ | `hybrid` | Main hybrid loop — generates, encodes, selects, evaluates |
75
+ | `bnn_trainer` | Retrains BNN every 5 min from accumulated experience |
76
+ | `candidate_pool` | Generates diverse candidates (4 sampling strategies) |
77
+ | `neuro_coupling` | BNN-guided token-by-token temperature adjustment |
78
+ | `ml` | Collects DPO preference pairs for LLM fine-tuning |
79
+ | `meta_analyzer` | Updates evolutionary mutation weights before each session |
80
 
81
+ Encoder parameters (pulse width, burst count, frequency, entropy scale) are found
82
+ by **evolutionary search** — propose mutation, run 100 benchmark questions,
83
+ keep if improvement ≥ 0.5pp. This process ran for ~**30,000 experiments**
84
+ and produced 38+ confirmed improvements before this checkpoint.
85
 
86
+ ## Results
87
 
88
+ | System | Accuracy |
89
+ |---|---|
90
+ | Raw Falcon H1 0.5B (baseline) | 21.0% |
91
+ | Hybrid Intelligence (BNN + LLM) | ~26–28% |
92
 
93
+ **+5–7 percentage points** improvement. The gap is entirely from the hybrid loop
94
+ the BNN selector adds no latency perceivable to the user (~1ms overhead).
95
 
96
+ ## DPO Fine-Tuning
97
 
98
+ The LLM component was fine-tuned with DPO on **4,234 preference pairs**
99
+ collected autonomously by the `ml` researcher over multiple nights.
100
 
101
+ - LoRA: r=16, α=32, target modules: q_proj + v_proj
102
+ - β=0.1, 3 epochs, cosine schedule
103
 
104
+ ## Usage
105
 
106
+ ```python
107
+ from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
108
 
109
+ model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
110
+ "MerlinSafety/falcon-h1-0.5b-dpo",
111
+ trust_remote_code=True,
112
+ )
113
+ tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(
114
+ "MerlinSafety/falcon-h1-0.5b-dpo",
115
+ trust_remote_code=True,
116
+ )
117
 
118
+ prompt = "Question: What is the capital of France?\nAnswer:"
119
+ inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt")
120
+ out = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=40, do_sample=False)
121
+ print(tokenizer.decode(out[0][inputs['input_ids'].shape[1]:]))
122
+ ```
123
 
124
+ ## Status & Roadmap
125
 
126
+ This is **Checkpoint #1**. The hybrid loop continues to run and improve.
127
 
128
+ - [ ] Stronger base model (Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B or any Qwen3.5)
129
+ - [ ] Scale DPO dataset to 10,000+ pairs
130
+ - [ ] Online BNN adaptation during inference
131
+ - [ ] Multi-model candidate pool
132
+ - [ ] We hope to collaborate with [Cortical Labs](https://corticallabs.com) —
133
+ running the hybrid loop on biological neurons (CL1) as a true wetware selector
134
 
135
+ ---
136
+ *Merlin Research — building hybrid intelligence, one checkpoint at a time.*