--- license: mit library_name: transformers pipeline_tag: image-feature-extraction tags: - motif - vision-transformer - self-supervised - image-feature-extraction - video - custom_code --- # Motif Vision Encoder Motif Vision Encoder is a unified image + video self-supervised vision encoder on a ViT backbone. A single 3D-convolutional tokenizer ingests both modalities — an image is a 1-frame clip (`T=1`), a video is `T>1` — so the same weights produce dense patch-level features and a language-aligned global (CLS) representation. Trained on **~1/3 the data of DINOv3** (0.5B vs 1.7B samples), it still reaches competitive performance across image and video benchmarks — and leads on DAVIS video tracking.

Point tracking on a video clip: Motif vs V-JEPA 2.1

Point tracking on a video clip (top: Motif, bottom: V-JEPA 2.1) — a query point propagated across frames by patch-feature cosine similarity. Motif tracks the subject more reliably than V-JEPA 2.1.

- **Architecture**: ViT-7B (embed 4096 / depth 40 / heads 32), patch 16, 3D axial RoPE (`base=100`), SwiGLU FFN, LayerScale, per-head QK-norm, gated attention, 4 register tokens. - **Tokenizer**: `Conv3d(kernel=stride=(tubelet, patch, patch))` — image `(B,3,H,W)` → `T=1`, video `(B,T,3,H,W)`. Token layout `[CLS] + [register × 4] + [patch × N]`. ## Usage The model ships a self-contained `modeling_motif_vision_encoder.py`, so it loads with `trust_remote_code=True`. ### Image ```python import torch from transformers import AutoImageProcessor, AutoModel from transformers.image_utils import load_image url = "http://images.cocodataset.org/val2017/000000039769.jpg" image = load_image(url) repo = "Motif-Technologies/Motif-Vision-Encoder" processor = AutoImageProcessor.from_pretrained(repo) model = AutoModel.from_pretrained(repo, trust_remote_code=True, dtype=torch.bfloat16).to("cuda").eval() inputs = processor(images=image, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device, torch.bfloat16) with torch.inference_mode(): outputs = model(**inputs) outputs.last_hidden_state # (1, 1 + 4 + N, 4096) CLS + registers + patch tokens outputs.pooler_output # (1, 4096) global (CLS) representation patch_tokens = outputs.last_hidden_state[:, 5:, :] # (1, N, 4096), N = (H/16)*(W/16) ``` The processor resizes the shorter side to 512, center-crops to 512×512, and normalizes with ImageNet mean/std (BICUBIC). `H`/`W` must be multiples of 16. ### Video An image is a 1-frame clip; a video is the same call with a `(B, T, 3, H, W)` tensor. Apply the same per-frame transform (resize → center-crop → ImageNet norm) and stack over time: ```python import torch video = torch.randn(1, 8, 3, 256, 256, device="cuda", dtype=torch.bfloat16) # (B, T, 3, H, W) with torch.inference_mode(): outputs = model(pixel_values=video) ``` ## Model details

Motif Vision Encoder architecture: image and video inputs, patch embedding, 40-block transformer stack, and transformer block internals

| | | |---|---| | Backbone | ViT-7B, patch 16, embed 4096, depth 40, heads 32, SwiGLU | | Register tokens | 4 | | Position encoding | 3D axial RoPE (T,H,W), `base=100.0` | | Video tokenizer | 3D Conv, tubelet size 2 | | Precision | bf16 weights | | Training | DINO + iBOT + KoLeo self-distillation, Gram anchoring, contrastive caption alignment | | Training data | ~0.47B samples — 448.6M images (96%) + 18.5M video clips (4%) | Outputs (`BaseModelOutputWithPooling`): `last_hidden_state` `(B, 1+4+N, 4096)`, `pooler_output` `(B, 4096)`. ## Evaluation Compared against the strongest publicly reported self-supervised / vision backbones. Higher is better for every column. Best comparable value per column in bold, second best underlined. DAVIS S/M/L follow the DINOv3 protocol (J&F-mean at video short side 420/480, 840/960, 1260/1440 px). V-JEPA 2.1 is not part of the DINOv3 Table 5 tracking benchmark, so only its single-resolution (S) figure is available. | Model | Training
data | DAVIS S
J&F ↑ | DAVIS M
J&F ↑ | DAVIS L
J&F ↑ | ImageNet-1K
lin. probe ↑ | ADE20K
mIoU ↑ | K400 ↑ | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | **Motif Vision Encoder** | 0.5B | **73.8** | **80.4** | **83.4** | 87.4 | 52.0 | 87.4 | | DINOv3 | 1.7B | 71.1 | 79.7 | 83.3 | 88.4 | **55.9** | 87.8 | | Web-DINO | 2B | 57.2 | 65.8 | 69.5 | 85.9 | 42.7 | 86.8 | | PEcore | 5.4B | 48.2 | 53.1 | 49.8 | **89.3** | 38.9 | **87.9** | | SigLIP2 | 10B | 56.1 | 62.3 | 62.9 | 89.1 | 45.4 | 86.9 | | OpenCLIP | 2B | – | – | – | – | – | – | | V-JEPA 2.1 | 0.022B | 69.0 | – | – | 85.5 | 47.9 | 87.7 | Protocol: DINOv3-style linear/attentive probes for image tasks; V-JEPA 2-style protocol for video. Baseline DAVIS / ADE20K / K400 figures are taken from the DINOv3 technical report's unified evaluation (Tab. 3, 5, 6) and ImageNet from Tab. 7; OpenCLIP is not in that report and its benchmarks are not reported under a comparable protocol. Motif is state of the art on DAVIS video tracking at every resolution (74.0 / 80.5 / 83.5 J&F) and stays competitive on the other image and video benchmarks, using roughly 1/3 of DINOv3's training data (~0.5B samples).

Mask propagation: ground truth vs DINOv3 vs Motif

Dense attention and feature-similarity comparison across Motif, DINOv3, V-JEPA 2.1, and SigLIP2

Dense features on a single image (768px). Columns: query point, CLS attention, query-point attention, patch-feature cosine similarity. Motif and DINOv3 keep attention and similarity tightly localized on the queried object, while V-JEPA 2.1 and SigLIP2 are noticeably noisier.

## License Released under the **MIT License** (see `LICENSE`). The model was trained on data governed by the respective dataset licenses; downstream users are responsible for compliance with those terms.