Instructions to use Mozat/how-affect-v1 with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use Mozat/how-affect-v1 with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-classification", model="Mozat/how-affect-v1")# Load model directly from transformers import AutoModel model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("Mozat/how-affect-v1", dtype="auto") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
add README
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: other
|
| 3 |
+
library_name: transformers
|
| 4 |
+
base_model: distilbert-base-uncased
|
| 5 |
+
tags:
|
| 6 |
+
- text-classification
|
| 7 |
+
- affect
|
| 8 |
+
- emotion
|
| 9 |
+
- distilbert
|
| 10 |
+
language:
|
| 11 |
+
- en
|
| 12 |
+
---
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
# how-affect-v1 — Bridge-Grounded Affect Detector
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
A DistilBERT-based affect-valence classifier fine-tuned on **non-circular**
|
| 17 |
+
author-narrated affect labels (mined from public-domain novel narration via
|
| 18 |
+
BookNLP), rather than on LLM-generated personality scores.
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
## Why this exists
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
Production personality / emotion classifiers in companion AI are commonly trained
|
| 23 |
+
**on LLM labels** (e.g. Claude/GPT scores). Evaluation against those same LLM
|
| 24 |
+
labels is circular — the model only learns to imitate the labeling LLM. We
|
| 25 |
+
needed a HOW (affect) detector grounded in **independent human-written signal**
|
| 26 |
+
about how characters speak. Solution: harvest dialogue-tag adverbs + WordNet
|
| 27 |
+
emotion supersenses from BookNLP-processed novels (~1000 books, 25k labeled
|
| 28 |
+
quotes), bind them to the speaker's actual utterances, and train a probe.
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
## Metrics
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
Held-out test set (5,971 quotes, balanced neg/pos author affect):
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
| Model | Held-out AUC |
|
| 35 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 36 |
+
| Existing circular "emotion" dim (177-dim model trained on Claude scores) | 0.557 |
|
| 37 |
+
| Frozen-embedding probe (sentence-transformer + linear head) | 0.637 |
|
| 38 |
+
| **This model — DistilBERT end-to-end on bridge labels** | **0.678** |
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
Honest ceiling: ~0.68 is real but modest. Narrated affect ("said bitterly")
|
| 41 |
+
often lives in prosody, not lexical content, so text-only affect detection
|
| 42 |
+
has a structural ceiling. A voice/prosody channel is the path to higher AUC.
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
## Files
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
- `model.pt` — full state-dict: DistilBERT encoder + mean-pool + Linear(hidden→1) head.
|
| 47 |
+
- `metrics.json` — final held-out AUC + baseline comparison.
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
## Usage
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
The head is custom (DistilBERT + mean-pool + 1-logit), so you can't use
|
| 52 |
+
`AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained` directly. Load like this:
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
```python
|
| 55 |
+
import torch
|
| 56 |
+
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModel
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
class AffectNet(torch.nn.Module):
|
| 59 |
+
def __init__(self):
|
| 60 |
+
super().__init__()
|
| 61 |
+
self.enc = AutoModel.from_pretrained("distilbert-base-uncased")
|
| 62 |
+
self.head = torch.nn.Linear(self.enc.config.hidden_size, 1)
|
| 63 |
+
def forward(self, ids, mask):
|
| 64 |
+
h = self.enc(input_ids=ids, attention_mask=mask).last_hidden_state
|
| 65 |
+
m = mask.unsqueeze(-1).float()
|
| 66 |
+
pooled = (h * m).sum(1) / m.sum(1).clamp(min=1e-6)
|
| 67 |
+
return self.head(pooled).squeeze(1)
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("distilbert-base-uncased")
|
| 70 |
+
model = AffectNet()
|
| 71 |
+
model.load_state_dict(torch.load("model.pt", map_location="cpu"))
|
| 72 |
+
model.eval()
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
text = "I can't bear this any longer."
|
| 75 |
+
enc = tok(text, padding="max_length", truncation=True, max_length=48, return_tensors="pt")
|
| 76 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
| 77 |
+
valence = torch.sigmoid(model(enc["input_ids"], enc["attention_mask"]))[0].item()
|
| 78 |
+
print(valence) # ~1.0 = negative/distressed affect, ~0.0 = positive
|
| 79 |
+
```
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
## Training data (non-circular)
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
Bridge corpus from ~1000 BookNLP-processed novels (`corpus/booknlp_output/`):
|
| 84 |
+
for each character quote, the narration window (±7 tokens around the quote) was
|
| 85 |
+
scanned for emotion supersense spans (`verb.emotion`, `noun.feeling`) and
|
| 86 |
+
manner adverbs anchored to a speech verb ("said *bitterly*"). Quotes mapped
|
| 87 |
+
to net-negative vs net-positive author affect → 17,749 neg / 16,375 pos
|
| 88 |
+
balanced labels (29,852 total used, 23,881 train / 5,971 test).
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
## Architecture
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
- Base encoder: `distilbert-base-uncased` (~66M params).
|
| 93 |
+
- Head: `Dropout-free Linear(hidden_size, 1)` over mean-pooled token embeddings.
|
| 94 |
+
- Loss: `BCEWithLogitsLoss` on binary affect-valence.
|
| 95 |
+
- Trained 1-2 epochs on CPU (best epoch saved by held-out AUC; early-stopped when AUC stopped improving).
|
| 96 |
+
- Max input length: 48 tokens (quotes are short).
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
## License
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
Trained on derivatives of public-domain (Project Gutenberg) novels processed
|
| 101 |
+
via BookNLP. The model weights are released for research use; please consult
|
| 102 |
+
your jurisdiction's rules around derivative works for production deployment.
|