Nerdsking commited on
Commit
ad0e9e0
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): d78f3da

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +2 -2
README.md CHANGED
@@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ We did not considered it for our score, but "if" considered those extra 5 questi
121
 
122
 
123
  ### <font color=red>Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.1-3B </font> (4 billion model, "marketed" as 3B billions), with 92% HumanEval accuracy in Python
124
- - Time to finish 160 questions from HumanEval: 22263.80s --- <b>MORE THAN SIX HOURS</b> !!! (in a RTX 5060 ti 16gb)
125
 
126
  ### <font color=red>Nerdsking/nerdsking-python-coder-3B-i</font> (real 3 billion model) with 88,41% HumanEval accuracy in Python
127
- - Time to finish 160 questions from HumanEval: 210.51s --- <b>THREE MINUTES AND HALF</b> (in a RTX 5060 ti 16gb)
128
 
129
  <b><i><font color=red>Lesson: Anyone can create a bigger model with an "eternal loop" to solve problems by randomly trying all possible variables. That is not "intelligence", that's
130
  mere BRUTE FORCE, and waste of time and resources. INTELLIGENCE is doing MORE, with LESS and EFFICIENCY. </b></font></i>
 
121
 
122
 
123
  ### <font color=red>Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.1-3B </font> (4 billion model, "marketed" as 3B billions), with 92% HumanEval accuracy in Python
124
+ - Time to finish 160 questions from HumanEval: 22263.80s --- <b><u>MORE THAN SIX HOURS</b></u> !!! (in a RTX 5060 ti 16gb)
125
 
126
  ### <font color=red>Nerdsking/nerdsking-python-coder-3B-i</font> (real 3 billion model) with 88,41% HumanEval accuracy in Python
127
+ - Time to finish 160 questions from HumanEval: 210.51s --- <b><u>THREE MINUTES AND HALF</b></u> !!! (in a RTX 5060 ti 16gb)
128
 
129
  <b><i><font color=red>Lesson: Anyone can create a bigger model with an "eternal loop" to solve problems by randomly trying all possible variables. That is not "intelligence", that's
130
  mere BRUTE FORCE, and waste of time and resources. INTELLIGENCE is doing MORE, with LESS and EFFICIENCY. </b></font></i>