# Green Patent Detection: Advanced Agentic Workflow with QLoRA ## Project Summary This is the final assignment it synthesizes Assignments 2 and 3 into a data labelling pipeline. A Generative LLM is fine-tuned via QLoRA to understand patent language, then integrated as the "jduge" of a Multi-Agent System (MAS) to debate and label complex patent claims. Finally, a targeted Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) review step produces a gold dataset for a final PatentSBERTa fine-tuning. --- ## Pipeline Architecture patents_50k_green.parquet [Part A & B] Baseline PatentSBERTa + Uncertainty Sampling - Top 100 high-risk claims (u ≈ 1.0) [Part C – Step 1] QLoRA Fine-tuning on Colab (Qwen3-8B, 4-bit, 3 epochs) - qlora_green_patent_adapter (LoRA weights) - Qwen3-8B.Q4_K_M.gguf (served via LM Studio) [Part C – Step 2] Multi-Agent System (CrewAI) - Agent 1 – Advocate (Qwen3-4B, argues for green: Advocator) - Agent 2 – Skeptic (Qwen3-4B, argues against green: Skeptic) - Agent 3 – Judge (QLoRA Qwen3-8B, final verdict: Judge) [Part D] Exception-Based HITL (only deadlocks / low-confidence) - 26 claims reviewed with deadlock, 3 human overrides - hitl_green_100_final.csv (gold labels) [Part D] Final PatentSBERTa Fine-tuning on gold dataset - patentsberta_finetuned_final/ ## Part C – Step 1: QLoRA Domain Adaptation The generative LLM fine-tuning was performed on Google Colab (T4, 15 GB VRAM) using Unsloth's QLoRA implementation. | Parameter | Value | |---|---| | Base model | `unsloth/Qwen3-8B-bnb-4bit` | | LoRA rank (r) | 16 | | LoRA alpha | 16 | | Target modules | q_proj, k_proj, v_proj, o_proj, gate_proj, up_proj, down_proj | | Training examples | 2,000 (train_silver, Alpaca format) | | Epochs | 3 (375 total steps) | | Batch size | 4 × 4 gradient accumulation = effective 16 | | Learning rate | 2e-4 (AdamW 8-bit, linear schedule) | | Max sequence length | 2,048 tokens | | Training loss | 0.8899 | | Training time | ~105 minutes on T4 | | VRAM usage | ~5 GB (4-bit quantization) | The fine-tuned adapter was exported to GGUF Q4_K_M format (4.682 GB) and served locally via LM Studio for use in the MAS. ## Part C – Step 2: Multi-Agent System Three agents collaborate to label each of the 100 high-risk patent claims using CrewAI as the orchestration framework. The QLoRA fine-tuned model serves as the Judge's brain. | Agent | Model | Temperature | Role | |---|---|---|---| | Advocate | Qwen3-4B (LM Studio) | 0.1 | Argues FOR Y02 green classification | | Skeptic | Qwen3-4B (LM Studio) | 0.1 | Argues AGAINST (identifies greenwashing) | | Judge | QLoRA Qwen3-8B (LM Studio) | 0.1 | Weighs debate and produces final JSON label | Each claim produces a structured JSON output: `classification` (0/1), `confidence` (Low/Medium/High), and `rationale`. ## Part D: Targeted HITL & Final Fine-tuning **Exception-Based HITL** was applied — only intervening when agents reached a deadlock or produced low-confidence outputs. | Metric | Value | |---|---| | Total claims reviewed by MAS | 100 | | Auto-accepted (high confidence) | 74 | | Escalated to human review | 26 | | Human overrides | 3 | | Human agreement rate with Judge | 88.5% | The gold-labelled dataset (`hitl_green_100_final.csv`) was used to fine-tune PatentSBERTa for 3 epochs using CosineSimilarityLoss on an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT via DirectML (fell back to CPU, completed in ~31 minutes). ## Performance Results | Model Version | Training Data Source | F1 Score (Test Set) | |---|---|---| | 1. Baseline | Frozen Embeddings (No Fine-tuning) | 0.7494 | | 2. Assignment 2 Model | Silver + Gold (Simple Generic LLM) | 0.7465 | | 3. Assignment 3 Model | Silver + Gold (Advanced Techniques / MAS) | 0.7467 | | 4. Final Model | Silver + Gold (QLoRA-Powered MAS + Targeted HITL) | 0.7530 | The Final Model achieves the highest F1 score across all iterations, demonstrating that QLoRA domain adaptation combined with structured agent debate and targeted human review produces measurable improvements. ## Key Findings **QLoRA advantages:** - Adapts a generative LLM to patent language with only 0.53% of parameters trained - Enables a domain-aware Judge that understands Y02 classification logic - 4-bit quantization fits 8B model on a free 15 GB T4 GPU **MAS + HITL advantages:** - Debate structure surfaces disagreements that single-model approaches miss - Exception-based HITL reduces human effort by 74% (26 vs 100 reviews) - Gold labels are higher-quality than silver LLM labels alone **Limitations:** - DirectML (AMD GPU) not fully supported by sentence-transformers training — fell back to CPU - torchao 0.16.0 conflicts with transformers lazy loader in certain environments ## Repository Contents | File | Description | |---|---| | `Final_Assignment.ipynb` | Main notebook (Parts A–D) | | `patentsberta_finetuned_final/` | Final fine-tuned PatentSBERTa model | | `hitl_green_100_final.csv` | Gold dataset — 100 claims with HITL labels and debate rationales | | `final_classifier.joblib` | Serialised final Logistic Regression classifier | | `qlora_outputs.zip` | QLoRA adapter weights (`qlora_green_patent_adapter/`) | | `Part C Step 1.ipynb` | Colab notebook for QLoRA fine-tuning | | `Debate transcripts` | All debate transcrips for MAS | ## Related Repositories - [Assignment 1 – ](https://github.com/Ory999/Portfolio-Assignment-1-M4-SGD-Mechanics-Attention-Context) - [Assignment 2 – ](https://huggingface.co/Ory999/Assignment_2) - [Assignment 3 – ](https://huggingface.co/Ory999/Assignment_3) - Video link: https://aaudk-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/g/personal/dl02af_student_aau_dk/IQCPwPoohhSGQr_1T0-tmw7-AZHTGk2JIY01ZNHmYpGHiNQ?email=hamidb%40business.aau.dk&e=GYbwCw&nav=eyJyZWZlcnJhbEluZm8iOnsicmVmZXJyYWxBcHAiOiJTdHJlYW1XZWJBcHAiLCJyZWZlcnJhbFZpZXciOiJTaGFyZURpYWxvZy1MaW5rIiwicmVmZXJyYWxBcHBQbGF0Zm9ybSI6IldlYiIsInJlZmVycmFsTW9kZSI6InZpZXcifX0%3D