Pushing model and README files to the repo!
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ If you use this model, please cite it as follows:
|
|
| 170 |
}
|
| 171 |
```
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
-
# Intended
|
| 174 |
|
| 175 |
This regression model is designed to predict the cost of rides based on various features such as expected ride duration, number of drivers, and time of booking.
|
| 176 |
|
|
@@ -187,21 +187,6 @@ This regression model is designed to predict the cost of rides based on various
|
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
The model was trained using grid search to optimize hyperparameters. Cross-validation (5-fold) was performed to ensure robust evaluation. The best model was selected based on the lowest Mean Absolute Error (MAE) on the validation set.
|
| 189 |
|
| 190 |
-
# Hyperparameters
|
| 191 |
-
|
| 192 |
-
### Hyperparameters:
|
| 193 |
-
|
| 194 |
-
- alpha: 1
|
| 195 |
-
- copy_X: True
|
| 196 |
-
- fit_intercept: False
|
| 197 |
-
- max_iter: 1000
|
| 198 |
-
- positive: False
|
| 199 |
-
- precompute: False
|
| 200 |
-
- random_state: None
|
| 201 |
-
- selection: cyclic
|
| 202 |
-
- tol: 0.0001
|
| 203 |
-
- warm_start: False
|
| 204 |
-
|
| 205 |
# Evaluation
|
| 206 |
|
| 207 |
## Model Coefficients
|
|
@@ -238,7 +223,7 @@ The following plot shows the relationship between the actual and predicted value
|
|
| 238 |
|
| 239 |
The scatter plot above shows the predicted values against the actual values. The dashed line represents the ideal predictions where the predicted values are equal to the actual values.
|
| 240 |
|
| 241 |
-
# Evaluation
|
| 242 |
|
| 243 |
The model achieved the following results on the test set:
|
| 244 |
- **Mean Absolute Error (MAE)**: 50.32
|
|
|
|
| 170 |
}
|
| 171 |
```
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
+
# Intended uses & limitations
|
| 174 |
|
| 175 |
This regression model is designed to predict the cost of rides based on various features such as expected ride duration, number of drivers, and time of booking.
|
| 176 |
|
|
|
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
The model was trained using grid search to optimize hyperparameters. Cross-validation (5-fold) was performed to ensure robust evaluation. The best model was selected based on the lowest Mean Absolute Error (MAE) on the validation set.
|
| 189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 190 |
# Evaluation
|
| 191 |
|
| 192 |
## Model Coefficients
|
|
|
|
| 223 |
|
| 224 |
The scatter plot above shows the predicted values against the actual values. The dashed line represents the ideal predictions where the predicted values are equal to the actual values.
|
| 225 |
|
| 226 |
+
# Evaluation results
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
The model achieved the following results on the test set:
|
| 229 |
- **Mean Absolute Error (MAE)**: 50.32
|