docs(deploy): add detailed architecture guide and update k8s workloads
Browse files- Add AntiAtropos Architecture Guide explaining system design and Kubernetes concepts
- Document SRE agent operation loop and action effects on AWS EKS
- Explain telemetry flow from real cluster to agent via AMP and Prometheus
- Clarify three-layer scaling caps for cost control and safety limits
- Provide mapping of simulator nodes to real Kubernetes deployments
- Include comprehensive component listings for Hugging Face Spaces, AWS EKS, and managed services
- Describe simulator modes and cost implications of scaling actions
- Add ResourceQuota to prod-sre namespace limiting pods and resource usage
- Restructure and clean Kubernetes manifest for microservice deployments and services
- Enhance manifest comments for better understanding of workloads and scraping setup
- deploy/aws/ARCHITECTURE.md +361 -0
- deploy/aws/k8s-workloads.yaml +20 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,361 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# AntiAtropos Architecture Guide
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
A complete explanation of how AntiAtropos works across Hugging Face Spaces and AWS, written for someone who is technically strong but new to Kubernetes.
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
---
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
## The Big Picture
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
AntiAtropos trains AI agents to be Site Reliability Engineers (SREs). An SRE agent watches a simulated microservice cluster and decides when to scale services, reroute traffic, or shed load to keep things running smoothly.
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
The system is split across two platforms:
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
```
|
| 14 |
+
Hugging Face Spaces AWS
|
| 15 |
+
===================== ======================
|
| 16 |
+
The "brain" The "muscle"
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
AntiAtropos FastAPI server EKS (Kubernetes cluster)
|
| 19 |
+
- Runs the simulator - Runs the actual microservice pods
|
| 20 |
+
- Runs the SRE agent logic - The agent scales these pods
|
| 21 |
+
- Queries Prometheus for metrics - Prometheus Agent scrapes metrics
|
| 22 |
+
- Sends scale commands to K8s - Metrics flow to AMP
|
| 23 |
+
- Grafana (AMG) visualizes it all
|
| 24 |
+
```
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
Why split? HF Spaces is free/cheap for running the Python server. AWS EKS is where the real infrastructure lives that the agent practices on.
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
---
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
## Kubernetes Concepts You Need
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
### Pod
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
The smallest unit in Kubernetes. A pod is one or more containers that run together. In our case, each pod runs a single nginx container that simulates a microservice (like "payments" or "checkout").
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
Think of it as: one running instance of a service.
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
### Deployment
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
A Deployment is a recipe that tells Kubernetes "keep N copies of this pod running at all times." If a pod dies, the Deployment automatically replaces it.
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
The key field is `spec.replicas` — this is the number the SRE agent changes when it scales a service up or down.
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
```
|
| 45 |
+
Deployment: payments
|
| 46 |
+
replicas: 3 <-- the agent changes this number
|
| 47 |
+
|
|
| 48 |
+
+-- Pod: payments-abc123 (running)
|
| 49 |
+
+-- Pod: payments-def456 (running)
|
| 50 |
+
+-- Pod: payments-ghi789 (running)
|
| 51 |
+
```
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
**The agent scales replicas, not pods.** When it sets `replicas: 5`, Kubernetes creates 5 pods. When it sets `replicas: 2`, Kubernetes kills 3 pods.
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
### Service
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
A Service gives pods a stable network name. Instead of connecting to `payments-abc123` directly (which changes when the pod is recreated), you connect to `payments` (the Service), which routes to whichever pods are healthy.
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
### Namespace
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
A namespace is a folder for organizing resources. We use:
|
| 62 |
+
- `prod-sre` — where the 5 microservice Deployments live
|
| 63 |
+
- `monitoring` — where the Prometheus Agent pod lives
|
| 64 |
+
- `kube-system` — where AWS/EKS system pods live
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
### Node
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
A node is one EC2 virtual machine in the EKS cluster. Our cluster has 2-4 nodes. Each node runs multiple pods. When all nodes are full and the agent wants to scale up, Kubernetes adds more nodes (up to `maxSize: 4` in our config).
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
```
|
| 71 |
+
EKS Cluster
|
| 72 |
+
Node 1 (t3.medium - 4 vCPU, 8GB RAM)
|
| 73 |
+
Pod: payments-abc123
|
| 74 |
+
Pod: checkout-def456
|
| 75 |
+
Pod: catalog-ghi789
|
| 76 |
+
Pod: prometheus-agent-xyz
|
| 77 |
+
Node 2 (t3.medium - 4 vCPU, 8GB RAM)
|
| 78 |
+
Pod: payments-jkl012 <-- agent scaled payments from 1 to 2
|
| 79 |
+
Pod: cart-mno345
|
| 80 |
+
Pod: auth-pqr678
|
| 81 |
+
```
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
### ResourceQuota
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
A hard limit on how many resources a namespace can use. We set one on `prod-sre` that caps total pods at 30. This is a safety net — even if the Python code cap fails, Kubernetes itself will refuse to create more than 30 pods.
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
---
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
## How the SRE Agent Works
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
### The Loop
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
Every "tick" (one step of the simulation), the agent goes through this cycle:
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
```
|
| 96 |
+
1. OBSERVE -- Read telemetry (CPU, latency, queue depth) from Prometheus
|
| 97 |
+
2. DECIDE -- Choose an action (SCALE_UP, SCALE_DOWN, REROUTE_TRAFFIC, SHED_LOAD, NO_OP)
|
| 98 |
+
3. ACT -- Send the action to KubernetesExecutor
|
| 99 |
+
4. REWARD -- Compute Lyapunov stability reward (was the cluster more or less stable?)
|
| 100 |
+
5. REPEAT
|
| 101 |
+
```
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
### How Each Action Works
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
| Action | What the Agent Decides | What Happens on EKS |
|
| 106 |
+
|---|---|---|
|
| 107 |
+
| `SCALE_UP` | "node-0 needs more capacity" | `KubernetesExecutor` patches `payments` Deployment: `replicas: 2 -> 5` |
|
| 108 |
+
| `SCALE_DOWN` | "node-3 is over-provisioned" | `KubernetesExecutor` patches `cart` Deployment: `replicas: 4 -> 1` |
|
| 109 |
+
| `REROUTE_TRAFFIC` | "Move traffic away from node-2" | Currently simulation-only (no live K8s ingress patching) |
|
| 110 |
+
| `SHED_LOAD` | "Drop 50% of traffic to node-3" | Currently simulation-only (no live K8s traffic shaping) |
|
| 111 |
+
| `NO_OP` | "Do nothing this tick" | Nothing changes on EKS |
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
### The SCALE_UP Flow in Detail
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
Here is exactly what happens when the agent decides to scale up `node-0` (the payments service):
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
```
|
| 118 |
+
HF Spaces AWS EKS
|
| 119 |
+
---------- --------
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
Agent: "SCALE_UP, node-0, parameter=0.5"
|
| 122 |
+
|
|
| 123 |
+
v
|
| 124 |
+
AntiAtroposEnvironment.step()
|
| 125 |
+
|
|
| 126 |
+
v
|
| 127 |
+
KubernetesExecutor.execute_with_metadata()
|
| 128 |
+
|
|
| 129 |
+
v
|
| 130 |
+
_load_node_workload_map()
|
| 131 |
+
reads: node-0 -> {"deployment": "payments", "namespace": "prod-sre"}
|
| 132 |
+
|
|
| 133 |
+
v
|
| 134 |
+
_scale_deployment("SCALE_UP", "node-0", 0.5)
|
| 135 |
+
|
|
| 136 |
+
+-- 1. Read current replicas: apps_v1.read_namespaced_deployment_scale("payments", "prod-sre")
|
| 137 |
+
| Current replicas = 2
|
| 138 |
+
|
|
| 139 |
+
+-- 2. Calculate delta: max(1, int(0.5 * 3)) = 1
|
| 140 |
+
| Desired = min(6, 2 + 1) = 3 <-- max_replicas cap from env var
|
| 141 |
+
|
|
| 142 |
+
+-- 3. Patch: apps_v1.patch_namespaced_deployment_scale("payments", "prod-sre",
|
| 143 |
+
| body={"spec": {"replicas": 3}})
|
| 144 |
+
|
|
| 145 |
+
v +---------------------------+
|
| 146 |
+
Returns: "Ack: SCALE_UP for node-0 - | K8s creates 1 new pod: |
|
| 147 |
+
deployment payments in namespace | payments-newpod-xyz |
|
| 148 |
+
prod-sre scaled 2->3" +---------------------------+
|
| 149 |
+
```
|
| 150 |
+
|
| 151 |
+
### The Telemetry Flow in Detail
|
| 152 |
+
|
| 153 |
+
How the agent reads metrics from the real cluster:
|
| 154 |
+
|
| 155 |
+
```
|
| 156 |
+
EKS Cluster AMP HF Spaces
|
| 157 |
+
----------- --- ----------
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
Workload pods AMP Workspace AntiAtropos
|
| 160 |
+
(payments, checkout...) stores all metrics PrometheusClient
|
| 161 |
+
| ^ |
|
| 162 |
+
| /metrics (scraped every 15s) | |
|
| 163 |
+
v | |
|
| 164 |
+
Prometheus Agent | |
|
| 165 |
+
| | |
|
| 166 |
+
| remote-write (SigV4 auth) | |
|
| 167 |
+
+-------------------------------------------> |
|
| 168 |
+
| |
|
| 169 |
+
| HTTPS query |
|
| 170 |
+
+------------------------>
|
| 171 |
+
(PROMETHEUS_URL env var)
|
| 172 |
+
|
|
| 173 |
+
v
|
| 174 |
+
_fetch_real_metrics()
|
| 175 |
+
runs PromQL like:
|
| 176 |
+
sum(rate(http_requests_total[1m])) by (pod)
|
| 177 |
+
returns: TelemetryRecord for each node
|
| 178 |
+
```
|
| 179 |
+
|
| 180 |
+
---
|
| 181 |
+
|
| 182 |
+
## The Three Layers of Scaling Caps
|
| 183 |
+
|
| 184 |
+
This is the most important thing to understand for cost control. There are **three** independent limits:
|
| 185 |
+
|
| 186 |
+
### Layer 1: Python Code Cap (Soft)
|
| 187 |
+
|
| 188 |
+
**Where:** `ANTIATROPOS_MAX_REPLICAS` env var on HF Spaces, read by `kubernetes_executor.py` line 18.
|
| 189 |
+
|
| 190 |
+
**How it works:** The `_scale_deployment()` method calculates `desired = min(self.max_replicas, current + delta)`. If the agent tries to scale above 6, it gets:
|
| 191 |
+
|
| 192 |
+
```
|
| 193 |
+
Ack: SCALE_UP for node-0 - replicas unchanged at 6 (bounds 1-6)
|
| 194 |
+
```
|
| 195 |
+
|
| 196 |
+
**Can it be bypassed?** Yes. A bug in the code, or someone running `kubectl scale deployment payments --replicas=50` directly.
|
| 197 |
+
|
| 198 |
+
**Set to:** `6` on HF Spaces.
|
| 199 |
+
|
| 200 |
+
### Layer 2: Kubernetes ResourceQuota (Hard)
|
| 201 |
+
|
| 202 |
+
**Where:** `k8s-workloads.yaml` — ResourceQuota on the `prod-sre` namespace.
|
| 203 |
+
|
| 204 |
+
**How it works:** Kubernetes itself refuses to schedule pods that would exceed the quota. If the namespace already has 30 pods and something tries to create a 31st:
|
| 205 |
+
|
| 206 |
+
```
|
| 207 |
+
Error from server (Forbidden): pods "payments-new" is forbidden:
|
| 208 |
+
exceeded quota: prod-sre-quota, requested: pods=1, used: pods=30, limited: pods=30
|
| 209 |
+
```
|
| 210 |
+
|
| 211 |
+
**Can it be bypassed?** Only by someone with cluster-admin access who deletes or edits the ResourceQuota.
|
| 212 |
+
|
| 213 |
+
**Set to:** 30 pods total, 8 CPU, 8GB RAM.
|
| 214 |
+
|
| 215 |
+
### Layer 3: EKS Node Group Max Size (Hard)
|
| 216 |
+
|
| 217 |
+
**Where:** `eksctl-cluster.yaml` — `managedNodeGroups[0].maxSize: 4`.
|
| 218 |
+
|
| 219 |
+
**How it works:** The Cluster Autoscaler will never add more than 4 nodes. Even if there are 100 pending pods, it stops at 4 nodes. Pending pods just wait.
|
| 220 |
+
|
| 221 |
+
**Can it be bypassed?** Only by someone editing the node group in the AWS console.
|
| 222 |
+
|
| 223 |
+
**Set to:** 4 nodes (4 x t3.medium = 8 vCPU, 16GB RAM max).
|
| 224 |
+
|
| 225 |
+
### How the Three Layers Work Together
|
| 226 |
+
|
| 227 |
+
```
|
| 228 |
+
Agent wants to scale all 5 deployments to 20 replicas each:
|
| 229 |
+
|
| 230 |
+
Layer 1 (Python cap): 6 replicas max per deployment -> agent gets "unchanged at 6"
|
| 231 |
+
5 x 6 = 30 pods maximum
|
| 232 |
+
|
| 233 |
+
Layer 2 (ResourceQuota): 30 pods max in namespace -> 31st pod is Forbidden
|
| 234 |
+
|
| 235 |
+
Layer 3 (Node group): 4 nodes max -> if 30 pods don't fit on 4 nodes,
|
| 236 |
+
some stay Pending (no cost)
|
| 237 |
+
|
| 238 |
+
Worst case with all caps: 30 pods on 4 nodes = ~$160/month
|
| 239 |
+
Without any caps: 100 pods on 25 nodes = ~$1,800/month
|
| 240 |
+
```
|
| 241 |
+
|
| 242 |
+
---
|
| 243 |
+
|
| 244 |
+
## The Mapping: Simulator Nodes to Real Deployments
|
| 245 |
+
|
| 246 |
+
The simulator has 5 abstract nodes (node-0 through node-4). The `ANTIATROPOS_WORKLOAD_MAP` env var tells the system which K8s Deployment each simulator node maps to:
|
| 247 |
+
|
| 248 |
+
```
|
| 249 |
+
Simulator Node K8s Deployment Namespace Notes
|
| 250 |
+
------------- --------------- --------- -----
|
| 251 |
+
node-0 payments prod-sre VIP (4x importance weight)
|
| 252 |
+
node-1 checkout prod-sre Critical (no SHED_LOAD)
|
| 253 |
+
node-2 catalog prod-sre Critical (no SHED_LOAD)
|
| 254 |
+
node-3 cart prod-sre Non-critical (sheddable)
|
| 255 |
+
node-4 auth prod-sre Non-critical (sheddable)
|
| 256 |
+
```
|
| 257 |
+
|
| 258 |
+
When the simulator says "SCALE_UP node-0 by 0.5", the system:
|
| 259 |
+
1. Looks up node-0 in the workload map -> `payments` in `prod-sre`
|
| 260 |
+
2. Calls `patch_namespaced_deployment_scale("payments", "prod-sre", ...)`
|
| 261 |
+
3. Kubernetes creates/destroys pods to match the new replica count
|
| 262 |
+
|
| 263 |
+
---
|
| 264 |
+
|
| 265 |
+
## What Runs Where (Complete List)
|
| 266 |
+
|
| 267 |
+
### On Hugging Face Spaces
|
| 268 |
+
|
| 269 |
+
| Component | What It Does | Port |
|
| 270 |
+
|---|---|---|
|
| 271 |
+
| FastAPI server (`server/app.py`) | HTTP API for the agent | 7860 (via NGINX) |
|
| 272 |
+
| Simulator (`simulator.py`) | 5-node microservice cluster simulation | Internal |
|
| 273 |
+
| PrometheusClient (`telemetry/prometheus_client.py`) | Queries AMP for real metrics | Outbound HTTPS |
|
| 274 |
+
| KubernetesExecutor (`control/kubernetes_executor.py`) | Sends scale commands to EKS | Outbound HTTPS |
|
| 275 |
+
| Prometheus metrics exporter | Serves `/metrics` for HF's monitoring | 8000 |
|
| 276 |
+
| Grafana + local Prometheus | Local dashboards (from the Dockerfile) | 3000, 9090 |
|
| 277 |
+
|
| 278 |
+
### On AWS EKS
|
| 279 |
+
|
| 280 |
+
| Component | Namespace | What It Does |
|
| 281 |
+
|---|---|---|
|
| 282 |
+
| payments Deployment | prod-sre | 2 nginx pods (scales with agent) |
|
| 283 |
+
| checkout Deployment | prod-sre | 1 nginx pod (scales with agent) |
|
| 284 |
+
| catalog Deployment | prod-sre | 1 nginx pod (scales with agent) |
|
| 285 |
+
| cart Deployment | prod-sre | 1 nginx pod (scales with agent) |
|
| 286 |
+
| auth Deployment | prod-sre | 1 nginx pod (scales with agent) |
|
| 287 |
+
| Prometheus Agent | monitoring | Scrapes workload pods, remote-writes to AMP |
|
| 288 |
+
| Cluster Autoscaler | kube-system | Adds/removes EC2 nodes based on demand |
|
| 289 |
+
|
| 290 |
+
### On AWS Managed Services
|
| 291 |
+
|
| 292 |
+
| Service | What It Does |
|
| 293 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 294 |
+
| AMP (Amazon Managed Prometheus) | Stores all metrics. Queried by HF Spaces. |
|
| 295 |
+
| AMG (Amazon Managed Grafana) | Visualizes metrics in dashboards. Accessed via browser. |
|
| 296 |
+
|
| 297 |
+
---
|
| 298 |
+
|
| 299 |
+
## The Simulator vs Real Cluster
|
| 300 |
+
|
| 301 |
+
AntiAtropos has three modes controlled by `ANTIATROPOS_ENV_MODE`:
|
| 302 |
+
|
| 303 |
+
### Simulated Mode (`simulated`)
|
| 304 |
+
|
| 305 |
+
Everything is fake. The simulator generates synthetic metrics (random CPU, latency, etc.). No K8s, no Prometheus. The agent practices in a safe sandbox.
|
| 306 |
+
|
| 307 |
+
This is the default on HF Spaces without AWS configured.
|
| 308 |
+
|
| 309 |
+
### Hybrid Mode (`hybrid`)
|
| 310 |
+
|
| 311 |
+
The simulator runs, but it pulls real metrics from AMP to calibrate itself. If AMP says `payments` pods have 80% CPU, the simulator adjusts its internal model to match. The agent can read real data but actions only affect the simulator, not real pods.
|
| 312 |
+
|
| 313 |
+
### Live Mode (`live`)
|
| 314 |
+
|
| 315 |
+
The real deal. The agent reads real metrics from AMP and sends real scale commands to EKS. When it says `SCALE_UP`, actual pods get created on actual EC2 instances that cost actual money.
|
| 316 |
+
|
| 317 |
+
**Set `ANTIATROPOS_ENV_MODE=live` on HF Spaces to enable this.**
|
| 318 |
+
|
| 319 |
+
---
|
| 320 |
+
|
| 321 |
+
## Cost Flow
|
| 322 |
+
|
| 323 |
+
Every pod on EKS costs money. Here is how costs flow based on the agent's actions:
|
| 324 |
+
|
| 325 |
+
```
|
| 326 |
+
Agent action: SCALE_UP node-0
|
| 327 |
+
-> payments Deployment: replicas 2 -> 5
|
| 328 |
+
-> 3 new pods created
|
| 329 |
+
-> If existing nodes are full, Cluster Autoscaler adds a node
|
| 330 |
+
-> New node = another t3.medium EC2 instance = ~$0.04/hr
|
| 331 |
+
-> 3 pods running = 3 x (0.1 CPU + 64MB RAM) from the quota
|
| 332 |
+
|
| 333 |
+
Agent action: SCALE_DOWN node-3
|
| 334 |
+
-> cart Deployment: replicas 4 -> 1
|
| 335 |
+
-> 3 pods terminated
|
| 336 |
+
-> If nodes are now underutilized, Cluster Autoscaler removes a node (after 10 min)
|
| 337 |
+
-> One fewer EC2 instance = saves ~$0.04/hr
|
| 338 |
+
```
|
| 339 |
+
|
| 340 |
+
The Lyapunov reward function penalizes the agent for both instability AND cost, so a well-trained agent should learn to scale efficiently:
|
| 341 |
+
|
| 342 |
+
```
|
| 343 |
+
R_t = -(alpha * delta_V + beta * cost + gamma * SLA_violation)
|
| 344 |
+
^^^^
|
| 345 |
+
beta=0.01 penalizes over-provisioning
|
| 346 |
+
```
|
| 347 |
+
|
| 348 |
+
---
|
| 349 |
+
|
| 350 |
+
## Quick Reference: Key Files
|
| 351 |
+
|
| 352 |
+
| File | Purpose |
|
| 353 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 354 |
+
| `kubernetes_executor.py` | Translates agent actions to K8s API calls |
|
| 355 |
+
| `prometheus_client.py` | Queries AMP for real metrics |
|
| 356 |
+
| `simulator.py` | 5-node fluid-queue simulation |
|
| 357 |
+
| `stability.py` | Lyapunov reward computation |
|
| 358 |
+
| `deploy/aws/k8s-workloads.yaml` | The 5 Deployments + ResourceQuota on EKS |
|
| 359 |
+
| `deploy/aws/eksctl-cluster.yaml` | EKS cluster definition (nodes, caps) |
|
| 360 |
+
| `deploy/aws/prometheus-agent-values.yaml` | Helm config for Prometheus Agent |
|
| 361 |
+
| `deploy/aws/generate-kubeconfig.sh` | Creates kubeconfig for HF Spaces |
|
|
@@ -17,6 +17,26 @@ metadata:
|
|
| 17 |
labels:
|
| 18 |
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: antiatropos
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
---
|
| 21 |
# payments — node-0 (VIP)
|
| 22 |
# Business-critical payment service. Always has 2 replicas for redundancy.
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
labels:
|
| 18 |
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: antiatropos
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
+
---
|
| 21 |
+
# ResourceQuota: Hard cap on pods in prod-sre namespace.
|
| 22 |
+
# This is a Kubernetes-level safety net. Even if the agent's Python cap fails,
|
| 23 |
+
# Kubernetes will refuse to create pods beyond this limit.
|
| 24 |
+
#
|
| 25 |
+
# Max 30 pods = 6 replicas x 5 deployments (our worst-case budget)
|
| 26 |
+
# Max 8 CPU / 8GB RAM = enough for 30 small nginx pods
|
| 27 |
+
apiVersion: v1
|
| 28 |
+
kind: ResourceQuota
|
| 29 |
+
metadata:
|
| 30 |
+
name: prod-sre-quota
|
| 31 |
+
namespace: prod-sre
|
| 32 |
+
spec:
|
| 33 |
+
hard:
|
| 34 |
+
pods: "30"
|
| 35 |
+
requests.cpu: "8"
|
| 36 |
+
requests.memory: 8Gi
|
| 37 |
+
limits.cpu: "15"
|
| 38 |
+
limits.memory: 15Gi
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
---
|
| 41 |
# payments — node-0 (VIP)
|
| 42 |
# Business-critical payment service. Always has 2 replicas for redundancy.
|