Standardize measured performance comparison

README.md

@@ -58,10 +58,10 @@ The directly timed A/B used the same layout and kernel on a matched 512x512
 Turbo generation on a 32 GiB M1 Pro; it is representative of the projection
 path, not a separately timed standard-model claim.
 
-| path | transformer | total generation | gain vs regular |
+| comparison | regular / baseline | optimized path | resulting gain |
 |---|---:|---:|---:|
-| regular output-major | 253.9 s | 278.7 s | baseline |
-| input-major | 231.4 s | 256.5 s | **8.9% transformer; 8.0% total (1.09x)** |
+| transformer, output-major vs input-major | 253.9 s | 231.4 s | **8.9% (1.10x)** |
+| complete generation, same layout A/B | 278.7 s | 256.5 s | **8.0% (1.09x)** |
 
 The generated images were identical. The standard checkpoint in this
 repository separately passed a real H3ddle image-quality check before