File size: 9,478 Bytes
d574a3d
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
# Phase 5: AdapterRouter Integration & Gamma Stabilization

**Status**: ✅ COMPLETE (Session 2026-03-19)
**Goal**: Prevent three failure modes (weight drift, false convergence, feedback lock-in) through reinforcement tuning and system health monitoring.

## Implementation Summary

### Part A: Reinforcement Coefficient Tuning (Steps 1-3)

**Created ReinforcementConfig dataclass** (`reasoning_forge/memory_weighting.py`):
```python

@dataclass

class ReinforcementConfig:

    boost_successful: float = 0.08        # Reward for resolution_rate > 40%

    penalize_failed: float = 0.08         # Penalty for "worsened" conflicts

    reward_soft_consensus: float = 0.03   # Partial reward for soft_consensus

```

**Key Features**:
- Tunable via `from_dict()` and `to_dict()` — load from config files
- Integrated into `MemoryWeighting.__init__()` (backward compatible, defaults match Phase 4)
- Updated `update_from_evolution()` to use configurable coefficients

**Wired into AdapterRouter** (`inference/adapter_router.py`):
- Added `memory_weighting` parameter to `__init__()`
- New `_apply_memory_boost()` method: modulates confidence [-50%, +50%] based on adapter weights
- Enhanced secondary adapter selection to prefer high-performing adapters
- New `explain_routing()` method: returns routing decision with memory context

**Updated CodetteOrchestrator** (`inference/codette_orchestrator.py`):
- Accepts `memory_weighting` parameter
- New `route_and_generate()` method: orchestrates routing + generation + logging
- New `log_routing_decision()` method: verbose routing context for observability

### Part B: Gamma Stabilization Field (Step 3.5A — CRITICAL)

**Created CoherenceFieldGamma class** (`reasoning_forge/coherence_field.py`, 380+ lines):

**Health Metrics** (`GammaHealthMetrics` dataclass):
- Tracks: conflict strength, perspective diversity, resolution rate, adapter weight variance, epistemic tension
- Computes **gamma (Γ)** score ∈ [0, 1] via weighted sum:
  ```

  Γ = 0.25×diversity + 0.25×tension_health + 0.25×(1-weight_variance) + 0.25×resolution_rate

  ```

**Health Zones**:
- **Γ < 0.4**: System collapses → inject diverse perspective (diversity_injection)

- **0.4 ≤ Γ ≤ 0.8**: Healthy/stable zone (maintain status quo)

- **Γ > 0.8**: Groupthink risk → force conflict pair (conflict_injection)

**Safety Mechanisms**:
- Runs alongside Phase 4 runaway detection (complementary, not redundant)
- Tracks health history and interventions
- Exports metrics for monitoring
- Graceful fallback if intervention fails

**Integrated into ForgeEngine** (`reasoning_forge/forge_engine.py`):
- Initialized in `__init__()` with `self.coherence_field = CoherenceFieldGamma()`
- Health monitoring added to debate loop after Phase 4 (after conflict evolution + runaway detection)
- Interventions executed when gamma out of bounds
- Gamma metrics exported in metadata:
  - `gamma_metrics`: health history (50-sample rolling window)
  - `gamma_interventions`: list of stabilization actions taken
  - `phase_5a_active`: flag indicating monitoring active

### Part C: Routing Metrics & Observability (Step 4)

**Created RoutingMetrics class** (`reasoning_forge/routing_metrics.py`, 250+ lines):

**Tracks Per-Adapter**:
- Selection count (primary vs secondary)
- Average confidence
- Memory boost hit rate (% of selections with boost applied)
- Average boost magnitude

**System-Level Metrics**:
- Total queries routed
- Strategy distribution (keyword, llm, hybrid, forced)
- Memory boost rate
- Top 5 adapters by selection frequency

**Observability Features**:
- `record_route()`: log individual routing decisions
- `get_adapter_stats()`: per-adapter performance
- `get_summary()`: comprehensive routing statistics
- `get_recent_routes()`: last N routes for debugging
- `create_record()`: factory method with boost magnitude calculation

### Part D: Configuration Management (Step 5)

**Created Phase 5 config file** (`configs/phase5_config.yaml`, 150+ lines):

Sections:
- **reinforcement**: Tuning coefficients for boost/penalize
- **adapter_router**: Memory weighting strategy (soft vs hard)

- **gamma_stabilization**: Health thresholds and intervention strategies
- **monitoring**: Observability settings (logging, metrics export)
- **memory**: Recency decay, weight bounds, update intervals
- **edge_cases**: Cold-start, missing adapters, memory load failures

- **development**: Testing mode, dry-run, replay mode



### Part E: Integration Tests (Step 6)



**Created test_phase5_e2e.py** (300+ lines, ALL PASSING):



**5 Test Functions**:

1. **test_reinforcement_config()**: ReinforcementConfig creation, from_dict, to_dict, partial configs

2. **test_adapter_router_with_memory()**: Router without memory, routing explanations

3. **test_gamma_health_monitoring()**: Health scoring, collapse/groupthink detection, interventions
4. **test_routing_metrics()**: Route recording, adapter stats, summary generation
5. **test_phase5_integration()**: All components working together (health + routing + metrics)

**Test Results**:
```

RESULTS: 5 passed, 0 failed

```

## Files Created/Modified

**NEW FILES**:
- `reasoning_forge/coherence_field.py` (380 lines)
- `reasoning_forge/routing_metrics.py` (250 lines)
- `configs/phase5_config.yaml` (150 lines)
- `test_phase5_e2e.py` (300 lines)
- `PHASE5_SUMMARY.md` (this file)

**MODIFIED FILES**:
- `reasoning_forge/memory_weighting.py` (+40 lines: ReinforcementConfig, config methods)
- `inference/adapter_router.py` (+80 lines: memory_weighting param, _apply_memory_boost, explain_routing)

- `inference/codette_orchestrator.py` (+100 lines: memory_weighting param, log_routing_decision, route_and_generate)

- `reasoning_forge/forge_engine.py` (+80 lines: CoherenceFieldGamma import/init, debate loop gamma monitoring, metadata export)



## Architecture



```

Complete Phase 5 Closed Loop:



Query


[P5 AdapterRouter]

  - Routes via keyword/LLM

  - Tests memory_weighting for confidence boost
  - Returns RouteResult with confidence
  ↓
[RoutingMetrics] logs the decision
  ↓
[Agents generate via selected adapters]
  ↓
[P1-P3] Detect + track + evolve conflicts
  ↓
[P4] Self-correcting: update weights, dynamic reroute, runaway detection
  ↓
[P5A Gamma] Monitor health
  ├─ If Γ < 0.4: diversity_injection (inject unused adapter)

  ├─ If Γ > 0.8: conflict_injection (force debate pair)
  └─ Log intervention + metrics
  ↓
Synthesis + export metadata (phase_5a metrics included)


[Memory learning] improves next query's routing

```



## Key Metrics Exposed



**Per-Response**:

- `adapter`: Selected primary adapter

- `confidence_before_boost`: Base keyword score

- `confidence_after_boost`: Final confidence (after memory boost)

- `memory_boost_applied`: Boolean flag



**Per-Debate**:

- `gamma_health`: {gamma, status, conflict_strength, perspective_diversity, weight_variance, intervention}

- `adapter_weights`: Current learned weights for all adapters
- `phase_5a_active`: Flag that stabilization is live

**Per-Session** (RoutingMetrics.get_summary()):

- `total_queries`: Total routed
- `avg_confidence`: Mean confidence across routes
- `top_adapters`: Most frequently selected
- `memory_boost_rate`: % routes with memory boost
- `adapter_stats`: Per-adapter breakdown (selections, boosts, coherence)

## Safety Guardrails

**Weight Bounds**: [0, 2.0] prevents unbounded amplification

**Soft Boost Strategy**:
- Confidence modulation [-50%, +50%], not full replacement
- Keyword routing remains primary signal, memory boost refine

**Recency Decay**:
- 7-day half-life prevents old patterns from dominating
- Recent successes count more

**Gamma Intervention Thresholds**:
- Collapse at Γ < 0.4 requires >25% diversity loss or >75% weight concentration
- Groupthink at Γ > 0.8 requires very high diversity but low tension

**Gradual Reinforcement**:
- Boost/penalize caps at ±0.08 per round (prevents oscillation)
- Soft consensus gets partial credit (±0.03) for incremental progress

## What This Prevents

1. **Weight Drift**: Gamma monitoring detects when weight variance spikes (monoculture forming), injects diversity
2. **False Convergence**: Low conflict doesn't guarantee correctness; Gamma checks if diversity also dropping
3. **Feedback Lock-in**: Early bad runs reinforce via memory; Gamma can override by forcing new perspectives

## What This Enables

- **Real-time Health Dashboards**: Monitor Γ, adapter weights, intervention history in real-time
- **Fine-tuning**: Adjust coefficients (boost=0.08 → 0.10) via config without code changes
- **Adaptive Stabilization**: System self-corrects when drifting toward pathological modes
- **Production Observability**: Every routing decision logged with context for debugging
- **A/B Testing**: Can compare different boost amounts or gamma thresholds

## Next Steps (Phase 6+)

Potential enhancements:
- **Emergent Specialization**: Observe which adapters naturally cluster when helping each other
- **Meta-Learning**: Learn which conflicts are "resolvable" vs "epistemic disagreements"
- **Federated Gamma**: Sync gamma health across multiple Codette agents (distributed monitoring)
- **Adversarial Conflict Injection**: Deliberately create productive tension for training robustness