Ranjit0034 commited on
Commit
0ae3f18
Β·
verified Β·
1 Parent(s): 6608d5e

Upload docs/UPGRADE_ROADMAP.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. docs/UPGRADE_ROADMAP.md +269 -0
docs/UPGRADE_ROADMAP.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # FinEE v2.0 - Upgrade Roadmap
2
+ ## From Extraction Engine to Intelligent Financial Agent
3
+
4
+ ### Current vs Target Comparison
5
+
6
+ | Dimension | Current State | Target State | Priority |
7
+ |-----------|--------------|--------------|----------|
8
+ | **Base Model** | Phi-3 Mini (3.8B) | Llama 3.1 8B / Qwen2.5 7B | P0 |
9
+ | **Training Data** | 456 samples | 100K+ distilled samples | P0 |
10
+ | **Output Format** | Token extraction | Instruction-following JSON | P0 |
11
+ | **Context** | None | RAG + Knowledge Graph | P1 |
12
+ | **Interaction** | Single-turn | Multi-turn agent | P1 |
13
+ | **Input Types** | Email only | SMS + Email + PDF + Images | P1 |
14
+ | **Accuracy** | ~70% (estimated) | 95%+ (measured) | P0 |
15
+
16
+ ---
17
+
18
+ ## Phase 1: Foundation (Week 1-2)
19
+ ### 1.1 Model Upgrade
20
+ - [ ] Download Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
21
+ - [ ] Download Qwen2.5 7B Instruct (backup)
22
+ - [ ] Benchmark both on finance extraction task
23
+ - [ ] Set up quantization pipeline (4-bit, 8-bit)
24
+
25
+ ### 1.2 Training Data Expansion
26
+ - [ ] Generate 100K synthetic samples (DONE βœ…)
27
+ - [ ] Distill from GPT-4/Claude for complex cases
28
+ - [ ] Add real data from user (2,419 SMS samples βœ…)
29
+ - [ ] Create validation set (10K samples)
30
+ - [ ] Create test set (5K unseen samples)
31
+
32
+ ### 1.3 Instruction Format
33
+ ```json
34
+ {
35
+ "system": "You are a financial entity extractor...",
36
+ "instruction": "Extract entities from this message",
37
+ "input": "<bank SMS or email>",
38
+ "output": {
39
+ "amount": 2500.00,
40
+ "type": "debit",
41
+ "merchant": "Swiggy",
42
+ "category": "food",
43
+ "date": "2026-01-12",
44
+ "reference": "123456789012"
45
+ }
46
+ }
47
+ ```
48
+
49
+ ---
50
+
51
+ ## Phase 2: Multi-Modal Support (Week 3-4)
52
+ ### 2.1 Input Types
53
+ - [ ] SMS Parser (DONE βœ…)
54
+ - [ ] Email Parser (DONE βœ…)
55
+ - [ ] PDF Statement Parser
56
+ - Use `pdfplumber` for text extraction
57
+ - Table detection with `camelot`
58
+ - OCR fallback with `pytesseract`
59
+ - [ ] Image/Screenshot Parser
60
+ - OCR with `EasyOCR` or `PaddleOCR`
61
+ - Vision model for structured extraction
62
+
63
+ ### 2.2 Bank Statement Processing
64
+ ```
65
+ PDF Input β†’ Text Extraction β†’ Table Detection β†’
66
+ Row Parsing β†’ Entity Extraction β†’ Transaction List
67
+ ```
68
+
69
+ ### 2.3 Image Processing Pipeline
70
+ ```
71
+ Image β†’ OCR β†’ Text Blocks β†’ Layout Analysis β†’
72
+ Entity Extraction β†’ Structured Output
73
+ ```
74
+
75
+ ---
76
+
77
+ ## Phase 3: RAG + Knowledge Graph (Week 5-6)
78
+ ### 3.1 Knowledge Base
79
+ - Merchant database (10K+ Indian merchants)
80
+ - Bank template patterns
81
+ - Category taxonomy
82
+ - UPI VPA mappings
83
+
84
+ ### 3.2 RAG Architecture
85
+ ```
86
+ Query β†’ Retrieve Similar Transactions β†’
87
+ Augment Context β†’ Generate Extraction
88
+ ```
89
+
90
+ ### 3.3 Knowledge Graph
91
+ ```
92
+ [Merchant: Swiggy] --is_a--> [Category: Food Delivery]
93
+ --accepts--> [Payment: UPI, Card]
94
+ --typical_amount--> [Range: 100-2000]
95
+ ```
96
+
97
+ ### 3.4 Vector Store
98
+ - Use Qdrant/ChromaDB for transaction embeddings
99
+ - Enable semantic search for similar transactions
100
+ - Support for "transactions like this" queries
101
+
102
+ ---
103
+
104
+ ## Phase 4: Multi-Turn Agent (Week 7-8)
105
+ ### 4.1 Agent Capabilities
106
+ ```python
107
+ class FinancialAgent:
108
+ def extract_entities(self, message) -> dict
109
+ def categorize_spending(self, transactions) -> dict
110
+ def detect_anomalies(self, transactions) -> list
111
+ def generate_report(self, period) -> str
112
+ def answer_question(self, question, context) -> str
113
+ ```
114
+
115
+ ### 4.2 Conversation Flow
116
+ ```
117
+ User: "How much did I spend on food last month?"
118
+ Agent: [Retrieves transactions] β†’ [Filters by category] β†’
119
+ [Aggregates amounts] β†’ "You spent β‚Ή12,450 on food"
120
+
121
+ User: "Compare with previous month"
122
+ Agent: [Uses conversation context] β†’ [Retrieves both months] β†’
123
+ "December: β‚Ή12,450, November: β‚Ή9,800 (+27%)"
124
+ ```
125
+
126
+ ### 4.3 Tool Use
127
+ - Calculator for aggregations
128
+ - Date parser for time queries
129
+ - Budget tracker integration
130
+ - Export to CSV/Excel
131
+
132
+ ---
133
+
134
+ ## Phase 5: Production Deployment (Week 9-10)
135
+ ### 5.1 Model Optimization
136
+ - [ ] GGUF quantization for llama.cpp
137
+ - [ ] ONNX export for faster inference
138
+ - [ ] vLLM for batch processing
139
+ - [ ] MLX optimization for Apple Silicon
140
+
141
+ ### 5.2 API Design
142
+ ```python
143
+ # FastAPI endpoints
144
+ POST /extract # Single message extraction
145
+ POST /extract/batch # Batch extraction
146
+ POST /parse/pdf # PDF statement parsing
147
+ POST /parse/image # Image OCR + extraction
148
+ POST /chat # Multi-turn agent
149
+ GET /analytics # Spending analytics
150
+ ```
151
+
152
+ ### 5.3 Deployment Options
153
+ - Docker container
154
+ - Hugging Face Spaces (demo)
155
+ - Modal/Replicate (serverless)
156
+ - Self-hosted with vLLM
157
+
158
+ ---
159
+
160
+ ## Technical Architecture
161
+
162
+ ```
163
+ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
164
+ β”‚ FinEE v2.0 Agent β”‚
165
+ β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
166
+ β”‚ β”ŒοΏ½οΏ½οΏ½β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
167
+ β”‚ β”‚ SMS β”‚ β”‚ Email β”‚ β”‚ PDF β”‚ β”‚ Image β”‚ β”‚
168
+ β”‚ β”‚ Parser β”‚ β”‚ Parser β”‚ β”‚ Parser β”‚ β”‚ OCR β”‚ β”‚
169
+ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
170
+ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
171
+ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
172
+ β”‚ β–Ό β”‚
173
+ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
174
+ β”‚ β”‚ Preprocessor β”‚ β”‚
175
+ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
176
+ β”‚ β–Ό β”‚
177
+ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
178
+ β”‚ β”‚ RAG Pipeline β”‚ β”‚
179
+ β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚
180
+ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Vector β”‚ β”‚ Knowledge β”‚ β”‚ Merchant β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
181
+ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Store β”‚ β”‚ Graph β”‚ β”‚ Database β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
182
+ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚
183
+ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚
184
+ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
185
+ β”‚ β–Ό β”‚
186
+ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
187
+ β”‚ β”‚ Llama 3.1 8B / Qwen β”‚ β”‚
188
+ β”‚ β”‚ Instruction-Tuned β”‚ β”‚
189
+ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
190
+ β”‚ β–Ό β”‚
191
+ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
192
+ β”‚ β”‚ JSON Output β”‚ β”‚
193
+ β”‚ β”‚ + Confidence Score β”‚ β”‚
194
+ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
195
+ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
196
+ ```
197
+
198
+ ---
199
+
200
+ ## Model Selection Analysis
201
+
202
+ | Model | Size | Speed | Quality | License | Choice |
203
+ |-------|------|-------|---------|---------|--------|
204
+ | Llama 3.1 8B | 8B | Fast | Excellent | Meta | ⭐ Primary |
205
+ | Qwen2.5 7B | 7B | Fast | Excellent | Apache | ⭐ Backup |
206
+ | Mistral 7B | 7B | Fast | Good | Apache | Alternative |
207
+ | Phi-3 Medium | 14B | Medium | Excellent | MIT | Future |
208
+
209
+ ### Why Llama 3.1 8B?
210
+ 1. **Instruction following** - Best in class for its size
211
+ 2. **Structured output** - Reliable JSON generation
212
+ 3. **Context length** - 128K tokens (future RAG)
213
+ 4. **Quantization** - Excellent 4-bit performance
214
+ 5. **Ecosystem** - Wide support (vLLM, llama.cpp, MLX)
215
+
216
+ ---
217
+
218
+ ## Training Strategy
219
+
220
+ ### Stage 1: Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT)
221
+ ```
222
+ Base: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
223
+ Data: 100K synthetic + 2.4K real
224
+ Method: LoRA (rank=16, alpha=32)
225
+ Epochs: 3
226
+ ```
227
+
228
+ ### Stage 2: DPO (Direct Preference Optimization)
229
+ ```
230
+ Create preference pairs:
231
+ - Chosen: Correct extraction with confidence
232
+ - Rejected: Partial/incorrect extraction
233
+ Objective: Improve extraction precision
234
+ ```
235
+
236
+ ### Stage 3: RLHF (Optional)
237
+ ```
238
+ Reward model based on:
239
+ - JSON validity
240
+ - Field accuracy
241
+ - Merchant identification
242
+ - Category correctness
243
+ ```
244
+
245
+ ---
246
+
247
+ ## Metrics & Benchmarks
248
+
249
+ ### Extraction Accuracy
250
+ - **Amount**: Target 99%+
251
+ - **Type (debit/credit)**: Target 98%+
252
+ - **Merchant**: Target 90%+
253
+ - **Category**: Target 85%+
254
+ - **Reference**: Target 95%+
255
+
256
+ ### System Metrics
257
+ - Latency: <100ms per extraction
258
+ - Throughput: >100 msgs/sec
259
+ - Memory: <8GB (quantized)
260
+
261
+ ---
262
+
263
+ ## Next Steps (Immediate)
264
+
265
+ 1. [ ] Download Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
266
+ 2. [ ] Create instruction-format training data
267
+ 3. [ ] Set up LoRA fine-tuning pipeline
268
+ 4. [ ] Run first training experiment
269
+ 5. [ ] Benchmark against current Phi-3 model