# FinEE v2.0 - Upgrade Roadmap ## From Extraction Engine to Intelligent Financial Agent ### Current vs Target Comparison | Dimension | Current State | Target State | Priority | |-----------|--------------|--------------|----------| | **Base Model** | Phi-3 Mini (3.8B) | Llama 3.1 8B / Qwen2.5 7B | P0 | | **Training Data** | 456 samples | 100K+ distilled samples | P0 | | **Output Format** | Token extraction | Instruction-following JSON | P0 | | **Context** | None | RAG + Knowledge Graph | P1 | | **Interaction** | Single-turn | Multi-turn agent | P1 | | **Input Types** | Email only | SMS + Email + PDF + Images | P1 | | **Accuracy** | ~70% (estimated) | 95%+ (measured) | P0 | --- ## Phase 1: Foundation (Week 1-2) ### 1.1 Model Upgrade - [ ] Download Llama 3.1 8B Instruct - [ ] Download Qwen2.5 7B Instruct (backup) - [ ] Benchmark both on finance extraction task - [ ] Set up quantization pipeline (4-bit, 8-bit) ### 1.2 Training Data Expansion - [ ] Generate 100K synthetic samples (DONE ✅) - [ ] Distill from GPT-4/Claude for complex cases - [ ] Add real data from user (2,419 SMS samples ✅) - [ ] Create validation set (10K samples) - [ ] Create test set (5K unseen samples) ### 1.3 Instruction Format ```json { "system": "You are a financial entity extractor...", "instruction": "Extract entities from this message", "input": "", "output": { "amount": 2500.00, "type": "debit", "merchant": "Swiggy", "category": "food", "date": "2026-01-12", "reference": "123456789012" } } ``` --- ## Phase 2: Multi-Modal Support (Week 3-4) ### 2.1 Input Types - [ ] SMS Parser (DONE ✅) - [ ] Email Parser (DONE ✅) - [ ] PDF Statement Parser - Use `pdfplumber` for text extraction - Table detection with `camelot` - OCR fallback with `pytesseract` - [ ] Image/Screenshot Parser - OCR with `EasyOCR` or `PaddleOCR` - Vision model for structured extraction ### 2.2 Bank Statement Processing ``` PDF Input → Text Extraction → Table Detection → Row Parsing → Entity Extraction → Transaction List ``` ### 2.3 Image Processing Pipeline ``` Image → OCR → Text Blocks → Layout Analysis → Entity Extraction → Structured Output ``` --- ## Phase 3: RAG + Knowledge Graph (Week 5-6) ### 3.1 Knowledge Base - Merchant database (10K+ Indian merchants) - Bank template patterns - Category taxonomy - UPI VPA mappings ### 3.2 RAG Architecture ``` Query → Retrieve Similar Transactions → Augment Context → Generate Extraction ``` ### 3.3 Knowledge Graph ``` [Merchant: Swiggy] --is_a--> [Category: Food Delivery] --accepts--> [Payment: UPI, Card] --typical_amount--> [Range: 100-2000] ``` ### 3.4 Vector Store - Use Qdrant/ChromaDB for transaction embeddings - Enable semantic search for similar transactions - Support for "transactions like this" queries --- ## Phase 4: Multi-Turn Agent (Week 7-8) ### 4.1 Agent Capabilities ```python class FinancialAgent: def extract_entities(self, message) -> dict def categorize_spending(self, transactions) -> dict def detect_anomalies(self, transactions) -> list def generate_report(self, period) -> str def answer_question(self, question, context) -> str ``` ### 4.2 Conversation Flow ``` User: "How much did I spend on food last month?" Agent: [Retrieves transactions] → [Filters by category] → [Aggregates amounts] → "You spent ₹12,450 on food" User: "Compare with previous month" Agent: [Uses conversation context] → [Retrieves both months] → "December: ₹12,450, November: ₹9,800 (+27%)" ``` ### 4.3 Tool Use - Calculator for aggregations - Date parser for time queries - Budget tracker integration - Export to CSV/Excel --- ## Phase 5: Production Deployment (Week 9-10) ### 5.1 Model Optimization - [ ] GGUF quantization for llama.cpp - [ ] ONNX export for faster inference - [ ] vLLM for batch processing - [ ] MLX optimization for Apple Silicon ### 5.2 API Design ```python # FastAPI endpoints POST /extract # Single message extraction POST /extract/batch # Batch extraction POST /parse/pdf # PDF statement parsing POST /parse/image # Image OCR + extraction POST /chat # Multi-turn agent GET /analytics # Spending analytics ``` ### 5.3 Deployment Options - Docker container - Hugging Face Spaces (demo) - Modal/Replicate (serverless) - Self-hosted with vLLM --- ## Technical Architecture ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ FinEE v2.0 Agent │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │ │ │ SMS │ │ Email │ │ PDF │ │ Image │ │ │ │ Parser │ │ Parser │ │ Parser │ │ OCR │ │ │ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────┴──────┬──────┴─────────────┘ │ │ ▼ │ │ ┌────────────────┐ │ │ │ Preprocessor │ │ │ └────────┬───────┘ │ │ ▼ │ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ RAG Pipeline │ │ │ │ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ │ │ Vector │ │ Knowledge │ │ Merchant │ │ │ │ │ │ Store │ │ Graph │ │ Database │ │ │ │ │ └────┬────┘ └──────┬──────┘ └───────┬──────┘ │ │ │ │ └───────────────┼──────────────────┘ │ │ │ └───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────┘ │ │ ▼ │ │ ┌───────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Llama 3.1 8B / Qwen │ │ │ │ Instruction-Tuned │ │ │ └───────────┬───────────┘ │ │ ▼ │ │ ┌───────────────────────┐ │ │ │ JSON Output │ │ │ │ + Confidence Score │ │ │ └───────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` --- ## Model Selection Analysis | Model | Size | Speed | Quality | License | Choice | |-------|------|-------|---------|---------|--------| | Llama 3.1 8B | 8B | Fast | Excellent | Meta | ⭐ Primary | | Qwen2.5 7B | 7B | Fast | Excellent | Apache | ⭐ Backup | | Mistral 7B | 7B | Fast | Good | Apache | Alternative | | Phi-3 Medium | 14B | Medium | Excellent | MIT | Future | ### Why Llama 3.1 8B? 1. **Instruction following** - Best in class for its size 2. **Structured output** - Reliable JSON generation 3. **Context length** - 128K tokens (future RAG) 4. **Quantization** - Excellent 4-bit performance 5. **Ecosystem** - Wide support (vLLM, llama.cpp, MLX) --- ## Training Strategy ### Stage 1: Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT) ``` Base: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Data: 100K synthetic + 2.4K real Method: LoRA (rank=16, alpha=32) Epochs: 3 ``` ### Stage 2: DPO (Direct Preference Optimization) ``` Create preference pairs: - Chosen: Correct extraction with confidence - Rejected: Partial/incorrect extraction Objective: Improve extraction precision ``` ### Stage 3: RLHF (Optional) ``` Reward model based on: - JSON validity - Field accuracy - Merchant identification - Category correctness ``` --- ## Metrics & Benchmarks ### Extraction Accuracy - **Amount**: Target 99%+ - **Type (debit/credit)**: Target 98%+ - **Merchant**: Target 90%+ - **Category**: Target 85%+ - **Reference**: Target 95%+ ### System Metrics - Latency: <100ms per extraction - Throughput: >100 msgs/sec - Memory: <8GB (quantized) --- ## Next Steps (Immediate) 1. [ ] Download Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 2. [ ] Create instruction-format training data 3. [ ] Set up LoRA fine-tuning pipeline 4. [ ] Run first training experiment 5. [ ] Benchmark against current Phi-3 model