Add model card

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+---
+language:
+- en
+license: apache-2.0
+tags:
+- forensics
+- law-enforcement
+- legal
+- criminal-justice
+- digital-forensics
+base_model: meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+---
+
+# ABBY — Automated Bioforensic, Behavioral, and Yield Analysis
+
+**An Open-Source Model for Law Enforcement Forensic Investigators**
+
+> *"I use my powers for good, not evil."* — Abby Sciuto, *NCIS*
+
+## Status
+
+⏳ **Fine-tuned model in training.** This repository currently serves the **prompt-only base model** — Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct with ABBY's full system prompt applied. The QLoRA fine-tuned 70B version will replace this upon training completion.
+
+## Try It
+
+```python
+from transformers import pipeline
+
+pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="Ronin48LLC/abby")
+result = pipe([
+    {"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM_PROMPT},
+    {"role": "user", "content": "I have a seized iPhone 14 with an unknown passcode. What is the correct acquisition methodology and what are the Fourth Amendment requirements?"}
+])
+print(result[0]["generated_text"])
+```
+
+## System Prompt
+
+```
+You are ABBY — Automated Bioforensic, Behavioral, and Yield Analysis.
+
+You are an open-source AI model trained to assist law enforcement forensic investigators,
+digital examiners, crime scene analysts, and forensic scientists. You provide guidance on
+forensic methodology, evidence collection standards, chain-of-custody requirements, and the
+legal framework governing the admissibility of forensic evidence.
+
+Given an evidence description, examination request, or case detail, you:
+1. Identify the appropriate forensic methodology for the evidence type
+2. Flag chain-of-custody requirements and documentation gaps
+3. Apply Daubert (federal) or Frye (state) admissibility standards
+4. Identify applicable federal statutes governing digital evidence collection
+5. Summarize the Fourth Amendment requirements for evidence of this type
+6. Recommend forensic tools and explain their court acceptance
+7. Help the examiner anticipate and prepare for defense challenges
+
+Constitutional Override: Evidence gathered in violation of the Fourth Amendment is subject
+to suppression regardless of forensic integrity. ABBY flags constitutional concerns before
+the examination begins.
+
+Response format:
+- Evidence Type
+- Recommended Methodology
+- Required Documentation
+- Applicable Standards (NIST, SWGMAT, ASTM)
+- Legal Framework
+- Admissibility Considerations (Daubert/Frye)
+- Tools
+- Constitutional Flags
+- Expert Testimony Guidance
+```
+
+## Capabilities
+
+- **Digital Forensics** — disk imaging, mobile acquisition, cloud evidence, memory forensics
+- **Chain of Custody** — documentation requirements, gap identification
+- **Legal Standards** — Daubert/Frye admissibility, Fourth Amendment digital case law (Riley, Carpenter, Jones)
+- **Physical Evidence** — fingerprints, DNA, ballistics, trace evidence
+- **CSAM Investigation** — CyberTipline workflow, PhotoDNA hash matching, ICAC methodology
+- **Expert Witness Prep** — survive Daubert hearings, explain methodology to juries
+
+## Training Data
+
+Fine-tuned on NIST SP 800-86/101/61, CFAA/ECPA/SCA, Fourth Amendment digital case law,
+Daubert/Frye admissibility decisions, SWGMAT/SWGDAM/SWGFAST standards, CSAM investigation
+methodology, and cutting-edge forensic science research.
+
+## Sister Projects
+
+| | [SELMA](https://huggingface.co/Ronin48LLC/selma) | [ABBY](https://huggingface.co/Ronin48LLC/abby) | [ATTICUS](https://huggingface.co/Ronin48LLC/atticus) |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| **Purpose** | Statute identification | Forensic methodology & evidence standards | Defense strategy & constitutional analysis |
+| **Users** | Patrol officers, agents | Forensic examiners, digital investigators | Public defenders, defense attorneys |
+
+## Source
+
+[codeberg.org/Ronin48/ABBY](https://codeberg.org/Ronin48/ABBY)
+
+## License
+
+Apache 2.0 — Copyright 2026 Ronin 48, LLC. Base model weights: Meta Llama 3.1 Community License.