chore: update model card
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,199 +1,139 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
library_name: transformers
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
---
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
-
# Model Card for Model ID
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
<!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
## Model Details
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
### Model Description
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
This is the model card of a 🤗 transformers model that has been pushed on the Hub. This model card has been automatically generated.
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
-
- **Developed by:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 21 |
-
- **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 22 |
-
- **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 23 |
-
- **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 24 |
-
- **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
|
| 25 |
-
- **License:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 26 |
-
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
- **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
## Uses
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-
<!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
### Direct Use
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
-
### Downstream Use [optional]
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
### Recommendations
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
## Training Details
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
### Training Data
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
### Training Procedure
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
-
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
#### Preprocessing [optional]
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
<!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
## Evaluation
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
-
<!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
|
| 106 |
-
|
| 107 |
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
#### Testing Data
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
-
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
#### Factors
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
-
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
#### Metrics
|
| 122 |
|
| 123 |
-
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
### Results
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 |
-
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
#### Summary
|
| 132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
## Model Examination [optional]
|
| 136 |
-
|
| 137 |
-
<!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
|
| 138 |
-
|
| 139 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 140 |
-
|
| 141 |
-
## Environmental Impact
|
| 142 |
-
|
| 143 |
-
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
|
| 144 |
-
|
| 145 |
-
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
| 146 |
-
|
| 147 |
-
- **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 148 |
-
- **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 149 |
-
- **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 150 |
-
- **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 151 |
-
- **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 152 |
-
|
| 153 |
-
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
| 154 |
|
| 155 |
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 156 |
|
| 157 |
-
|
| 158 |
-
|
| 159 |
-
### Compute Infrastructure
|
| 160 |
-
|
| 161 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 162 |
-
|
| 163 |
-
#### Hardware
|
| 164 |
-
|
| 165 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 166 |
|
| 167 |
#### Software
|
| 168 |
|
| 169 |
-
|
| 170 |
-
|
| 171 |
-
## Citation [optional]
|
| 172 |
-
|
| 173 |
-
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
| 174 |
-
|
| 175 |
-
**BibTeX:**
|
| 176 |
-
|
| 177 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 178 |
-
|
| 179 |
-
**APA:**
|
| 180 |
-
|
| 181 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 182 |
-
|
| 183 |
-
## Glossary [optional]
|
| 184 |
-
|
| 185 |
-
<!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
|
| 186 |
-
|
| 187 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 188 |
-
|
| 189 |
-
## More Information [optional]
|
| 190 |
-
|
| 191 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 192 |
-
|
| 193 |
-
## Model Card Authors [optional]
|
| 194 |
-
|
| 195 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 196 |
|
| 197 |
-
##
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
library_name: transformers
|
| 3 |
+
license: mit
|
| 4 |
+
language:
|
| 5 |
+
- en
|
| 6 |
+
base_model:
|
| 7 |
+
- microsoft/phi-2
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
# Model Card for Phi-2_DPO_M3_Base
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+
A LoRA-finetuned variant of **microsoft/phi-2** targeting STEM multiple-choice question answering (MCQA). The model was first trained with SFT on mixed STEM MCQA datasets, then aligned via DPO using human preference data (EPFL exam MCQAs). This **Base** checkpoint is the standard (non-quantized) version intended for highest fidelity before any 4/8-bit compression.
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
## Model Details
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
### Model Description
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
+
This model adapts Phi-2 (≈2.78B params, 2,048 context length) for MCQA, especially STEM. Training used LoRA adapters (rank=16, α=16, dropout=0.05) with the TRL library for SFT and DPO; checkpoints focus on adapter weights for compactness. This Base release loads in full precision (fp16/bf16 capable) and is recommended for evaluation and further finetuning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
* **Developed by:** ShAIkespear team
|
| 22 |
+
* **Shared by:** ShAIkespear team
|
| 23 |
+
* **Model type:** Causal decoder-only LM (Phi-2) with LoRA adapters; DPO-aligned MCQA assistant
|
| 24 |
+
* **Language(s) (NLP):** English (training/eval datasets primarily EN)
|
| 25 |
+
* **License:** MIT (per repository)
|
| 26 |
+
* **Finetuned from model:** microsoft/phi-2
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
+
### Model Sources
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
+
* **Repository:** [2.8B-Phi-2-LLM-QA](https://github.com/EricSaikali/2.8B-Phi-2-LLM-QA)
|
| 31 |
+
* **Report:** “ShAIkerspear – How to replace TAs: A comprehensive study on letting LLMs answer your questions”
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
## Uses
|
| 34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
### Direct Use
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
+
* MCQA answering for STEM and general knowledge benchmarks (e.g., MMLU, OpenBookQA).
|
| 38 |
+
* Educational assistants/tutors for multiple-choice reasoning with short explanation-then-answer prompts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
+
* High-stakes domains (medical, legal, safety-critical) without human oversight.
|
| 43 |
+
* Generative tasks outside MCQA chat format may underperform (e.g., long-form proofs).
|
| 44 |
+
* Any use that violates exam integrity or leaks copyrighted/confidential test content.
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
+
* **STEM difficulty:** Performance on harder math/science MCQA can hover near chance on some sets, indicating limited reliability for difficult reasoning.
|
| 49 |
+
* **Alignment drift:** DPO after SFT can affect strict letter-only answer formatting; the model may add extra content or follow-ups.
|
| 50 |
+
* **Data risk:** Exam-derived prompts/answers may raise confidentiality/fairness concerns if reused exams are included.
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
### Recommendations
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
+
* Keep a human in the loop for grading/teaching.
|
| 55 |
+
* Prefer balanced MCQA data; use explicit “### Question / ### Explanation / ### Answer” formatting to stabilize outputs.
|
| 56 |
+
* Add guardrails to discourage cheating or policy-violating requests.
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
+
```python
|
| 61 |
+
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
|
| 62 |
+
import torch
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
model_id = "ShAIkespear/Phi-2_DPO_M3_Base" # replace with your Hub ID
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
+
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id, use_fast=True)
|
| 67 |
+
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id, device_map="auto")
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
prompt = "### Question: What is 2+2?\n### Explanation: Add the integers.\n### Answer:"
|
| 70 |
+
inputs = tok(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
|
| 71 |
+
out = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=10)
|
| 72 |
+
print(tok.decode(out[0], skip_special_tokens=True))
|
| 73 |
+
```
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
## Training Details
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
### Training Data
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
+
Mixed SFT on MathQA, OpenBookQA, ScienceQA, TAL-SCQ5K, plus balanced/shuffled merged MCQA sets; DPO on HelpSteer and a student-curated EPFL preference dataset (~20–30k pairs; subsets used for SFT/DPO). Long items (>512 tokens) dropped; large datasets clipped to 20k samples. Example split: train 50%, test_overfit 25%, test_comparison 10%, test_quantization 15% (quant split retained for comparability, though this is the Base model).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
### Training Procedure
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
+
#### Preprocessing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
+
Unified MCQA schema.
|
| 86 |
+
SFT format: `id, subject, question, answer/answer_text, choices`.
|
| 87 |
+
DPO format: `prompt, rejected, chosen`.
|
| 88 |
+
Prompts used a structured header:
|
| 89 |
+
`### Question ... ### Explanation ... ### Answer`
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
+
* **Regime:** Mixed precision typical for TRL (fp16/bf16 depending on hardware); LoRA rank 16, α 16, dropout 0.05.
|
| 94 |
+
* **Batch sizes:** SFT train/eval = 4; DPO = 1 (to avoid OOM).
|
| 95 |
+
* **Learning rate:** 1e-5 for public datasets; 1e-4 for EPFL data; cosine schedule with warmup.
|
| 96 |
+
* **Frameworks:** Hugging Face TRL + PEFT/LoRA, Transformers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
## Evaluation
|
| 99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 100 |
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
#### Testing Data
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
+
Per-dataset held-out test sets (per splits), plus MMLU converted to the SFT schema.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
#### Factors
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
+
Task domain (math vs. general science vs. open-domain), data balancing, and SFT→DPO ordering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
#### Metrics
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
+
MCQA accuracy; DPO pairwise preference accuracy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
### Results
|
| 115 |
|
| 116 |
+
Across ablations, the **balanced-then-DPO** configuration (M3) performed best overall on the team’s benchmark suite. The Base model serves as the reference for subsequent quantized variants.
|
| 117 |
|
| 118 |
#### Summary
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
+
* Balanced MCQA SFT improved robustness.
|
| 121 |
+
* DPO on EPFL preferences improved alignment and EPFL-style accuracy.
|
| 122 |
+
* Use this Base checkpoint when you prioritize maximum fidelity or plan additional finetuning; switch to quantized variants for memory-constrained inference.
|
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
+
## Technical Specifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 125 |
|
| 126 |
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 127 |
|
| 128 |
+
Phi-2 transformer decoder LM (≈2.78B params) with next-token prediction objective; LoRA adapters for parameter-efficient finetuning; DPO for preference alignment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |
#### Software
|
| 131 |
|
| 132 |
+
Hugging Face TRL, PEFT/LoRA, Transformers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
+
## Glossary
|
| 135 |
|
| 136 |
+
* **MCQA:** Multiple-choice question answering.
|
| 137 |
+
* **SFT:** Supervised finetuning with gold answers.
|
| 138 |
+
* **DPO:** Direct Preference Optimization (pairwise preference alignment).
|
| 139 |
+
* **LoRA:** Low-Rank Adaptation for parameter-efficient finetuning.
|