import Forth.Correct import Forth.Parse import Forth.Print import Forth.ParseProps import Forth.Eval import Forth.Example /-! # Forth.TextExample Forth source text through the whole pipeline: parsing, reference semantics (by the sound evaluator `eval`), lowering with colon definitions, and machine execution. -/ namespace WordDialect namespace Forth /-! ## Parsing facts -/ theorem parse_fiveDupPlus : parse "5 DUP +" = .ok ⟨[], fiveDupPlus, 0⟩ := by rfl theorem parse_case_and_comments : parse "( a comment ) 1 2 \\ a line comment, ignored: 3 +\n swap -7 if 4 else 5 then" = .ok ⟨[], .op (.lit 1) (.op (.lit 2) (.op .swap (.op (.lit (-7)) (.ite (.op (.lit 4) .nil) (.op (.lit 5) .nil) .nil)))), 0⟩ := by rfl theorem parse_square : parse ": SQ DUP * ; 7 sq" = .ok ⟨[.op .dup (.op .mul .nil)], .op (.lit 7) (.call 0 .nil), 0⟩ := by rfl theorem parse_begin_until : parse "10 BEGIN 1 - DUP 0 = UNTIL" = .ok ⟨[], .op (.lit 10) (.untilL (.op (.lit 1) (.op .sub (.op .dup (.op (.lit 0) (.op .eq .nil))))) .nil), 0⟩ := by rfl /-- `+LOOP` is not in the supported subset (only the words listed in `Forth.Parse`). -/ theorem parse_not_in_subset : parse "1 +LOOP" = .error "unknown word: +LOOP" := by rfl theorem parse_unknown : parse "1 FOO" = .error "unknown word: FOO" := by rfl theorem parse_use_before_definition : parse "SQ : SQ DUP * ;" = .error "unknown word: SQ" := by rfl theorem parse_missing_semicolon : parse ": SQ DUP *" = .error "definition of SQ has no ;" := by rfl theorem parse_unbalanced : parse "1 IF 2" = .error "IF without THEN" := by rfl /-! ## A recursive word, end to end -/ /-- Triangular numbers by recursion: `SUM ( n -- 0+1+…+n )`. -/ def sumSrc : String := ": SUM ( n -- 0+1+...+n ) DUP IF DUP 1 - SUM + THEN ; \\ recursive\n10 SUM" def sumBody : Block := .op .dup (.ite (.op .dup (.op (.lit 1) (.op .sub (.call 0 (.op .add .nil))))) .nil .nil) def sumProg : Program := ⟨[sumBody], .op (.lit 10) (.call 0 .nil), 0⟩ theorem parse_sum : parse sumSrc = .ok sumProg := by rfl /-- The reference semantics: `10 SUM` leaves `55`. -/ theorem sumProg_run (mem : Memory 64) : Run sumProg.defs sumProg.main ⟨[], mem, []⟩ (.ok ⟨[55#64], mem, []⟩) := eval_sound 100 _ _ _ (by rfl) /-- The lowered program (with `SUM` as an IR subroutine) halts with exactly `[55]`. -/ theorem sumProg_machine (mem : Memory 64) : ∃ s', Exec (sumProg.compile : Prog 64) (State.init mem) (.halted s') ∧ s'.dstack = [55#64] ∧ s'.mem = mem ∧ s'.astack = [] := by have := Program.compile_correct (sumProg_run mem) simpa using this /-- If the evaluator ends normally with data stack `stk`, the reference semantics derives a normal end with that stack (whatever the memory then is). -/ def okStack? {n : Nat} : Res n → Option (List (Word n)) | .ok st' => some st'.stack | _ => none theorem run_of_eval_stack {n : Nat} {defs : List Block} {fuel : Nat} {b : Block} {st : FState n} {stk : List (Word n)} (h : (eval defs fuel b st).bind okStack? = some stk) : ∃ st', Run defs b st (.ok st') ∧ st'.stack = stk := by cases he : eval defs fuel b st with | none => rw [he] at h; cases h | some r => rw [he] at h cases r with | ok st' => simp [okStack?] at h; exact ⟨st', eval_sound _ _ _ _ he, h⟩ | exit _ => simp [okStack?] at h | error _ => simp [okStack?] at h /-! ## `0=` and `MOD` -/ theorem parse_mod_zeq : parse "-7 2 MOD 7 -2 mod 0 0= 5 0=" = .ok ⟨[], .op (.lit (-7)) (.op (.lit 2) (.op .mod (.op (.lit 7) (.op (.lit (-2)) (.op .mod (.op (.lit 0) (.op .zeq (.op (.lit 5) (.op .zeq .nil))))))))), 0⟩ := by rfl /-- `MOD` follows symmetric `/`: `-7 MOD 2 = -1`, `7 MOD -2 = 1`; `0=` gives `-1`/`0`. -/ theorem mod_zeq_run (mem : Memory 64) : Run [] (.op (.lit (-7)) (.op (.lit 2) (.op .mod (.op (.lit 7) (.op (.lit (-2)) (.op .mod (.op (.lit 0) (.op .zeq (.op (.lit 5) (.op .zeq .nil)))))))))) ⟨[], mem, []⟩ (.ok ⟨[0#64, BitVec.ofInt 64 (-1), 1#64, BitVec.ofInt 64 (-1)], mem, []⟩) := eval_sound 20 _ _ _ (by rfl) theorem mod_zero_run (mem : Memory 64) : Run [] (.op (.lit 1) (.op (.lit 0) (.op .mod .nil))) ⟨[], mem, []⟩ (.error .divideByZero) := eval_sound 20 _ _ _ (by rfl) /-! ## `VARIABLE` and `CONSTANT` -/ def varSrc : String := "VARIABLE X VARIABLE Y 10 CONSTANT TEN\n TEN X ! 32 Y ! X @ Y @ + Y ! Y @" /-- Variables are cells `0` and `1`; the constant is a literal. -/ def varProg : Program := ⟨[], .op (.lit 10) (.op (.lit 0) (.op .store (.op (.lit 32) (.op (.lit 1) (.op .store (.op (.lit 0) (.op .fetch (.op (.lit 1) (.op .fetch (.op .add (.op (.lit 1) (.op .store (.op (.lit 1) (.op .fetch .nil)))))))))))))), 2⟩ theorem parse_var : parse varSrc = .ok varProg := by rfl theorem parse_constant_needs_literal : parse "1 2 + CONSTANT X" = .error "CONSTANT needs a number literal immediately before it" := by rfl theorem parse_variable_in_definition : parse ": F VARIABLE X ;" = .error "VARIABLE or CONSTANT inside definition of F" := by rfl /-- With its two variable cells available, `varProg` leaves `42`, and so does the machine. -/ theorem varProg_machine : ∃ s', Exec (varProg.compile : Prog 64) (State.init (Memory.ofImage [0, 0])) (.halted s') ∧ s'.dstack = [42#64] := by have h : (eval varProg.defs 40 varProg.main ⟨[], (Memory.ofImage [0, 0] : Memory 64), []⟩).bind okStack? = some [42#64] := by rfl obtain ⟨st', hrun, hst⟩ := run_of_eval_stack h obtain ⟨s', hs, hd, _⟩ := Program.compile_correct hrun exact ⟨s', hs, hd.trans hst⟩ theorem varProg_memOk : varProg.MemOk (Memory.ofImage [0, 0] : Memory 64) := by intro a ha simp only [varProg] at ha simp [Memory.ofImage] omega /-! ## `RECURSE` and `EXIT` -/ theorem parse_recurse : parse ": SUM DUP IF DUP 1 - RECURSE + THEN ; 10 SUM" = .ok sumProg := by rfl theorem parse_recurse_outside : parse "1 RECURSE" = .error "RECURSE outside a definition" := by rfl theorem parse_exit_outside : parse "1 EXIT" = .error "EXIT outside a definition" := by rfl theorem parse_exit_dead_code : parse ": F 1 EXIT 2 ; F" = .ok ⟨[.op (.lit 1) (.exit (.op (.lit 2) .nil))], .call 0 .nil, 0⟩ := by rfl /-- A recursive word that leaves early with `EXIT` at its base case. -/ def sumExitSrc : String := ": SUM ( n -- 0+...+n ) DUP 0= IF EXIT THEN DUP 1 - RECURSE + ;\n10 SUM" def sumExitProg : Program := ⟨[.op .dup (.op .zeq (.ite (.exit .nil) .nil (.op .dup (.op (.lit 1) (.op .sub (.call 0 (.op .add .nil)))))))], .op (.lit 10) (.call 0 .nil), 0⟩ theorem parse_sumExit : parse sumExitSrc = .ok sumExitProg := by rfl theorem sumExitProg_run (mem : Memory 64) : Run sumExitProg.defs sumExitProg.main ⟨[], mem, []⟩ (.ok ⟨[55#64], mem, []⟩) := eval_sound 100 _ _ _ (by rfl) theorem sumExitProg_machine (mem : Memory 64) : ∃ s', Exec (sumExitProg.compile : Prog 64) (State.init mem) (.halted s') ∧ s'.dstack = [55#64] ∧ s'.mem = mem ∧ s'.astack = [] := by have := Program.compile_correct (sumExitProg_run mem) simpa using this /-! ## Printing -/ theorem print_sumExit : print sumExitProg = ": W0 DUP 0= IF EXIT ELSE THEN DUP 1 - W0 + ; 10 W0 " := by rfl theorem print_var : print varProg = "VARIABLE V VARIABLE V 10 0 ! 32 1 ! 0 @ 1 @ + 1 ! 1 @ " := by rfl theorem sumExitProg_wf : sumExitProg.WF := by refine ⟨fun i body h => ?_, by simp [sumExitProg, Block.WF]⟩ match i, h with | 0, h => simp only [sumExitProg, List.getElem?_cons_zero, Option.some.injEq] at h; subst h simp [Block.WF] /-- An instance of the proved round trip `parse_print`. -/ theorem parse_print_sumExit : parse (print sumExitProg) = .ok sumExitProg := parse_print _ sumExitProg_wf /-! ## The converse direction (`Forth.ParseProps`) -/ /-- Well-formedness comes from the parse, with no case analysis. -/ theorem varProg_wf : varProg.WF := parse_wf parse_var /-- Printing is canonical: the printed text of any parsed program parses back to it. -/ theorem parse_print_var : parse (print varProg) = .ok varProg := parse_print_of_parse parse_var /-- Case-insensitivity, proved for all sources by `parse_case_insensitive`. -/ theorem parse_square_lower : (parse ": sq dup * ; 7 SQ").toOption = (parse ": SQ DUP * ; 7 sq").toOption := parse_case_insensitive (String.ext (by simp only [String.toList_map]; decide)) /-- Only error messages keep the original spelling. -/ theorem parse_unknown_lower : parse "1 foo" = .error "unknown word: foo" := by rfl /-- A `( … )` comment tokenizes like a space (`tokenize_paren_comment`). -/ theorem tokenize_paren_example : Parse.tokenize ("1 \\ x" ++ " ( " ++ "any ( text" ++ " ) " ++ "2") = Parse.tokenize ("1 \\ x" ++ " " ++ "2") := tokenize_paren_comment ⟨_, rfl⟩ (by decide) /-- A `\` comment runs to the end of the line (`tokenize_line_comment`). -/ theorem tokenize_line_example : Parse.tokenize ("1" ++ " \\ " ++ "2 ( 3" ++ "\n" ++ "4") = Parse.tokenize ("1" ++ "\n" ++ "4") := tokenize_line_comment (by decide) /-- `5 CONSTANT five`: the literal leaves the main block and `five` (any case) is `5`. -/ theorem parse_constant_case : parse "5 CONSTANT five FIVE Five +" = .ok ⟨[], .op (.lit 5) (.op (.lit 5) (.op .add .nil)), 0⟩ := by rfl theorem constant_step : Parse.parseTop 3 [] [] 0 .nil [['5'], ['c', 'o', 'n', 's', 't', 'a', 'n', 't'], ['X']] = Parse.parseTop 2 [(['X'], Block.op (.lit 5))] [] 0 .nil [] := parseTop_constant_lit rfl rfl rfl /-- `RECURSE` and the word's own name parse the same inside its definition. -/ theorem parse_recurse_name : parse ": F DUP IF 1 - RECURSE THEN ; 3 F" = parse ": F DUP IF 1 - F THEN ; 3 F" := by rfl /-! ## Return-data stack and `DO … LOOP` -/ theorem parse_rstack_words : parse "1 >r r@ R> i j" = .ok ⟨[], .op (.lit 1) (.op .tor (.op .rfetch (.op .fromr (.op .loopI (.op .loopJ .nil))))), 0⟩ := by rfl theorem parse_do_loop : parse "0 10 0 do i + loop" = .ok ⟨[], .op (.lit 0) (.op (.lit 10) (.op (.lit 0) (.doLoop (.op .loopI (.op .add .nil)) .nil))), 0⟩ := by rfl theorem parse_do_without_loop : parse "10 0 DO I" = .error "DO without LOOP" := by rfl theorem parse_loop_without_do : parse "1 LOOP" = .error "unexpected LOOP" := by rfl theorem parse_do_then : parse "1 IF 10 0 DO THEN LOOP" = .error "DO without LOOP" := by rfl /-- `0 10 0 DO I + LOOP` sums the indices `0 … 9`. -/ def loopSumProg : Program := ⟨[], .op (.lit 0) (.op (.lit 10) (.op (.lit 0) (.doLoop (.op .loopI (.op .add .nil)) .nil))), 0⟩ theorem loopSum_run (mem : Memory 64) : Run loopSumProg.defs loopSumProg.main ⟨[], mem, []⟩ (.ok ⟨[45#64], mem, []⟩) := eval_sound 30 _ _ _ (by rfl) theorem loopSum_machine (mem : Memory 64) : ∃ s', Exec (loopSumProg.compile : Prog 64) (State.init mem) (.halted s') ∧ s'.dstack = [45#64] ∧ s'.mem = mem ∧ s'.astack = [] := by have := Program.compile_correct (loopSum_run mem) simpa using this /-- Nested loops: `J` is the outer index. `Σ_{j<3} Σ_{i<4} i*j = 18`. -/ theorem nested_loops : parse "0 3 0 DO 4 0 DO I J * + LOOP LOOP" = .ok ⟨[], .op (.lit 0) (.op (.lit 3) (.op (.lit 0) (.doLoop (.op (.lit 4) (.op (.lit 0) (.doLoop (.op .loopI (.op .loopJ (.op .mul (.op .add .nil)))) .nil))) .nil))), 0⟩ := by rfl theorem nested_loops_run (mem : Memory 64) : Run [] (.op (.lit 0) (.op (.lit 3) (.op (.lit 0) (.doLoop (.op (.lit 4) (.op (.lit 0) (.doLoop (.op .loopI (.op .loopJ (.op .mul (.op .add .nil)))) .nil))) .nil)))) ⟨[], mem, []⟩ (.ok ⟨[18#64], mem, []⟩) := eval_sound 30 _ _ _ (by rfl) /-- `R>` on an empty return-data stack traps `returnUnderflow`, and so does the machine. -/ theorem fromr_empty_run (mem : Memory 64) : Run [] (.op (.lit 1) (.op .fromr .nil)) ⟨[], mem, []⟩ (.error .returnUnderflow) := eval_sound 5 _ _ _ (by rfl) theorem fromr_empty_machine (mem : Memory 64) : Exec (compileProgram (.op (.lit 1) (.op .fromr .nil)) : Prog 64) (State.init mem) (.trapped .returnUnderflow) := compileProgram_correct (fromr_empty_run mem) /-- A value parked with `>R` survives calls, and a word may change it. -/ def bumpSrc : String := ": BUMP R> 1 + >R ; 5 >R BUMP BUMP R>" def bumpProg : Program := ⟨[.op .fromr (.op (.lit 1) (.op .add (.op .tor .nil)))], .op (.lit 5) (.op .tor (.call 0 (.call 0 (.op .fromr .nil)))), 0⟩ theorem parse_bump : parse bumpSrc = .ok bumpProg := by rfl theorem bump_run (mem : Memory 64) : Run bumpProg.defs bumpProg.main ⟨[], mem, []⟩ (.ok ⟨[7#64], mem, []⟩) := eval_sound 20 _ _ _ (by rfl) /-- `EXIT` inside a loop leaves the loop parameters (index on top, then limit) on the return-data stack. -/ def find3Prog : Program := ⟨[.op (.lit 10) (.op (.lit 0) (.doLoop (.op .loopI (.op (.lit 3) (.op .eq (.ite (.op .loopI (.exit .nil)) .nil .nil)))) (.op (.lit 99) .nil)))], .call 0 .nil, 0⟩ theorem parse_find3 : parse ": FIND3 10 0 DO I 3 = IF I EXIT THEN LOOP 99 ; FIND3" = .ok find3Prog := by rfl theorem find3_run (mem : Memory 64) : Run find3Prog.defs find3Prog.main ⟨[], mem, []⟩ (.ok ⟨[3#64], mem, [3#64, 10#64]⟩) := eval_sound 40 _ _ _ (by rfl) theorem print_find3 : print find3Prog = ": W0 10 0 DO I 3 = IF I EXIT ELSE THEN LOOP 99 ; W0 " := by rfl theorem parse_print_find3 : parse (print find3Prog) = .ok find3Prog := parse_print_of_parse parse_find3 end Forth end WordDialect