Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
language: en
|
| 3 |
+
license: mit
|
| 4 |
+
tags:
|
| 5 |
+
- protocol-0
|
| 6 |
+
- binary-gate
|
| 7 |
+
- anti-fabrication
|
| 8 |
+
- sipa-os
|
| 9 |
+
- abstention
|
| 10 |
+
- neurodivergent
|
| 11 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-generation
|
| 12 |
+
---
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
# SIPA Binary Gate β Protocol 0
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
**20/20 refusals. 0/20 fabrications. Zero entropy.**
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
Not a model. Not a fine-tune. An architecture.
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
## What It Is
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
The SIPA Binary Gate is a post-generation gate that implements:
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
```
|
| 25 |
+
IF proof.exists AND proof.verified β RETURN answer
|
| 26 |
+
ELSE IF proof.partial β RETURN "partial: {known} | missing: {missing}"
|
| 27 |
+
ELSE β RETURN FALSE
|
| 28 |
+
```
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
It is not trained into model weights. It sits outside the model β a structural check, not a probabilistic one.
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
## The Problem It Solves
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
22 fine-tuning experiments across 6 base models attempted to teach a model to say "I don't know" instead of fabricating. All failed. Reason: SFT grades tokens, and good/bad traces share the disclaimer prefix. The gradient that separates them arrives only at the invented number β after the model has already committed to answering.
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
Identified by Dipankar Sarkar. Proven by k=20 resample benchmark.
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
## k=20 Benchmark Results
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
One unverifiable question, 20 resamples at temperature=1.0:
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
| Architecture | Refusals | Fabrications | Entropy |
|
| 43 |
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 44 |
+
| Base (Hermes-3-8B) | 9/20 | 11/20 | MED |
|
| 45 |
+
| Best SFT (Specialist C) | 13/20 | 8/20 | MED |
|
| 46 |
+
| Full merge (ABCD) | 5/20 | 11/20 | HIGH |
|
| 47 |
+
| **Binary Gate** | **20/20** | **0/20** | **ZERO** |
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
## Install
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
```bash
|
| 52 |
+
curl -fsSL https://get.sipa-os.org/install | bash
|
| 53 |
+
sipa "What was OpenAI's revenue in Q2 2026?"
|
| 54 |
+
# β "I don't know."
|
| 55 |
+
```
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
## Architecture
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
```
|
| 60 |
+
REQUEST β L01 INTAKE β L02-L05 β L06 AUDIT (BINARY GATE) β L07-L10 β RESPONSE
|
| 61 |
+
β
|
| 62 |
+
pass | warn | fail
|
| 63 |
+
β
|
| 64 |
+
IF proof β TRUE
|
| 65 |
+
ELSE β FALSE
|
| 66 |
+
```
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
## Authors
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
- Aelin AquaSoul β SIPA OS architect
|
| 71 |
+
- Dipankar Sarkar β k=20 methodology, SFT-gradient diagnosis
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
## License
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
MIT β the gate is open. The methodology is public. The proof is in the benchmark.
|