Mintzs commited on
Commit
80c5962
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 94fde3a

Add image understanding check below the benchmarks

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +33 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -179,6 +179,37 @@ tokenizer and `reasoning_effort` control.
179
 
180
  </details>
181
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
182
  ## Usage
183
 
184
  **vLLM**
@@ -222,7 +253,8 @@ Merged bf16 safetensors with the tokenizer, chat template and processor files of
222
  - At low effort, the average accuracy is 2.2 points below the base model, mostly from AIME 2025 (81.7 vs 90.0).
223
  - Long single-answer code was less reliable than the base model's: in the game test above, 1 of 5 games fully worked
224
  against 3 of 5.
225
- - The vision encoder is unchanged from Qwen3.8-27B; training data was text only.
 
226
  - No safety tuning beyond the base model's. Check the model on your own tasks before relying on it.
227
 
228
  ## License
 
179
 
180
  </details>
181
 
182
+ ## Image understanding
183
+
184
+ Thinklite-27B accepts images like Qwen3.8-27B. Its training data was text only and its vision encoder is
185
+ byte-for-byte the base model's, so we checked that the fine-tuned language model still reads what it sees: 88 questions
186
+ from six public image datasets, each answerable only from the picture (a chart, a scanned document, an infographic, a
187
+ math figure, an exam diagram or a photo). Both models got the same image and question at `reasoning_effort="low"`,
188
+ with the same seeds and sampling as the benchmarks above.
189
+
190
+ <table class="tl-table">
191
+ <thead>
192
+ <tr><th style="width:26%;text-align:left;padding-left:16px;">Model</th><th>ChartQA</th><th>DocVQA</th><th>InfoVQA</th><th>MathVista</th><th>MMMU</th><th>A-OKVQA</th><th>Average</th></tr>
193
+ </thead>
194
+ <tbody>
195
+ <tr><td class="section" colspan="8">Score (%)</td></tr>
196
+ <tr><td class="name tl">Thinklite-27B</td><td class="tl">100.0</td><td class="tl">100.0</td><td class="tl"><strong>91.1</strong></td><td class="tl">87.5</td><td class="tl">100.0</td><td class="tl">87.5</td><td class="tl"><strong>94.35</strong></td></tr>
197
+ <tr><td class="name">Qwen3.8-27B</td><td>100.0</td><td>100.0</td><td>88.1</td><td>87.5</td><td>100.0</td><td>87.5</td><td>93.85</td></tr>
198
+ <tr><td class="section" colspan="8">Reasoning tokens vs Qwen3.8-27B</td></tr>
199
+ <tr><td class="name tl">Thinklite-27B</td><td class="tl">&#8595; 15%</td><td class="tl">&#8595; 15%</td><td class="tl">&#8595; 32%</td><td class="tl">&#8595; 37%</td><td class="tl">&#8595; 30%</td><td class="tl">&#8595; 15%</td><td class="tl">&#8595; 24.0%</td></tr>
200
+ </tbody>
201
+ </table>
202
+
203
+ - 16 questions per dataset (12 for InfographicVQA and MMMU), a seeded random sample of each validation or testmini
204
+ split. Scores: ChartQA relaxed accuracy (numbers within 5%), DocVQA and InfographicVQA ANLS, multiple-choice or exact
205
+ accuracy for MathVista, MMMU and A-OKVQA. No answer was cut off or unparseable.
206
+ - Both models answered the same 83 of 88 questions correctly; the only score difference is partial ANLS credit on one
207
+ InfographicVQA answer.
208
+ - 18 of the questions (3 per dataset) also ran at `reasoning_effort="xhigh"`: Thinklite-27B answered 17 correctly
209
+ and Qwen3.8-27B 16, with 52% less reasoning per answer (758 vs 1,565 tokens).
210
+ - This is a check, not a full benchmark: one question moves a dataset's score by 6 to 8 points. It shows that image
211
+ understanding is kept, not that it improved.
212
+
213
  ## Usage
214
 
215
  **vLLM**
 
253
  - At low effort, the average accuracy is 2.2 points below the base model, mostly from AIME 2025 (81.7 vs 90.0).
254
  - Long single-answer code was less reliable than the base model's: in the game test above, 1 of 5 games fully worked
255
  against 3 of 5.
256
+ - The vision encoder is unchanged from Qwen3.8-27B and training data was text only; image understanding was checked
257
+ on 88 questions, not a full vision benchmark.
258
  - No safety tuning beyond the base model's. Check the model on your own tasks before relying on it.
259
 
260
  ## License