Siqi Tang commited on
Commit ·
358cfa6
1
Parent(s): 724e5e1
Update README.md formatting and tags
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,20 +2,18 @@
|
|
| 2 |
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
tags:
|
| 4 |
- chemistry
|
| 5 |
-
- pyrolysis
|
| 6 |
-
- biomass
|
| 7 |
-
-
|
| 8 |
-
-
|
| 9 |
-
-
|
| 10 |
-
-
|
| 11 |
-
- matlab
|
| 12 |
-
- machine-learning
|
| 13 |
pretty_name: PyroBot Pyrolysis Foundation Models
|
| 14 |
---
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
# PyroBot Pyrolysis Foundation Models (`bpDNN2Ea` & `bpDNN2Yield`)
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-
This repository contains the core neural network surrogate models of **PyroBot**, an autonomous, agentic framework designed for interpreting, optimizing, and simulating biomass pyrolysis. These foundation surrogates are trained to predict the apparent activation energy (
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
By utilizing these pre-trained Backpropagation Deep Neural Networks (BP-DNNs) as a fast and accurate surrogate "brain," PyroBot bypasses computationally expensive ab initio or multi-phase CFD simulations, enabling real-time closed-loop autonomous kinetic analysis and thermogravimetric (TG) curve reconstruction.
|
| 21 |
|
|
@@ -45,23 +43,23 @@ Each `Results_trained.mat` file contains three core structures:
|
|
| 45 |
## 🧠 Model Descriptions & Architectures
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
### 1. `bpDNN2Ea` (Activation Energy Prediction)
|
| 48 |
-
* **Goal**: Predicts the Apparent Activation Energy (
|
| 49 |
-
* **Network Topology**: `256` (Input)
|
| 50 |
* **Input Features (256 Dimensions)**:
|
| 51 |
-
* **Basic Feedstock Characteristics (19 Dimensions)**: Includes proximate analysis (volatile matter, fixed carbon, ash), ultimate analysis (C, H, O, N, S), and detailed ash compositions (
|
| 52 |
-
* **Pyrolysis Progress State (1 Dimension)**: The instantaneous degree of conversion (
|
| 53 |
* **Feedstock Blending/Mixing Features (236 Dimensions)**: Captures complex multi-component feedstock mixtures, geographic source classifications, and blending ratio parameters.
|
| 54 |
-
* **Output**: Apparent Activation Energy
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
### 2. `bpDNN2Yield` (Product Yields Prediction)
|
| 57 |
* **Goal**: Predicts the ultimate three-phase pyrolysis yields (Char, Liquid, Gas) under high-temperature conditions.
|
| 58 |
-
* **Network Topology**: `259` (Input)
|
| 59 |
* **Input Features (259 Dimensions)**:
|
| 60 |
* **Basic Feedstock Characteristics (19 Dimensions)**
|
| 61 |
* **Detailed Feedstock Blending/Mixing Features (240 Dimensions)**
|
| 62 |
* **Outputs (3 Dimensions)**:
|
| 63 |
* Pyrolysis yields (expressed in weight percentages):
|
| 64 |
-
1. **Char Yield (%)** (used directly as the ultimate residue
|
| 65 |
2. **Liquid/Bio-oil Yield (%)**
|
| 66 |
3. **Gas Yield (%)**
|
| 67 |
|
|
@@ -71,17 +69,20 @@ Each `Results_trained.mat` file contains three core structures:
|
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
In the PyroBot cognitive ecosystem, these two models are combined to reconstruct simulated Thermogravimetric (TG) curves with perfect physical and kinetic consistency:
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
-
1. **Mass Loss Curve Platform (
|
| 75 |
-
The ultimate char yield predicted by `bpDNN2Yield` sets the lower boundary platform (
|
| 76 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
2. **Kinetic & Temperature Integration**:
|
| 79 |
-
The conversion-dependent apparent activation energy profile
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
3. **Synthesis**:
|
| 84 |
-
Combining
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
---
|
| 87 |
|
|
@@ -100,18 +101,18 @@ For reference, the 19 basic feedstock input characteristics representing the bio
|
|
| 100 |
| **7** | Oxygen (O) | Ultimate analysis of elemental Oxygen | wt.% (dry-basis) |
|
| 101 |
| **8** | Nitrogen (N) | Ultimate analysis of elemental Nitrogen | wt.% (dry-basis) |
|
| 102 |
| **9** | Sulfur (S) | Ultimate analysis of elemental Sulfur | wt.% (dry-basis) |
|
| 103 |
-
| **10** |
|
| 104 |
-
| **11** |
|
| 105 |
-
| **12** |
|
| 106 |
-
| **13** |
|
| 107 |
-
| **14** |
|
| 108 |
-
| **15** |
|
| 109 |
-
| **16** |
|
| 110 |
-
| **17** |
|
| 111 |
-
| **18** |
|
| 112 |
-
| **19** |
|
| 113 |
-
|
| 114 |
-
*Note: For the
|
| 115 |
|
| 116 |
---
|
| 117 |
|
|
@@ -238,13 +239,11 @@ These models are distributed under the **Apache License 2.0**.
|
|
| 238 |
If you use **PyroBot** or these foundation pyrolysis surrogate networks in your scientific publications or research, please cite our corresponding work:
|
| 239 |
|
| 240 |
```bibtex
|
| 241 |
-
@
|
| 242 |
-
|
| 243 |
-
|
| 244 |
-
|
| 245 |
-
|
| 246 |
-
|
| 247 |
-
pages={xx},
|
| 248 |
-
doi={xx}
|
| 249 |
}
|
| 250 |
```
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
tags:
|
| 4 |
- chemistry
|
| 5 |
+
- pyrolysis-thermochemistry
|
| 6 |
+
- biomass-energy-feedstocks
|
| 7 |
+
- thermodynamics-and-kinetic-modeling
|
| 8 |
+
- physics-informed-neural-networks
|
| 9 |
+
- monte-carlo-bootstrapped-uncertainty
|
| 10 |
+
- autonomous-agent-precision-pyrolysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
pretty_name: PyroBot Pyrolysis Foundation Models
|
| 12 |
---
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
# PyroBot Pyrolysis Foundation Models (`bpDNN2Ea` & `bpDNN2Yield`)
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
This repository contains the core neural network surrogate models of **PyroBot**, an autonomous, agentic framework designed for interpreting, optimizing, and simulating biomass pyrolysis. These foundation surrogates are trained to predict the apparent activation energy (Ea) and three-phase product yields (Char, Liquid, Gas) directly from multi-dimensional feedstock properties and process state variables.
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
By utilizing these pre-trained Backpropagation Deep Neural Networks (BP-DNNs) as a fast and accurate surrogate "brain," PyroBot bypasses computationally expensive ab initio or multi-phase CFD simulations, enabling real-time closed-loop autonomous kinetic analysis and thermogravimetric (TG) curve reconstruction.
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
|
| 43 |
## 🧠 Model Descriptions & Architectures
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
### 1. `bpDNN2Ea` (Activation Energy Prediction)
|
| 46 |
+
* **Goal**: Predicts the Apparent Activation Energy (Ea, in kJ/mol) as a function of biomass feedstock composition and the instantaneous conversion level (α).
|
| 47 |
+
* **Network Topology**: `256` (Input) → `42` (Hidden Layer 1) → `42` (Hidden Layer 2) → `1` (Output).
|
| 48 |
* **Input Features (256 Dimensions)**:
|
| 49 |
+
* **Basic Feedstock Characteristics (19 Dimensions)**: Includes proximate analysis (volatile matter, fixed carbon, ash), ultimate analysis (C, H, O, N, S), and detailed ash compositions (SiO₂, Al₂O₃, etc.).
|
| 50 |
+
* **Pyrolysis Progress State (1 Dimension)**: The instantaneous degree of conversion (α), ranging from `0.01` to `0.999`.
|
| 51 |
* **Feedstock Blending/Mixing Features (236 Dimensions)**: Captures complex multi-component feedstock mixtures, geographic source classifications, and blending ratio parameters.
|
| 52 |
+
* **Output**: Apparent Activation Energy Ea (kJ/mol).
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
### 2. `bpDNN2Yield` (Product Yields Prediction)
|
| 55 |
* **Goal**: Predicts the ultimate three-phase pyrolysis yields (Char, Liquid, Gas) under high-temperature conditions.
|
| 56 |
+
* **Network Topology**: `259` (Input) → `45` → `45` → `45` → `45` → `45` → `3` (Outputs).
|
| 57 |
* **Input Features (259 Dimensions)**:
|
| 58 |
* **Basic Feedstock Characteristics (19 Dimensions)**
|
| 59 |
* **Detailed Feedstock Blending/Mixing Features (240 Dimensions)**
|
| 60 |
* **Outputs (3 Dimensions)**:
|
| 61 |
* Pyrolysis yields (expressed in weight percentages):
|
| 62 |
+
1. **Char Yield (%)** (used directly as the ultimate residue w_inf for TG scaling).
|
| 63 |
2. **Liquid/Bio-oil Yield (%)**
|
| 64 |
3. **Gas Yield (%)**
|
| 65 |
|
|
|
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
In the PyroBot cognitive ecosystem, these two models are combined to reconstruct simulated Thermogravimetric (TG) curves with perfect physical and kinetic consistency:
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
+
1. **Mass Loss Curve Platform (w_inf)**:
|
| 73 |
+
The ultimate char yield predicted by `bpDNN2Yield` sets the lower boundary platform (w_inf = Char Yield / 100) of the mass-loss profile. For any degree of conversion α, the remaining sample weight w(α) is calculated via mass balance:
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
w(α) = 100 × [1 - α · (1 - w_inf)] %
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
2. **Kinetic & Temperature Integration**:
|
| 78 |
+
The conversion-dependent apparent activation energy profile Ea(α) predicted by `bpDNN2Ea` is mapped to an adaptive kinetic solver. The system compares a library of 130 mechanisms (such as diffusion, nucleation, geometrical, and reaction-order models in series/parallel/hybrid modes) and uses a **Genetic Algorithm (GA)** coupled with non-linear optimization (`fmincon`) to solve the Kissinger-Arrhenius equations:
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
G(α) = ∫ (A/β) · exp(-Ea(α) / RT) dT
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
Solving this equation gives the temperature trajectory T(α) and pre-exponential factor A.
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
3. **Synthesis**:
|
| 85 |
+
Combining T(α) (from the Ea network + kinetic solver) and w(α) (from the Yield network) yields the completed, publication-quality TG curve (w vs. T) without requiring numerical interpolation.
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
---
|
| 88 |
|
|
|
|
| 101 |
| **7** | Oxygen (O) | Ultimate analysis of elemental Oxygen | wt.% (dry-basis) |
|
| 102 |
| **8** | Nitrogen (N) | Ultimate analysis of elemental Nitrogen | wt.% (dry-basis) |
|
| 103 |
| **9** | Sulfur (S) | Ultimate analysis of elemental Sulfur | wt.% (dry-basis) |
|
| 104 |
+
| **10** | SiO₂ | Silica percentage in biomass ash | wt.% of ash |
|
| 105 |
+
| **11** | Al₂O₃ | Alumina percentage in biomass ash | wt.% of ash |
|
| 106 |
+
| **12** | Fe₂O₃ | Iron oxide percentage in biomass ash | wt.% of ash |
|
| 107 |
+
| **13** | CaO | Calcium oxide percentage in biomass ash | wt.% of ash |
|
| 108 |
+
| **14** | MgO | Magnesium oxide percentage in biomass ash | wt.% of ash |
|
| 109 |
+
| **15** | TiO₂ | Titanium dioxide percentage in biomass ash | wt.% of ash |
|
| 110 |
+
| **16** | Na₂O | Sodium oxide percentage in biomass ash | wt.% of ash |
|
| 111 |
+
| **17** | K₂O | Potassium oxide percentage in biomass ash | wt.% of ash |
|
| 112 |
+
| **18** | P₂O₅ | Phosphorus pentoxide percentage in biomass ash | wt.% of ash |
|
| 113 |
+
| **19** | SO₃ | Sulfur trioxide percentage in biomass ash | wt.% of ash |
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
*Note: For the Ea network, column 20 is the degree of conversion (α), and columns 21–256 contain mixed feedstock attributes. For the Yield network, columns 20–259 contain mixed feedstock attributes.*
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
---
|
| 118 |
|
|
|
|
| 239 |
If you use **PyroBot** or these foundation pyrolysis surrogate networks in your scientific publications or research, please cite our corresponding work:
|
| 240 |
|
| 241 |
```bibtex
|
| 242 |
+
@misc{tang2026pyrobot,
|
| 243 |
+
author = {Tang, Siqi and others},
|
| 244 |
+
title = {PyroBot_FoundationModel: Pre-trained Deep Neural Network Surrogate Models for Biomass Pyrolysis},
|
| 245 |
+
year = {2026},
|
| 246 |
+
publisher = {Hugging Face},
|
| 247 |
+
howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/TANG-Research-Group/PyroBot_FoundationModel}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 248 |
}
|
| 249 |
```
|