Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,199 +1,273 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
---
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
-
#
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
-
|
| 21 |
-
- **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 22 |
-
- **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 23 |
-
- **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 24 |
-
- **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
|
| 25 |
-
- **License:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 26 |
-
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
-
### Model Sources [optional]
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
-
<!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
-
- **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 33 |
-
- **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 34 |
-
- **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 35 |
-
|
| 36 |
-
## Uses
|
| 37 |
-
|
| 38 |
-
<!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
### Direct Use
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
-
### Downstream Use [optional]
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 57 |
-
|
| 58 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
### Recommendations
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
-
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
-
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
-
-
|
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
-
##
|
| 98 |
|
| 99 |
-
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
-
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
-
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
-
##
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
-
|
| 114 |
|
| 115 |
-
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
-
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
-
##
|
| 122 |
|
| 123 |
-
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
-
###
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
-
|
| 132 |
|
|
|
|
| 133 |
|
|
|
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
-
##
|
| 136 |
|
| 137 |
-
|
| 138 |
|
| 139 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
-
|
| 142 |
|
| 143 |
-
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
-
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
-
|
| 148 |
-
-
|
| 149 |
-
-
|
| 150 |
-
|
| 151 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 152 |
|
| 153 |
-
##
|
| 154 |
|
| 155 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 156 |
|
| 157 |
-
|
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
-
|
| 160 |
|
| 161 |
-
|
| 162 |
|
| 163 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 164 |
|
| 165 |
-
|
| 166 |
|
| 167 |
-
##
|
| 168 |
|
| 169 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 170 |
|
| 171 |
-
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
-
|
| 174 |
|
| 175 |
-
|
| 176 |
|
| 177 |
-
|
| 178 |
|
| 179 |
-
**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
-
|
| 182 |
|
| 183 |
-
##
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 |
-
|
| 186 |
|
| 187 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 188 |
|
| 189 |
-
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 192 |
|
| 193 |
-
|
| 194 |
|
| 195 |
-
|
| 196 |
|
| 197 |
-
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
+
language:
|
| 3 |
+
- ne
|
| 4 |
+
tags:
|
| 5 |
+
- text-classification
|
| 6 |
+
- hate-speech-detection
|
| 7 |
+
- offensive-language
|
| 8 |
+
- nepali
|
| 9 |
+
- devanagari
|
| 10 |
+
- low-resource-nlp
|
| 11 |
+
- bert
|
| 12 |
+
- nepali-bert
|
| 13 |
+
datasets:
|
| 14 |
+
- niraula2021nepali
|
| 15 |
+
metrics:
|
| 16 |
+
- f1
|
| 17 |
+
- accuracy
|
| 18 |
+
license: mit
|
| 19 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-classification
|
| 20 |
+
base_model: Rajan/NepaliBERT
|
| 21 |
+
paper: https://aclanthology.org/2021.woah-1.7
|
| 22 |
---
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
+
# NepaliBERT — Nepali Hate Content Classification
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
+
Fine-tuned [NepaliBERT](https://huggingface.co/Rajan/NepaliBERT) for multi-class hate content classification of Nepali social media text. The model is specifically optimized for Devanagari script Nepali and handles mixed-script inputs through a comprehensive preprocessing pipeline.
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
+
## Model Description
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
+
This model was developed as part of a Bachelor of Computer Engineering final project at Khwopa College of Engineering, Tribhuvan University (February 2026). It classifies Nepali social media comments into four categories targeting different types of offensive content.
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
+
**Base model:** `Rajan/NepaliBERT` (110M parameters, 12 transformer layers, pre-trained on a large Nepali corpus using masked language modelling)
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
+
**Task:** Multi-class text classification (4 classes)
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
+
**Languages:** Nepali (Devanagari primary), Romanized Nepali, code-mixed
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
+
> **Compared to XLM-RoBERTa Large (our other model):** NepaliBERT's Nepali-specific pre-training gives it stronger Devanagari understanding and the best OR (Offensive-Racist) class F1 (0.4833) among all evaluated models. However, it has limited exposure to Romanized Nepali and English, making XLM-RoBERTa more robust on heavily code-mixed inputs.
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
+
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
+
## Labels
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
+
| ID | Label | Description |
|
| 45 |
+
|----|-------|-------------|
|
| 46 |
+
| 0 | `NON_OFFENSIVE` | Text containing no offensive content |
|
| 47 |
+
| 1 | `OTHER_OFFENSIVE` | General offensive content not targeting specific groups |
|
| 48 |
+
| 2 | `OFFENSIVE_RACIST` | Content targeting individuals/groups based on ethnicity, race, or caste |
|
| 49 |
+
| 3 | `OFFENSIVE_SEXIST` | Content targeting individuals based on gender |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
+
---
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
+
## Usage
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
+
```python
|
| 56 |
+
from transformers import pipeline
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
+
classifier = pipeline(
|
| 59 |
+
"text-classification",
|
| 60 |
+
model="UDHOV/nepalibert-nepali-hate-classification"
|
| 61 |
+
)
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
+
# Devanagari input
|
| 64 |
+
classifier("यो राम्रो छ")
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
+
# Romanized Nepali (will be preprocessed via transliteration ideally)
|
| 67 |
+
classifier("yo ramro cha")
|
| 68 |
+
```
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
+
Or manually:
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
+
```python
|
| 73 |
+
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification
|
| 74 |
+
import torch
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("UDHOV/nepalibert-nepali-hate-classification")
|
| 77 |
+
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("UDHOV/nepalibert-nepali-hate-classification")
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
+
text = "तिमी देखी घृणा लाग्छ"
|
| 80 |
+
inputs = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=128)
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
| 83 |
+
logits = model(**inputs).logits
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
+
predicted_class = logits.argmax().item()
|
| 86 |
+
print(model.config.id2label[predicted_class])
|
| 87 |
+
```
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
+
---
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
+
## Preprocessing Pipeline
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
+
The model was trained on text processed through a 5-stage pipeline:
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
+
1. **Script Detection** — Unicode-based confidence scoring to classify input as Devanagari, Romanized Nepali, or English
|
| 96 |
+
2. **Script Unification** — Romanized Nepali transliterated to Devanagari via ITRANS; English translated to Nepali via Deep Translator API
|
| 97 |
+
3. **Emoji Processing** — 180+ emojis semantically mapped to Nepali equivalents; unknown emojis preserved; 18-dimensional emoji feature vector extracted
|
| 98 |
+
4. **Text Cleaning** — URL removal, @mention removal, hashtag handling, whitespace normalization
|
| 99 |
+
5. **Feature Extraction** — Script metadata, emoji features, and text statistics merged with cleaned text
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
+
> **Note:** NepaliBERT's WordPiece tokenizer is optimized for Devanagari. For best results, pre-process Romanized or English inputs through the transliteration/translation pipeline before passing to this model.
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
+
---
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
+
## Training Data
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
+
- **Source:** Niraula et al. (2021) — *Offensive Language Detection in Nepali Social Media* ([ACL Anthology](https://aclanthology.org/2021.woah-1.7))
|
| 108 |
+
- **Platform:** Facebook and YouTube comments
|
| 109 |
+
- **Total samples:** 7,625
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
+
| Split | NO | OO | OR | OS | Total |
|
| 112 |
+
|-------|----|----|----|----|-------|
|
| 113 |
+
| Train | 3,206 (57.7%) | 1,759 (31.6%) | 376 (6.8%) | 214 (3.8%) | 5,555 |
|
| 114 |
+
| Validation | 356 (57.5%) | 195 (31.5%) | 42 (6.8%) | 27 (4.4%) | 620 |
|
| 115 |
+
| Test | 896 (62.1%) | 486 (33.7%) | 49 (3.4%) | 19 (1.3%) | 1,450 |
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
+
**Class imbalance:** NO vs OS imbalance ratio = 14.98×. Addressed via class-weighted cross-entropy loss with weights capped in the range [0.5, 3.0] to prevent extreme gradient updates from the severely under-represented OS class.
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
+
---
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
+
## Training Configuration
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
| Hyperparameter | Value |
|
| 124 |
+
|----------------|-------|
|
| 125 |
+
| Optimizer | AdamW |
|
| 126 |
+
| Learning rate | 2e-5 (discriminative LR strategy) |
|
| 127 |
+
| Weight decay | 0.01 |
|
| 128 |
+
| Warmup steps | 10% of total steps |
|
| 129 |
+
| LR schedule | Linear decay |
|
| 130 |
+
| Batch size | 16 (grad accum × 2 = effective 32) |
|
| 131 |
+
| Max epochs | 5 |
|
| 132 |
+
| Early stopping patience | 2 epochs |
|
| 133 |
+
| Max sequence length | 128 tokens |
|
| 134 |
+
| Dropout (classification head) | 0.3 |
|
| 135 |
+
| Label smoothing | 0.05 |
|
| 136 |
+
| Class weight capping | [0.5, 3.0] |
|
| 137 |
+
| Gradient clipping | 1.0 |
|
| 138 |
+
| Loss | Class-weighted cross-entropy |
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
Training took approximately 3,759 seconds (~62.7 minutes) on a single GPU.
|
| 141 |
|
| 142 |
+
---
|
| 143 |
|
| 144 |
+
## Evaluation Results
|
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
+
### Test Set Performance
|
| 147 |
|
| 148 |
+
| Class | Precision | Recall | F1-Score | Support |
|
| 149 |
+
|-------|-----------|--------|----------|---------|
|
| 150 |
+
| NON_OFFENSIVE | 0.7805 | 0.7701 | 0.7753 | 896 |
|
| 151 |
+
| OTHER_OFFENSIVE | 0.6102 | 0.5926 | 0.6013 | 486 |
|
| 152 |
+
| OFFENSIVE_RACIST | 0.4085 | 0.5918 | **0.4833** | 49 |
|
| 153 |
+
| OFFENSIVE_SEXIST | 0.1739 | 0.2105 | 0.1905 | 19 |
|
| 154 |
+
| **Macro Avg** | **0.4933** | **0.5413** | **0.5126** | 1,450 |
|
| 155 |
+
| **Weighted Avg** | 0.7029 | 0.6972 | 0.6994 | 1,450 |
|
| 156 |
+
| **Accuracy** | | | **0.6972** | 1,450 |
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 |
+
### Validation Set Performance (Best Checkpoint)
|
| 159 |
|
| 160 |
+
| Class | Precision | Recall | F1-Score | Support |
|
| 161 |
+
|-------|-----------|--------|----------|---------|
|
| 162 |
+
| NON_OFFENSIVE | 0.7961 | 0.8118 | 0.8039 | 356 |
|
| 163 |
+
| OTHER_OFFENSIVE | 0.6609 | 0.5897 | 0.6233 | 195 |
|
| 164 |
+
| OFFENSIVE_RACIST | 0.6727 | 0.8810 | 0.7629 | 42 |
|
| 165 |
+
| OFFENSIVE_SEXIST | 0.8214 | 0.8519 | 0.8364 | 27 |
|
| 166 |
+
| **Macro Avg** | **0.7378** | **0.7836** | **0.7566** | 620 |
|
| 167 |
+
| **Accuracy** | | | **0.7484** | 620 |
|
| 168 |
|
| 169 |
+
> NepaliBERT achieved the **highest validation macro F1 (0.7566)** among all evaluated models, outperforming even XLM-RoBERTa Large (0.7392 val macro F1). The validation-to-test gap is primarily explained by distributional shift in the OR and OS minority classes, not overfitting (train-val loss gap = 0.066).
|
| 170 |
|
| 171 |
+
> **Primary metric:** Macro F1-score. Accuracy is misleading given class imbalance; macro F1 weights all classes equally, making it the appropriate metric for evaluating minority hate class performance.
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
+
---
|
| 174 |
|
| 175 |
+
## Training Dynamics
|
| 176 |
|
| 177 |
+
Training proceeded over approximately 1,000 gradient steps in three phases:
|
| 178 |
|
| 179 |
+
- **Phase 1 (steps 0–300):** Rapid co-descent of train and validation loss (1.50 → 1.00), faster than XLM-RoBERTa due to Nepali-specific pre-training. Validation F1 rises from 0.26 to 0.47.
|
| 180 |
+
- **Phase 2 (steps 300–600):** Training loss continues declining (~0.90); validation loss stabilizes around 1.00–1.02. Validation F1 improves to 0.65 as OO and OR class discrimination refines.
|
| 181 |
+
- **Phase 3 (steps 600–1000):** Validation F1 peaks near 0.75 at step 700, then settles at 0.72. Post-step-600 divergence between F1 and accuracy reflects a trade-off between majority class accuracy and minority class precision.
|
| 182 |
|
| 183 |
+
The final train-validation loss gap of 0.066 confirms minimal overfitting; poor OS test performance is a data distribution issue rather than model overfitting.
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 |
+
---
|
| 186 |
|
| 187 |
+
## Comparison with Other Models
|
| 188 |
|
| 189 |
+
| Approach | Model | Accuracy | Macro F1 |
|
| 190 |
+
|----------|-------|----------|----------|
|
| 191 |
+
| Classical ML | Logistic Regression (TF-IDF) | 0.7538 | 0.5701 |
|
| 192 |
+
| Classical ML | SVM | 0.7552 | 0.5502 |
|
| 193 |
+
| Deep Learning | GRU + Word2Vec | — | 0.3307 (test) |
|
| 194 |
+
| Transformer | XLM-RoBERTa Large | 0.7034 | 0.5465 |
|
| 195 |
+
| **Transformer** | **NepaliBERT (this model)** | **0.6972** | **0.5126** |
|
| 196 |
|
| 197 |
+
### Per-Class F1 Comparison (Test Set)
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
+
| Model | Macro F1 | NO | OO | OR | OS |
|
| 200 |
+
|-------|----------|----|----|----|----|
|
| 201 |
+
| Logistic Regression | 0.5701 | 0.8225 | 0.6722 | 0.5000 | 0.2857 |
|
| 202 |
+
| SVM | 0.5502 | 0.8288 | 0.6659 | 0.4660 | 0.2400 |
|
| 203 |
+
| XLM-RoBERTa Large | 0.5465 | 0.7825 | 0.6306 | 0.3731 | **0.4000** |
|
| 204 |
+
| **NepaliBERT (this model)** | 0.5126 | 0.7753 | 0.6013 | **0.4833** | 0.1905 |
|
| 205 |
|
| 206 |
+
> **Key finding:** NepaliBERT achieves the best OR class F1 (0.4833) among all models, outperforming XLM-RoBERTa Large (0.3731), confirming that Nepali domain pre-training provides a meaningful advantage for ethnicity/caste-related hate content. XLM-RoBERTa Large outperforms NepaliBERT on the OS class (0.4000 vs 0.1905).
|
| 207 |
|
| 208 |
+
---
|
| 209 |
|
| 210 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
+
- **Romanized Nepali coverage:** NepaliBERT's pre-training corpus is predominantly Devanagari, limiting its ability to handle Romanized Nepali without prior transliteration. The OR test set contains 59.2% Romanized script vs 46.1% in training, contributing to the validation-to-test gap.
|
| 213 |
+
- **OS class collapse:** With only 19 OS test samples, high length mismatch (train avg 13.1 words vs test avg 19.9 words), and narrow training vocabulary, OS results (F1 = 0.1905) should be interpreted with significant caution.
|
| 214 |
+
- **Optimal checkpoint sensitivity:** NepaliBERT shows a more pronounced F1 peak-and-drop than XLM-RoBERTa, making it more sensitive to early stopping checkpoint selection.
|
| 215 |
+
- **Preprocessing dependency:** Performance on Romanized or English inputs degrades without prior transliteration/translation through the preprocessing pipeline.
|
| 216 |
+
- **Language scope:** Optimized specifically for Nepali. Not evaluated on other South Asian languages.
|
| 217 |
|
| 218 |
+
---
|
| 219 |
|
| 220 |
+
## Intended Use
|
| 221 |
|
| 222 |
+
- Automated hate content moderation on Nepali social media platforms, especially where content is primarily in Devanagari script
|
| 223 |
+
- Research on Nepali-specific NLP and low-resource hate speech detection
|
| 224 |
+
- Comparative study of language-specific vs multilingual transformer models
|
| 225 |
+
- Explainable AI integration — this model was evaluated with LIME, SHAP, and Captum-based Integrated Gradients for token-level attribution
|
| 226 |
|
| 227 |
+
**Out-of-scope uses:** This model should not be used as the sole decision-making system for content removal without human review. OS class predictions carry particularly high uncertainty due to extremely limited test support.
|
| 228 |
|
| 229 |
+
---
|
| 230 |
|
| 231 |
+
## Explainability
|
| 232 |
|
| 233 |
+
The deployment system integrates three complementary XAI methods for token-level explanation of predictions:
|
| 234 |
|
| 235 |
+
- **LIME** — Local surrogate model via word masking perturbations
|
| 236 |
+
- **SHAP** — Shapley value attribution (KernelSHAP)
|
| 237 |
+
- **Integrated Gradients (Captum)** — Gradient-based attribution along input-to-baseline path
|
| 238 |
|
| 239 |
+
---
|
| 240 |
|
| 241 |
+
## Citation
|
| 242 |
|
| 243 |
+
If you use this model, please cite the original dataset:
|
| 244 |
|
| 245 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 246 |
+
@inproceedings{niraula2021offensive,
|
| 247 |
+
title={Offensive Language Detection in Nepali Social Media},
|
| 248 |
+
author={Niraula, Nobal B. and Dulal, Saurav and Koirala, Diwa},
|
| 249 |
+
booktitle={Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH 2021)},
|
| 250 |
+
pages={67--75},
|
| 251 |
+
year={2021}
|
| 252 |
+
}
|
| 253 |
+
```
|
| 254 |
|
| 255 |
+
And the base model:
|
| 256 |
|
| 257 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 258 |
+
@article{thapa2024nepali,
|
| 259 |
+
title={Development of Pre-trained Transformer-based Models for the Nepali Language},
|
| 260 |
+
author={Thapa, Prashant and Sharma, Prajwal and Kharel, Aman},
|
| 261 |
+
journal={Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing},
|
| 262 |
+
year={2024}
|
| 263 |
+
}
|
| 264 |
+
```
|
| 265 |
|
| 266 |
+
---
|
| 267 |
|
| 268 |
+
## Authors
|
| 269 |
|
| 270 |
+
**Uddav Rajbhandari**
|
| 271 |
|
| 272 |
+
Department of Computer and Electronics Engineering
|
| 273 |
+
Khwopa College of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Nepal (2026)
|