Remove BitTransformerLM/ABOUTME.md - cleanup for OS launch
Browse files- BitTransformerLM/ABOUTME.md +0 -110
BitTransformerLM/ABOUTME.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,110 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
Here’s a menu of additional, “pure-PyTorch” extensions that can close the gap even further to a production-grade LLM:
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
⸻
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
1. Native Low-Rank & MoE Layers (DO LAST)
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
Why: Expert mixtures and low-rank adapters let you balloon effective parameter count without proportional compute.
|
| 8 |
-
• Mixture-of-Experts: Implement a tiny gating network (one or two linear layers) that routes each token’s representation to one of E experts (each a small FFN). Only that expert runs on that position, so compute per token stays constant while total capacity grows by E×.
|
| 9 |
-
• PyTorch sketch:
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
class MoE(nn.Module):
|
| 12 |
-
def __init__(self, d_model, d_ff, n_experts=4):
|
| 13 |
-
super.__init__
|
| 14 |
-
self.gate = nn.Linear(d_model, n_experts)
|
| 15 |
-
self.experts = nn.ModuleList(
|
| 16 |
-
[nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(d_model, d_ff), nn.GELU, nn.Linear(d_ff, d_model))
|
| 17 |
-
for _ in range(n_experts)]
|
| 18 |
-
)
|
| 19 |
-
def forward(self, x):
|
| 20 |
-
# x: [T,B,D]
|
| 21 |
-
logits = self.gate(x) # [T,B,E]
|
| 22 |
-
w = F.softmax(logits, dim=-1) # [T,B,E]
|
| 23 |
-
y = torch.stack([expert(x) for expert in self.experts], -1)
|
| 24 |
-
# y: [T,B,D,E] → weighted sum:
|
| 25 |
-
out = (y * w.unsqueeze(2)).sum(-1)
|
| 26 |
-
return out
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
• Trade-off: You’ll need a load-balancing loss term (e.g. encourage the gate to spread load) and telemetry on expert usage, but the code stays pure PyTorch.
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
⸻
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
-
2. [x] Adaptive Computation Time (ACT)
|
| 34 |
-
|
| 35 |
-
Why: Let the model learn to spend more depth on “hard” bits and skip layers on easier ones.
|
| 36 |
-
• Implementation: Add a tiny halting unit after each layer—e.g. a single linear+sigmoid per token that predicts stop/pause. Accumulate “halt probability” across layers and stop processing tokens once they cross a threshold.
|
| 37 |
-
• Benefit: On average you’ll do fewer layer passes per token, reducing compute without touching PyTorch internals.
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
-
⸻
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
3. [x] Advanced PyTorch-Native Quantization
|
| 42 |
-
|
| 43 |
-
Why: Move beyond static 4-bit packaging to full QAT / dynamic quant.
|
| 44 |
-
• FX-graph QAT: Use torch.quantization.prepare_qat_fx on your SparseQuantTransformerLayer with a custom 4-bit observer (we sketched one earlier). Then convert_fx to int8 or 4-bit for weights—no external libs needed.
|
| 45 |
-
• Dynamic quant for inference: Wrap your model in torch.quantization.quantize_dynamic(...), quantizing only Linear modules to int8 on-the-fly. Gives a big speed/memory win at inference time on CPU.
|
| 46 |
-
|
| 47 |
-
⸻
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
-
4. [x] Chunked & Overlapping Attention
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
Why: Emulate sparse attention with pure PyTorch and no for-loops.
|
| 52 |
-
• How: Break your sequence into fixed-size chunks (e.g. 512 bits), attend within each chunk plus a small overlap window to neighbors.
|
| 53 |
-
• Pure PyTorch: Use unfold + batched torch.matmul to compute all chunked attention in parallel:
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
-
x: [B, L, D], chunk_size=C, overlap=O
|
| 56 |
-
pads = (O, O)
|
| 57 |
-
x_padded = F.pad(x, (0,0) + pads) # pad on seq dim
|
| 58 |
-
chunks = x_padded.unfold(1, C+2*O, C) # [B, n_chunks, C+2O, D]
|
| 59 |
-
Then project Q,K,V per-chunk and do fused matmuls batchwise
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
• Benefit: You get an O(L·(C+2O)) algorithm without Python loops, all in tensor ops.
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
⸻
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
5. Functorch-Based Vectorization & vmap
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
Why: Fuse your per-head or per-expert loops automatically.
|
| 69 |
-
• Use functorch.vmap to turn your per-head attention code (the one inside the for t in range(T)) into a single batched kernel.
|
| 70 |
-
• Benefit: Cleaner code, fewer Python loops, and TorchInductor can fuse it just as well as hand-written loops.
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
⸻
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
6. [x] Fully-Sharded DataParallel & Pipeline Parallel (PyTorch-Native)
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
Why: Scale out to multiple GPUs without external frameworks.
|
| 77 |
-
• FSDP: Wrap your model in torch.distributed.fsdp.FullyShardedDataParallel to shard both parameters and optimizer state across GPUs.
|
| 78 |
-
• Pipe: Use torch.distributed.pipeline.sync.Pipe to split your 40+ layer model across GPUs as pipeline stages.
|
| 79 |
-
• Benefit: Zero external deps—pure PyTorch DDP/FS/PIPE—so you can train 100M+ parameter models.
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
⸻
|
| 82 |
-
|
| 83 |
-
7. [x] Mixed Precision & Autocast on CPU (bfloat16)
|
| 84 |
-
|
| 85 |
-
Why: PyTorch now supports `torch.amp.autocast('cpu')` for bfloat16 on some architectures.
|
| 86 |
-
• Surround your forward in with `torch.amp.autocast('cpu')`: to cut memory and speed up linear/attention kernels, even on CPU.
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
⸻
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
8. [x] Optimized Learning-Rate Schedules & Optimizers
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
Why: Achieve GPT-level convergence behavior…
|
| 93 |
-
• Implement OneCycleLR or CosineAnnealingWarmRestarts directly via torch.optim.lr_scheduler.
|
| 94 |
-
• Swap to AdamW with decoupled weight decay (torch.optim.AdamW) and dynamic gradient clipping (torch.nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_).
|
| 95 |
-
• All of these live in core PyTorch.
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
⸻
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
Putting It All Together
|
| 100 |
-
1. MoE + ACT will let you scale capacity (E× experts) while controlling average compute.
|
| 101 |
-
2. FX/QAT + dynamic quant gives you 4-bit int inference with no external libs.
|
| 102 |
-
3. Chunked attention + vmap replaces loops with giant fused tensor ops.
|
| 103 |
-
4. FSDP + Pipe moves you onto multi-GPU purely in torch.distributed.
|
| 104 |
-
5. Autocast (bfloat16) on CPU/GPU for mixed precision speed.
|
| 105 |
-
|
| 106 |
-
By layering these techniques, you can:
|
| 107 |
-
• Reach hundreds of millions (even billions) of effective parameters
|
| 108 |
-
• Maintain single-library purity (just PyTorch)
|
| 109 |
-
• Hit LLM-class throughputs (100’s of tokens/sec GPU, 10’s CPU)
|
| 110 |
-
• Keep full NRB telemetry available for safety checks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|