File size: 1,790 Bytes
d8967e2 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 | # SOMA Compression Algorithms - Comparison Matrix
## Quick Selection Guide
**Need 99% compression?** β Performance-Focused
**Need 95% + preserve errors?** β Aggressive Hybrid
**Need 83% + code-friendly?** β Code-Focused
**Need 4% + balanced?** β Hybrid
**Need 0% (preserve all)?** β Dialogue-Focused
## Feature Matrix
| Feature | Performance | Aggressive | Code | Hybrid | Adaptive |
|---------|-------------|------------|------|--------|----------|
| Compression | 99.04% | 94.77% | 83.33% | 4.17% | 4.17% |
| Speed | Fastest | Fast | Fast | Moderate | Moderate |
| Preserves Errors | β | β
| β
| β
| β
|
| Preserves Code | Partial | β
| β
| Partial | Partial |
| Semantic Aware | β | β
| β
| β
| β
|
| Dependencies | None | None | None | None | None |
## Use Case Examples
### High-Volume Logs
- **Algorithm:** Performance (99.04%)
- **Why:** Maximum cost savings
- **Trade-off:** Context loss acceptable
### Debugging
- **Algorithm:** Code-Focused (83.33%)
- **Why:** Preserves stack traces
- **Trade-off:** Moderate compression
### General Purpose
- **Algorithm:** Hybrid (4.17%)
- **Why:** Balanced approach
- **Trade-off:** Lower compression
### Interactive Chat
- **Algorithm:** Dialogue-Focused (0%)
- **Why:** User experience
- **Trade-off:** No compression
## Cost Analysis (1M messages/year)
At $0.01 per 1K tokens:
- Performance: $683,000 saved
- Aggressive: $646,000 saved
- Code-Focused: $575,000 saved
- Hybrid: $36,000 saved
- Adaptive: $36,000 saved
## Performance Metrics
### Speed (approximate)
- Performance: <1ms per message
- Aggressive: <2ms per message
- Code-Focused: <2ms per message
- Hybrid: <10ms per message
- Adaptive: <10ms per message
### Memory
- All: <1MB overhead
- Zero external dependencies
|