File size: 7,075 Bytes
882ece9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
{
  "question": "can a reader follow a dedup backreference, and is the target the right content",
  "king_query": {
    "call": "octave_chain.metagraph(netuid=114)",
    "block": 8860292,
    "neurons": 256,
    "network": "finney"
  },
  "instrument_failure_caught_by_contradiction": {
    "symptom": "my first audit reported 245 of 315 backref targets MISSING, contradicting v135 (315/315 resolving, re-verified in v140)",
    "cause": "my LABEL regex required a SPACE after the label; 2348 of 3381 labels are followed by a NEWLINE and only 1033 by a space, so I saw 30.6% of labels",
    "rule_held": "suspect the instrument before the compressor - the compressor has been correct every time"
  },
  "direction": {
    "total": 315,
    "missing": 0,
    "backward": 315,
    "forward": 0,
    "dist_min": 58,
    "dist_median": 961,
    "dist_p90": 17777,
    "dist_max": 55501,
    "lines_median": 48,
    "lines_p90": 573,
    "lines_max": 1573
  },
  "direction_finding": "315 of 315 backrefs point BACKWARD, 0 forward, 0 missing - every pointer resolves on a single forward pass",
  "distance_cost": "median 961 chars / 48 lines back, p90 17777 chars / 573 lines, max 55501 chars / 1573 lines - resolvable but a real comprehension cost",
  "RETRACTION_v130_span_census": {
    "retracted": "output r-spans 1033, 35 multi-line (3.39%), mean 1.0368 lines",
    "corrected": "ALL r-spans 3381, 1820 multi-line (53.83%), mean 1.8953 lines, max 13",
    "space_form_subset": {
      "spans": 1033,
      "multi": 35,
      "pct": 3.39,
      "mean_lines": 1.0368,
      "max": 4
    },
    "newline_form_subset": {
      "newline_form_spans": 2348,
      "newline_multiline": 1785,
      "newline_mean_lines": 2.273,
      "newline_max_lines": 13
    },
    "why_it_was_wrong": "the space-form is single-line BY CONSTRUCTION - a space after the label means the body starts on the label line - so selecting on that delimiter selected for short bodies. The census was not a sample but a filter that guaranteed its own answer, the same defect class as v123 tautological content check and v140 self-consistent report field",
    "corroboration": "3381 equals the raw payload count from v127/v130, one span per payload; the 1033 figure never matched anything",
    "consequence": "v130 STRUCTURAL EXHAUSTION is withdrawn as a justification. The line-relation family REOPENS with a measured surface"
  },
  "reopened_surface": {
    "bodies": 3381,
    "total_span_lines": 6408,
    "multi_body_lines": 4847,
    "multi_bodies": 1820,
    "mean_lines_multi": 2.6632,
    "pct_span_lines_in_multi": 75.64
  },
  "intra_span_line_dedup": {
    "measured": {
      "distinct": 3305,
      "redundant": 1542,
      "redundant_tokens": 2684,
      "median_per_ch": 8.0,
      "max_per_ch": 276,
      "top": [
        [
          "",
          1327
        ],
        [
          "    \"\"\"",
          13
        ],
        [
          "(Command exited with code 1)",
          11
        ],
        [
          "{",
          8
        ],
        [
          "  \"status\": \"error\",",
          8
        ],
        [
          "  \"err",
          8
        ],
        [
          "Traceback (most recent call last):",
          5
        ],
        [
          "  \"tool\": \"edit\",",
          4
        ],
        [
          "   ",
          4
        ],
        [
          "checks.Error(",
          3
        ],
        [
          "/usr/bin/python3",
          3
        ],
        [
          "dmp_ext_factor entry, degree_list: (1, 1)",
          3
        ],
        [
          "  aft",
          3
        ],
        [
          "raise ValueError(",
          3
        ],
        [
          "except PolynomialError:",
          3
        ],
        [
          "invariance: True",
          3
        ],
        [
          "def _lambdifygenerated():",
          3
        ],
        [
          "        ",
          2
        ],
        [
          "/usr/bin/python3: No module named pytest",
          2
        ],
        [
          "\"\"\"",
          2
        ]
      ]
    },
    "preregistered": "expected repetition LOW and replacement to LOSE, with a trap - if repetition were high I must check whether repeated lines are CONTENTFUL or boilerplate",
    "trap_fired": "1327 of 1542 redundant occurrences (86.1%) are the EMPTY STRING, i.e. the already-closed blank-line family; the rest are boilerplate ('    \"\"\"', '{', '(Command exited with code 1)', 'Traceback (most recent call last):')",
    "arithmetic": "2684 redundant tokens = 0.96% of the corpus GROSS before addressing cost; mean redundant line under 2 tokens against v126's 14.43 saved per backref, so a ~2-token backref saves nothing",
    "decision": "CLOSED on arithmetic without running arms; both pre-registered predictions held",
    "scope_of_this_closure": "narrow - intra-span line dedup only. v130 closed the family on a WRONG census; this closes ONE policy on a correct census. Other line-relation policies on the 4847 lines remain untested with a measured surface"
  },
  "structure_inside_bodies": {
    "lines": 4847,
    "indented": 750,
    "python": 351,
    "depths": {
      "2": 205,
      "3": 21,
      "4": 248,
      "5": 5,
      "6": 6,
      "7": 8,
      "8": 181,
      "9": 3,
      "10": 1,
      "11": 2,
      "12": 45,
      "16": 15,
      "17": 1,
      "18": 1,
      "19": 1,
      "20": 6,
      "24": 1
    },
    "distinct_depths": 17,
    "pct_indented": 15.47
  },
  "connection_to_v140": "351 python-keyword lines and 750 indented lines with 17 distinct indent depths live INSIDE span bodies, so v140's ws-collapse indentation repair protects concentrated structure, not a diffuse 4.08%",
  "emitter_mechanism": {
    "sole_emitter": "line 271 return f'\\n\\u00abr{_id(_attr(tag, \"tool_call_id\"))[1:]} ' accounts for 774 of 774 labels on a 40-challenge sample; line 253 never fires on this corpus",
    "how_the_two_forms_arise": "the emitter always writes a trailing SPACE; a later trailing-whitespace pass strips it whenever the body begins on the next line. One emitter plus cleanup, not two emitters",
    "located_by_transforming_not_searching": "my guessed literal matched 0 times; enumerating lines mentioning the opening guillemet found both candidates, and replacing each with a marker identified which one fires",
    "consequence": "3381 is the single correct span population; the 1033/2348 split is an artefact of cleanup, not a real distinction"
  },
  "guard_gap": {
    "found": "removing the emitter's trailing space makes ALL labels newline-form, yet my live test passed",
    "cause": "'multi_space / max(n_space, 1)' evaluates to 0/1 = 0 when the space-form population VANISHES - the guard written to avoid a division error also made an empty population pass",
    "defect_class": "an assertion that cannot fail on the case it most needs to catch, the same shape as the tautology class",
    "closed": "added a non-vacuity assertion that the population EXISTS before its ratio is read; both live mutations now fire"
  }
}