wmeddie commited on
Commit
d176a1b
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 7d144fd

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +44 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -143,6 +143,50 @@ reasoning prompts:
143
  The probe alone suggested rys_33-36 was a moderate win. The **sampled BFCL
144
  run with thinking enabled confirms it on the harder live categories** (above).
145
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
146
  ---
147
 
148
  ## Hybrid Mamba/attention architecture constraint
 
143
  The probe alone suggested rys_33-36 was a moderate win. The **sampled BFCL
144
  run with thinking enabled confirms it on the harder live categories** (above).
145
 
146
+ ### Extended evaluation (Ng's protocol)
147
+
148
+ After a thoughtful question on the discussion forum about deviations from
149
+ [David Ng's suggested reproduction path](https://github.com/dnhkng/RYS#suggested-reproduction-path),
150
+ we went back and ran the steps we had skipped:
151
+
152
+ **Extended probe** — `math_120 + eq_140` from Ng's repo, `--reasoning off` to
153
+ match the protocol's intent (the math probe is designed for intuitive
154
+ guessing, not deliberate computation):
155
+
156
+ | Variant | math_120 | eq_140 |
157
+ |---|---|---|
158
+ | base | 0.9986 | 74.53 |
159
+ | **rys_33-36** | 0.9930 | **78.81** |
160
+
161
+ On the larger probe rys_33-36 holds its EQ improvement (+4.28 pp). Math is at
162
+ ceiling for both. Note this is the *opposite* direction from our small
163
+ internal probe (where rys_33-36 had lower EQ) — small-probe variance was
164
+ misleading us; the 140-question sample is the trustworthy reading.
165
+
166
+ **Depth-2 beam search** — 10 non-overlapping pair-combinations of the top
167
+ single-block configs, each scored on the same probe:
168
+
169
+ | Variant | math_120 | eq_140 |
170
+ |---|---|---|
171
+ | **rys_33-36** | 0.9930 | **78.81** |
172
+ | rys_33-36 + 49-52 | 0.9226 | 75.66 |
173
+ | rys_33-36 + 53-56 | 0.9219 | 75.27 |
174
+ | rys_33-36 + 54-57 | 0.9639 | 72.21 |
175
+ | rys_33-36 + 56-59 | 0.9643 | 74.21 |
176
+ | rys_33-36 + 58-61 | 0.9930 | 68.78 |
177
+ | rys_49-52 + 53-56 | 0.8864 | 66.70 |
178
+ | rys_49-52 + 56-59 | 0.9654 | 69.67 |
179
+ | rys_49-52 + 58-61 | 0.9606 | 69.18 |
180
+ | rys_53-56 + 58-61 | 0.9635 | 63.57 |
181
+ | rys_54-57 + 58-61 | 0.9703 | 59.93 |
182
+
183
+ No depth-2 combination beats rys_33-36 on EQ_140. Stacking blocks degrades
184
+ math (sometimes catastrophically) without improving EQ. So the shortcut we
185
+ took in candidate selection (no beam search) did not cost us a better
186
+ configuration in this neighborhood. We did **not** train Ng's surrogate
187
+ regressor or run a deeper beam search — those would explore more of the
188
+ configuration space and might find something better.
189
+
190
  ---
191
 
192
  ## Hybrid Mamba/attention architecture constraint