[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather spend time on a hobby or learn something new? Use examples to support your answer.

Student Response: I would rather spend my time learning something new. While hobbies are relaxing, I find the process of acquiring new skills and knowledge to be more fulfilling and beneficial in the long run. Firstly, learning something new keeps my mind sharp and engaged. When I challenge myself to understand a new concept or master a new skill, I feel a sense of accomplishment that hobbies don't always provide. For example, when I decided to learn a programming language last year, the mental stimulation and problem-solving involved made me feel more productive than when I was just reading novels as a hobby. Secondly, learning new things can open up opportunities for personal and professional growth. Unlike hobbies, which are primarily for personal enjoyment, new skills can enhance my career prospects or help me contribute more to my community.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer reading books or watching movies? Why?

Student Response: I prefer reading books over watching movies. Reading books gives me more detailed information and allows me to use my imagination. When I read, I can create my own pictures in my mind, which is very enjoyable. Also, books usually have more content than movies because movies have time limits. Reading also helps improve my vocabulary and language skills, which is beneficial for my studies.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe an experience you wish you could have.

Student Response: I wish travel around world. Want see different countries and learn about cultures. Try different food and meet people from other places.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Your university is planning to allow students to watch TV in their dormitories. What is your opinion and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages of watching TV in dormitories?

Student Response: I think allowing TV in dorms has more disadvantages than advantages. Good thing is that students can relax and watch shows after studying. But TV can distract students from homework and they might watch instead of studying, which hurts their grades. Also, students might stay in room watching TV alone instead of talking with other students in common areas.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather read a novel or listen to an audiobook? Explain why.

Student Response: I would rather read a novel than listen to an audiobook. First, reading allows me to control the pace and I can slow down for difficult passages or speed up when the story is exciting. Second, I find it easier to remember characters and plot details when I read because I can flip back through pages to check information. However, audiobooks can be convenient during commuting or exercising.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the statement that ""Working remotely is better than working in an office""? Provide reasons for your opinion.

Student Response: I agree that for many jobs, remote work is better than office work. Working from home gives more flexibility to manage personal life and family needs. You don't need to commute, which saves time and money and reduces stress. You can also create comfortable work environment at home. But some people miss social interaction with colleagues and it can be harder to collaborate on team projects.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the idea that ""Eating healthy is more important than exercising regularly""? Provide reasons for your opinion.

Student Response: I disagree with the idea that one is more important than the other; I believe they are equally crucial partners for good health. You cannot out-exercise a bad diet. Eating healthy provides the essential nutrients and fuel your body needs to function, and it prevents diseases linked to poor nutrition. On the other hand, exercise is vital for cardiovascular health, muscle strength, and mental well-being, benefits that diet alone cannot provide. For example, exercise releases endorphins that reduce stress. True health requires a commitment to both nutritious eating and regular physical activity; neglecting one undermines the other.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the idea that ""Traveling should be a part of everyone's education""? Provide reasons for your opinion.

Student Response: I strongly agree that traveling should be a part of everyone's education. Firstly, it provides a real-world context for what is learned in the classroom. Visiting the Colosseum in Rome makes ancient history come alive in a way no textbook can. This experiential learning is incredibly powerful and memorable. Secondly, traveling teaches invaluable life skills like independence, problem-solving, and adaptability. Navigating a foreign city, communicating across language barriers, and managing a budget on the road builds confidence and a global perspective that are essential components of a well-rounded education.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the statement that ""The government should invest more in public transportation""? Provide reasons for your view.

Student Response: Government should... um... invest in buses and trains. It's good for environment. Less cars, less pollution. People without cars can use it to go work. But expensive for government. Sometimes buses are late.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that online shopping is better than traditional shopping? Explain your opinion.

Student Response: Online shopping is good because convenient. You can buy things at home. Don't need go to store. But sometimes products not good quality. Traditional shopping you can see things before buy.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that children should learn how to draw or paint at school? Use examples to explain your view.

Student Response: Children should learn art. Good for creativity and feeling. Help hand skill. Good for other subject. I agree.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer taking short breaks throughout the day or one long break? Explain your preference.

Student Response: Short breaks is better. You can rest many times. Work long time make you tired. I take break every hour. Long break make you lazy.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people prefer to be constantly busy and always have something to do. Others choose not to be busy all the time but to spend some periods doing nothing. Which approach do you think is better? Explain why.

Student Response: I think it is better to spend some periods doing nothing. Firstly, being constantly busy can lead to chronic stress and burnout. Our minds and bodies need time to rest and recharge. Without downtime, we become less productive and our work quality suffers. Secondly, having free time allows for creativity and self-reflection. Some of my best ideas come when I'm not actively trying to solve a problem. I can think about my goals and priorities when I have quiet moments. A balanced approach that includes both productivity and relaxation is ideal.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Which of the following technological developments has made the greatest impact on students' lives? (1) electronic books (2) online classes (3) smart phones

Student Response: Smart phone is most important. Students use phone every day. Can call friends and family. Also can search internet for homework. But phone can distract in class.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?  It is better for children to have teachers who are young, even if they are inexperienced.

Student Response: Young teachers... good... bad... experience important... students like... young teachers understand... but... old teachers better... I don't know...

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: When doing a school or work assignment, would you rather write a long report or give a presentation to a large audience? Explain your choice.

Student Response: I prefer presentation to audience. It's more interesting than report because you can use... um... visuals and voice to make it better. Also good for speaking skills development. Sometimes nervous but helps to become more confident. Good for career.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: What do you like to read in your free time: newspapers, magazines, or books?

Student Response: Books. I read books. Good. Newspapers... no. Books better. Learn. Read is good for... um... for mind.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather read a novel or listen to an audiobook? Explain why.

Student Response: I would rather read a physical novel. Firstly, I find that I have better comprehension and retention when I see the words on the page. The act of reading forces me to be more actively engaged, and I can easily pause to think about a sentence or reread a complex passage. With an audiobook, my mind sometimes wanders. Secondly, reading a book is a more immersive experience for me without the distraction of a narrator's voice. I enjoy creating the characters' voices and the tone of the story in my own imagination, which makes the experience more personal and creative.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: When doing a school or work assignment, would you rather write a long report or give a presentation to a large audience? Explain your choice.

Student Response: I would rather give a presentation to a large audience. Firstly, I find it to be a more engaging and dynamic way to convey information. Presenting allows me to use visuals, tone of voice, and body language to make the material more interesting and memorable for the audience, which is more effective than a dry report. Secondly, it's a great opportunity to develop my public speaking skills. While it can be nerve-wracking, each presentation helps me become more confident and articulate, which are incredibly valuable skills for my future career. I see it as a chance for personal growth.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Who has been your best teacher? What attributes do you think to make him/her such an effective teacher?

Student Response: My best teacher was Mr. Park who taught history in high school. He was very passionate about history and made classes interesting. He always explained things clearly and answered all questions. He also cared about students personally and helped us when we had problems. This made him special teacher.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you believe that technology has made our lives better or worse? Explain your position.

Student Response: Technology... good communication. Information fast. But... um... too much time. Not talk people.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that learning from past experiences is important for the future? Use examples to support your answer.

Student Response: Yes, I think past experiences important. When you have experience, you know what to do next time. Like if you fail test, you study more next time. Past teach us many things. But some people cannot forget bad things from past. Experience help us but also can make us worry too much.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer reading books or watching movies? Why?

Student Response: I prefer reading books over watching movies because books give me a deeper and more personal experience. Unlike movies, which have time limits and need to cut out details, books provide full descriptions and allow me to use my imagination to visualize the story. When I read, I can create my own mental images of the characters and settings, which makes the experience more engaging and personal. Also, books often contain more detailed character development and plot complexity that simply can't fit into a two-hour movie format. Additionally, reading helps improve my vocabulary and language skills, which is beneficial for my academic and professional development. I can read at my own pace, pause to think about complex ideas, and even reread passages that I find particularly meaningful or confusing. While movies can be visually stunning and entertaining, I find that books offer a more immersive and intellectually stimulating experience that stays with me longer.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that money is the most important factor in choosing a career? Explain your position.

Student Response: Money... important needs. Security good. But not most important. Happiness... um... family health too. Rich people not always happy.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the statement that experienced doctors are better than young doctors? Use details and examples to support your choice.

Student Response: I agree that, in general, experienced doctors are better than young doctors. The most important reason is clinical expertise gained through years of practice. Experienced doctors have encountered a vast array of medical conditions, complications, and unusual cases that young doctors may have only read about in textbooks. This practical knowledge enables them to recognize subtle symptoms, make faster diagnoses, and avoid potential pitfalls that might not be obvious to newer practitioners. For example, an experienced cardiologist might quickly identify a rare heart condition based on a combination of seemingly unrelated symptoms that a resident might miss. Additionally, experienced doctors have developed better patient communication skills and emotional intelligence over time. They've learned how to explain complex medical concepts in understandable terms, provide comfort during difficult situations, and manage the psychological aspects of healthcare that are just as important as technical medical knowledge. While young doctors bring valuable energy and current medical knowledge, experience provides irreplaceable wisdom and refined judgment.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Who is your closest family member? Describe them and why you feel a connection with them.

Student Response: My closest family member is my older sister. There are two main reasons we have such a strong connection. First, she has a wonderful sense of humor and positive outlook that always brightens my day. Even during difficult times, she can find something to laugh about or a silver lining to focus on. This optimism has been incredibly valuable throughout my life, especially during stressful periods like exam time or when I was dealing with friendship problems in school. Her ability to make me laugh and see the bright side has helped me develop resilience and a more positive mindset. Second, she's an excellent listener who gives thoughtful advice without being judgmental. When I have problems or important decisions to make, I always turn to her first because I know she'll really hear me out and offer balanced perspectives.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people enjoy going to parties and meeting new people while others prefer to stay at home and relax. Which do you prefer?

Student Response: I prefer going to parties and meeting new people over staying home alone. The primary reason is that social interaction energizes me and helps me build valuable connections. Parties provide opportunities to practice communication skills and learn about different perspectives from people with diverse backgrounds. For example, at university parties, I've met students from various majors who have given me insights into different career paths. While staying home can be relaxing, I find that socializing helps me grow personally and professionally.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe any previous work experience you've had.

Student Response: My most significant work experience was a part-time job I had at a busy cafe near my university for about two years. Initially, I was hired as a barista, but over time I took on additional responsibilities that taught me valuable skills. The fast-paced environment during morning and lunch rushes taught me how to work efficiently under pressure while maintaining quality standards. I learned to multitask—taking orders, preparing drinks, and handling payments simultaneously—while always keeping customer service as the top priority. Additionally, my manager eventually promoted me to a shift supervisor role, which gave me my first taste of leadership responsibilities. I had to train new employees, manage inventory, and handle customer complaints. This experience was invaluable because it taught me practical skills like time management, teamwork, and conflict resolution that I continue to use in all areas of my life.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer to shop online or in physical stores? Explain why.

Student Response: I like shopping in physical stores better than online. I can examine products carefully before buying. For clothes and shoes, need to try on for proper fit. Shopping in stores means I can take things home... um... immediately instead of waiting for delivery.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you believe that social media has a positive or negative impact on society? Explain your view.

Student Response: Social media good and bad. People can talk to friends and family. Share information fast. But sometimes fake news. People spend too much time on phone.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer taking public transportation or driving your own car? Use examples to support your choice.

Student Response: I like public transportation. It's good because... um... less cars. Environment is better. Bus is... train is okay. I can read book. But sometimes late. Car is expensive, need gas. Public transportation cheaper. Traffic is bad with car. I don't like drive in traffic.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: You will need to accomplish an assignment for a presentation. Which one will you choose? (1) Act out a scene from a play (2) Explain your review of a novel you recently read (3) Read a selection of poems

Student Response: I would choose to explain review of novel I read recently. First reason is that I'm good at explaining things to other people and I have read many books in my life. When I read novel, I can remember many details and I think other students will be interested to hear about it. However, sometimes it might be difficult to explain everything clearly because novels can be very complex with many characters.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer traveling alone or with a group? Explain your preference.

Student Response: I prefer traveling with a group rather than alone. First reason is safety - traveling with others provides security, especially in unfamiliar places. If something goes wrong, there are people to help and support each other. Second reason is that sharing experiences makes travel more enjoyable and memorable. You can discuss what you see and create shared memories with friends or family.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe one of the best moments of your life.

Student Response: One of the best moments was when I graduated from university. I felt very proud because I worked hard for four years. My family was there to celebrate with me, which made it even more special. It was the beginning of a new chapter in my life, and I felt excited about the future.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think it's better for college students to attend school full-time or part-time? Explain your choice.

Student Response: I think full-time is better for college students if they can afford it. Full-time students can focus completely on their studies and finish their degree faster. They also have more opportunities to join activities and use campus resources. However, part-time can be good for students who need to work or have family responsibilities. It depends on each person's situation.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: When doing a school or work assignment, would you rather write a long report or give a presentation to a large audience? Explain your choice.

Student Response: I would rather give presentation to large audience. First, presentation is more engaging way to share information. I can use visuals and body language to make material more interesting and memorable for audience. Second, it helps me develop public speaking skills. Although it can be nervous, each presentation makes me more confident and articulate, which is valuable for future career.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather live in a big city or a small town? Explain why.

Student Response: I want live in big city. Big city has more jobs and opportunities. You can find work easier. There are museums and theaters. Small town is quiet but maybe boring. In big city, you meet different people and learn about cultures. Traffic is bad but still I prefer big city.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: What is your favourite movie or television show, and why do you like it?

Student Response: Parasite movie. Korea movie. Rich poor family. Surprising. Win Oscar. Korean proud.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather attend a small, local event or a large, international festival? Explain why.

Student Response: Small event. Personal. Talk people. Large festivals crowded. Local culture good. International exciting but... crowded.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather live in a country with four seasons or a tropical climate? Use details to support your choice.

Student Response: Four seasons. Variety change. Different activities. Skiing winter hiking spring. Mark time. Tropical nice but... same year.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Among the following jobs, which one do you think is most interesting one and why? a. airplane pilot b. actor c. detective

Student Response: I think detective is the most interesting job. Detective work is like solving puzzles, but these puzzles are real and help people. You need to think carefully and look for clues to solve crimes. Every case is different, so the job is never boring. Being pilot might be exciting, but you do same thing every flight. Actor is fun, but detective work is more meaningful because you help solve real problems and make society safer.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Which holiday is your favourite? Explain why this is your favourite holiday and what you generally do during that holiday.

Student Response: My favorite holiday is Seollal, Korean New Year. I love because family come together and celebrate culture. We meet at grandparents house, do ceremony for ancestors, eat traditional food like tteokguk and jeon. Wear hanbok and play traditional games. Children get money from older people. Special because remember culture and spend time with family.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that it is important for people to learn about other cultures? Explain your opinion.

Student Response: Absolutely, I think it is essential for people to learn about other cultures. Firstly, it promotes tolerance and empathy. By understanding different customs, traditions, and perspectives, we are less likely to judge or fear people who are different from us. It helps us see our common humanity. Secondly, in our interconnected global economy, cultural competence is a vital skill. Whether in business, science, or diplomacy, being able to communicate and collaborate effectively with people from around the world is necessary for success. It opens up our minds and our opportunities.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing.

Student Response: I agree. This... good idea. Better for... for people. Sometimes difficult but... yes, I think this way is good.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that parents should have a say in the university their child attends? Explain your opinion with examples.

Student Response: I agree parents should have say in university choice. First reason is parents have experience and can give good advice. Second reason is parents often pay for education so they should have input.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some students prefer to review their course materials by themselves. Others would rather form a study group with their peers. Which do you prefer and why?

Student Response: I think both options have advantages, but I prefer studying alone because it is more practical for me. Based on my experience, this option works better in most situations. There are some disadvantages sometimes, but the benefits are usually greater. Other people might have different opinions, but this is what I believe is better choice.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Restaurants should provide nutritional information about the food items on their menu.

Student Response: Yes, nutrition information good. People choose healthy food. Good for health. Restaurants should do this.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: There is going to be a TV show that relates to students. Which show would you like to watch? (1) Interview with school leaders (2) Students' debate on political and social topics (3) Comedy about school life

Student Response: I would most like to watch the students' debate on political and social topics. The first reason is that it promotes critical thinking and civic engagement among viewers. When students discuss complex issues like climate change, healthcare, or social justice, it encourages other students to form their own informed opinions and become more aware of important societal challenges. This type of content has educational value that extends far beyond entertainment. The second reason is that student debates provide diverse perspectives that reflect the real campus experience. Unlike interviews with school leaders, which might feel formal or scripted, student debates showcase authentic voices and concerns of the student body. For example, hearing students discuss the pros and cons of tuition increases gives viewers insight into issues that directly affect them, making the content both relevant and engaging.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Your foreign friend is considering coming to your country to visit, but he/she doesn't know how to plan the trip. What suggestions do you give him/her?

Student Response: I tell friend two things. First, visit one or two places, not everything. Seoul for culture, Busan for beach. Better than rush. Second, learn Korean words like hello and thank you.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that 18-year-olds are not mature enough to vote? Explain your opinion with specific details.

Student Response: 18-year-old can vote. They work and pay tax. Know politics. Care about future. I disagree they not mature.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather have a job that pays well or a job that you love? Explain why.

Student Response: I want job that I love. Money is important but if you hate job, you will be... will be unhappy. When you love your job, you feel good and work better. Happy people are more successful. Money can't buy happiness. So I choose job I love even if pay is not high.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.