[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people think that the family is the most important influence on young adults. Others think that friends are the most important influence. Which view do you agree with and why?

Student Response: I think this is good question. Both choices have good and bad points. I prefer one because it is better for me. Sometimes difficult to choose but I think this way is more correct. Other people maybe think different way.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people carry their mobile phones everywhere they go, while others choose to leave them behind or not use them often. Which do you prefer and why?

Student Response: I prefer to carry my mobile phone with me everywhere I go. The most important reason is for safety and emergencies. If my car breaks down or if there's an urgent situation, having a phone allows me to call for help immediately. It provides a crucial sense of security. Secondly, my phone is an incredibly useful tool for convenience. I use it for navigation when I'm in a new place, for quick communication with friends and family to coordinate plans, and for mobile banking. It streamlines many aspects of my daily life, making it much more efficient.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather travel by car or by train? Explain your choice.

Student Response: I would rather travel by train than by car. Firstly, train travel is far more relaxing. When you're in a car, you have to constantly focus on the road, traffic, and navigation, which can be stressful. On a train, I can sit back, read a book, listen to music, or simply enjoy the scenery passing by without any stress. Secondly, it's often more efficient. Trains aren't affected by traffic jams and often take a more direct route between city centers. This means that for many inter-city journeys, the train can actually be faster than driving, and I arrive at my destination feeling rested instead of tired from driving.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people prefer to spend their vacation time in one place. Others prefer to travel to several different places during their vacation. Which do you prefer and why?

Student Response: I think both options have advantages, but I prefer one choice because it is more practical for me. Based on my experience, this option works better in most situations. There are some disadvantages sometimes, but the benefits are usually greater. Other people might have different opinions, but this is what I believe is better choice.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Imagine you have to give your friend some bad news. Would you rather do it in a quiet private room, or a loud public place?

Student Response: Private place better. Public place many people. Bad news is... private thing. People should not hear. Private place good. Quiet place. Friend feel comfortable.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that schools should focus more on practical skills rather than academic subjects? Provide your opinion.

Student Response: I believe schools should focus more on practical skills but not completely ignore academic subjects. Practical skills like financial planning and cooking are very useful in daily life. Many students graduate without knowing how to manage money. However, academic subjects are also important for developing critical thinking.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather live in a country with four seasons or a tropical climate? Use details to support your choice.

Student Response: I would rather live in country with four seasons than tropical climate. First reason is variety and change that seasons bring. Each season offers different activities and experiences - skiing in winter, hiking in spring, swimming in summer, and enjoying beautiful colors in fall. Second reason is that seasonal changes help mark the passage of time and create natural rhythm in life.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A boss or a manager should not form close friendship with their employees.

Student Response: I disagree with this statement because I believe bosses and employees can maintain professional friendships if they handle the relationship thoughtfully. First, workplace friendships can significantly improve team morale and productivity. When people genuinely like and trust each other, they communicate more openly, collaborate more effectively, and are more committed to shared goals. A friendly, supportive manager often inspires better performance than one who maintains strict distance. Second, as long as the manager can remain objective and fair in their professional decisions, personal friendships don't have to compromise their judgment. The key is establishing clear boundaries—being friendly during work hours and social events while maintaining professionalism during performance reviews, promotions, and disciplinary actions.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe your country's culture.

Student Response: My country South Korea has special culture. One important thing is jeong which is like emotional connection between people. Korean people care about each other very much and help family and friends. We also respect older people and have special way to talk to them. Food culture is also important and we eat together often.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: State whether you agree or disagree with the following statement. Then explain your reasons using specific details in your argument. Teachers should assign daily homework to students.

Student Response: I think homework is good for students. It help them to remember what they learn in class. Also, homework can make students more responsible about their study. But sometimes too much homework can be stressful for children. So teachers should give reasonable amount of homework.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer to live alone or with roommates? Why?

Student Response: I prefer living alone because I can have privacy and control my environment. When I live alone, I can study without noise from roommates and keep my room clean the way I like. I can also invite friends when I want without asking permission from roommates. Living alone helps me become more independent and responsible for myself.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe any previous work experience you've had.

Student Response: Work cafe. Make coffee. Help people. Busy sometimes. Learn work. Responsible. Help understand.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following sentence?  We can learn a lot from making mistakes.

Student Response: Mistakes are good for learning. When we make mistake, we remember it. I made many mistakes in my life and I learned from them. But mistakes can also be bad because they make us feel sad. People don't like to make mistakes.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following sentence?  We can learn a lot from making mistakes.

Student Response: I totally agree that we can learn a lot from making mistakes. First of all, we always remember how our past mistakes made us feel and since they usually make us feel really terrible, we try to avoid repeating them, so we don't feel that way again.  We also take deliberate action to avoid it.  For instance, last year before my big science midterm I made the mistake of playing video games all day long.  As a result, of course I failed the test and I felt miserable. But, I learned from that that it's very important to study and prepare for tests.  So, the next year during exam season I buckled down, I studied, and I learned a lot.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that students should be required to wear uniforms in school? Explain your opinion.

Student Response: I agree with this idea because there are several good reasons. First, it can be beneficial for people in many ways and help them develop important skills. Second, it addresses current needs in society. However, there might be some disadvantages that people should consider carefully.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: What is your favourite movie or television show, and why do you like it?

Student Response: My favorite movie is ""Parasite,"" a film from my country, South Korea. I love it for two main reasons. First, it has an incredibly clever and unpredictable story. It starts as a dark comedy about a poor family infiltrating a rich household, but it slowly transforms into a tense and shocking thriller. This masterful blend of genres keeps you on the edge of your seat. The second reason I love it is its powerful social commentary. The film brilliantly uses the story to explore serious themes of class inequality and social struggle in a way that is both entertaining and deeply thought-provoking. It's a movie that stayed with me long after I left the theater.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: What do you like to read in your free time: newspapers, magazines, or books?

Student Response: I like read books. Books are good because... um... they have stories. Newspapers is okay but books better. I can learn from books. Sometimes difficult to understand but I try. Magazine have pictures but books more... how to say... more content.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather visit a new place or return to a favorite destination? Use examples to support your answer.

Student Response: New place is good. You can see different things. I like travel to... um... different country. Same place is boring. New place has new food and people.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to learn about other cultures. Use details and examples to explain your opinion.

Student Response: I agree that learning about other cultures is very important. First, it helps us understand different people better. When we know about their traditions and beliefs, we can respect them more and avoid misunderstandings. For example, in my country, we bow to show respect, but in other countries, people shake hands. Second, learning about cultures can help us in our career. Many companies now work internationally, so understanding different cultures can help us communicate better with colleagues from other countries.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Which type of professor do you prefer: an interesting professor with a strict grading policy or a boring professor with a loose grading policy?

Student Response: Interesting professor good. Learn more. Work hard. Better than boring.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe your city's or country's most popular tourist attraction.

Student Response: Popular place is old temple. Many people visit for pray. Beautiful building and garden. Tourist take photo and learn culture.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree that being independent is more important than relying on others?

Student Response: I think independence is important. When you independent, you can... solve problems yourself. You don't need wait for other people. But sometimes you need help from others, so both are important.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer taking short breaks throughout the day or one long break? Explain your preference.

Student Response: I prefer taking several short breaks throughout the day. Firstly, I find it's more effective for maintaining high levels of concentration. Working in focused 45-minute to 1-hour intervals with 10-15 minute breaks allows my brain to reset and stay sharp. When I try to work for several hours straight, my attention starts to wander and my productivity decreases significantly. Secondly, short breaks help prevent both physical and mental fatigue. I can stretch, walk around, or have a quick snack, which refreshes me for the next work session. One long break tends to make me feel disconnected from my work, and it's harder to regain momentum afterward.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer traveling alone or with a group? Explain your preference.

Student Response: I prefer traveling with a group rather than alone. The most important reason is safety and security, especially when visiting unfamiliar destinations. Having travel companions provides a support system if something goes wrong - whether it's getting lost, dealing with language barriers, or handling emergencies like illness or lost documents. There's comfort in knowing that someone has your back. Additionally, sharing travel experiences with others makes them much more enjoyable and memorable. When I travel with friends or family, we can discuss what we're seeing, share different perspectives on new cultures, and create lasting memories together. Some of my most treasured travel moments involve laughing with companions about unexpected situations or discovering hidden gems that we might have missed if we were traveling alone. While solo travel can offer independence and self-discovery, I find that the companionship and shared adventure of group travel enhances the entire experience.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people prefer to finish the assignment a long time before the due date while others prefer finishing assignments right before the due date. Which one do you prefer?

Student Response: I definitely prefer to finish my assignments a long time before the due date. The main reason is that it significantly reduces stress. I don't have to worry about last-minute problems like my computer crashing or getting sick. Knowing the work is already done gives me great peace of mind. Secondly, finishing early allows me time to review and revise my work. I can put the assignment aside for a day or two and then come back to it with fresh eyes. This often helps me catch mistakes and find ways to improve the quality of my work, which usually results in a better grade.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some teachers encourage their students to work alone on projects and compete with each other. Other teachers encourage them to collaborate and work in groups. Which approach do you think is better?

Student Response: I think teachers should encourage their students to collaborate on assignments. First of all, this teaches students skills that are useful in the workplace.  Most jobs require us to work with other people, and when we work in groups in school, we learn how to cooperate with others and how to share ideas.  These are skills that will help us find jobs and succeed in our careers.  Secondly, working in groups helps students learn more.  When we work with other students, we can share our knowledge and learn from each other.  For example, a student who is good at math might help a student who is good at writing, and they can both learn from each other.  This kind of collaboration can help students understand the material better than if they worked alone.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that online education is as effective as traditional classroom education? Explain your view.

Student Response: Online education not as effective as classroom. Classroom teachers see students faces, know if understand. Students ask questions, discuss classmates. Social interaction important. Online convenient but hard focus, students feel alone.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that students should be required to wear uniforms in school? Explain your opinion.

Student Response: I think students should be required to wear uniforms in school for several practical reasons. Firstly, uniforms help reduce economic inequality and social pressure among students. When everyone wears the same clothing, there's less opportunity for bullying or discrimination based on clothing brands or family income. Students can focus on learning rather than worrying about fashion or fitting in through expensive clothes. Secondly, uniforms create a sense of community and school identity. They help students feel they belong to something larger than themselves and can increase school pride and unity. This can be particularly beneficial in diverse schools where students come from different backgrounds. Finally, uniforms eliminate the daily decision-making about what to wear, which can reduce morning stress for both students and parents and ensure that clothing choices don't become a distraction in the learning environment. While I understand that uniforms may limit self-expression, I believe the benefits to equality and focus on education outweigh this concern.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A boss or a manager should not form close friendship with their employees.

Student Response: I agree that managers should not form close friendships with employees. The main reason is it can create unfair situations at work. If manager is friends with some employees but not others, it might look like they give special treatment to their friends. This can cause problems with other workers and make workplace uncomfortable.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Give an example of a time in your life when you were successful.

Student Response: A time I felt truly successful was when I organized a charity fundraising event on my university campus last year. Initially, it was a huge challenge because I had never organized such a large-scale event before. I had to coordinate with multiple student organizations, secure venue permissions, arrange for speakers and entertainment, and create a comprehensive marketing strategy. There were many obstacles along the way, including budget constraints and scheduling conflicts with other campus events. However, through persistent effort, creative problem-solving, and effective teamwork, we managed to raise over $15,000 for a local homeless shelter. The event brought together more than 500 students and community members. What made me feel most successful wasn't just the money we raised, but seeing how the event united people around a meaningful cause and knowing that our efforts would directly help families in need.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer taking public transportation or driving your own car? Use examples to support your choice.

Student Response: Transportation... um... I take bus. Car is... expensive. Bus good. Environment. I read. Sometimes late bus. Car traffic bad. I like bus more.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer taking public transportation or driving your own car? Use examples to support your choice.

Student Response: I prefer taking public transportation over driving my own car for several practical and environmental reasons. Public transit is significantly more cost-effective when considering gas, insurance, parking fees, and vehicle maintenance costs. Additionally, commuting by bus or train allows productive use of travel time - I can read, study, or catch up on emails rather than focusing on traffic. From an environmental perspective, public transportation dramatically reduces carbon emissions per person compared to individual car use. While driving offers more schedule flexibility, the financial savings, productivity benefits, and environmental responsibility of public transit make it the better choice for regular commuting.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather study in a lively public space or in a quiet, private environment? Explain your preference with examples.

Student Response: I would much rather study in a quiet, private environment. The main reason is that I need silence to be able to concentrate fully. When I'm trying to understand complex information or memorize facts for an exam, any background noise from a lively cafe or public space is incredibly distracting. A quiet room allows for deep focus. For example, the silence of the top floor of the library is perfect for my study sessions. Furthermore, in a private space, I can spread out my books and notes without worrying about disturbing others, which helps me to organize my thoughts and work more effectively.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that making mistakes is one of the most effective ways to learn something? Support your answer with examples.

Student Response: Mistakes good... learn. Make mistake... understand wrong. Remember mistakes... better than reading.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: If you are going to choose a roommate, which of the following qualities is the most important to you? (1) cleanness (2) friendliness (3) quietness

Student Response: For me, the most important quality in a roommate is cleanness. Firstly, a clean living space is essential for both physical and mental health. When the shared areas like the kitchen and bathroom are maintained properly, it prevents the spread of germs and creates a more pleasant living environment for everyone. I've had experience living with messy roommates before, and it created constant stress and even health issues. Secondly, cleanliness often reflects a person's level of respect for shared spaces and consideration for others. Someone who keeps their area clean usually demonstrates responsibility and thoughtfulness, which are valuable qualities that extend beyond just tidiness. These traits make for better communication and fewer conflicts in daily living situations.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people think that the family is the most important influence on young adults. Others think that friends are the most important influence. Which view do you agree with and why?

Student Response: I prefer... um... one choice. Better. This one is... good. Sometimes hard but... yes, I think this better for me.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that people should be required to take regular physical exams? Explain your opinion.

Student Response: Yes, I think people should be strongly encouraged, if not required, to take regular physical exams. The primary reason is prevention. Regular check-ups can detect serious health problems, like heart disease or cancer, at an early stage when they are much easier and more successful to treat. This can save lives and also reduce long-term healthcare costs. Secondly, it promotes health education. During a physical exam, doctors can provide personalized advice on diet, exercise, and lifestyle choices, empowering people to take a more active role in maintaining their own health and preventing future illnesses.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe one of the best moments of your life.

Student Response: Best moment was graduation from university. I was very happy because... I worked hard. My family came to see me graduate. It was start of new life for me. Very exciting time.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to learn about other cultures. Use details and examples to explain your opinion.

Student Response: I believe it's crucial to learn about other cultures as it helps us become more empathetic and open-minded. By understanding different traditions and values, we develop respect for people from diverse backgrounds. For example, when I traveled abroad, I gained a deep appreciation for how different cultures prioritize family and community, which broadened my view on what's important in life. Additionally, in today's interconnected world, cultural knowledge is essential for building relationships and succeeding in global environments. I've personally seen how understanding cultural differences can improve communication and teamwork, especially when working with people from various countries. This cultural awareness opens doors to new opportunities and enriches personal growth.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you believe that technology has made our lives better or worse? Explain your position.

Student Response: I believe technology has overall made our lives better, despite some drawbacks. Firstly, technology has dramatically improved communication and access to information. We can instantly connect with people around the world, access vast amounts of knowledge, and stay informed about global events. This has made education more accessible and helped break down geographical and social barriers. Secondly, technology has revolutionized healthcare, leading to better diagnostic tools, more effective treatments, and longer life expectancies. Medical devices, telemedicine, and health monitoring apps have all contributed to improved health outcomes. Finally, technology has made many daily tasks more efficient, from online banking to GPS navigation to automated home systems. While I acknowledge concerns about privacy, social isolation, and job displacement, I think the benefits of technology far outweigh the costs when used responsibly.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that students should be required to wear uniforms in school? Explain your opinion.

Student Response: I think... um... good idea. Important for people. But... problems too. Should think.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather travel by car or by train? Explain your choice.

Student Response: I would rather travel by train than by car for long-distance journeys. Trains offer a superior travel experience because passengers can move freely, work on laptops, read, or simply relax while enjoying scenic views. Unlike driving, there's no stress about navigation, traffic, or finding parking at the destination. Additionally, trains are more environmentally sustainable, producing fewer carbon emissions per passenger than individual cars. Train stations are typically located in city centers, eliminating the need for additional transportation upon arrival. While cars offer more flexibility for local exploration, trains provide comfort, productivity, and environmental responsibility for intercity travel.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think technology makes people more productive or more distracted? Explain your viewpoint.

Student Response: In my opinion, technology makes people more distracted. While it has the potential to increase productivity, its design often works against it. Firstly, modern technology is designed to be addictive. Social media platforms, news apps, and even email use psychological techniques to keep us constantly checking our devices. For instance, the notification system creates a sense of urgency that pulls our attention away from important tasks. Secondly, multitasking, which technology encourages, actually reduces productivity. Research shows that when people switch between tasks, they lose focus and make more mistakes. Before smartphones, people could concentrate on one thing at a time, but now we're constantly interrupted by messages, calls, and app notifications.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the statement? If you want to succeed in business, being outgoing and friendly is more important than being knowledgeable.

Student Response: Friendly important business. People like friendly. Make connections. But need other things.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer to communicate via text messages or phone calls? Explain why.

Student Response: Text... good. Phone call... long time. I use text... every day. Text quick.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer spending your free time indoors or outdoors? Use details and examples to support your choice.

Student Response: I prefer spending my free time outdoors because it's beneficial for both my physical and mental health. Outdoor activities like hiking, cycling, or even just walking in the park help me stay fit and active. Also, being in nature helps me relax and reduce stress from studies. The fresh air and sunshine make me feel more energetic and positive compared to staying indoors all day.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that all students should be required to learn a second language in school? Explain your opinion using specific examples.

Student Response: I agree that students should learn a second language. Learning another language helps you communicate with more people and understand different cultures. It also improves your brain function and makes you smarter. For example, I learned Spanish and now I can talk to Spanish-speaking people. However, it can be difficult for some students who already struggle with other subjects.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe your city's or country's most popular tourist attraction.

Student Response: Palace Korea. Old building. Beautiful. History important. Tourists come. See traditional. Guards change.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?  It is better for children to have teachers who are young, even if they are inexperienced.

Student Response: I think it's better for students to have young teachers even if they're a little bit inexperienced. First of all, young teachers can relate more to their students.  They simply have a lot more in common with them in terms of personal interests and pop culture awareness.  As a result, it's easier for them to connect the classroom material to the real lives of the students.  This can encourage kids to stay motivated and keep on task for their whole school day. Secondly, younger teachers have a lot more energy.  Class sizes are huge now.  In fact, they're probably bigger than ever before.  This can create trouble for older teachers who might run out of energy and not be able to finish their lessons if they have a huge group of students.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.