[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer shopping for fun, even when you don't need anything, or only going shopping when you have something specific to buy? Why?

Student Response: I only go shopping when I have something specific to buy. The main reason is that it saves money and prevents impulsive purchases. If I go shopping for fun, I'm much more likely to buy things I don't really need, which is not good for my budget. Having a clear list helps me stay focused and financially responsible. Additionally, I find shopping without a purpose to be a stressful and inefficient use of time. I would much rather spend my free time on other hobbies, like reading or hiking, than wandering aimlessly through a crowded mall.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Who has been your best teacher? What attributes do you think to make him/her such an effective teacher?

Student Response: My best teacher was my high school history teacher, Mr. Park. He was so effective for two main reasons. First, he was incredibly passionate about his subject, and that enthusiasm was absolutely contagious. Every single class felt like he was sharing fascinating stories rather than just teaching dry historical facts. He would act out historical events, use different voices for historical figures, and connect past events to current world situations in ways that made everything feel relevant and alive. His genuine excitement about history made me and my classmates actually look forward to his classes, which is remarkable for a subject many students find boring. Second, Mr. Park had this amazing ability to connect with each student individually while managing a class of thirty students. He learned everyone's names within the first week and would remember personal details about our lives. He adapted his teaching style to different learning preferences - using visual aids for visual learners, encouraging discussions for verbal learners, and incorporating hands-on activities for kinesthetic learners. He also made himself available outside of class hours and genuinely cared about our success, not just academically but as people.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students should live with a roommate who is studying the same subject.

Student Response: No same subject. Different roommate better. Learn different things. But same subject help homework.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer working on long-term projects or short-term tasks? Explain why.

Student Response: Long project... good. Big achievement. Short task... easy but not important.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer working with deadlines or having more flexibility? Explain why.

Student Response: I prefer working with deadlines. Deadlines help you organize your time and work efficiently. Without deadlines, people often procrastinate and don't finish work on time. Deadlines give structure to your work. But sometimes deadlines can cause stress if time is too short.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer taking short breaks throughout the day or one long break? Explain your preference.

Student Response: Short breaks... better. Rest many times. Long work... tired. I take break... every hour.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer to shop online or in physical stores? Explain why.

Student Response: I prefer shopping in physical stores rather than online. The most important advantage is being able to examine products carefully before making a purchase. For clothing and shoes especially, I need to try items on to ensure they fit properly and that the quality meets my expectations. Online photos can be misleading, and returning items is often inconvenient and time-consuming. Additionally, shopping in physical stores provides immediate gratification - I can take my purchases home right away instead of waiting days or weeks for delivery. There's also something enjoyable about the social aspect of shopping in person, whether it's getting advice from knowledgeable sales staff or browsing with friends. While online shopping offers convenience and sometimes better prices, I find that the tactile experience and instant satisfaction of in-store shopping make it worth the extra effort for most purchases.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people believe that television has a negative impact on children and should be avoided. Others feel that television is one of many ways a child can learn. Which do you believe?

Student Response: TV good for children. They watch cartoons. Learn new things. But some TV bad. Parents should... um... watch with children. TV not all bad. Children like TV.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people believe that we should not discuss the private activities of popular people, like movie stars and singers. What is your opinion? Give reasons and examples to support your response.

Student Response: I agree that we should not discuss private activities of popular people. Everyone deserves privacy, including celebrities. Their personal life is not our business and we should respect their private time. Media attention can be stressful for celebrities and their families. However, sometimes celebrities share their private life voluntarily.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some students prefer to work on class assignments by themselves. Others believe it is better to work in a group. Which do yyou prefer? Explain why.

Student Response: I prefer... um... working alone. Because... it's more easy. Group work is... is difficult because... um... people don't always work. And... um... meeting is hard. So alone is better for me.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people enjoy having a single long-term career, while others like switching careers at different stages of life. Which do you think is better? Explain your opinion.

Student Response: I think it is better to switch careers at different stages of life. The primary reason is that people change and evolve over time. The career that was perfect for you in your twenties might not align with your values or interests in your forties. Switching careers allows for continuous personal and professional growth, preventing burnout and stagnation. Furthermore, having multiple careers can make a person more adaptable and skilled. For example, someone who transitions from marketing to software development gains a unique blend of communication and technical skills that can be highly valuable in the job market.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to learn about other cultures. Use details and examples to explain your opinion.

Student Response: I agree that learning about other cultures is important. In today's world, we work and study with people from different countries, so understanding their cultures helps us communicate better. Learning about other cultures also makes us more open-minded and less prejudiced. For example, when I learned about Japanese culture, I understood why Japanese students are always polite and respectful to teachers.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: The university decides to remodel the dormitory and add a new space to it. Which space do you recommend to add? (1) study room (2) game room (3) meeting room.

Student Response: I think university should add study room to dormitory. Study room is very important for students because we need quiet place to study. Sometimes our room is too noisy because roommate is watching TV or talking on phone. Study room will help students to concentrate better on their homework and prepare for exams.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather work for a large corporation or a small business? Use examples to support your choice.

Student Response: Small business... good. Big company... many rules. Small... more friendly. I want small business.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather have a pet or live without one? Explain your preference.

Student Response: I would rather have pet because pets are good companions and make me happy. When I feel sad or lonely, pet can comfort me and make me smile. Having dog means I must walk every day, which is good exercise for me. Pets also teach responsibility because I must feed them and take care of them. Pet can be like family member.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some schools are considering eliminating computer labs on campus because all students nowadays have their laptops.

Student Response: I disagree with the idea of eliminating computer labs. The first reason is to ensure equity. While many students have laptops, some students from lower-income backgrounds may not, or their personal computers may be old and unreliable. The computer lab provides all students with equal access to high-performance computers and essential software. Secondly, computer labs often have specialized, expensive software that students wouldn't be able to afford on their own, such as advanced video editing programs or statistical analysis tools. These labs are crucial resources for many academic departments.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the idea that ""People should read more books""? Provide reasons for your opinion.

Student Response: I strongly agree that people should read more books. Firstly, reading is one of the best ways to expand your vocabulary and improve your communication skills. The more you read, the more you are exposed to new words and sophisticated sentence structures, which enhances your own writing and speaking. Secondly, reading books, especially fiction, is a powerful way to develop empathy. By stepping into the shoes of different characters and experiencing their lives, we can gain a better understanding of different perspectives and the human condition, making us more compassionate individuals.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To be successful in life, one has to make enemies.

Student Response: I disagree with this statement. I believe that true, lasting success is built on positive relationships, not on making enemies. Firstly, success in almost every field requires collaboration and teamwork. Making enemies creates obstacles and burns bridges that could have led to future opportunities. People who are helpful and well-liked are more likely to receive support, recommendations, and valuable connections throughout their careers. Secondly, making enemies creates unnecessary stress and conflict that can actually hinder success. Energy spent dealing with adversaries could be better used focusing on goals and building constructive relationships. Ethical success that you can be proud of comes from integrity and cooperation, not from creating enemies.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people prefer to buy ready-made meals, while others enjoy cooking their own food. Which do you prefer and why?

Student Response: I definitely prefer to cook my own food. First and foremost, it's significantly healthier. Ready-made meals are often high in sodium, preservatives, and unhealthy fats. When I cook, I control every ingredient, ensuring my meal is fresh and nutritious. For example, I can make a salad with a simple vinaigrette instead of a creamy, high-calorie dressing. Secondly, cooking is a creative and rewarding skill. I find it very satisfying to experiment with recipes and create something delicious from scratch. It's a relaxing activity that allows me to de-stress after a long day, which is a benefit you don't get from microwaving a packaged meal.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.

Student Response: I agree with this statement because I think it makes sense in many situations. From my personal experience, I have seen that this approach usually works well. There might be some problems sometimes, but generally the positive aspects are more than the negative ones. I think most people would benefit from this way of thinking.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some students would prefer to live with roommates. Others would prefer to live alone. Which option would you prefer and why?

Student Response: I prefer to live alone. I like privacy and quiet. Roommate can be noisy sometimes. I can study better when alone. Also I can keep my room clean the way I want. Living alone gives me more freedom.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather exercise indoors at a gym or outdoors in nature? Use examples to support your answer.

Student Response: Outdoor... good. Gym... expensive. I like... um... run. Weather... sometimes bad. Outdoor better than gym.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that parents should have a say in the university their child attends? Explain your opinion with examples.

Student Response: I agree that parents should have a say, but not the final word. Firstly, parents often have valuable life experience and perspective that can help a student make a more informed decision. They understand the financial implications of different choices and may see practical considerations that an 18-year-old might overlook. For example, parents might point out that attending a nearby university could save money on room and board, or they might know about job market trends in certain fields. Secondly, parents are often the ones paying for their child's education, so it's reasonable that they should have input into how their money is spent. However, the student should have the ultimate decision because they're the one who will be attending the university and living with the consequences. The ideal situation is for parents and students to work together, with parents providing guidance and students making the final choice based on their own goals and preferences.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Tell us about some of your favourite dishes.

Student Response: Traditional food. Rice vegetables. Mother soup. Home. Cook... not same mother.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer learning new skills online or in a classroom setting? Explain why.

Student Response: I prefer learning new skills in a classroom setting. The first reason is the benefit of immediate, personalized feedback from an instructor. If I'm learning something practical, like photography or a new language, the teacher can instantly correct my technique or pronunciation, which accelerates my learning process. This is difficult to get from a pre-recorded online course. Secondly, I learn a lot from my peers in a classroom. The collaborative environment allows us to practice together, ask each other questions, and stay motivated. This sense of community is a powerful learning tool.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that students should have a longer summer vacation? Explain your view.

Student Response: I do not think students should have a longer summer vacation. The first reason is the problem of ""summer learning loss."" Research consistently shows that students, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, lose significant academic progress during extended breaks from school. The longer the vacation, the more knowledge and skills students tend to forget, requiring teachers to spend valuable time at the beginning of each school year reviewing previous material instead of introducing new concepts. This educational regression ultimately hurts student achievement and widens the gap between high and low-performing students. The second reason is that shorter, more frequent breaks would be more beneficial for both learning and mental health. Instead of one long summer break, having several shorter vacations throughout the year would help prevent burnout while minimizing learning loss. Many countries with top-performing education systems use this approach, and their students consistently outperform those in systems with traditional long summer breaks.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: What is the common mistake parents make when they are educating their children?

Student Response: Parents... um... they don't listen. Work too much. Children sad. Need listen more. Time important for children. Parents busy.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people believe print materials will become obsolete, while others think books and newspapers will always be valued. Which opinion do you agree with and why?

Student Response: I think books will always be valued. First reason is print offers different experience than digital. Many people prefer physical books. Second reason is books don't need electricity or internet. They are more reliable than technology.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather spend a holiday at home or travel to a new place? Use examples to support your choice.

Student Response: Travel... exciting. New place. Home... boring. I like... different country.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer working in a team or working individually? Use details and examples to explain your preference.

Student Response: I prefer working in teams over working individually. Collaboration brings diverse perspectives and skills that lead to better outcomes. For example, in my marketing class project, my teammate's design skills complemented my research abilities, resulting in a presentation that was much stronger than what either of us could have created alone. Additionally, teamwork develops essential interpersonal skills like communication, compromise, and conflict resolution that are crucial for professional success. While individual work offers more control, the learning and networking benefits of teamwork make it more valuable for long-term growth.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some students want to take a wide variety of courses, while others want to concentrate on just one field of study. Which approach do you prefer and why?

Student Response: Take different courses is good. You learn many things. Art, science, history... all different. It helps you understand world better. Maybe you find new interest. But one field makes you expert.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer to spend extra money right away on something fun or save it for the future? Explain your preference.

Student Response: I prefer to save my extra money for the future. Firstly, saving provides a sense of security. Knowing I have money set aside for unexpected emergencies, like a medical issue or a sudden repair, makes me feel more confident about my financial stability. Secondly, saving allows me to work towards larger, more meaningful goals. Instead of spending small amounts on immediate pleasures, I can accumulate enough money to invest in something truly significant, like furthering my education, buying a reliable car, or making a down payment on a house. Additionally, I've learned that the satisfaction from saving money and achieving long-term goals is often greater and more lasting than the temporary happiness from impulse purchases. When I finally use my savings for something important, I feel proud of my discipline and forward-thinking. While I understand the appeal of spending money on fun things immediately, I believe that delaying gratification and saving for the future demonstrates financial maturity and will ultimately lead to greater opportunities and security in life.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer to study in a quiet place or in a lively environment? Use details and examples to support your choice.

Student Response: I prefer studying in quiet place because noise distracts me and makes it hard to concentrate. In library or my quiet room, I can focus on difficult subjects like mathematics and science. When there are people talking or music playing, I cannot think clearly and remember information. Quiet environment helps me study more efficiently.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Which type of professor do you prefer: an interesting professor with a strict grading policy or a boring professor with an easy grading policy?

Student Response: Interesting professor. Want learn. Not just easy grades. Interesting class fun. Learn difficult things. Study harder. Boring professor... easy grades but forget later.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer traveling alone or with a group? Explain your preference.

Student Response: Group travel. Safer. New places. Problems people help. Sharing experiences enjoyable. Discuss friends.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather attend a small, local event or a large, international festival? Explain why.

Student Response: I prefer small local event. It's more... um... personal and you can talk to people better. Large festivals too crowded and loud. Local events show culture of area which is more... authentic. But international festivals can be exciting too.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather cook from a recipe or experiment with your own ingredients? Use examples to support your answer.

Student Response: Experiment... fun. Recipe... same. I like... create food. Sometimes fail.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that learning history is essential for the future? Explain your view.

Student Response: History... important. Learn from past. Understand... um... cultures. But some people not think useful.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer working in a team or working individually? Use details and examples to explain your preference.

Student Response: Team work... I like team. People help... um... help me. Alone work is... is hard. Team is good. Many people work together. I like... I like team work because... because it's good.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people like to read reviews before going to see a movie, in which critics offer their opinions of the movie. Other people prefer to watch films without reading reviews. Which do you prefer?

Student Response: No reviews. I watch movie first. Reviews... bad influence. I decide movie good or bad myself.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer shopping for fun, even when you don't need anything, or only going shopping when you have something specific to buy? Why?

Student Response: I shop only when I need something. It saves money and... um... you don't buy things you don't need. Shopping for fun is expensive. I prefer other activities in free time like reading. Shopping without list is not good idea.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer attending live concerts or listening to recorded music? Explain why.

Student Response: Live concerts. Special energy. Recordings don't have. Performers audience emotional. Performance different special.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the idea that ""People should read more books""? Provide reasons for your opinion.

Student Response: People should read more books. Reading improves vocabulary and communication. Learn new words and express ideas. Stories help understand different people and feelings. Makes empathetic. Reading relaxing. But people busy, prefer videos and social media.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer attending lectures or participating in discussions? Explain your choice.

Student Response: Discussion... better. Talk with people. Lecture... only listening. Discussion active.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: You are planning to donate money to a charity and want it to have a major impact on people. Should you donate to a small local group or to a large international organization?

Student Response: Hands down, I would donate my money to a small local group. For one, I think that local charities do more for my community. When I was growing up, my parents always had us volunteer during the summer with a group that repaired the homes of those less fortunate in our town. Of course, someone had to pay for the supplies and equipment, but we provided the labor. Not only did those people get remodeled houses to live in, but our overall community was improved. If I had to donate money instead of time, I would donate to a local charity like that one because I would be able to see the impact that I was making on a more local level.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer watching entertainment or educational TV programs?

Student Response: I prefer educational TV programs because you can learn new things. Documentaries are very interesting and teach about science, history, and nature. Entertainment programs are fun but they don't give you knowledge. However, sometimes educational programs can be boring if the topic is not interesting to you. I think learning is important for personal development.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer reading books or watching movies? Use details and examples to support your choice.

Student Response: Books are... are good. You can think... think and imagine. Movies show... show everything. Books have... have more details. I like books because... because more interesting.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?  It is better for children to have teachers who are young, even if they are inexperienced.

Student Response: Young teachers... I think they are good. They understand students because they are young too. But experience is also important. Some young teachers don't know how to control class. Old teachers have more experience with students.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe your favorite sport.

Student Response: My favorite sport is basketball. I like it because it's fast game with lots of action. Players need to be quick and think fast. I enjoy watching professional games and sometimes play with friends. It's exciting sport and there are many skilled players around the world.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe any previous work experience you've had.

Student Response: My most significant work experience was a part-time job I had at a busy cafe near my university for about a year. Firstly, my main role was as a barista, which meant I was responsible for preparing various coffee drinks, taking customer orders, and handling the cash register during peak hours. This position taught me valuable skills in multitasking and working under pressure, especially during morning rush hours when we would serve hundreds of customers. I learned to work efficiently while maintaining quality, and I developed strong customer service skills by interacting with people from diverse backgrounds every day. I had to remember regular customers' preferences and handle complaints professionally. Secondly, this job gave me important insights into teamwork and workplace dynamics. I worked closely with five other part-time employees and two full-time managers, and we had to coordinate seamlessly to ensure smooth operations. During busy periods, we would communicate through quick signals and had to trust each other completely. This experience taught me how to be reliable and how my individual performance directly impacts the entire team's success.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.