[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Three kinds of activities will be offered on a special day organized by the International Student office at your university: food fair, international music concert and international dance. Which activity would you prefer? Please explain your choice with details and examples.

Student Response: I would prefer to attend international food fair. Food is very interesting way to learn about different cultures. You can taste many different foods from different countries and it's like traveling without leaving university. Also food fair is more interactive than other activities. However, sometimes food fair can be crowded and noisy.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people enjoy going to parties and meeting new people while others prefer to stay at home and relax. Which do you prefer?

Student Response: I prefer staying at home and relaxing rather than going to parties. First, I am naturally introverted person, so large groups of people make me feel tired and overwhelmed. At home, I can do activities I really enjoy like reading books or watching movies. Also, parties can be expensive because of transportation and buying drinks. I feel more comfortable in quiet environment where I can think clearly.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: When it comes to class assignments, do you prefer working on your own or collaborating with classmates? Explain your answer with examples.

Student Response: I prefer collaborating with classmates on class assignments. The main reason is that teamwork fosters a more dynamic learning environment. When we work together, we can share different perspectives and insights, which often leads to a deeper understanding of the material. For instance, in a history discussion group, a classmate might point out a detail I missed, enriching my own analysis. Additionally, collaboration helps develop crucial communication and interpersonal skills. Learning to effectively delegate tasks, resolve disagreements, and present a unified project are invaluable skills for any future career path.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that students should sit in assigned seats during class? Explain your reasons with examples.

Student Response: Assigned seats good. Teacher know names. Students sit with friends... talk. Teacher can separate students. Good for classroom.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer spending your weekends relaxing or being active? Use examples to support your choice.

Student Response: Active weekends. Hiking energetic. Sitting work... need movement. Try new things. Meet people interesting.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer cooking at home or ordering takeout? Use details and examples to support your choice.

Student Response: I prefer cooking at home because it is healthier and cheaper. When I cook, I know exactly what ingredients I use and can make food less oily and salty. Takeout food often has preservatives and chemicals that are bad for health. Cooking also saves money - I can make several meals for price of one takeout order. Learning to cook is useful skill for future.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the statement that ""Children should be given more responsibilities at home""? Use details and examples to support your view.

Student Response: I agree that children should have more responsibilities at home. This helps them become independent and learn important life skills. For example, when children help with cleaning or cooking, they learn how to take care of themselves. Also, responsibilities teach children about commitment and hard work. However, parents should give age-appropriate tasks and not overwhelm children.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: The university wants to provide students with more types of entertainment and three choices provided below. Which one do you prefer? (1) theater performance by the student actors (2) concert by professional musicians (3) lecture by well-known professors.

Student Response: I would prefer a concert by professional musicians. Firstly, it offers a higher quality of entertainment that students typically cannot access on campus. Professional musicians bring years of training and expertise that create a truly memorable experience. Unlike student performances, which can be enjoyable but sometimes lack polish, professional concerts deliver consistent quality and can expose students to music they might not otherwise encounter. Secondly, concerts have broader appeal across different student populations. While lectures might only interest students in specific academic fields, and theater might appeal to arts enthusiasts, music has universal appeal that can bring together students from diverse backgrounds and majors. This creates a unifying campus experience that builds community spirit and allows students to socialize with peers they might not normally interact with in their academic studies.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Which idea do you agree with? Children born with talents should be treated in a different way, or they should be treated in the same way as average children?

Student Response: Talented children need different education. Normal class too easy, they get bored. Need special program or fast learning. But for other things, treat same as normal children. They learn talent not make them better person. Need work hard and be kind.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some students like teachers who often supervise their study and work, while others like teachers who allow them to study independently. Which one do you prefer?

Student Response: Independent study better. Learn self-discipline and responsibility. When teacher trust me, I learn organize. Also explore interesting topics more.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that parents should help their children choose a career path? Use details and examples to support your opinion.

Student Response: I agree that parents should help their children choose a career path, but they should act as guides, not dictators. Firstly, parents can offer valuable insights based on their life and work experience. They understand the realities of different careers, including salary expectations, work-life balance, and job market trends. They can help their children think through practical considerations like education requirements, potential earnings, and long-term career prospects. For example, a parent who works in engineering might explain both the rewards and challenges of that field to help their child make an informed decision. Secondly, parents know their children's strengths, weaknesses, and interests better than anyone else. They've observed their child's natural talents and preferences over many years. However, the final decision should always rest with the child, as they're the one who will have to live with the consequences. The goal should be collaborative discussion, not parental control.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Many students are asked to evaluate their professors at the end of the semester. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?

Student Response: Evaluating professors has both clear advantages and disadvantages. The main advantage is that it provides direct feedback to help instructors improve their teaching. For instance, if many students comment that the professor's slides are confusing, the professor can work on making them clearer for the next semester. A significant disadvantage, however, is that the evaluations can be biased or unfair. A student who received a poor grade might give a negative evaluation out of anger, or students might rate popular, ""easy"" professors more highly than challenging professors who actually teach more effectively. This can make the data unreliable.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the statement that ""Children should be encouraged to participate in sports""? Provide reasons for your opinion.

Student Response: I strongly agree that children should be encouraged to participate in sports. The first reason is for the obvious physical health benefits. In an age of increasing childhood obesity, sports provide a fun and engaging way for children to stay active, build strong bones and muscles, and develop healthy habits for life. The second, and perhaps more important, reason is that sports teach crucial life skills. Being part of a team teaches children about cooperation, leadership, and how to win and lose gracefully. These lessons in resilience and teamwork are invaluable for their development.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people enjoy working in teams, while others prefer working alone. Which do you prefer and why?

Student Response: I prefer working in teams. The primary reason is that collaboration leads to better ideas. When you have multiple people with different perspectives working on a project, you can brainstorm more creative and effective solutions than one person could alone. For example, in a marketing class project, my team came up with a much stronger campaign by combining our different ideas. Additionally, working in a team helps develop important interpersonal skills like communication and compromise. Learning to work effectively with others is a crucial skill for any future career.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people prefer to stay in touch with their friends and family while traveling. Others prefer not to get in touch and stay alone. Which do you choose and why?

Student Response: Stay in touch good. Safe for travel. Share experiences. But sometimes... alone good too. Depends.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.