[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer to eat a big breakfast or a big dinner? Explain your choice.

Student Response: Big breakfast is better. Give energy for day. I eat... eggs and bread. Big dinner make you fat. My family always eat big breakfast. Dinner should be small.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some companies have rules that forbid employees from using personal cell phones during working hours. Do you think this is a good idea? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Student Response: Cell phones at work... I think it's okay to use phones sometimes. Maybe for emergency calls from family. But employees should not use phones too much because it affects their work productivity.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people prefer to finish the assignment a long time before the due date while others prefer finishing assignments right before the due date. Which one do you prefer?

Student Response: Early finish good. No stress. Check work. Get good grade. Computer no break.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: When starting a research project, do you prefer using online sources or printed books and journals? Explain your choice.

Student Response: I like online sources for research. They are easy to access and have newest information. Search function helps find what I need quickly. But printed books sometimes have... um... better and more reliable information. Online is faster though.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that people should always follow the rules, even if they believe the rules are unfair? Explain your view.

Student Response: This topic... important. I think... um... yes, agree. Because... because it good. Help people... and society. But... um... sometimes difficult. People need... need think about this.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: If you are going to choose a position in the school community during summer vacation, which one will you choose? (1) library assistant (2) painter (3) technician.

Student Response: Technician job is good. Can learn about computers and technology. Useful skills for future. Not too much stress. But maybe difficult if don't know enough.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the statement that female and male university students should have separate residence halls? Use specific details and examples to support your answer.

Student Response: I disagree with having separate residence halls for male and female students. Living together helps students to learn how to interact with opposite gender, which is important skill for real life. Separate halls might make students feel uncomfortable around opposite gender later. However, some students might feel more comfortable in separate halls.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: You have been very busy and unable to prepare for the exam tomorrow. You can either stay up late to study and sleepless or just study less and get full night's sleep. Which will you choose?

Student Response: I choose sleep better than study late. Sleep is good for brain. If no sleep, very tired in exam and cannot think. Study many hours but no sleep is bad. Brain need sleep to remember things. So I sleep full night and study less.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer working in a team or working individually? Use details and examples to explain your preference.

Student Response: I prefer working individually for most tasks. The main reason is that I can work at my own pace and maintain a high level of focus. When I'm alone, I can concentrate deeply without interruptions from group discussions or meetings, which boosts my efficiency. For example, when writing a research paper, I do my best work when I can just immerse myself in the material. Additionally, working individually allows for a clear sense of ownership and responsibility. I enjoy taking full credit for my successes and learning directly from my own mistakes, which I feel helps me grow professionally.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather wake up early or stay up late? Use examples to support your choice.

Student Response: I prefer wake up early. Morning is most productive time because I feel fresh and can concentrate better. I do best work in morning before... um... distractions start. Also I can have peaceful morning with exercise or breakfast. Night time makes me tired.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that people live healthier lives today than they did 100 years ago? Explain your opinion with details.

Student Response: I agree people more healthy today. Medicine is better and can... um... cure many disease. People live longer time. Water and food are clean and safe. But today people have new problem like fat and stress from modern life.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people enjoy working in teams, while others prefer working alone. Which do you prefer and why?

Student Response: I prefer working in teams. The primary reason is that collaboration leads to better ideas. When you have multiple people with different perspectives working on a project, you can brainstorm more creative solutions and catch mistakes that you might miss when working alone. For example, in my last job, our team was tasked with developing a marketing campaign, and the combination of our different backgrounds - one person from design, another from psychology, and me from business - resulted in a campaign that was both visually appealing and psychologically effective. Additionally, working in teams helps distribute the workload more evenly, which reduces stress and prevents burnout. When responsibilities are shared, everyone can focus on their strengths, leading to higher quality outcomes.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather live in a shared house with several students or in a small private apartment near your university? Explain your choice.

Student Response: I would choose a small private apartment because I need a quiet environment for studying. In a shared house, there might be too many distractions from other students, like noise or social activities. Having my own space allows me to focus on my studies and maintain my own schedule. Although a shared house might be more social and fun, I think academic success should be the priority during university years.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe any previous work experience you've had.

Student Response: I work at restaurant. Serve customer and help kitchen. Very busy. Learn work with other people. Manager teach me about teamwork.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Which of the following technological developments has made the greatest impact on students' lives? (1) electronic books (2) online classes (3) smart phones

Student Response: Smart phone important. Use every day. Call friends. Internet for homework. But distract in class.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that people should spend more time on hobbies rather than working long hours? Explain your opinion.

Student Response: Yes, I strongly believe people should spend more time on hobbies rather than working long hours. The first reason is for mental health. Hobbies provide a creative outlet and stress relief that work often cannot offer. When people engage in activities they're passionate about, like painting, gardening, or playing music, they experience joy and fulfillment that improves their overall well-being. Secondly, hobbies often lead to personal growth and new skills that can actually benefit their professional lives. For instance, my friend took up photography as a hobby, and it eventually led to freelance opportunities and improved his attention to detail at work. Finally, work-life balance is essential for maintaining healthy relationships and preventing burnout, which ultimately makes people more productive and happier in all areas of life.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer shopping for fun, even when you don't need anything, or only going shopping when you have something specific to buy? Why?

Student Response: I only go shopping when I have something specific to buy. The main reason is that it saves money and prevents impulsive purchases. If I go shopping for fun, I'm much more likely to buy things I don't really need, which is not good for my budget. Having a clear list helps me stay focused and financially responsible. Additionally, I find shopping without a purpose to be a stressful and inefficient use of time. I would much rather spend my free time on other hobbies, like reading or hiking, than wandering aimlessly through a crowded mall.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that learning from past experiences is important for the future? Use examples to support your answer.

Student Response: Past experience... yes, important. I think... um... when you do something before, you know. Like... if bad thing happen, next time you careful. Experience teach... teach us. But sometimes... past is... difficult to remember.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe a time when you faced a challenge in your life.

Student Response: A significant challenge I faced was during my first year of university when I failed my first calculus midterm exam. I had always been a good student in high school, so this failure was devastating to my confidence. The challenge was not just academic but also emotional I had to overcome my fear of math and rebuild my self-esteem. I developed a systematic study plan, attended every office hour, formed a study group with classmates, and worked with a tutor. It took months of consistent effort, but I gradually improved. By the end of the semester, I earned a B+ in the class. This experience taught me that failure is not permanent and that perseverance and asking for help when needed are key to overcoming obstacles.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that learning a second language is more important now than ever before? Use details to explain your opinion.

Student Response: I agree that learning second language is more important now. First reason is globalization. World is more connected through business and internet. Being bilingual gives more job opportunities. Second reason is cultural understanding. When you speak another language, you understand different cultures better.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Which kind of extracurricular activity would you like to attend if you have a chance: writing essays for the university newspaper, joining a hiking club, or working in the dormitory cafeteria?

Student Response: Hiking club. Good health. Relax after study. Meet friends. Enjoy nature. Prefer outdoor activity.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Who has been your best teacher? What attributes do you think to make him/her such an effective teacher?

Student Response: My best teacher was my high school history teacher, Mr. Park. He was so effective for two main reasons. First, he had an incredible ability to make historical events feel relevant and exciting by connecting them to current events and our daily lives. Instead of just memorizing dates and names, he would have us debate historical decisions from multiple perspectives, role-play important figures, and analyze how past events shaped our modern world. He made us understand that history wasn't just something that happened long ago—it was a living story that continues to influence us today. Second, Mr. Park genuinely cared about each student's individual growth and learning style. He took time to understand how each of us learned best and adapted his teaching accordingly. When I struggled with essay writing, he spent extra time helping me organize my thoughts and develop my arguments. His encouragement and personalized attention gave me confidence not just in history, but in my overall academic abilities.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer using public libraries or buying your own books? Explain why.

Student Response: Buy books... better. Keep forever. Library... return quick. I like own books.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people think that those children who do not want to keep learning a musical instrument course should be required to keep learning the course; While others think that those children should be allowed to make decisions by themselves. What is your opinion and why?

Student Response: Children decide music. Force bad. Hate music. Real skill from want learn.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that learning math and science is more important than learning subjects like literature or the arts? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Student Response: I disagree with this. Math and science are important but literature and art are also important. Literature help you understand people and culture. Art is good for... um... creativity. All subject are important for education. Not just math and science.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully. Others choose not to make any plans at all for their free time. Which do you prefer and why?

Student Response: I prefer to plan activities for my free time carefully. First, planning helps me make the most efficient use of my limited free time. Without a plan, I often end up wasting time trying to decide what to do or settling for less fulfilling activities simply because they're convenient. When I plan ahead, I can research the best options, make necessary reservations, and ensure that I'm doing things I truly enjoy. For example, if I want to visit a museum, planning ahead allows me to check their special exhibitions and avoid disappointment. Second, having plans gives me something to look forward to, which enhances my overall happiness and motivation. When I know I have an exciting weekend trip or social event coming up, it helps me get through stressful periods during the week and provides positive anticipation that improves my mood.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather study in a lively public space or in a quiet, private environment? Explain your preference with examples.

Student Response: I prefer studying in quiet, private environment. The main reason is that I need silence to concentrate well. When I study complex information or prepare for exams, background noise from cafe or public places is very distracting. Quiet room helps me focus deeply. Also, in private space I can organize my books and notes without disturbing others.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people prefer to do their shopping online or through mail catalogs, while others enjoy shopping in person. Which do you prefer and why?

Student Response: I prefer shopping in person rather than online. First reason is that I can see and touch the products before buying them. This is especially important for clothes and shoes - I need to try them on to make sure they fit properly. Second reason is that shopping in person allows me to get immediate help from sales staff if I have questions about products. However, online shopping can be more convenient sometimes.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people who unexpectedly receive a large amount of money spend it on practical things, while others spend it for pleasure only. Which do you think is better and why?

Student Response: Personally, I think it's much wiser to spend unexpected money on practical things because it can have a lasting impact on your life. Let's say I received a large sum of money-rather than spending it on a lavish vacation or expensive gadgets that might lose their appeal over time, I would invest it in something practical like education, home improvements, or starting a business.For example, if I used the money to pay for additional courses or certifications, that investment would pay dividends for years to come by improving my career prospects. Similarly, if I used it to buy a reliable car or make home improvements, those purchases would provide practical benefits every single day. While spending money on pleasurable experiences can be enjoyable in the moment, the satisfaction is often temporary. Practical purchases, on the other hand, continue to provide value and improve your quality of life for years to come.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that kind and friendly teachers help students learn more effectively? Use details to support your opinion.

Student Response: I agree that kind teachers help students learn better. First reason is kind teacher creates safe classroom environment. Students feel comfortable to ask questions. Second reason is friendly teachers motivate students more. Students work harder when they like their teacher.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer traveling alone or with a group? Explain your preference.

Student Response: I like traveling with group better than alone. Group travel is safer, especially in new places. If problems happen, people can help each other. Also sharing experiences makes travel more... um... enjoyable and you can discuss what you see with friends.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer to shop online or in physical stores? Explain why.

Student Response: Physical stores. Examine products. Clothes shoes try on. Proper fit. Take home immediately. Waiting delivery.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Describe your favorite sport.

Student Response: My favorite sport is basketball. I love it for two primary reasons. First, I am captivated by the fast pace and constant action of the game. Unlike some other sports where there can be long pauses, basketball is a continuous flow of running, passing, and shooting. The momentum can shift in an instant, which makes it incredibly exciting to both play and watch. Second, I appreciate the high level of skill and teamwork required to succeed. It's amazing to watch players execute complex plays, make incredible passes, and display amazing athleticism. It's a perfect combination of individual talent and collective strategy.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Which study aid are you most reliant on?

Student Response: The study aid I am most reliant on is a digital flashcard application called Anki. It's so effective for two reasons. Firstly, it uses a system called spaced repetition, which is scientifically proven to improve long-term memory retention. The algorithm tracks which cards I struggle with and shows them to me more frequently, while cards I know well appear less often. This means I spend more time on material I need to learn rather than reviewing things I already know well. The system is much more efficient than traditional studying methods because it optimizes my study time based on my actual performance. Secondly, the flexibility and accessibility of Anki makes it incredibly convenient for my lifestyle. I can create my own flashcard decks for any subject - whether it's vocabulary for language learning, formulas for mathematics, or concepts for biology. I can study anywhere using my smartphone during small pockets of free time, like when I'm waiting for the bus or during breaks between classes. I can also download pre-made decks shared by other users, which saves me time while giving me access to high-quality study materials created by experts.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that it is better to plan everything in advance or to be spontaneous? Explain your view.

Student Response: I think it's better to plan important things but also be spontaneous sometimes. Planning helps you save money and time, especially for big things like vacations or work projects. But being spontaneous can make life more interesting and fun. If you plan everything, life becomes boring. If you don't plan anything, you might have problems. So balance is good.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Nowadays, some people use extreme methods, including surgery, to change how they look. They do this because they think it will make them appear more attractive to others. Do you think this is a good idea? Support your answer with details and examples.

Student Response: I think it's a really fantastic idea to get surgery to change your appearance.  I feel this way for two reasons. First of all, it can make us feel a lot more self-confident.  If we really like our appearance we can feel a lot less shy when talking to people.  And it will be easier to interact and therefore we'll achieve more success in our personal and professional lives. Secondly, if we don't like the result of our surgery we can always change it back.  I mean, plastic surgery is really affordable these days, so if you get some surgery and it looks bad… you can just get another procedure done.  For instance, I've changed my nose about six times already, and the expense to me has been pretty minimal.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people prefer to do their shopping online or through mail catalogs, while others enjoy shopping in person. Which do you prefer and why?

Student Response: Person shopping. See touch things. Clothes try. Staff help. Online convenient but... different pictures.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: If you are to choose between 2 apartments to live in next semester, one apartment is near the campus but slightly more expensive, the other is a bit far from the campus but cheaper, which one do you prefer?

Student Response: I would prefer apartment near campus even if it's more expensive. Living close to university saves a lot of time for commuting. I can walk to classes and library easily. It's also safer to live near campus because there are more people around. However, apartment near campus might be smaller and more expensive than apartment far from campus.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree with the statement that ""It is better to learn from mistakes than to avoid them""? Explain your reasoning.

Student Response: This topic... important. I think... um... yes, agree. Because... because it good. Help people... and society. But... um... sometimes difficult. People need... need think about this.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people like to follow the news by watching television, while others prefer reading articles online or in newspapers. Which method do you prefer and why?

Student Response: Reading news. My speed. Think about. Read again. More details. TV short time.

[Assistant]
Score: 1

This response demonstrates significant limitations. The answer shows very limited language control with frequent errors that impede communication. Topic development is minimal with basic ideas that lack proper elaboration. Delivery issues likely include pronunciation problems and choppy rhythm that require considerable listener effort.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that a university's academic reputation should be the top factor when choosing where to study? Use examples to support your answer.

Student Response: University reputation is important but not most important thing. Program quality and campus are also important. Students should choose university where they can learn good and feel comfortable.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that kind and friendly teachers help students learn more effectively? Use details to support your opinion.

Student Response: Kind teachers help students learn better. When teacher is friendly, students feel safe to ask questions. Students also work harder when they like teacher. Kind teacher make classroom more positive.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer cooking at home or ordering takeout? Use details and examples to support your choice.

Student Response: I strongly prefer cooking at home over ordering takeout for multiple compelling reasons. First, home cooking provides complete control over ingredients, allowing me to create healthier meals with fresh vegetables, lean proteins, and minimal processed foods. For example, I can prepare a nutritious stir-fry with organic vegetables and brown rice for a fraction of the sodium and calories found in restaurant versions. Second, cooking develops valuable life skills and creativity while providing stress relief through the meditative process of meal preparation. Finally, the economic benefits are substantial - groceries for home-cooked meals cost significantly less than regular takeout, allowing more money for other priorities like travel or savings.

[Assistant]
Score: 4

This response fulfills the task demands excellently with sustained, coherent discourse. Delivery shows well-paced flow with clear speech and only minor lapses that don't affect intelligibility. Language use demonstrates effective grammar and vocabulary with good control of complex structures. Topic development is well-developed and coherent with clear progression of ideas.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites. Other people prefer not to create such records. Which approach do you prefer and why?

Student Response: This topic is... how to say... important for people. I have some experience with both options. One choice is better because more useful in life. Sometimes there can be problem but usually it is okay. I choose this because I think it is good.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that schools should teach practical life skills, such as managing money or cooking? Explain your opinion.

Student Response: Schools should teach practical skills like cooking and money management. These skills are important for life. Many students don't learn these things at home. Schools can help prepare students for adult life.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Would you rather study in a lively public space or in a quiet, private environment? Explain your preference with examples.

Student Response: I prefer studying in quiet, private environment. The main reason is that I need silence to concentrate well. When I study complex information or prepare for exams, background noise from cafe or public places is very distracting. Quiet room helps me focus deeply. Also, in private space I can organize my books and notes without disturbing others.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you think that online education is as effective as traditional classroom education? Explain your view.

Student Response: I don't think online education is as effective as traditional classroom education. In classroom, teachers can see students' faces and know if they understand or not. Students can ask questions immediately and discuss with classmates. This social interaction is important for learning. Online education is convenient and flexible, but it's harder to stay focused and students might feel isolated.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you agree or disagree that private cars should be banned from the downtown areas of large cities? Explain your viewpoint.

Student Response: I agree that private cars should be banned from downtown. First reason is to reduce traffic and pollution. Too many cars create problems in city center. Second reason is public transportation becomes more efficient when less cars on road.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Tell us about some of your favourite dishes.

Student Response: I like kimchi jjigae and bibimbap. Kimchi jjigae is soup with kimchi, very spicy. Bibimbap is rice with vegetables. These food from Korea. I like because taste good and healthy. My family eat often.

[Assistant]
Score: 2

This response addresses the task but with limited development. While basically intelligible, there are noticeable problems with delivery including unclear articulation or awkward pacing. Grammar and vocabulary range is limited, often preventing full expression of ideas. The response presents basic ideas but lacks sufficient detail and support.


[System]
You are an expert TOEFL iBT Independent Speaking evaluator. Your task is to score student responses on a scale of 0-4 based on the official TOEFL Independent Speaking rubric.

Scoring Criteria:
- Score 4: Fulfills task demands with sustained, coherent discourse. Well-paced delivery, effective grammar/vocabulary, well-developed and coherent ideas.
- Score 3: Addresses task appropriately but may lack full development. Generally clear speech with some fluency, fairly effective language use, mostly coherent with some limitations.
- Score 2: Addresses task but limited development. Intelligible speech requiring listener effort, limited grammar/vocabulary range, basic ideas with limited elaboration.
- Score 1: Very limited content/coherence, largely unintelligible speech, severely limited language control, lacks substance beyond basic ideas.
- Score 0: No attempt or unrelated to topic.

Provide your score and a brief explanation focusing on delivery, language use, and topic development.

[User]
Please evaluate this TOEFL Independent Speaking response:

Question: Do you prefer reading books or watching movies? Why?

Student Response: I prefer reading books because books give me more detailed stories and characters. When I read Harry Potter books, I can learn more about characters' thoughts and feelings than movies. Books also help me improve my vocabulary and imagination. Reading is more personal experience because I can read at my own speed and think about story carefully.

[Assistant]
Score: 3

This response appropriately addresses the task with generally clear speech and some fluency. Language use demonstrates fairly automatic and effective grammar and vocabulary, though there may be some imprecise usage that doesn't seriously interfere with communication. Topic development is mostly coherent but somewhat limited in elaboration or specificity.