Yoel125 commited on
Commit
ae07063
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 1ccd450

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +2 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -149,7 +149,9 @@ Since the groups are almost equal, our model can learn from both types of data e
149
  In this final analytical stage, I evaluated the three trained classifiers using Confusion Matrices to understand their prediction patterns and error types.
150
  ### Model Performance Analysis:
151
  Logistic Regression: This model served as a strong baseline, achieving the highest number of True Negatives (10,380). It is highly reliable at identifying on-time flights but struggle with a significant number of False Negatives (3,079), meaning it often misses actual delays.
 
152
  Decision Tree: While it captured the highest number of True Positives (5,989), it suffered from the highest rate of False Positives (2,974). This indicates that the single tree is prone to "over-detecting" delays, leading to many false alarms.
 
153
  Random Forest: This model provided the most balanced performance. It maintained a high count of True Negatives (9,596) while successfully identifying 5,902 delayed flights with significantly fewer false alarms than the Decision Tree.
154
  ![image](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/69c79aa8f856b118f80df631/TZzzpOliTb8WGjzw8W9PM.png)
155
  ![image](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/69c79aa8f856b118f80df631/X2R8v3yyBl3Op-6KrC9Ny.png)
 
149
  In this final analytical stage, I evaluated the three trained classifiers using Confusion Matrices to understand their prediction patterns and error types.
150
  ### Model Performance Analysis:
151
  Logistic Regression: This model served as a strong baseline, achieving the highest number of True Negatives (10,380). It is highly reliable at identifying on-time flights but struggle with a significant number of False Negatives (3,079), meaning it often misses actual delays.
152
+
153
  Decision Tree: While it captured the highest number of True Positives (5,989), it suffered from the highest rate of False Positives (2,974). This indicates that the single tree is prone to "over-detecting" delays, leading to many false alarms.
154
+
155
  Random Forest: This model provided the most balanced performance. It maintained a high count of True Negatives (9,596) while successfully identifying 5,902 delayed flights with significantly fewer false alarms than the Decision Tree.
156
  ![image](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/69c79aa8f856b118f80df631/TZzzpOliTb8WGjzw8W9PM.png)
157
  ![image](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/69c79aa8f856b118f80df631/X2R8v3yyBl3Op-6KrC9Ny.png)